Time and well-being,an institutional,comparative perspective: Is it time to explore the idea of a time policy?

Abstract

This article explores the relationship between time and well-being as a social policy question. Although the research on time and well-being is extensive, few have dealt with them together from a comparative institutional perspective. Based on data from the third European Quality of Life Survey (EQLS) of 2012, regarding 34 mostly European countries, in different welfare regimes, we explore two issues: (1) What are the effects of welfare regimes on the uses of time and subjective well-being? and (2) What are the effects of different uses of time on subjective well-being? We find that the institutional structure – the welfare regime – affects the way people use their time. Furthermore, the findings documented that uses of time have a direct effect on well-being when controlling for individual level as well as country-level variables. These findings may have important implications for policymaking.

Keywords

comparative institutions time welfare regimes well-being

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aaker

Rudd

Mogilner

(2011) ‘If Money Doesn’t Make You Happy, Consider Time’, Journal of Consumer Psychology 21: 126–30.

Aguiar

Hurst

Karabarbounis

(2013) ‘Time Use during the Great Recession’, American Economic Review 103(5): 1664–96.

Ahn

Jimeno

J.F.

Ugidos

(2004) ‘“Mondays in the Sun”: Unemployment, Time Use, and Consumption Patterns in Spain’, Contributions to Economic Analysis 271: 237–59.

Alpman

Balestra

Murtin

(2018) ‘Unveiling the Monetary Value of Non-Market Activities Using Experienced Well-Being and Time-Use Surveys’, OECD Statistics Working Papers. Paris: OECD.

Arts

Gelissen

(2002) ‘Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism or More? A State-Of Report’, Journal of European Social Policy 12(2): 137–58.

Becker

G.S.

(1965) ‘A Theory of the Allocation of Time’, The Economic Journal 75(299): 493–517.

Bettio

Simonazzi

Villa

(2006) ‘Change in Care Regimes and Female Migration: The “Care Drain” in the Mediterranean’, Journal of European Social Policy 16(3): 271–85.

Bianchi

S.M.

Sayer

L.C.

Milkie

M.A.

Robinson

J.P.

(2012) ‘Housework: Who Did, Does or Will Do It, and How Much Does It Matter?’, Social Forces 91(1): 55–63.

Bonoli

(2007) ‘Time Matters: Postindustrialization, New Social Risks, and Welfare State Adaptation in Advanced Industrial Democracies’, Comparative Political Studies 40(5): 495–520.

10.

Bryson

(2007) Gender and the Politics of Time: Feminist Theory and Contemporary Debates. Bristol: Policy Press.

11.

Budig

M.J.

Folbre

(2004) ‘Activity, Proximity, or Responsibility? Measuring Parental Childcare Time’, in Bittman

Folbre

(eds) Family Time: The Social Organization of Care, pp. 51–68. Abingdon: Routledge.

12.

Buhr

Stoy

(2015) ‘More Than Just Welfare Transfers? A Review of the Scope of Esping-Andersen’s Welfare Regime Typology’, Social Policy and Society 14(2): 271–85.

13.

Clark

A.E.

(2010) ‘Work, Jobs and Well-Being across the Millennium’, in Diener

Helliwell

J.F.

Kahneman

(eds) International Differences in Well-Being, pp. 436–68. New York: Oxford University Press.

14.

Csikszentmihalyi

Hunter

(2003) ‘Happiness in Everyday Life: The Uses of Experience Sampling’, Journal of Happiness Studies 4(2): 185–99.

15.

Deeming

Hayes

(2012) ‘Worlds of Welfare Capitalism and Wellbeing: A Multilevel Analysis’, Journal of Social Policy 41(4): 811–29.

16.

Diener

Seligman

M.E.

(2004) ‘Beyond Money: Toward an Economy of Well-Being’, Psychological Science in the Public Interest 5(1): 1–31.

17.

Diener

Scollon

C.N.

Lucas

R.E.

(2009) ‘The Evolving Concept of Subjective Well-Being: The Multifaceted Nature of Happiness’, in Diener

(ed.) Assessing Well-Being, pp. 67–100. Dordrecht: Springer.

18.

Easterlin

R.A.

