Using panel data on 1739 listed manufacturing firms in 108 prefecture-level cities along the Yangtze River Economic Belt from 2010 to 2023, this study examines how artificial intelligence influences firm green transformation. Two-way fixed effects and difference-in-differences models are employed, and AI is measured through a three-dimensional framework of technologicalisation, integration, and assetisation. The results show that AI significantly promotes green transformation, and all three dimensions exert positive effects. Mechanism tests indicate that the effect operates through industrial upgrading, improved financing efficiency, and enhanced innovation capacity. Regional heterogeneity is pronounced, with the strongest impact observed in upstream areas. The findings imply that policies should strengthen AI-enabled green applications and improve the policy support system of the National Digital Economy Innovation Development Pilot Zones, with greater emphasis on application scenarios and digital infrastructure in upstream regions and on diffusion and adaptation in midstream and downstream regions.
QuCShaoJChengZ. Can embedding in global value chain drive green growth in China’s manufacturing industry?J Cleaner Prod2020; 268: 121962.
2.
Realyvásquez-VargasAArredondo-SotoKCBlanco-FernandezJ, et al.Work standardization and anthropometric workstation design as an integrated approach to sustainable workplaces in the manufacturing industry. Sustainability2020; 12: 3728.
3.
ShenL. Research on economical mechanism and influencing factors of linkage development between manufacturing and logistics industry. Xi’an, China: Chang’an University, 2015.
4.
MargheritaEGBracciniAM. Industry 4.0 technologies in flexible manufacturing for sustainable organizational value: reflections from a multiple case study of Italian manufacturers. Inf Syst Front2023; 25: 995–1016.
5.
SongJZChenCWangXP, et al.Research on construction industry carbon emission efficiency based on three-stage super efficient DEA model. Environ Sci Technol2019; 42: 193–200.
6.
ShahidRShijieLYifanN, et al.Pathway to green growth: a panel-ARDL model of environmental upgrading, environmental regulations, and GVC participation for the Chinese manufacturing industry. Front Environ Sci2022; 10: 972412.
7.
CaiXLinPWangR. Intelligent manufacturing and corporate green transformation. Int Rev Financ Anal2025; 97: 103796.
8.
ZhangZLiPHuangL, et al.The impact of artificial intelligence on green transformation of manufacturing enterprises: evidence from China. Econ Change Restruct2024; 57: 46.
9.
ZhouCZhangHYingJ, et al.Artificial intelligence and green transformation of manufacturing enterprises. Int Rev Financ Anal2025; 104: 104330. doi:10.1016/j.irfa.2025.104330
10.
SuTYZhangLLZhaoX. The impact of the coupling of manufacturing industry and logistics industry on the productivity of manufacturing enterprises: a perspective of industry symbiosis. Ind Eng Manag2020; 25: 42–49.
11.
XiaFXuJ. Green total factor productivity: a re-examination of quality of growth for provinces in China. China Econ Rev2020; 62: 101454.
12.
WangJLiuYWangW, et al.Does artificial intelligence improve enterprise carbon emission performance? Evidence from an intelligent transformation policy in China. Technol Soc2024; 79: 102751.
13.
ChenLTangS. The value of data: data assetization and enterprises’ business credit. Finance Res Lett2025; 86: 108610.
14.
ShestakofskyB. The labor of assetization: producing ‘hypergrowth’ inside a tech startup. Socioecon Rev2025; 23: 445–468.
15.
XuYYangCGeW, et al.Can industrial intelligence promote green transformation? New insights from heavily polluting listed enterprises in China. J Cleaner Prod2023; 421: 138550.
16.
LuYGaoYZhangY, et al.Can the green finance policy force the green transformation of high-polluting enterprises? A quasi-natural experiment based on “Green Credit Guidelines”. Energy Econ2022; 114: 106265.
17.
ZhangJXieTKongX, et al.Can data assets promote green innovation in enterprises?Finance Res Lett2025; 72: 106554.
