Although environmental regulations are effective forces to conduct green innovation, the existing research has not yet reached a consensus on the relationship between environmental regulations and enterprise green innovation. The objective of this study is to explore the influence mechanism of environmental regulations (i.e., market-based and command-based) on enterprise green innovation from the perspective of social information processing theory and regulatory focus theory. A time-lagged survey based on a Chinese sample of 184 firms supports the hypothesized moderated mediation model. The results show that (a) environmental regulations positively impact enterprise green innovation; (b) top management team (TMT) harmonious environmental passion climate fully mediates the relationship between market-based environmental regulation and enterprise green innovation, while TMT environmental performance anxiety climate partially mediates the relationship between command-based environmental regulation and enterprise green innovation; (3) chief executive officer (CEO) promotion regulatory focus moderates the positive impact of TMT harmonious environmental passion climate on enterprise green innovation, and CEO prevention regulatory focus moderates the positive impact of TMT environmental performance anxiety climate on enterprise green innovation. These findings extend the green innovation literature on how and when environmental regulations affect enterprise green innovation.
JiangWBChaiHQShaoJ, et al.Green entrepreneurial orientation for enhancing firm performance: A dynamic capability perspective. J Clean Prod2018; 198: 1311–1323.
2.
SongYTFengTWJiangWB. The influence of green external integration on firm performance: Does firm size matter?Sustainability2017; 9: 1328.
3.
ZhangJMLiangGQFengTW, et al.Green innovation to respond to environmental regulation: How external knowledge adoption and green absorptive capacity matter?Bus Strategy Environ2020; 29: 39–53.
4.
ZhaoYHFengTWShiHB. External involvement and green product innovation: The moderating role of environmental uncertainty. Bus Strategy Environ2018; 27: 1167–1180.
5.
KarpDRGauldingCL. Motivational underpinnings of command-and-control, market-based, and voluntarist environmental policies. Hum Relat1995; 48: 439–465.
6.
ZhaoXLZhaoYZengSX, et al.Corporate behavior and competitiveness: Impact of environmental regulation on Chinese firms. J Clean Prod2015; 86: 311–322.
7.
WangLPLongYLiC. Research on the impact mechanism of heterogeneous environmental regulation on enterprise green technology innovation. J Environ Manage2022; 322: 116127.
8.
KongTFengTWYeCM. Article advanced manufacturing technologies and green innovation: The role of internal environmental collaboration. Sustainability2016; 8: 1056.
9.
ChenYS. The driver of green innovation and green image-green core competence. J Bus Ethics2008; 81: 531–543.
10.
HanSZPanYMygrantM, et al.Differentiated environmental regulations and corporate environmental responsibility: The moderating role of institutional environment. J Clean Prod2021; 313: 127870.
11.
HongMLiZHDrakefordB. Do the green credit guidelines affect corporate green technology innovation? Empirical research from China. Int J Environ Res Publ Health2021; 18: 1682.
12.
PorterMELindeCVD. Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. J Econ Perspect1995; 9: 97–118.
13.
LiDYZhengMCaoCC, et al.The impact of legitimacy pressure and corporate profitability on green innovation: Evidence from China top 100. J Clean Prod2017; 141: 41–49.
14.
GerstlbergerWKnudsenMPStampeI. Sustainable development strategies for product innovation and energy efficiency. Bus Strategy Environ2014; 23: 131–144.
15.
PengHShenNYingHQ, et al.Can environmental regulation directly promote green innovation behavior?—Based on situation of industrial agglomeration. J Clean Prod2021; 314: 128044.
16.
BhatiaMSJakharSK. The effect of environmental regulations, top management commitment, and organizational learning on green product innovation: Evidence from automobile industry. Bus Strategy Environ2021; 30: 3907–3918.
17.
SongWH, WangGZMaXF. Environmental innovation practices and green product innovation performance: A perspective from organizational climate. Sustainable Development2020; 28: 224–234.
18.
PattersonMWarrPWestM. Organizational climate and company productivity: The role of employee affect and employee level. J Occup Organ Psychol2004; 77: 193–216.
19.
SalancikGRPfefferJ. A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design. Adm Sci Q1978; 23: 224–253.
20.
LiaoZJ. Environmental policy instruments, environmental innovation and the reputation of enterprises. J Clean Prod2018; 171: 1111–1117.
21.
YiSKnudsenTBeckerMC. Inertia in routines: A hidden source of organizational variation. Organ Sci2016; 27: 782–800.
22.
HerrmannPNadkarniS. Managing strategic change: The duality of CEO personality. Strateg Manag J2014; 35: 1318–1342.
23.