(2013) ‘Happiness, Growth, and Public Policy’, Economic Inquiry 51(1): 1–15.

19.

Eikemo

T.A.

Bambra

Judge

Ringdal

(2008) ‘Welfare State Regimes and Differences in Self-Perceived Health in Europe: A Multilevel Analysis’, Social Science & Medicine 66(11): 2281–95.

20.

EQLS (2012) available at https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/surveys/european-quality-of-life-surveys/european-quality-of-life-survey-2012/eqls-2012-methodology (accessed 1 February 2019).

21.

Esping-Andersen

(1990) The Three World of Welfare Capitalism. Oxford: Polity Press.

22.

Esping-Andersen

(2006) ‘Three World of Welfare Capitalism’, in Pierson

Castles

F.G.

(eds) The Welfare State Reader, 2nd edn, pp. 160–74. Cambridge: Polity Press.

23.

Eurofound (2018) available at https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/observatories/eurwork/articles/france-new-rules-on-working-time-enter-into-force- (accessed 23 March 2018).

24.

European Social Survey (2015) ‘Topline Results from Round 6 of the European Social Survey, Issue 5’, available at http://www.europeansocialsurvey.org/docs/findings/ESS6_toplines_issue_5_personal_and_social_wellbeing.pdf (accessed 14 November 2016).

25.

Fenger

H.M.

(2007) ‘Welfare Regimes in Central and Eastern Europe: Incorporating Post-Communist Countries in a Welfare Regime Typology’, Contemporary Issues and Ideas in Social Sciences 3(2): 1–30, available at http://journal.ciiss.in/index.php/ciiss/article/view/45 (accessed 19 March 2018).

26.

Ferragina

Seeleib-Kaiser

(2011) ‘Thematic Review: Welfare Regime Debate: Past, Present, Futures?’, Policy & Politics 39(4): 583–611.

27.

Ferragina

Seeleib-Kaiser

Spreckelsen

(2015) ‘The Four Worlds of “Welfare Reality” – Social Risks and Outcomes in Europe’, Social Policy and Society 14(2): 287–307.

28.

Ferrera

(1996) ‘The “Southern Model” of Welfare in Social Europe’, Journal of European Social Policy 6(1): 17–37.

29.

Finch

(2005) ‘Comparison of the Performance of Nonparametric and Parametric MANOVA Test Statistics When Assumptions Are Violated’, Methodology 1(1): 27–38.

30.

Fleckenstein

Seeleib-Kaiser

(2011) ‘Business, Skills and the Welfare State: The Political Economy of Employment-Oriented Family Policy in Britain and Germany’, Journal of European Social Policy 21(2): 136–49.

31.

Folbre

Bittman

(eds) (2004) Family Time: The Social Organization of Care. London: Routledge.

32.

Gal

(2010) ‘Is There an Extended Family of Mediterranean Welfare States?’, Journal of European Social Policy 20(4): 283–300.

33.

Gershuny

(2011) Time-Use Surveys and the Measurement of National Well-Being. Oxford: Centre for Time-Use Research, Department of Sociology, University of Oxford.

34.

Gershuny

Sullivan

(2003) ‘Time Use, Gender, and Public Policy Regimes’, Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society 10(2): 205–28.

35.

Goodin

R.E.

(2010) ‘Temporal Justice’, Journal of Social Policy 39(1): 1–16.

36.

Goodin

R.E.

Rice

J.M.

Parpo

Eriksson

(2008) Discretionary Time: A New Measure of Freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

37.

Gorz

(1999) Reclaiming Work: Beyond the Wage-Society. Malden, MA: Polity Press.

38.

Gregory

(2015) Trading Time: Can Exchange Lead to Social Change? Bristol: Policy Press.

39.

Hagqvist

Toivanen

Vinberg

(2019) ‘The Gender Time Gap: Time Use among Self-Employed Women and Men Compared to Paid Employees in Sweden’, Time & Society 28: 680–96.

40.

Haller

Hadler

Kaup

(2013) ‘Leisure Time in Modern Societies: A New Source of Boredom and Stress?’, Social Indicators Research 111(2): 403–34.

41.

Helliwell

J.F.

