We assess how a variety of disruptive life-course events impact the economic wellbeing of US households and trace the importance of household wealth in helping families who experience these events avoid entering a spell of material hardship. Using longitudinal data from two panels of the Survey of Income and Program Participation (SIPP), we draw on direct measures of material hardship, disruptive events and household assets. Our analyses reveal that the relationship between disruptive events and the likelihood of experiencing a new spell of material hardship strongly varies across the wealth distribution, suggesting that high household wealth provides an effective private safety net. By distinguishing different types of disruptive events, we demonstrate that divorce, disability and income loss entail a risk of material hardship but also that this risk is effectively buffered by substantial wealth. Different types of hardship – namely, financial, food and medical hardship – respond in similar ways.
Like public insurance schemes, wealth insurance helps buffer the effects of disruptive events on material hardship, but unlike public insurance schemes, reliance on private wealth further stratifies the economic wellbeing of households. Policy options for addressing this highly stratified private insurance scheme include disposing of the need for it by funding more robust public insurance, for instance through wealth taxation.
AittomäkiAMartikainenPLaaksonenM, et al. (2010) The associations of household wealth and income with self-rated health: a study on economic advantage in middle-aged Finnish men and women. Social Science & Medicine71: 1018–1026.
2.
AllstotAAckermanBA (2000) The Stakeholder Society. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
3.
AzpitarteF (2012) Measuring poverty using both income and wealth: a cross-country comparison between the U.S. and Spain. Review of Income and Wealth58: 24–50.
4.
BaneMJEllwoodDT (1986) Slipping into and out of poverty: the dynamics of spells. The Journal of Human Resources21: 1.
5.
BlundellRPistaferriLPrestonI (2008) Consumption inequality and partial insurance. American Economic Review98: 1887–1921.
6.
BradyDFinniganRMHübgenS (2017) Rethinking the risks of poverty: a framework for analyzing prevalences and penalties. American Journal of Sociology123: 740–786.
7.
BrandoliniAMagriSSmeedingTM, et al. (2010) Asset-based measurement of poverty. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management29: 267–284.
8.
ChristophB (2010) The relation between life satisfaction and the material situation: a re-evaluation using alternative measures. Social Indicators Research98: 475–499.
9.
CrettazE (2015) Poverty and material deprivation among European workers in times of crisis. International Journal of Social Welfare24: 312–323.
10.
CzajkaJLDenmeadG (2008) Income Data for Policy Analysis: A Comparative Assessment of Eight Surveys. Final Report’, Technical report. ASPE: Mathematica Policy Research, Inc. under contract to the Department of Health and Human Services.
11.
DiPreteTA (2002) Life course risks, mobility regimes, and mobility consequences: a comparison of Sweden, Germany, and the United States. American Journal of Sociology108: 267–309.
12.
DuncanGJ (1984) Years of Poverty, Years of Plenty: The Changing Economic Fortunes of American Workers and Families. Ann Arbor, MI: Survey Research Center, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan.
13.
DwyerRE (2018) Credit, debt, and inequality. Annual Review of Sociology44: 237–261.
14.
EhlertM (2012) Buffering income loss due to unemployment: family and welfare state influences on income after job loss in the United States and western Germany. Social Science Research41: 843–860.
15.
FisherJJohnsonDSSmeedingTM (2015) Inequality of income and consumption in the U.S.: measuring the trends in inequality from 1984 to 2011 for the same individuals. Review of Income and Wealth61: 630–650.
16.
GanongPJonesDPascal NoelJ, et al. (2020) Wealth, Race, and Consumption Smoothing of Typical Income Shocks. NBER Working Paper 27552.
17.
GodaGSLiu StreeterJ (2021) Wealth Trajectories Across Key Milestones: Longitudinal Evidence from Life-Course Transitions. Technical Report w28329. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
18.
GruberJ (2001) The wealth of the unemployed. Industrial and Labor Relations Review55: 79–94.
19.
GuioAnne-CatherineA-CMarlierEGordonD, et al. (2016) Improving the measurement of material deprivation at the European Union level. Journal of European Social Policy26: 219–333.
20.
HackerJS (2007) The Great Risk Shift. The New Economic Insecurity and the Decline of the American Dream. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
21.
HeadeyB (2008) Poverty is low consumption and low wealth, not just low income. Social Indicators Research89: 23–39.
22.
HeflinC (2016) Family instability and material hardship: results from the 2008 survey of income and program participation. Journal of Family and Economic Issues37: 359–372.
23.
HeflinCM (2017) The role of social positioning in observed patterns of material hardship: new evidence from the 2008 survey of income and program participation. Social Problems64: 513–531.
24.
HeflinCHButlerJS (2013) Why do women enter and exit from material hardship?Journal of Family Issues34: 631–660.