KaplanS. Research in cognition and strategy: Reflections on two decades of progress and a look to the future. J Manag Stud2011; 48: 665–695.
24.
HigginsET. Value from regulatory fit. Curr Dir Psychol Sci2005; 14: 209–213.
25.
XuXYHouPLiuY. The impact of heterogeneous environmental regulations on the technology innovation of urban green energy: A study based on the panel threshold model. Green Financ2022; 4: 115–136.
26.
GrayWB. The cost of regulation: OSHA, EPA and the productivity slowdown. Am Econ Rev1987; 77: 998–1006.
27.
LangpapCShimshackJP. Private citizen suits and public enforcement: Substitutes or complements?J Environ Econ Manage2010; 59: 235–249.
28.
LinHZengSXMaHY, et al.Can political capital drive corporate green innovation? Lessons from China. J Clean Prod2014; 64: 63–72.
29.
YangLZhangJHZhangYF. Environmental regulations and corporate green innovation in China: The role of city leaders’ promotion pressure. Int J Environ Res Public Health2021; 18: 7774.
30.
ZhouPSongFMHuangXQ. Environmental regulations and firms’ green innovations: Transforming pressure into incentives. Int Rev Financial Anal2023; 86: 102504.
31.
BerronePFosfuriAGelabertL, et al.Necessity as the mother of ‘green’ inventions: Institutional pressures and environmental innovations. Strateg Manag J2013; 34: 891–909.
32.
ZhangWLiGX. Environmental decentralization, environmental protection investment, and green technology innovation. Environ Sci Pollut Res2022; 29: 12740–12755.
33.
XuXMJingRLLuFF. Environmental regulation, corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosure and enterprise green innovation: Evidence from listed companies in China. Int J Environ Res Public Health2022; 19: 14771.
34.
OuyangXLLiQDuKR. How does environmental regulation promote technological innovations in the industrial sector? Evidence from Chinese provincial panel data. Energy Policy2020; 139: 111310.
35.
ParkS. State renewable energy governance: Policy instruments, markets, or citizens. Rev Policy Res2015; 32: 273–296.
36.
VallerandRJVerner-FilionJ. Making people’s life most worth living: On the importance of passion for positive psychology. Temát Psicol2013; 31: 35–48.
37.
Seguin-LevesqueCLaliberteaMLNPelletierLG, et al.Harmonious and obsessive passion for the internet: Their associations with the couple’s relationship. J Appl Psychol2003; 33: 197–221.
38.
RobertsonJLBarlingJ. Greening organizations through leaders’ influence on employees’ pro-environmental behaviors. J Organ Behav2013; 34: 176–194.
39.
OzcelikHLangtonNAldrichH. Doing well and doing good: The relationship between leadership practices that facilitate a positive emotional climate and organizational performance. J Manag Psychol2008; 23: 186–203.
40.
LiuXYSunJMHaertelCEJ. Developing measure of team emotional climate in China. Int J Psychol2008; 43: 285.
41.
HatfieldECacioppoJTRapsonRL. Emotional contagion. Curr Dir Psychol Sci1993; 2: 96–100.
42.
BaumJRLockeEA. The relationship of entrepreneurial traits, skill, and motivation to subsequent venture growth. J Appl Psychol2004; 89: 587–598.
43.
MayerJDGaschkeYNBravermanDL, et al.Mood-congruent judgment is a general effect. J Pers Soc Psychol1992; 63: 119–132.
44.
MuschallaBLindenM. Specific job anxiety in comparison to general psychosomatic symptoms at admission, discharge and six months after psychosomatic inpatient treatment. Psychopathology2012; 45: 167–173.
45.
ZeidnerMMatthewsG. Evaluation anxiety: Current theory and research. In: ElliotAJDweckCS (eds) Handbook of competence and motivation. New York, NY, USA: Guilford Publications, 2005, pp. 141–163.
46.
FerrisDLJohnsonRERosenCC, et al.When is success not satisfying? Integrating regulatory focus and approach/avoidance motivation theories to explain the relation between core self-evaluation and job satisfaction. J Appl Psychol2013; 98: 342–353.
47.
SpielbergerCD. Anxiety: Current trends in theory and research. Oxford, England: Academic Press, 1972.
48.
McCraeRRCostaPT. Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. J Pers Soc Psychol1987; 52: 81–90.
49.
LiuQZhuYYangW, et al.Research on the impact of environmental regulation on green technology innovation from the perspective of regional differences: A quasi-natural experiment based on China’s new environmental protection law. Sustainability2022; 14: 1714.
50.
DoranJRyanG. The importance of the diverse drivers and types of environmental innovation for firm performance. Bus Strategy Environ2016; 25: 102–119.
