What happens to the legitimacy of the Scandinavian model of the welfare state within the context of post-industrial development and the growth of the middle classes? Theoretically, two rival hypotheses can be posed. According to the saturation approach, the legitimation of the welfare state collapses. As general welfare increases, people adopt more individualistic stances toward the welfare state. By contrast, the irreversibility theory of the welfare state suggests that the legitimacy of the welfare state even improves as more people are employed by the welfare state and as all citizens are covered by its services. These hypotheses are tested empirically by using recent Finnish opinion survey data and by employing structural equation methods. At least in Finland, the irreversibility approach clearly gets more support than the rival saturation hypothesis. The results show that the middle classes are neither overly individualist nor critical of the Finnish welfare state.
Baldwin, P. (1990) The Politics of Social Solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2.
Blomberg, H., Kroll, C., Suominen, S. and Helenius, H. (1996) ‘Socialklass och attityderna till nedskärningar i välfärdsystemet i Finland’, Sociologisk forskning33 (4): 57-79.
3.
Bollen, K. (1989) Structural Equations with Latent Variables.New York: Wiley.
4.
Castles, F. (1985) The Working Class and Welfare.Wellington: Allen & Unwin.
5.
Clark, T., Lipset, S. M. and Rempel, M. (1993) ‘The Declining Political Significance of Class’, International Sociology8 (3): 293-316.
6.
Dean, H. and Taylor-Gooby, P. (1992) Dependency Culture.Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
7.
de Vaus, D. (1991) Surveys in Social Research. London: Allen & Unwin.
8.
Ervasti, H. (1995) Social Classes and WelfareServices, University of Turku, Department of Social Policy, Series B:6.
9.
Ervasti, H. (1996) Kenen vastuu? Tutkimuksia hyv-invointipluralismista legitimiteetin nkkulmasta.Helsinki: Stakes.
10.
Ervasti, H. (1997) `The Rise of the New Political Agenda: the End of Democratic Class Struggle', paper presented in `Nordiske socialpolitiskeforskerseminar' (November), Kge, Denmark.
11.
Ervasti, H. (1998) `Civil Criticism and the Welfare State', Scandinavian Journal of Social Welfare7(2): 288-299.
12.
Ervasti, H. and Kangas, O. (1995) `Class Basis of Universal Social Policy', European Journal of Political Research27 (3): 347-367.
13.
Esping-Andersen, G. (1985) Politics against Markets. The Social Democratic Road to Power. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
14.
Esping-Andersen, G. (1993) ‘Post-industrial Class Structures: an Analytical Framework’, in G. Esping-Andersen (ed.) Changing Classes, pp. 7-31. London: Sage.
15.
Esping-Andersen, G. and Korpi, W. (1987) ‘From Poor Relief to Institutional Welfare States: the Development of Scandinavian Social Policy’, in R. Erikson, E. J. Hansen, S. Ringen and H. Uusitalo (eds) The Scandinavian Model, pp. 39-74. Armonk, NY: Sharpe.
16.
Evans, M. D. R., Kelley, J. and Kolosi, T. (1992) ‘Images of Class: Public Perceptions in Hungary and Australia’, American Sociological Review57 (4): 461-482.
17.
Ferner, A. and Hyman, R. (1992) Industrial Relations in the New Europe. Oxford: Blackwell.
18.
Forma, P. (1997) ‘The Rational Legitimacy of the Welfare State. Popular Support for Ten Income Transfer Schemes in Finland’, Policy and Politics25 (3): 235-249.
19.
Forma, P. (1998) ‘Sukupolvien välinen ristiriita Suomessa hyvinvointivaltiomielipiteiden valossa’, Nuorisotutkimus16 (2): 18-31.
20.
Ginsberg, B. (1986) The Captive Public. New York: Basic Books.
21.
Glazer, N. (1988) The Limits of Social Policy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
22.
Goodin, R. and LeGrand, J. (1987) ‘Not Only the Poor’, in R. Goodin and J. LeGrand (eds) Not Only the Poor, pp. 203-337. London: Allen & Unwin.
23.
Gould, A. (1981) ‘The Salaried Middle Class and the Corporatist Welfare State’, Policy and Politics9 (4): 401-418.
24.
Hasenfeld, Y. and Rafferty, J. (1989) ‘The Determinants of Public Attitudes toward the Welfare State’, Social Forces67 (4): 1027-1048.
25.
Heath, A., Jowell, R., Curtice, J. and Evans, G. (1990) ‘The Rise of the New Political Agenda?’, European Sociological Review6 (1): 31-48.
26.
Hirschman, A. O. (1974) Exit, Voice and Loyalty. Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
27.
Hirschman, A. O. (1982) Shifting Involvements. Private Interest and Public Action.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
28.
Hobson, B. (1990) ‘No Exit, No Voice: Women's Economic Dependency and the Welfare State’, Acta Sociologica33 (3): 235-250.
29.
Hoel, M. and Knutsen, O. (1989) ‘Social Class, Gender, and Sector Employment as Political Cleavages in Scandinavia’, Acta Sociologica32 (1): 181-201.
30.
Hoff, J. and Goul Andersen, J. (1989) ‘The Danish Class Structure’, Acta Sociologica32 (1): 23-52.