25.
HeflinCSandbergJRafailP (2009) The structure of material hardship in U.S. Households: an examination of the coherence behind common measures of well-being. Social Problems56: 746–764.
26.
IcelandJBaumanKJ (2007) Income poverty and material hardship: how strong is the association?The Journal of Socio-Economics36: 376–396.
27.
JacquesONoëlA (2021) Targeting within universalism. Journal of European Social Policy31: 15–29.
28.
KuypersSMarxI (2018) Estimation of joint income-wealth poverty: a sensitivity analysis. Social Indicators Research136: 117–137.
29.
KuypersSMarxI (in press) Poverty in the EU using augmented measures of financial resources: the role of assets and debt. Journal of European Social Policy. This issue: in press.
30.
LoktievaI (2016) Approaches to empirical analysis of social exclusion: international comparison. Economics & Sociology9: 148–157.
31.
LongSJFreeseJ (2014) Regression Models for Categorical Dependent Variables Using Stata. College Station, TX: Stata Press.
32.
LusardiA (1998) On the importance of the precautionary saving motive. The American Economic Review88: 449–453.
33.
MarchalSarahKuypersSMarxI, et al. (2020) ‘Singling Out the Truly Needy: The Role of Asset Testing in European Minimum Income Schemes’, Working Paper 20.03. Antwerp, Belgium: Herman Deleeck Centre for Social Policy, University of Antwerp.
34.
MayerSE (1993) Living conditions among the poor in four rich countries. Journal of Population Economics6: 261–286.
35.
MayerSEJencksC (1989) Poverty and the distribution of material hardship. The Journal of Human Resources24(1): 88–114.
36.
McKernanS-MRatcliffeC (2005) Events that trigger poverty entries and exits. Social Science Quarterly86.
37.
NelsonK (2012) Counteracting material deprivation: the role of social assistance in Europe. Journal of European Social Policy22: 148–163.
38.
NolanBWhelanCT (2011) Poverty and Deprivation in Europe. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
39.
ParkSSWiemersEESeltzerJA (2019) The family safety net of black and white multigenerational families. Population and Development Review45: 351–378.
40.
PfefferFT (2011) Status attainment and wealth in the United States and Germany. In: TMSmeedingREriksonMJaentti (eds) Persistence, Privilege, and Parenting. New York,NY: Russell Sage Foundation, 109–137.
41.
PfefferFTFombyPInsoleraN (2020) The longitudinal revolution: sociological research at the 50-year milestone of the panel study of income dynamics. Annual Review of Sociology46: 83–108.
42.
PrixIrenePfefferFabian T. (2017) Does Donald need Uncle Scrooge? Extended-family wealth and children’s educational attainment in the United States. In: EJaniK-JElina (ed) Social Inequality across the Generations. The Role of Resource Compensation and Multiplication in Resource Accumulation (forthcoming). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
43.
RingenS (1988) Direct and indirect measures of poverty. Journal of Social Policy17: 351–365.
44.
RodemsR (2019) ‘Hidden Hardship in the United States: Material Hardship Above the Poverty Line’, Discussion Paper 2019-3, Ann Arbor, MI: The Center for Inequality Dynamics.
45.
RodemsRShaeferHL (2016) Left out: policy diffusion and the exclusion of black workers from unemployment insurance. Social Science History40: 385–404.
46.
RodemsRShaeferHL (2020) Many of the kids are not alright: material hardship among children in the United States. Children and Youth Services Review112: 104767.
47.
SaezEGabrielZ (2019) The Triumph of Injustice: How the Rich Dodge Taxes and How to Make Them Pay. New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Company.
48.
SaltkjelTMalmberg-HeimonenI (2017) Welfare generosity in Europe: a multi-level study of material deprivation and income poverty among disadvantaged groups. Social Policy & Administration51: 1287–1310.
49.
SchreinerMSherradenM (2007) Can the Poor Save? Saving and Asset Building in Individual Development Accounts. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
50.
SkinnerJ (1988) Risky Income, Life Cycle Consumption, and Precautionary Savings. Journal of Monetary Economics22: 237–255.
51.
StiglitzJESenAFitoussiJ-P (2009) Report by the Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress. New York, NY: United Nations Press.
52.
TownsendP (1979) Poverty in the United Kingdom: A Survey of Household Resources and Standards of Living. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
53.
TreanorMC (2014) Deprived or not deprived? Comparing the measured extent of material deprivation using the UK government's and the Poverty and Social Exclusion surveys' method of calculating material deprivation. Quality & Quantity48: 1337–1346.
54.
WeisbrodBAHansenWL (1968) An income-net worth approach to measuring economic welfare. American Economic Review58: 1315–1329.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
