Caring for children with increased care needs can be demanding and the time required to provide such care hampers parents’ employment participation. Especially, mothers and lower educated parents are affected by the increased care burden and reduce or stop their employment participation. So far, the literature lacks studies investigating the employment impact in a comparative perspective. We fill this gap by comparing Belgium and Norway. We use comparable administrative datasets, identifying children with increased care needs as those receiving a cash benefit designed to financially compensate for the extra private care. The results confirm that gender and education inequalities exist in both countries. Moreover, we find that the negative care burden gap in employment depends on the country of residence, with significantly larger inequalities in Belgium. Our analyses suggest that increased support on multiple fronts is needed for these families.
Albertini FrühE.LidénH.GardsjordR.AdenP.KvarmeL.G. (2016) ‘Innvandrerfamilier med barn med spesielle behov – mødres tilknytning til arbeidslivet’, Søkelys på arbeidslivet33: 269–90.
2.
BeckerG.S. (1985) ‘Human Capital, Effort, and the Sexual Division of Labor’, Journal of Labor Economics3: S33–58.
3.
BeckerG.S. (1991) A Treatise on the Family. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
4.
BélandD.LecoursA. (2018) ‘Federalism, Policy Change, and Social Security in Belgium: Explaining the Decentralization of Family Allowances in the Sixth State Reform’, Journal of European Social Policy28: 55–69.
5.
BlackburnC.M.SpencerN.J.ReadJ.M. (2010) ‘Prevalence of Childhood Disability and the Characteristics and Circumstances of Disabled Children in the UK: Secondary Analysis of the Family Resources Survey’, BMC Pediatrics10: 21.
6.
BrekkeI.NadimM. (2016) ‘Gendered Effects of Intensified Care Burdens: Employment and Sickness Absence in Families with Chronically Sick or Disabled Children in Norway’, Work, Employment and Society31: 391–408.
7.
BrekkeI.EvensenM.HartR.K. (2020) ‘Uptake of Attendance Benefit for Children with a Disability in Norway: Impact of Socioeconomic Status and Immigrant Background’, Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research22: 127–36.
8.
BrownT.J.ClarkC. (2017) ‘Employed Parents of Children with Disabilities and Work Family Life Balance: A Literature Review’, Child & Youth Care Forum46: 857–76.
9.
BurkhauserR.V.DalyM.C.ZiebarthN.R. (2016) ‘Protecting Working-Age People with Disabilities: Experiences of Four Industrialized Nations’, Journal for Labour Market Research49: 367–86.
10.
CantillonB.Van LanckerW. (2013) ‘Three Shortcomings of the Social Investment Perspective’, Social Policy and Society12: 553–64.
11.
ChouY.-C.KrögerT.PuC.-Y.(2018) ‘Under-employment among Mothers of Children with Intellectual Disabilities’, Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities31: 152–8.
12.
CrettendenA.WrightA.SkinnerN. (2014) ‘Mothers Caring for Children and Young People with Developmental Disabilities: Intent to Work, Patterns of Participation in Paid Employment and the Experience of Workplace Flexibility’, Community, Work & Family17: 244–67.
13.
DebackerM. (2007) ‘De socio-economische positie van gezinnen met kinderen’, in GhyselsJ.DebackerM. (eds) Zorgen voor kinderen in Vlaanderen: een dagelijkse evenwichtsoefening?, pp. 19–43. Leuven: ACCO.
14.
DeRigneL. (2012) ‘The Employment and Financial Effects on Families Raising Children with Special Health Care Needs: An Examination of the Evidence’, Journal of Pediatric Health Care26: 283–90.
15.
DeRigneL.PorterfieldS.L. (2010) ‘Employment Change and the Role of the Medical Home for Married and Single-Mother Families with Children with Special Health Care Needs’, Social Science & Medicine70: 631–41.
16.
DeRigneL.PorterfieldS.L. (2017) ‘Employment Change among Married Parents of Children with Special Health Care Needs’, Journal of Family Issues38: 579–606.
17.
DuncanS.EdwardsR.ReynoldsT.AlldredP. (2003) ‘Motherhood, Paid Work and Partnering: Values and Theories’, Work, Employment and Society17: 309–30.
18.
