This article maps the development and uses of the comparative method in academic research since the 1970s. It is based on an original database that we constructed for our review of 12,483 articles extracted from leading journals representing the disciplines of Social Policy, Political Science and Sociology. We proceed to a quantitative and qualitative analysis of the reported comparative research effort. We find that the comparative method became mainstream in the 1990s – following the publication of the Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism and that JESP is the most comparative journal of all. In 2020, 66% of articles published in JESP are comparative. The comparative turn has been stronger in Social Policy than Sociology and Political Science over the last three decades. We witness a rise in the use of formal techniques (case studies and comparative historical analysis, SEM/factorial techniques, cluster analysis, QCA/Fuzzy-set) and mixed-methods in comparison to descriptive analysis, and this is particularly pronounced in Sociology. Regression analysis is dominant, however the most cited comparative articles are based on case studies and descriptive statistics. Overall, we argue that the comparative method is, in essence, ‘a way of thinking’ and not simply the application of a set of disparate techniques.
AlberJ (1995) A framework for the comparative study of social services. Journal of European Social Policy5(2): 131–149.
2.
AlbertiniMKohliMVogelC (2007) Intergenerational transfers of time and money in European families. Journal of European Social Policy17(4): 319–334.
3.
AllmendingerJ (1989) Educational systems and labor market outcomes. European Sociological Review5(3): 231–250.
4.
AldersonASBeckfieldJ (2004) Power and position in the world city system. American Journal of Sociology109(4): 811–851.
5.
AldersonASNielsenF (2002) Globalization and the great U-turn. American Journal of Sociology107(5): 1244–1299.
6.
AlfordJFunkCHibbingJ (2005) Are political orientations genetically transmitted?The American Political Science Review99(2): 153–167.
7.
AndersonCGuilloryC (1997) Political institutions and satisfaction with democracy. American Political Science Review91(1): 66–81.
8.
AndreskiS (1965) The Uses of Comparative Sociology. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
9.
AnttonenASipiläJ (1996) European social care services: is it possible to identify models?Journal of European Social Policy6(2): 87–100.
10.
ArmerM (1973) Methodological problems and possibilities in comparative research. In: ArmerMGrinmshawA (eds), Comparative Social Research. New York: Wiley, pp. 49–79.
11.
ArtsWGelissenJ (2002) Three worlds of welfare capitalism or more?Journal of European Social Policy12(2): 137–158.
12.
BettioFSimonazziAVillaP (2006) Change in care regimes and female migration. Journal of European Social Policy16(3): 271–285.
13.
Bingham PowellG (1986) American voter turnout in comparative perspective. American Political Science Review80(1): 17–43.
14.
BlackD (1970) Production of crime rates. American Sociological Review35(4): 733–748.
15.
BonoliG (1997) Classifying welfare states. Journal of Social Policy26(3): 351–372.
16.
BoixC (1999) Setting the rules of the game. American Political Science Review93(3): 609–624.
17.
BradleyDEHuberEMollerS., et al (2003) Distribution and redistribution in postindustrial democracies. World Politics55(2): 193–228.
18.
CameronD (1978) The expansion of the public economy. American Political Science Review72(4): 1243–1261.
19.
CastlesFG (2003) The world turned upside down. Journal of European Social Policy13(3): 209–227.
20.
CressDMSnowDA (2000) The outcomes of homeless mobilization: the influence of organization, disruption, political mediation, and framing. American Journal of Sociology105(4): 1063–1104.
21.
DalyM (2005) Gender mainstreaming in theory and practice. Social Politics12(3): 433–450.
22.
DeaconB (2000) Eastern European welfare states. Journal of European Social Policy10(2): 146–161.
23.
DeemingC. (2017) The lost and the new ‘Liberal World’ of welfare capitalism: a critical assessment of Gøsta Esping-Andersen's The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism a quarter century later. Social Policy and Society16(3): 405–422.
24.
EmmeneggerPKvistJMarxP, et al (2015) Three worlds of welfare capitalism: the making of a classic. Journal of European Social Policy25(1): 3–13.
25.
Esping-AndersenG (1990) The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
26.
Esping-AndersenG (ed), (1996) Welfare States in Transition. London: Sage.
27.
Esping-AndersenG (1999) The Social Foundations of Postindustrial Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
28.
FerraginaEDeemingC (2022) Methodologies for comparative social policy analysis. In: MAYerkesNelsonKNieuwenhuisR (eds), Changing European Societies: The Role for Social Policy Research. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 218–235.
29.
FerraginaEFilettiFD (2022) Labour market protection across space and time: a revised typology and a taxonomy of countries’ trajectories of change. Journal of European Social Policy32(2): 148–165.
FerreraM (1996) The ‘Southern Model’ of welfare in social Europe. Journal of European Social Policy6(1): 17–37.
32.
Fourcade-GourinchasMBabbSL (2002) The rebirth of the liberal creed. American Journal of Sociology108(3): 533–579.
33.
GastilR (1971) Homicide and a regional culture of violence. American Sociological Review36(3): 412–427.
34.
GornickJCMeyersMKRossKE (1997) Supporting the employment of mothers. Journal of European Social Policy7(1): 45–70.
35.
HamiltonGGBiggartNW (1998) Market, culture, and authority. American Journal of Sociology94: S52–S94.
36.
HellmanJS (1998) Winners take all: the politics of partial reform in postcommunist transitions. World Politics50(2): 203–234.
37.
HicksASwankD (1992) Politics, institutions, and welfare spending in industrialized democracies, 1960–82. American Political Science Review86(3): 658–674.
38.
HuberERaginCStephensJD (1993) Social Democracy, Christian Democracy, constitutional structure, and the welfare state. American Journal of Sociology99(3): 711–749.
39.