(2008) Life Satisfaction and Quality of Development (No. w14507). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

42.

Helliwell

J.F.

Huang

Wang

(2015) ‘The Geography of World Happiness’, in Helliwell

Layard

Sachs

(eds) World Happiness Report, pp. 12–41. Toronto, ON, Canada: Canadian Institute for Advanced Research (CIFAR), Sustainable Development Solutions Network, The Earth Institute Colombia University, Center for Economic Performance, Emirates Competitiveness Council (ECC).

43.

Hilbrecht

M.J.

(2009) Parents, Employment, Gender and Well-Being: A Time Use Study. PhD thesis, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.

44.

Hox

J.J.

(2010) Multilevel Analysis: Techniques and Applications, 2nd edn. New York: Routledge.

45.

Huppert

F.A.

T.T.

(2013) ‘Flourishing across Europe: Application of a New Conceptual Framework for Defining Well-Being’, Social Indicators Research 110(3): 837–61.

46.

Juster

F.T.

Courant

P.N.

Dow

G.K.

(1981) ‘A Theoretical Framework for the Measurement of Well-Being’, Review of Income and Wealth 27(1): 1–31.

47.

Kahneman

Krueger

A.B.

(2006) ‘Developments in the Measurement of Subjective Well-Being’, The Journal of Economic Perspectives 20(1): 3–24.

48.

Kahneman

Krueger

A.B.

Schkade

Schwarz

Stone

(2004) ‘Toward National Well-Being Accounts’, The American Economic Review 94(2): 429–34.

49.

Kahneman

Schkade

D.A.

Fischler

Krueger

A.B.

Krilla

(2010) ‘The Structure of Well-Being in Two Cities: Life Satisfaction and Experienced Happiness in Columbus, Ohio; and Rennes, France’, in Diener

Helliwell

J.F.

Kahneman

(eds) International Differences in Well-Being, pp. 16–33. New York: Oxford University Press.

50.

Kan

M.Y.

Sullivan

Gershuny

(2011) ‘Gender Convergence in Domestic Work: Discerning the Effects of Interactional and Institutional Barriers from Large-Scale Data’, Sociology 45(2): 234–51.

51.

Korpi

(2000) ‘Faces of Inequality: Gender, Class, and Patterns of Inequalities in Different Types of Welfare States’, Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society 7(2): 127–91.

52.

Korpi

Palme

(1998) ‘The Paradox of Redistribution and Strategies of Equality: Welfare State Institutions, Inequality, and Poverty in the Western Countries’, American Sociological Review 63(5): 661–87.

53.

Korpi

Ferrarini

Englund

(2013) ‘Women’s Opportunities Under Different Family Policy Constellations: Gender, Class, and Inequality Tradeoffs in Western Countries Re-Examined’, Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society 20(1): 1–40.

54.

Krueger

A.B.

(2009) Measuring the Subjective Well-Being of Nations: National Accounts of Time Use and Well-Being. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

55.

Layard

(2011) Happiness: Lessons from a New Science. London: Penguin.

56.

Lewis

Campbell

Huerta

(2008a) ‘Patterns of Paid and Unpaid Work in Western Europe: Gender, Commodification, Preferences and the Implications for Policy’, Journal of European Social Policy 18(1): 21–37.

57.

Lewis

Knijn

Martin

Ostner

(2008b) ‘Patterns of Development in Work/Family Reconciliation Policies for Parents in France, Germany, the Netherlands, and the UK in the 2000s’, Social Politics 15(3): 261–86.

58.

Loewenstein

(2009) ‘That Which Makes Life Worthwhile’, in Krueger

A.B.

(ed.) Measuring the Subjective Well-Being of Nations: National Accounts of Time Use and Well-Being, pp. 87–106. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

59.

Miller

(2012) ‘Balancing Caring and Paid Work in the UK: Narrating “Choices” as First-Time Parents’, International Review of Sociology 22(1): 39–52.

60.

North

D.C.

(1990) Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. New York: Cambridge University Press.

61.

OECD (2015) ‘Better Life Index: Definitions and Metadata’, available at http://www.oecdbetterlifeindex.org

62.