EllingsæterA.L.GulbrandsenL. (2007) ‘Closing the Childcare Gap: The Interaction of Childcare Provision and Mothers’ Agency in Norway’, Journal of Social Policy36: 649–69.
19.
Esping-AndersenG. (1990) The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
20.
Esping-AndersenG.GallieD.HemerijckA.MyersJ. (2002) Why We Need a New Welfare State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
21.
European Agency Statistics on Inclusive Education (EASIE) (2018) ‘European Agency Statistics on Inclusive Education: 2016 Dataset Cross-Country Report’, in RambergJ.LénártA.WatkinsA. (eds) European Agency Statistics on Inclusive Education: 2016 Dataset Cross-Country Report, pp. 75. Odense: EASIE, available at: https://www.european-agency.org/data/cross-country-reports.
22.
European Commission (2013) Investing in Children: Breaking the Cycle of Disadvantage, (Commission Recommendation), p. 21. Brussels: European Commission.
23.
Famifed (2016) ‘Een overzicht per entiteit van de kinderbijslag voor kinderen met een aandoening’, Focus 2016-3, Brussels, Belgium, 4October2016.
FinchJ. (1989) Family Obligations and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.
26.
GhyselsJ.Van LanckerW. (2011) ‘The Unequal Benefits of Activation: An Analysis of the Social Distribution of Family Policy among Families with Young Children’, Journal of European Social Policy21: 472–85.
27.
Good GingrichL. (2008) ‘Social Exclusion and Double Jeopardy: The Management of Lone Mothers in the Market – State Social Field’, Social Policy & Administration42: 379–95.
28.
GordonM.RosenmanL.CuskellyM. (2007) ‘Constrained Labour: Maternal Employment When Children Have Disabilities’, Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities20: 236–46.
29.
GornickJ.C.MeyersM.K. (2003) Families That Work: Policies for Reconciling Parenthood and Employment. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
30.
HalvorsenR.JensesP.H. (2004) ‘Activation in Scandinavian Welfare Policy’, European Societies6: 461–83.
31.
HaugK.H.StorøJ. (2013) ‘Kindergarten: A Universal Right for Children in Norway’, International Journal of Child Care and Education Policy7: 1–13.
32.
HaugeL.J.KornstadT.NesR.B.KristensenP. (2013) ‘The Impact of a Child’s Special Health Care Needs on Maternal Work Participation during Early Motherhood’, Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology27: 353–60.
33.
HavnesT.MogstadM. (2011) ‘Money for Nothing? Universal Child Care and Maternal Employment’, Journal of Public Economics95: 1455–65.
34.
HemerijckA. (2017) The Uses of Social Investment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
35.
HemerijckA.MarxI. (2010) ‘Continental Welfare at a Crossroads: The Choice between Activation and Minimum Income Protection in Belgium and the Netherlands’, in PalierB (ed.) A Long Goodbye to Bismarck? The Politics of Welfare Reform in Continental Europe, pp. 129–55. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
36.
KauttoM.FritzellJ.HvindenB.KvistJ.UusitaloH. (2001) Nordic Welfare States in the European Context. London; New York: Routledge.
37.
KorpiW. (2000) ‘Faces of Inequality: Gender, Class, and Patterns of Inequalities in Different Types of Welfare States’, Social Politics7: 127–91.
38.
KorpiW.FerrariniT.EnglundS. (2013) ‘Women’s Opportunities Under Different Family Policy Constellations: Gender, Class, and Inequality Tradeoffs in Western Countries Re-Examined’, Social Politics20: 1–40.
39.
KossekE.E.LautschB.A. (2018) ‘Work–life Flexibility for Whom? Occupational Status and Work–life Inequality in Upper, Middle and Lower Level Jobs’, Academy of Management Annals12: 5–36.
40.
LarkinsC.ThomasN.JuddD.LloydJ.CarterL.BurgessN., et al. (2013) We Want to Help People See Things Our Way: A Rights-Based Analysis of Disabled Children’s Experience Living with Low Income. London: Office of the Children’s Commissioner.
41.
LeiterV.Wyngaarden KraussM.AndersonB.WellsN. (2004) ‘The Consequences of Caring: Effects of Mothering a Child with Special Needs’, Journal of Family Issues25: 379–403.
42.
