This article explores the specific effects of work-related family policies on poverty risks among various educational groups. Based on European Union Statistics on Income and Living Conditions (EU-SILC) data (2005–2010) and policy indicators drawn from the Multilinks project, we estimated a series of multilevel models for approximately 123,000 households with children below the age of 6 years in 25 European countries. The results emphasize clear education-specific differences and thus are essential for the ongoing social-policy discourse. Interestingly, with respect to infant childcare, the strongest poverty-reducing effect was identified among women with mid-level education and their families, followed by low-educated women. In contrast, full-time care for children aged 3–5 years reduced the poverty risk only among women with mid- and high-level education and their families, whereas a medium length of well-paid parental leave was observed to be of particular importance to low-qualified mothers.
AddaJ.DustmannC.StevensK. (2011) ‘The Career Costs of Children’, CEPR Discussion Paper no. DP8697. Florence: European University Institute (EUI).
2.
AndersonP.M.LevineP.B. (1999) ‘Child Care and Mothers’ Employment Decisions’, Working Paper 7058. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER).
3.
AndreßH.-J.LohmannH. (2008) The Working Poor in Europe: Employment, Poverty and Globalisation. Cheltenham/Northampton: Edward Elgar.
4.
ArmingeonK. (2007) ‘Reconciling Competing Claims of the Welfare State Clientele: The Politics of Old and New Social Risk Coverage in Comparative Perspective’, in ArmingeonK.BonoliG. (eds) The Politics of Post-Industrial Welfare States: Adapting Post-War Social Policies to New Social Risks, pp. 100–22. Abingdon: Taylor & Francis.
5.
AtkinsonA.B.MarlieE. (2010) Income and Living Conditions in Europe. Luxembourg: Eurostat.
6.
BäckmanO.FerrariniT. (2010) ‘Combating Child Poverty? A Multilevel Assessment of Family Policy Institutions and Child Poverty in 21 Old and New Welfare States’, Journal of Social Policy39(2): 275–96.
7.
BergemannA.Van den BergG.J. (2008) ‘From Giving Birth to Paid Labor: The Effects of Adult Education for Prime-aged Mothers’, Discussion Paper 3600. Bonn: Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA).
8.
BettioF.PlantengaJ. (2004) ‘Comparing Care Regimes in Europe’, Feminist Economics10(1): 85–113.
9.
BlossfeldH.-P.DrobničS. (2001) Careers of Couples in Contemporary Societies: From Male Breadwinner to Dual-Earner Families. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10.
BlossfeldH.-P.HakimC. (1997) Between Equalization and Marginalization: Women Working Part-Time in Europe and the United States of America. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
11.
BlossfeldH.-P.HofmeisterH. (2007) Globalization, Uncertainty and Women’s Careers: An International Comparison. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
12.
BlossfeldH.-P.TimmA. (2003) Who Marries Whom? Educational Systems as Marriage Markets in Modern Societies. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
13.
BlossfeldH.-P.MillsM.BernardiF. (2007) Globalization, Uncertainty and Men’s Careers: An International Comparison. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
14.
BonoliG. (2005) ‘The Politics of the New Social Policies: Providing Coverage Against New Social Risks in Mature Welfare States’, Policy and Politics33(3): 431–49.
15.
BonoliG. (2007) ‘Time Matters: Postindustrialization, New Social Risks, and Welfare State Adaptation in Advanced Industrial Democracies’, Political Studies40(5): 495–520.
16.
BrewerM.FrancesconiM.GreggP.GroggerJ. (2009) ‘Feature: In-Work Benefit Reform in a Cross-National Perspective – Introduction’, The Economic Journal119(535): F1–14.
17.
CantillonB. (2011) ‘The Paradox of the Social Investment State: Growth, Employment and Poverty in the Lisbon Era’, Journal of European Social Policy21(5): 432–49.
18.
CantillonB.GhyselsJ.MusscheN.Van DamR. (2001) ‘Female Employment Differences, Poverty and Care Provisions’, European Societies3(4): 447–69.
19.
CromptonR. (2006) Employment and the Family: The Reconfiguration of Work and Family Life in Contemporary Societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20.
CromptonR.HarrisF. (1999) ‘Employment, Careers, and Families: The Significance of Choice and Constraint in Women’s Lives’, in CromptonR. (ed.) Restructuring Gender Relations and Employment: The Decline of the Male Breadwinner, pp. 128–49. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
21.