OECD (2016) ‘Gender Data Portal 2016 Time Use across the World’, available at https://www.oecd.org/gender/data/OECD_1564_TUSupdatePortal.xls

63.

Pankratz

C.J.

(2009) ‘Cross-National Comparisons of Family Policies: The Relevance of National Approaches to Social Welfare’, Journal of Comparative Family Studies 40(3): 493–511.

64.

Pascall

Lewis

(2004) ‘Emerging Gender Regimes and Policies for Gender Equality in a Wider Europe’, Journal of Social Policy 33(3): 373–94.

65.

Patrick

(2012) ‘Work as the Primary “Duty” of the Responsible Citizen: A Critique of This Work-Centric Approach’, People, Place & Policy Online 6(1): 5–15.

66.

Pavot

(2018) ‘The Cornerstone of Research on Subjective Well-Being: Valid Assessment Methodology’, in Diener

Oishi

Tay

(eds) Handbook of Well-Being. Salt Lake City, UT: DEF Publishers.

67.

Pinquart

Sörensen

(2001) ‘Gender Differences in Self-Concept and Psychological Well-Being in Old Age: A Meta-Analysis’, The Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences 56(4): P195–P213.

68.

Rhodes

(2014) ‘Southern European Welfare States, Identity, Problems and Prospects’, in Rhodes

(ed.) Southern European Welfare States: Between Crisis and Reform, pp. 1–22. New York: Routledge.

69.

Ryan

R.M.

Deci

E.L.

(2001) ‘On Happiness and Human Potentials: A Review of Research on Hedonic and Eudaimonic Well-Being’, Annual Review of Psychology 52(1): 141–66.

70.

Samuel

Hadjar

(2016) ‘How Welfare-State Regimes Shape Subjective Well-Being Across Europe’, Social Indicators Research 129(2): 565–87.

71.

Sayer

L.C.

(2005) ‘Gender, Time and Inequality: Trends in Women’s and Men’s Paid Work, Unpaid Work and Free Time’, Social Forces 84(1): 285–303.

72.

Sened

(1997) The Political Institution of Private Property. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

73.

Stier

Mandel

(2009) ‘Inequality in the Family: The Institutional Aspects of Women’s Earning Contribution’, Social Science Research 38(3): 594–608.

74.

Stiglitz

Sen

Fitoussi

J.P.

(2009) The Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress Revisited. Reflections and Overview. Paris: Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress.

75.

Sullivan

Gershuny

(2001) ‘Cross-National Changes in Time-Use: Some Sociological (hi) Stories Re-Examined’, The British Journal of Sociology 52(2): 331–47.

76.

Ulloa

B.F.L.

Møller

Sousa-Poza

(2013) ‘How Does Subjective Well-Being Evolve with Age? A Literature Review’, Journal of Population Ageing 6(3): 227–46.

77.

Van der Veen

Groot

. (2006) ‘Post-Productivism and Welfare States: A Comparative Analysis’, British Journal of Political Science 36(4): 593–618.

78.

Van Parijs

. (2004) ‘Basic Income: A Simple and Powerful Idea for the Twenty-First Century’, Politics & Society 32(1): 7–39.

79.

Vanhoutte

(2013) ‘Happy and Flourishing?’, in European Social Survey (ed.) Measuring and Reporting on Europeans’ Wellbeing: Findings from the European Social Survey, available at http://www.europeansocialsurvey.org/docs/findings/ESS1-6_measuring_and_reporting_on_europeans_wellbeing.pdf (accessed 11 February 2017).

80.

Wajcman

(2015) Pressed for Time: The Acceleration of Life in Digital Capitalism. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

81.

Whelan

C.T.

Maître

(2010) ‘Welfare Regime and Social Class Variation in Poverty and Economic Vulnerability in Europe: An Analysis of EU-SILC’, Journal of European Social Policy 20(4): 316–32.

82.

Zuzanek

Hilbrecht

(2019) ‘Enforced Leisure: Time Use and Its Well-Being Implications’, Time & Society 28: 657–79.

83.

Zuzanek

(2015) ‘Of Happiness and of Despair, Is There a Measure? Time Use and Subjective Well-Being’, Journal of Happiness Studies 16(4): 839–56.