LindsayC.GreveB.CabrasI.EllisonN.KellettS. (2015) ‘Assessing the Evidence Base on Health, Employability and the Labour Market: Lessons for Activation in the UK’, Social Policy & Administration49: 143–50.
43.
LuZ.-H.ZuoA. (2010) ‘Effects of a Child’s Disability on Affected Female’s Labour Supply in Australia’, Australian Economic Papers49: 222–40.
44.
MitraS.PalmerM.KimH.MontD.GroceN. (2017) ‘Extra Costs of Living with a Disability: A Review and Agenda for Research’, Disability and Health Journal10: 475–84.
45.
MoodC. (2010) ‘Logistic Regression: Why We Cannot Do What We Think We Can Do, and What We Can Do about It’, European Sociological Review26: 67–82.
OECD (2006) Starting Strong II: Early Childhood Education and Care. Paris: OECD.
48.
OlssonM.B.HwangC.P. (2006) ‘Well-Being, Involvement in Paid Work and Division of Child-Care in Parents of Children with Intellectual Disabilities in Sweden’, Journal of Intellectual Disability Research50: 963–9.
49.
PorterfieldS.L. (2002) ‘Work Choices of Mothers in Families with Children with Disabilities’, Journal of Marriage and Family64: 972–81.
50.
PowersE.T. (2001) ‘New Estimates of the Impact of Child Disability on Maternal Employment’, The American Economic Review91: 135–9.
51.
PowersE.T. (2003) ‘Children’s Health and Maternal Work Activity: Estimates Under Alternative Disability Definitions’, The Journal of Human Resources38: 522–56.
52.
RoetsG.RooseR.ClaesL.VandekinderenC.Van HoveG.VanderplasschenW. (2012) ‘Reinventing the Employable Citizen: A Perspective for Social Work’, The British Journal of Social Work42: 94–110.
53.
SebrechtsL.BredaJ. (2012) Families of Children with Special Needs in Flanders: Their Vulnerability within the Citizenship Paradigm, p. 20. Antwerp: Herman Deleeck Centre for Social Policy.
54.
ShahtahmasebiS.EmersonE.BerridgeD.LancasterG. (2011) ‘Child Disability and the Dynamics of Family Poverty, Hardship and Financial Strain: Evidence from the UK’, Journal of Social Policy40: 653–73.
55.
StabileM.AllinS. (2012) ‘The Economic Costs of Childhood Disability’, The Future of Children22: 65–96.
56.
TøssebroJ.WendelborgC. (2017) ‘Marriage, Separation and Beyond: A Longitudinal Study of Families of Children with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities in a Norwegian Context’, Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities30: 121–31.
57.
UunkW.KalmijnM.MuffelsR. (2005) ‘The Impact of Young Children on Women’s Labour Supply’, Acta Sociologica48: 41–62.
58.
Van LanckerW. (2013) ‘Putting the Child-Centred Investment Strategy to the Test: Evidence for the EU27’, European Journal of Social Security15: 4–27.
59.
Van LandeghemC.BredaJ.MestdaghK. (2007) ‘Zorgpatronen van kinderen met een handicap’, in GhyselsJ.DebackerM. (eds) Zorgen voor kinderen in Vlaanderen: een dagelijkse evenwichtsoefening?, pp. 191–235. Leuven: Acco.
60.
VandenbrouckeF. (2013) The Active Welfare State Revisited. Brugge: die Keure.
61.
VinckJ.Van LanckerW. (2020) ‘An Intersectional Approach towards Parental Employment in Families with a Child with a Disability: The Case of Belgium’, Work, Employment and Society34: 228–61.
62.
VinckJ.LebeerJ.Van LanckerW. (2019) ‘Non-Take Up of the Supplemental Child Benefit for Children with a Disability in Belgium: A Mixed Method Approach’, Social Policy & Administration53: 357–84.
63.
WasiN.van den BergB.BuchmuellerT.C. (2012) ‘Heterogeneous Effects of Child Disability on Maternal Labor Supply: Evidence from the 2000 US Census’, Labour Economics19: 139–54.
64.
ZhuA. (2016) ‘Maternal Employment Trajectories and Caring for an Infant or Toddler with a Disability’, Applied Economics48: 4606–21.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