InglehartR (1971) The silent revolution in Europe. American Political Science Review65(4): 991–1017.
40.
IversenTCusackT (2000) The causes of welfare state expansion. World Politics52(3): 313–349.
41.
IversenTSoskiceD (2001) An asset theory of social policy preferences. The American Political Science Review95(4): 875–893.
42.
JacsóP (2012) Using Google Scholar for journal impact factors and the h-index in nationwide publishing assessments in academia. Online Information Review36(3): 462–478.
43.
KnijnTKremerM (1997) Gender and the caring dimension of welfare states. Social Politics4(3): 328–361.
44.
KorpiW (2000) Faces of inequality. Social Politics7(2): 127–191.
45.
KorpiWPalmeJ (1998) The paradox of redistribution and strategies of equality. American Sociological Review63(5): 661–687.
46.
KorpiWPalmeJ (2003) New politics and class politics in the context of austerity and globalization, 1975–95. The American Political Science Review97(3): 425–446.
47.
KrasnerS (1976) State power and the structure of international trade. World Politics28(3): 317–347.
48.
LaaksoMTaageperaR (1979) ‘Effective’ number of parties. Comparative Political Studies12(1): 3–27.
49.
LaverMBenoitKGarryJ (2003) Extracting policy positions from political texts using words as data. The American Political Science Review97(2): 311–331.
50.
LewisJ (1992) Gender and the development of welfare regimes. Journal of European Social Policy2(3): 159–173.
51.
LewisJ (2001) The decline of the male breadwinner model. Social Politics8(2): 152–169.
52.
MacintyreSMaciverSSoomanA (1993) Area, class and health. Journal of Social Policy22(2): 213–234.
53.
MannM (1970) The social cohesion of liberal democracy. American Sociological Review35(3): 423–439.
54.
MishlerWRoseR (2001) What are the origins of political trust?Comparative Political Studies34(1): 30–62.
55.
Martin-MartinAOrduna-MaleaEHarzingAW, et al (eds), (2017) Can we use Google Scholar to identify highly-cited documents?Journal of Informetrics 11(1): 152–163.
56.
MasseyDDentonN (1987) Trends in the residential segregation of Blacks, Hispanics, and Asians: 1970–1980. American Sociological Review52(6): 802–825.
57.
MasseyDDentonN (1988) Suburbanization and segregation in US metropolitan areas. American Journal of Sociology94(3): 592–626.
58.
MasseyDSEggersML (1990) The ecology of inequality, 1970–1980. American Journal of Sociology95(5): 1153–1188.
59.
MasseyDGoldringLDurandJ (1994) Continuities in transnational migration. American Journal of Sociology99(6): 1492–1533.
60.
MooreBJr (1966) Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy. London: Penguin.
61.
NölkeAVliegenthartA (2009) Enlarging the varieties of capitalism. World Politics61(4): 670–702.
62.
PavoliniERanciC (2008) Restructuring the welfare state: reforms in long-term care in Western European countries. Journal of European Social Policy18(3): 246–259.
63.
PhillipsD (1974) The influence of suggestion on suicide. American Sociological Review39(3): 340–354.
64.
PiersonP (1996) The new politics of the welfare state. World Politics48(2): 143–179.
65.
PortesASassen-KoobS (1987) Making it underground: comparative material on the informal sector in western market economies. American Journal of Sociology93(1): 30–61.
66.
PrzeworskiATeuneH (1970) The Logic of Comparative Social Enquiry. New York: Wiley.
67.
RaginC (1987) The Comparative Method. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
68.
RaginC (2014) The Comparative Method. Moving beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.
69.
Risse-KappenT (1991) Public opinion, domestic structure, and foreign policy in liberal democracies. World Politics43(4): 479–512.
70.
RokkanS (1966) Comparative cross-national research. In: MerrittRRokkanS (eds), Comparing Nations. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. pp. 3–26.
71.
SartoriG (1970) Concept misformation in comparative politics. American Political Science Review64(4): 1033–1053.
72.
ScheepersPGijsbertsMCoendersM (2002) Ethnic exclusionism in European countries public opposition to civil rights for legal migrants as a response to perceived ethnic threat. European Sociological Review18(1): 17–34.
73.
SchraederPHookSTaylorB (1998) Clarifying the foreign aid puzzle. World Politics50(2): 294–323.
74.
ScruggsLAllanJ (2006) Welfare-state decommodification in 18 OECD countries. Journal of European Social Policy16(1): 55–72.
75.
SkocpolT (1979) States and Social Revolutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
76.
SnyderDKickE (1979) Structural position in the world system and economic growth, 1955–1970. American Journal of Sociology84(5): 1096–1126.
77.
SvallforsS (1997) Worlds of welfare and attitudes to redistribution. European Sociological Review13(3): 283–304.
78.
ThoitsP (1986) Multiple identities: examining gender and marital status differences in distress. American Sociological Review51(2): 259–272.
79.
TocquevilleAD (1960) De la Démocratie en Amérique. London: Macmillan.
80.
van OorschotW (2006) Making the difference in social Europe. Journal of European Social Policy16(1): 23–42.
81.
van OorschotWArtsW (2005) The social capital of European welfare states. Journal of European Social Policy15(1): 5–26.
82.
WalbyS (2004) The European Union and gender equality. Social Politics11(1): 4–29.
83.
WallersteinI (1974) The Modern World-System. New York: Academic Press.
84.
WeberM (1930) The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. London: Unwin University Books.
85.
WimmerACedermanLMinB (2009) Ethnic politics and armed conflict. American Sociological Review74(2): 316–337.
86.
YamagishiTCookKSWatabeM (1998) Uncertainty, trust, and commitment formation in the United States and Japan. American Journal of Sociology104(1): 194.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