18.
CaiXWangWRaoA, et al.Regional sustainable development and spatial effects from the perspective of renewable energy. Front Environ Sci2022; 10: 859523.
19.
MohsinSMMaqsoodTMadaniSA. Towards energy efficient cloud: a green and intelligent migration of traditional energy sources. Energies2024; 17: 2787.
20.
LiuSHeWChenX, et al.Innovation ecosystem and innovation cooperation networks: the embeddedness of global innovation chain of Guangdong's manufacturing sectors towards industry 4.0. In: 2020 IEEE International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Computer Applications (ICAICA), IEEE, 2020, pp.1161–1165.
21.
LuoZChenYTangZ, et al.Environmental governance’s effect on green total factor productivity in the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China. Environ Dev Sustainability2025(7): 17557–17583.
22.
NguyenCPLeeGS. Uncertainty, financial development, and FDI inflows: global evidence. Econ Model2021; 99: 105473.
23.
PanZTangDKongH, et al.An analysis of agricultural production efficiency of Yangtze Economic Belt based on a three-stage DEA Malmquist model. Int J Environ Res Public Health2022; 19: 58.
24.
PengSYuY. Green development efficiency measurement and influencing factors analysis in the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China. Ecol Indic2024; 162: 112025.
25.
RafiZGreenlandS. Semantic and cognitive tools to aid statistical science: replace confidence and significance by compatibility and surprise. BMC Med Res Methodol2020; 20: 1–13.
26.
RenSGZhangRBYuanBL. Industrial eco-efficiency evaluation and regional differences of Yangtze River Economic Belt. Acta Ecologica Sinica2018; 38: 1–13.
27.
RightsJDSonyaKS. Quantifying explained variance in multilevel models: an integrative framework for defining R-squared measures. Psychol Methods2019; 24: 09.
28.
RuttingerAW. Development of energy systems towards a low carbon future: From atoms to policies. Ithaca, USA: Cornell University, 2021.
29.
SinghalKFengQGaneshanR, et al.Introduction to the special issue on perspectives on big data. Prod Oper Manage2018; 27: 1639–1641.
30.
SovacoolBKNewellPCarleyS, et al.Equity, technological innovation and sustainable behaviour in a low-carbon future. Nat Hum Behav2022; 6: 326–337.
31.
TaoL. Research on the linkage development between manufacturing industry and logistics industry in Shaanxi Province from the perspective of sub-industry segmentation. Xi’an, China: Chang’an University, 2019.
32.
VacchiMSiligardiCCedillo-GonzálezEI, et al.Industry 4.0 and smart data as enablers of the circular economy in manufacturing: product re-engineering with circular eco-design. Sustainability2021; 13: 10366.
33.
GniniguèMWonyraKOTchagnaoAF, et al.Participation of developing countries in global value chains: what role for information and communication technologies?Telecomm Policy2023; 47: 102508.
34.
GongYYangXQRanCY, et al.Evaluation of the sustainable coupling coordination of the logistics industry and the manufacturing industry in the Yangtze River economic belt. Sustainability2021; 13: 5167.
35.
HaLT. Impacts of digital business on global value chain participation in European countries. AI Soc2024; 39: 1039–1064.
36.
HaoN. Artificial intelligence applications in traditional steel manufacturers. Bachelor’s thesis, LAB University of Applied Sciences. Theseus, 2024. https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:amk-2024120533461.
37.
HeQGongY. The impact of the quality of digital economy development on manufacturing in the Yangtze River Delta City Cluster. J Econ Finance Accounting Stud2022; 4: 52–63.
38.
HuangDXieHMengX, et al.Digital transformation and enterprise value: empirical evidence based on text analysis methods. Economist2021; 33: 41–51.
39.
SunQZhouJ. Impact of informatization on manufacturing upgrading: an analysis from the perspective of technological innovation. Sci Decis Making2021; 5: 44–64.
40.