31.
Inglehart, R. (1990) Culture Shift in Advanced Industrial Society.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
32.
Jokivuori, P., Kevätsalo, K. and Ilmonen, K. (1996) Ay-jäsenen monet kasvot. University of Jyväskylä. Publications in Sociology 60.
33.
Jöreskog, K. and Sörbom, D. (1996) PRELIS 2: User's Reference Guide.Chicago, IL: Scientific Software.
34.
Judge, K. and Solomon, M. (1993) ‘Public Opinion and the National Health Service: Patterns and Perspectives in Consumer Satisfaction’, Journal of Social Policy22 (3): 299-327.
35.
Kalton, G. (1990) Introduction to Survey Sampling.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
36.
Kangas, O. (1996) ‘Attitudes on Means-tested Social Benefits in Finland’, Acta Sociologica38 (4): 299-310.
37.
Kangas, O. and Sikiö, J. (1996) ‘Kunnon kansalaisia vai laiskoja lurjuksia?’, in O. Kangas and V-M. Ritakallio (eds) Kuka on köyhä?, pp. 107-136. Helsinki: Stakes.
38.
King, D. (1987) ‘The State and the Social Structures of Welfare in Advanced Industrial Democracies’, Theory and Society16 (6): 841-868.
39.
Knutsen, O. (1986) ‘Sosiale klasser og politiske verdier in Norge’, Tidsskrift for samfunnsforskning27 (3): 263-287.
40.
Korpi, W. (1983) The Democratic Class Struggle. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
41.
Kortteinen, M. (1995) ‘When the Bottom Falls out of Life’, paper presented at the seminar ‘Social Research on Unemployment’ (May), Stockholm.
42.
Lipset, S. M. (1981) Political Man. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
43.
Ljungberg, C. J. (1996) Socialstatens ungdomar. Stockholm: City University Press.
44.
Marklund, S. (1988) Paradise Lost?Lund: Arkiv.
45.
Marshall, G., Rose, D., Newby, H. and Vogler, C. (1988) Social Class in Modern Britain.London: Unwin Hyman.
46.
Murray, C. (1984) Losing Ground. New York: Basic Books.
47.
Nachmias, C. and Nachmias, D. (1989) Research Methods in the Social Sciences.London: St Martin's Press.
48.
Nordlund, A. and Coughlin, R. (1996) ‘Who Hates the Welfare State?’, paper presented at the Eighth International Conference on Socio-economics (July), Geneva.
49.
Offe, C. (1987) ‘Democracy against the Welfare State? Structural Foundations of Neo-conservative Political Opportunities’, Political Theory15 (4): 501-537.
50.
Pakulski, J. (1993) ‘The Dying of Class or of Marxist Class Theory?’, International Sociology8 (3): 279-292.
51.
Papadakis, E. (1993) ‘Class Interests, Class Politics and Welfare State Regime’, British Journal of Sociology44 (2): 249-270.
52.
Papadakis, E. and Bean, C. (1993) ‘Popular Support for the Welfare State: a Comparison between Institutional Regimes’, Journal of Public Policy13 (3): 227-254.
53.
Roos, J-P. (1992) ‘Keskiluokka ja hyvinvointivaltio: Uusi hyvinvointisopimus’, in O. Riihinen (ed.) Sosiaalipolitiikka 2017, pp. 321-338. Porvoo-Helsinki-Juva: WSOY.
54.
Sainsbury, D. (1996) Gender, Equality and Welfare States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
55.
Stephens, J. (1979) The Transition from Capitalism to Socialism. London: Macmillan.
56.
Svallfors, S. (1995) ‘The End of Class Politics? Structural Cleavages and Attitudes to Swedish Welfare Policies’, Acta Sociologica38 (1): 53-74.
57.
Svallfors, S. (1996) Välfärdstatens moraliska ekonomi. Välfärdsopinionen i 90-talets Sverige.Umeå: Boréa.
58.
Taylor-Gooby, P. (1985) Public Opinion, Ideology and State Welfare.London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
59.
Taylor-Gooby, P. (1991a) Social Change, Social Welfare and Social Science.Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
60.
Taylor-Gooby, P. (1991b) ‘Attachment to the Welfare State’, in R. Jowell, L. Brook and B. Taylor (eds) British Social Attitudes. The 8th Report, pp. 23-42. Aldershot: Gower.
61.
Therborn, G. and Roe, J. (1986) ‘The Irreversible Welfare State: Its Recent Maturation, Its Encounter with the Economic Crisis and Its Future Prospects’, International Journal of Health Services16 (3): 319-338.
62.
Titmuss, R. (1974) Social Policy: an Introduction.London: Allen & Unwin.
63.
Walker, A. (1984) ‘The Political Economy of Privatization’, in J. LeGrand and R. Robinson (eds) Privatization and the Welfare State, pp. 19-44. London: Allen & Unwin.
64.
Weakliem, D. (1991) ‘The Two Lefts? Occupational and Party Choice in France, Italy, and the Netherlands’, American Journal of Sociology96 (2): 1327-1361.
65.
Wilensky, H. (1975) The Welfare State and Equality. Berkeley: University of California Press.
66.
Zetterberg, H. (1997) Sociological Endeavor. Stockholm: City University Press.