CromptonR.LyonetteC. (2005) ‘The New Gender Essentialism: Domestic and Family “Choices” and their Relation to Attitudes’, The British Journal of Sociology56(4): 601–20.
22.
DalyM. (2005) ‘Changing Family Life in Europe: Significance for State and Society’, European Societies7(3): 379–98.
23.
De Graaf-ZijlM.NolanB. (2011) ‘Household Joblessness and Its Impact on Poverty and Deprivation in Europe’, Journal of European Social Policy21(5): 413–31.
24.
DebackerM. (2005) ‘Care as a New Social Risk: Focusing on Low Skilled Women’, tlm.net Working Paper no. 27. Amsterdam: Netherlands Institute for the Social Sciences (SISWO).
25.
DebackerM. (2008) ‘Care Strategies among High- and Low-Skilled Mothers: A World of Difference?’, Work, Employment & Society22(3): 527–45.
26.
Del BocaD.PasquaS.PronzatoC. (2009) ‘Motherhood and Market Work Decisions in Institutional Context: A European Perspective’, Oxford Economic Papers61(Suppl. 1): 147–71.
27.
DiPreteT.A.GouxD.MaurinE.Quesnel-ValleeA. (2006) ‘Work and Pay in Flexible and Regulated Labor Markets: A Generalized Perspective on Institutional Evolution and Inequality Trends in Europe and the U.S.’, Research in Social Stratification and Mobility24: 311–32.
28.
DomańskiH.PrzybyszD. (2007) ‘Educational Homogamy in 22 European Countries’, European Societies9(4): 495–526.
29.
EndersC.TofighiD. (2007) ‘Centering Predictor Variables in Cross-sectional Multilevel Models: A New Look at an Old Issue’, Psychological Methods12: 121–38.
30.
EngsterD.Olofsdotter StensötaH. (2011) ‘Do Family Policy Regimes Matter for Children’s Well-being?’ Social Politics18(1): 81–124.
31.
EriksonR. (1984) ‘Social Class of Men, Women and Families’, Sociology18(4): 500–14.
32.
EriksonR.JonssonJ.O. (1996) Can Education be Equalized? The Swedish Case in Comparative Perspective. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
33.
Esping-AndersenG. (1990) The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
34.
Esping-AndersenG. (1999) Social Foundations of Post-Industrial Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
35.
Esping-AndersenG. (2002) Why We Need a New Welfare State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
36.
Esping-AndersenG. (2007) ‘Sociological Explanations of Changing Income Distributions’, American Behavioral Scientist50(5): 639–58.
37.
Esping-AndersenG. (2009) The Incomplete Revolution: Adapting to Women’s New Roles. Cambridge: Polity Press.
38.
Eurofound (2010) Working Poor in Europe. Dublin: European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions.
39.
EvertssonM.EnglandP.Mooi-ReciI.HermsenJ.de BruijnJ.CotterD. (2009) ‘Is Gender Inequality Greater at Lower or Higher Educational Levels? Common Patterns in the Netherlands, Sweden, and the United States’, Social Politics16(2): 210–41.
40.
FerrariniT. (2006) Families, States and Labour Markets: Institutions, Causes and Consequences of Family Policy in Post-War Welfare States. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
41.
FerrariniT.SjöbergO. (2010) ‘Social Policy and Health: Transition Countries in a Comparative Perspective’, International Journal of Social Welfare19: S60–88.
42.
FigariF. (2010) ‘Can In-work Benefits Improve Social Inclusion in the Southern European Countries?’, Journal of European Social Policy20(4): 301–15.
43.
FriedmanD.HechterM.KanazawaS. (1994) ‘A Theory of the Value of Children’, Demography31(3): 375–401.
44.
FuscoA.GuioA.-C.MarlierE. (2010) ‘Characterising the Income Poor and the Materially Deprived in European Countries’, in AtkinsonA.B.MarlierE. (eds) Income and Living Conditions in Europe, pp. 133–54. Luxembourg: Eurostat.
45.
GallieD.PaugamS. (2000) Welfare Regimes and the Experience of Unemployment in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
46.
GauthierA.H. (1996) The State and the Family: A Comparative Analysis of Family Policies in Industrialized Countries. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
47.
GesthuizenM.ScheepersP. (2010) ‘Economic Vulnerability among Low-Educated Europeans: Resource, Composition, Labour Market and Welfare State Influences’, Acta Sociologica5(3): 247–67.
48.