LiuZChenCYeM. Promoting high-quality development of the Yangtze River economic belt through regional coordinated integration. Contemp Finance Economics2024; 2: 3–10.
41.
ZhangLChenT. Dual leap of “power” and “intensity”: the logic and path of new quality productivity empowering high-quality development of agricultural socialized services. Social Sci J2025; 2: 159–169.
42.
FengSZhangRLiG. Environmental decentralization, digital finance and green technology innovation. Struct Change Econ Dyn2022; 61: 70–83.
43.
ChongCTVan FanYLeeCT, et al.Post COVID-19 energy sustainability and carbon emissions neutrality. Energy2022; 241: 122801.
44.
ChenJPengGHanW, et al.Research on the impact of artificial intelligence on financing efficiency of the real economy: theoretical mechanism and empirical test. J Cent South Univ (Social Sci Ed)2024; 30: 104–118.
45.
DuKChengYYaoX. Environmental regulation, green technology innovation, and industrial structure upgrading: the road to the green transformation of Chinese cities. Energy Econ2021; 98: 105247.
46.
WuTZhaoJ. Impact of government subsidy policies on enterprise green transformation under the “dual carbon” goals: an empirical study based on comprehensive evaluation index system. South Finance2023; 3: 48–65.
47.
LiuCGongZTeoKL, et al.Robust multi-objective optimal switching control arising in 1,3-propanediol microbial fed-batch process. Nonlinear Anal: Hybrid Syst2017; 25: 1–20.
48.
SongYNiuNSongX, et al.Decoding the influence of servitization on green transformation in manufacturing firms: the moderating effect of artificial intelligence. Energy Econ2024; 139: 107875.
49.
LiTLuC. Local social environment and the speed of leverage adjustment. Accounting and Finance2023; 63: 1919–1952.
50.
LiGYuHLuM. Low-carbon collaboration in the supply chain under digital transformation: an evolutionary game-theoretic analysis. Processes2022; 10: 1958.
51.
WeiZZengALiB. Financial ecological environment and enterprise financing constraints: empirical study based on Chinese listed companies. Accounting Res2014; 5: 73–95.
52.
YangGXiangXDengF, et al.Towards high-quality development: how does digital economy impact low-carbon inclusive development? Mechanism and path. Environ Sci Pollut Res2023; 30: 41700–41725.
53.
HuangQYuYZhangS. Internet development and the improvement of manufacturing productivity: internal mechanisms and China’s experience. China Ind Econ2019; 8: 5–23.
54.
HuHLiuHZhouF. The “chain-stabilizing” effect of artificial intelligence: empirical evidence from supply chain volatility. J Quant Technol Econ2025; 42: 90–111.
55.
AlekseevaLAzarJGinéM, et al.The demand for AI skills in the labor market. Labour Econ2021; 71: 102002.
56.
TrabelsiMA. The impact of artificial intelligence on economic development. Journal of Electronic Business and Digital Economics2024; 3: 142–155.
57.
RashidABalochNRasheedR, et al.Big data analytics–artificial intelligence and sustainable performance through green supply chain practices in manufacturing firms of a developing country. J Sci Technol Policy Manage2025; 16: 42–67.
58.
LinJZengYWuS, et al.How does artificial intelligence affect the environmental performance of organizations? The role of green innovation and green culture. Inf Manage2024; 61: 103924.
59.
SalmanMWangGQinL, et al.G20 roadmap for carbon neutrality: the role of Paris agreement, artificial intelligence, and energy transition in changing geopolitical landscape. J Environ Manag2024; 367: 122080.
60.
PengQHeWKongY, et al.Spatio-temporal analysis of water sustainability of cities in the Yangtze river economic belt based on the perspectives of quantity-quality-benefit. Ecol Indic2024; 160: 111909.
61.
YuanLZhouZHeW, et al.A fuzzy logic approach within the DPSIR framework to address the inherent uncertainty and complexity of water security assessments. Ecol Indic2025; 170: 112984.
