The rapid expansion of global value chain (GVC)-driven labor division has fueled sustained economic growth in developing countries, but it has also placed considerable strain on their resources and environments. Traditional GVC accounting methods have not accounted for environmental costs. Using China as an example, drawing on panel data from Chinese industries between 2000 and 2020, this study analyzes the effect of industrial intelligence on China’s participation in the GVC from three key perspectives: comprehensive benefits, economic gains, and environmental costs. The study finds that the advancement of industrial intelligence enhances China's participation in the GVC, resulting in improved comprehensive and economic benefits. Moreover, improving production efficiency and promoting technological progress are key mechanisms by which industrial intelligence enhances comprehensive benefits. An analysis of environmental costs reveals that the development of industrial intelligence also helps reduce these costs. This paper argues that China should further refine its socialist market economy system and strategically adjust key industries while effectively integrating into the GVC. Harmonizing the relationships between trade, economic development, and resource and environmental management is crucial.
ChenHXWangSHSongML. Global environmental value chain embeddedness and enterprise production efficiency improvement. Struct Change Econ Dyn2021; 58: 278–290.
2.
ChuZLiuGYangJ. Rethinking the semi-periphery: China’s impact on global value chains and environment. Environ Impact Assess Rev2025; 115: 108033.
3.
LinJPanDDavisSJ, et al.China’s international trade and air pollution in the United States. PNAS2014; 111: 1736–1741.
4.
MengJMiZFGuanDB, et al.The rise of south-south trade and its effect on global CO2 emissions. Nat Commun2018; 9: 1871.
5.
YeCSYeQShiXP, et al.Technology gap, global value chain and carbon intensity: Evidence from global manufacturing industries. Energy Pol2020; 137: 1–10.
6.
WangSHLiZZSongML. How embodied carbon in trade affects labor income in developing countries. Sci Total Environ2019; 672: 71–80.
7.
SongYDuCZhangX, et al.Global value chain upgrading effects of the renewable energy product trade network: a dual perspective of dynamic evolution and non-linear effects. Renew Energy2025; 249: 123178.
8.
WangZWeiSJYuXD, et al.Measures of participation in global value chains and global business cycles. NBER Working Paper2017: 23222.
9.
PorterM. The competitive advantage of nations. London: Macmillan Press, 1990.
10.
GereffiGKorzeniewiczM. Commodity chains and global capitalism. Westport, CT: Praeger, 1994.
11.
GereffiG. Global commodity chains: new forms of coordination and control among nations and firms in international industries. Compet Change1996; 1: 427–439.
12.
GereffiG. Beyond the producer-driven/buyer-driven dichotomy: the evolution of global value chains in the internet era. IDS Bull2001; 32: 30–40.
13.
BorrusMErnstDHaggardS. International production networks in Asia: Rivalry or riches?J Southeast Asian Econ2000; 19: 223–224.
14.
ErnstD. Global production networks and the changing geography of innovation systems-implications for developing countries. Econ Innovat New Technol2002; 11: 497–523.
15.
CousinsPDHandfieldRBLawsonB, et al.Creating supply chain relational capital: the impact of formal and informal socialization processes. J Oper Manage2006; 24: 851–863.
16.
CoeNMHessMYeungHWC, et al.Globalizing regional development: a global production networks perspective. Trans Inst Br Geograp2004; 29: 468–484.
17.
CopelandBRTaylorMS. Trade, growth and the environment. Economic Literature2004; 42: 7–71.
18.
LiXYZhouY. Offshoring pollution while offshoring production?Strateg Manag J2017; 38: 2310–2329.
19.
WangSHHeYQSongML. Global value chains, technological progress, and environmental pollution: Inequality towards developing countries. J Environ Manag2021; 277: 110999.
20.
PonteSSturgeonT. Explaining governance in global value chains: A modular theory-building effort. Rev Int Polit Econ2014; 21: 195–223.
21.
SongMLCuiXWangSH. Simulation of land green supply chain based on system dynamics and policy optimization. Int J Prod Econ2019; 217: 317–327.
22.
QuCYShaoJChengZH. Can embedding in global value chain drive green growth in China's manufacturing industry?J Cleaner Prod2020; 268: 121962.
23.
HuDXJiaoJLTangYS, et al.The effect of global value chain position on green technology innovation efficiency: From the perspective of environmental regulation. Ecol Indic2021; 121: 107195.
24.
LiuLYangKFujiiH, et al.Artificial intelligence and energy intensity in China’s industrial sector: effect and transmission channel. Econ Anal Policy2021; 70: 276–293.
25.
XiaLHanQJYuS. Industrial intelligence and industrial structure change: effect and mechanism. Int Rev Econ Fin2024; 93: 1494–1506.
26.
SatorninoCBDuSLGrewalD. Using artificial intelligence to advance sustainable development in industrial markets: a complex adaptive systems perspective. Ind Mark Manag2024; 116: 145–157.
27.
PodreccaMOrzesGSartorM, et al.Manufacturing internationalization: from distance to proximity? A longitudinal analysis of offshoring choices. J Manuf Technol Manag2021; 32: 346–368.
De BackerKDeStefanoTMenonC, et al.Industrial robotics and the global organisation of production. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Paper, 2018.
30.
HoLK. Effects of the fourth industrial revolution and criminal policy tasks. Law Rev2019; 19: 455–476.
31.
XieMDingLXiaY, et al.Does artificial intelligence affect the pattern of skill demand? Evidence from Chinese manufacturing firms. Econ Model2021; 97: 207–216.
32.
FreyCBOsborneMA. The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation?Technol Forecast Soc Change2017; 114: 254–280.
33.
AcemogluDRestrepoP. Unpacking skill bias: automation and new tasks. NBER Working Papers2020; 110: 356–361.
34.
BeierGMatthessMShuttleworthL, et al.Implications of industry 4.0 on industrial employment: a comparative survey from Brazilian, Chinese, and German practitioners. Technol Soc2022; 70: 102028.
35.
JavaidMHaleemASinghRP, et al.Substantial capabilities of robotics in enhancing industry 4.0 implementation. Cogn Robotics2021; 1: 58–75.
36.
KochMTManuylovISmolkaM. Robots and firms. Econ J2019; 131: 2553–2584.
37.
ZhangM. Practical analysis of mechanical automation technology in automobile manufacturing. J Electr Res Appl2023; 7: 26–31.
38.
VonderembseMARaghunathanTSSubba RaoS. A post-industrial paradigm: To integrate and automate manufacturing. Int J Prod Res1997; 35: 2579–2600.
39.
WangXSunXOprean-StanC, et al.What role does global value chain participation play in emissions embodied in trade? New evidence from value-added trade. Econ Anal Policy2023; 80: 1205–1223.
40.
QinXXuWChenH, et al.Automation, firm employment and skill upgrading: firm-level evidence from China. Ind Innov2022; 29: 1075–1107.
41.
JavaidMHaleemASinghRP, et al.Understanding the adoption of industry 4.0 technologies in improving environmental sustainability. Sustain Operat Comput2022; 3: 203–217.
42.
KoopmanRWangZWeiSJ. Tracing value-added and double counting in gross exports. Am Econ Res2014; 104: 459–494.
43.
AcemogluDRestrepoP. Artificial intelligence, automation and work. NBER Working Paper2025: w24196.
44.
FukuyamaHWeberWL. A directional slacks-based measures of technical inefficiency. Socio-Economic Planning Science2009; 43: 274–287.
45.
OhDH. A global Malmquist-Luenberger productivity Index. J Product Anal2010; 34: 183–197.