GhyselsJ.Van LanckerW. (2011) ‘The Unequal Benefits of Activation: An Analysis of the Social Distribution of Family Policy among Families with Young Children’, Journal of European Social Policy21(5): 472–85.
49.
GreggP.ScutellaR.WadsworthJ. (2010) ‘Reconciling Workless Measures at the Individual and Household Level: Theory and Evidence from the United States, Britain, Germany, Spain and Australia’, Journal of Population Economics23(1): 139–67.
50.
HaasB.SteiberN.HartelM.WallaceC. (2006) ‘Household Employment Patterns in an Enlarged European Union’, Work, Employment & Society20(4): 751–71.
51.
HakimC. (2000) Work-Lifestyle Choices in the 21st Century: Preference Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
52.
HamplovaD. (2009) ‘Educational Homogamy among Married and Unmarried Couples in Europe’, Journal of Family Issues30(1): 28–52.
53.
HegewischA.GornickJ. (2011) ‘The Impact of Work–Family Policies on Women’s Employment: A Review of Research from OECD Countries’, Community, Work & Family14(2): 119–38.
54.
HoxJ. (2010) Multilevel Analysis: Techniques and Applications. Abingdon: Taylor & Francis.
55.
ImmervollH.PearsonM. (2009) A Good Time for Making Work Pay? Taking Stock of In-Work Benefits and Related Measures across the OECD. Paris: OECD.
56.
JoeschJ.M. (1997) ‘Paid Leave and the Timing of Women’s Employment Before and After Birth’, Journal of Marriage and Family59(4): 1008–21.
57.
KangasO.RostgaardT. (2007) ‘Preferences or Institutions? Work–Family Life Opportunities in Seven European Countries’, Journal of European Social Policy17(3): 240–56.
58.
KeckW.SaracenoC. (2011a) Comparative Childcare Statistics in Europe: Conceptual and Methodological Fallacies. Berlin: Berlin Social Science Center (WZB), Multilinks.
59.
KeckW.SaracenoC. (2011b) ‘Multilinks: Database on Intergenerational Policy Indicators’, Methodological Report, Berlin Social Science Center (WZB), Berlin.
60.
KohlerU.KarlsonK.B.HolmA. (2011) ‘Comparing Coefficients of Nested Nonlinear Probability Models’, The Stata Journal11(3): 420–38.
61.
KonietzkaD.KreyenfeldM. (2010) ‘The Growing Educational Divide in Mothers’ Employment: An Investigation Based on the German Micro-Censuses 1976–2004’, Work, Employment & Society24(2): 260–78.
62.
KorpiW. (2000) ‘Faces of Inequality: Gender, Class, and Patterns of Inequalities in Different Types of Welfare States’, Social Politics7(2): 127–91.
63.
KorpiW. (2010) ‘Class and Gender Inequalities in Different Types of Welfare States: The Social Citizenship Indicator Program (SCIP)’, International Journal of Social Welfare19: 14–24.
64.
KorpiW.PalmeJ. (1998) ‘The Paradox of Redistribution and Strategies of Equality: Welfare State Institutions, Inequality, and Poverty in the Western Countries’, American Sociological Review63(5): 661–87.
65.
KorpiW.FerrariniT.EnglundS. (2009) Egalitarian Gender Paradise Lost? Re-examining Gender Inequalities in Different Types of Welfare States. Stockholm: Swedish Institute for Social Research.
66.
KorpiW.FerrariniT.EnglundS. (2013) ‘Women’s Opportunities under Different Family Policy Constellations: Gender, Class, and Inequality Tradeoffs in Western Countries Re-examined’, Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State and Society20(1): 1–40.
67.
KreyenfeldM. (2005) ‘Economic Uncertainty and Fertility Postponement: Evidence from German Panel Data’, Working Paper 2005-34. Rostock: Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research (MPIDR).
68.
LeitnerS. (2003) ‘Varieties of Familialism: The Caring Function of the Family in Comparative Perspective’, European Societies5(4): 353–75.
69.
LewisJ. (1992) ‘Gender and the Development of Welfare Regimes’, Journal of European Social Policy2(3): 159–73.
70.
LohmannH. (2009) ‘Welfare States, Labour Market Institutions and the Working Poor: A Comparative Analysis of 20 European Countries’, European Sociological Review25(4): 489–504.
71.
LongJ.S. (2009) ‘Group Comparisons in Logit and Probit Using Predicted Probabilities’, Working Paper 2009-06-25. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University.
72.