51.
SarkisJGonzalez-TorrePAdenso-DiazB. Stakeholder pressure and the adoption of environmental practices: The mediating effect of training. J Oper Manag2010; 28: 163–176.
52.
BrocknerJHigginsET. Regulatory focus theory: Implications for the study of emotions at work. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process2001; 86: 35–66.
53.
FriedmanRSForsterJ. The effects of promotion and prevention cues on creativity. J Pers Soc Psychol2001; 81: 1001–1013.
54.
TumasjanABraunR. In the eye of the beholder: How regulatory focus and self-efficacy interact in influencing opportunity recognition. J Bus Ventur2012; 27: 622–636.
55.
CarverCS and WhiteTL. Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: The BIS/BAS scales. J Pers Soc Psychol1994; 67: 319–333.
56.
LanajKChangCHJohnsonRE. Regulatory focus and work-related outcomes: A review and meta-analysis. Psychol Bull2012; 138: 998–1034.
57.
HigginsETSpiegelS. Promotion and prevention strategies for self-regulation: A motivated cognition perspective. In: BaumeisterRFVohsKD (eds) Handbook of self-regulation: Research, theory, and applications. New York, NY, USA: The Guilford Press, 2004, pp. 171–187.
58.
YangDFWangAXZhouKZ, et al.Environmental strategy, institutional force, and innovation capability: A managerial cognition perspective. J Bus Ethics2019; 159: 1147–1161.
59.
SekiguchiTLiJHosomiM. Predicting job crafting from the socially embedded perspective: The interactive effect of job autonomy, social skill, and employee status. J Appl Behav Sci2017; 53: 470–497.
60.
ChenMChenCCSheldonOJ. Relaxing moral reasoning to win: How organizational identification relates to unethical pro-organizational behavior. J Appl Psychol2016; 101: 1082–1096.
61.
PodsakoffPMBommerWHPodsakoffNP, et al.Relationships between leader reward and punishment behavior and subordinate attitudes, perceptions, and behaviors: A meta-analytic review of existing and new research. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process2006; 99: 113–142.
62.
BrislinRW. Translation and content analysis of oral and written materials. Methodology (Gott)1980; 2: 389–444.
63.
McCarthyJMTrougakosJPChengBH. Are anxious workers less productive workers? It depends on the quality of social exchange. J Appl Psychol2016; 101: 279–291.
64.
ChenYSLai SBWenCT. The influence of green innovation performance on corporate advantage in Taiwan. J Bus Ethics2006; 67: 331–339.
65.
PaillePValeauPRenwickDW. Leveraging green human resource practices to achieve environmental sustainability. J Clean Prod2020; 260: 121137.
66.
LittleTDCunninghamWAShaharG, et al.To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Struct Equ Modeling2002; 9: 151–173.
67.
NasserFWisenbakerJ. A Monte Carlo study investigating the impact of item parceling on measures of fit in confirmatory factor analysis. Educ Psychol Meas2003; 63: 729–757.
68.
BagozziRPEdwardsJR. A general approach for representing constructs in organizational research. Organ Res Methods1998; 1: 45–87.
69.
PreacherKJHayesAF. SPSS And SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput2004; 36: 717–731.
70.
AikenLSWestSG. Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: Sage Publications, Inc., 1991.
71.
TangPMYamKCKoopmanJ. Feeling proud but guilty? Unpacking the paradoxical nature of unethical pro-organizational behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process2020; 160: 68–86.
72.
CostantiniVMazzantiM. On the green and innovative side of trade competitiveness? The impact of environmental policies and innovation on EU exports. Res Policy2012; 41: 132–153.
73.
RenSGLiXLYuanBL, et al.The effects of three types of environmental regulation on eco-efficiency: A cross-region analysis in China. J Clean Prod2018; 173: 245–255.
74.
LiDYHuangMRenSG, et al.Environmental legitimacy, green innovation, and corporate carbon disclosure: Evidence from CDP China 100. J Bus Ethics2018; 150: 1089–1104.
75.
SopjaniLStierJJRitzenS, et al.Involving users and user roles in the transition to sustainable mobility systems: The case of light electric vehicle sharing in Sweden. Transport Res D Transport Environ2019; 71: 207–221.
76.
XieXMHuoJGZouHL. Green process innovation, green product innovation, and corporate financial performance: A content analysis method. J Bus Res2019; 101: 697–706.
77.
PinzoneMGuerciMLettieriE, et al.Effects of ‘green’ training on pro-environmental behaviors and job satisfaction: evidence from the Italian healthcare sector. J Clean Prod2019; 226: 221–232.