MincerJ. (1974) Schooling, Experience, and Earnings. New York: Columbia University Press.
73.
MisraJ.BudigM.BoeckmannI. (2011) ‘Work–Family Policies and the Effects of Children on Women’s Employment Hours and Wages’, Community, Work & Family14(2): 139–57.
74.
MisraJ.MollerS.BudigM. (2007) ‘Work-Family Policies and Poverty for Partnered and Single Women in Europe and North America’, Gender and Society21(6): 804–27.
75.
MisraJ.MollerS.StraderE.WemlingerE. (2012) ‘Family Policies, Employment and Poverty among Partnered and Single Mothers’, Research in Social Stratification and Mobility30(1): 113–28.
76.
MontanariI. (2000) ‘From Family Wage to Marriage Subsidy and Child Benefits: Controversy and Consensus in the Development of Family Support’, Journal of European Social Policy10(4): 307–33.
77.
MuffelsR.J.A.FouargeD.J.A.G. (2002) ‘Employment Regimes and Labour Market Attachment: Evidence from the ECHP’, in MuffelsR.J.A.TsakloglouP.MayesD.G. (eds) Social Exclusion in European Welfare States, pp. 51–77. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
78.
NieuwenhuisR.NeedA.Van Der KolkH. (2012) ‘Institutional and Demographic Explanations of Women’s Employment in 18 OECD Countries, 1975–1999’, Journal of Marriage and Family74(3): 614–30.
79.
NollmannG. (2009) ‘Working Poor: Eine vergleichende Längsschnittstudie für Deutschland und die USA’, Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie (KZfSS)61(1): 33–55.
80.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2012) Full-Time Equivalent Employment. Paris: OECD.
81.
PaccagnellaO. (2006) ‘Centering or Not Centering in Multilevel Models? The Role of the Group Mean and the Assessment of Group Effects’, Evaluation Review30(1): 66–85.
82.
PalmeJ. (2006) ‘Welfare States and Inequality: Institutional Designs and Distributive Outcome’, Research in Social Stratification and Mobility24(4): 387–403.
83.
Rabe-HeskethS.SkrondalA. (2008) Multilevel and Longitudinal Modeling Using Stata. College Station, TX: Stata Press.
84.
RønsenM.SundströmM. (2002) ‘Family Policy and After-Birth Employment among New Mothers: A Comparison of Finland, Norway and Sweden’, European Journal of Population/Revue européenne de Démographie18(2): 121–52.
85.
RuberyJ.SmithM.FaganC. (1999) Women’s Employment in Europe: Trends and Prospects. London: Routledge.
86.
SaracenoC. (2011) ‘Childcare Needs and Childcare Policies: A Multidimensional Issue’, Current Sociology59(1): 78–96.
87.
SchererS. (2005) ‘Patterns of Labour Market Entry – Long Wait or Career Instability? An Empirical Comparison of Italy, Great Britain and West Germany’, European Sociological Review21(5): 427–40.
88.
ShavitY.MüllerW. (1998) From School to Work: A Comparative Study of Educational Qualifications and Occupational Destinations. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
89.
SørensenA. (1994) ‘Women, Family and Class’, Annual Review of Sociology20: 27–47.
90.
Stadelmann-SteffenI. (2011) ‘Dimensions of Family Policy and Female Labor Market Participation: Analyzing Group-Specific Policy Effects’, Governance24(2): 331–57.
91.
Taylor-GoobyP. (2004) ‘New Risks and Social Change’, in Taylor-GoobyP. (ed.) Making a European Welfare State? Convergences and Conflicts over European Social Policy, pp. 1–28. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
92.
UgreninovE.HvindenB.NordvikV. (2013) Can Work–Family Policies Reduce the Poverty Gap Between One-Parent and Two-Parent Households?Oslo: Norwegian Social Research (NOVA).
93.
UunkW.KalmijnM.MuffelsR. (2005) ‘The Impact of Young Children on Women’s Labour Supply: A Reassessment of Institutional Effects in Europe’, Acta Sociologica48(1): 41–62.
94.
Van LanckerW.GhyselsJ. (2012) ‘Who Benefits? The Social Distribution of Subsidized Childcare in Sweden and Flanders’, Acta Sociologica55(2): 125–42.
95.
VleminckxK. (2002) ‘The Proliferation of Part-time Work, Family Employment and Household Income Security’, in MuffelsR.J.A.TsakloglouP.MayesD.G. (eds) Social Exclusion in European Welfare States, pp. 98–131. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
