This study describes different options regarding financing in low carbon energy sectors and air pollution, which further affect clean production and sustainable environment agenda regarding the Association of southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) states. The purpose of this study is to reduce air pollution and improve environmental production through low carbon energy financing. This study further investigates, which particular country among selected ASEAN states has most affected by air pollution and decrease their energy sources as well as clean productivity level. The findings of this study indicate that transformation toward low carbon energy increased energy efficiency encouraged by all sectors of society in the target countries. It is observed that around 20,000 people have died in South East Asia (SEA) every year due to the polluted air environment among these countries.
ASEAN. 2011 ASEAN statistical report on the millennium development goals.
Jakarta:
ASEAN Secretariat, 2012.
2.
RaymondL.Economic growth as environmental policy? Reconsidering the environmental Kuznets curve. J Pub Pol2004;
24: 327–348.
3.
EhrlichPHoldrenJ.The people problem. Saturday Rev1970;
4: 42–43.
4.
CommonerB.The environmental cost of economic growth. Popul Res Environ1972;
3: 343–363.
5.
UNCTAD (2012). UNCTAD series on issues in international investment agreements II.
New York and Geneva:
United Nations, 2012.
6.
HussenAM.Principles of environmental economics and sustainability: an integrated and ecological approach. [Air Pollution and per Capita Income, Working Paper Series]. Taylor and Francis: United Kingdom (UK), 2005, p. 84.
7.
VukinaTBeghinJCSolakogluEG, et al.
Transition to markets and the environment: effects of the change in the composition of manufacturing output. Envir Dev Econ1999;
4: 582–598.
8.
BrockWA, andTaylorMS.Economic growth and the environment: a review of theory and empirics. In: Handbook of economic growth. Taylor and Francis: United Kingdom (UK), 2005, pp. 1749–1821.
9.
DindaS.Environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: a survey. Ecol Econ2004;
49: 431–455.
10.
ApergisNPayneJE.CO2 emissions, energy usage, and output in Central America. Energy Policy2009;
37: 3282–3286.
11.
RitiJSSongDShuY, et al.
Decoupling CO2 emission and economic growth in China: is there consistency in estimation results in analyzing environmental Kuznets curve?J Clean Prod2017;
166: 1448–1461.
12.
JalilAMahmudSF.Environment Kuznets curve for CO2 emissions: a cointegration analysis for China. Energy Policy2009;
37: 5167–5172.
13.
PataUK.Renewable energy consumption, urbanization, financial development, income and CO2 emissions in Turkey: testing EKC hypothesis with structural breaks. J Clean Prod2018;
187: 770–779.
14.
OzatacNGokmenogluKKTaspinarN.Testing the EKC hypothesis by considering trade openness, urbanization, and financial development: the case of Turkey. Environ Sci Pollut Res2017;
24: 16690–16701.
15.
SekerFErtugrulHMCetinM.The impact of foreign direct investment on environmental quality: a bounds testing and causality analysis for Turkey. Renew Sust Energ Rev2015;
52: 347–356.
16.
YikunZGulASaleemS, et al.
The relationship between renewable energy sources and sustainable economic growth: evidence from SAARC countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res2021;
3: 1–10.
17.
LiuYSaleemSShabbirR, et al.
The relationship between corporate social responsibility and financial performance: a moderate role of fintech technology. Environ Sci Pollut Res2021;
4: 23–30.
18.
KhuongNVShabbirMSSialMS, et al.
Does informal economy impede economic growth? Evidence from an emerging economy. J Sustain Finance Invest2020;
2: 1–20.
19.
SaleemHKhanMBShabbirMS.The role of financial development, energy demand, and technological change in environmental sustainability agenda: evidence from selected Asian countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res2020;
27: 5266–5280.
20.
SaleemHShahzadMKhanMB, et al.
Innovation, total factor productivity and economic growth in Pakistan: a policy perspective. J Econ Struct2019;
8: 7.
21.
HaliciogluF.An econometric study of CO2 emissions, energy consumption, income and foreign trade in Turkey. Energy Policy2009;
37: 1156–1164.
22.
OzturkIAl-MulaliU.Investigating the validity of the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in Cambodia. Ecol Indic2015;
57: 324–330.
23.
JavidMSharifF.Environmental Kuznets curve and financial development in Pakistan. Renew Sust Energ Rev2016;
54: 406–414.
24.
NasirMRehmanFU.Environmental Kuznets curve for carbon emissions in Pakistan: an empirical investigation. Energy Policy2011;
39: 1857–1864.
25.
RafindadiAA.Revisiting the concept of environmental Kuznets curve in period of energy disaster and deteriorating income: empirical evidence from Japan. Energy Policy2016;
94: 274–284.
26.
SabooriBSulaimanJ.Environmental degradation, economic growth and energy consumption: evidence of the environmental Kuznets curve in Malaysia. Energy Policy2013;
60: 892–905.
27.
ShahbazMKhraiefNUddinGS, et al.
Environmental Kuznets curve in an open economy: a bounds testing and causality analysis for Tunisia. Renew Sust Energ Rev2014;
34: 325–336.
28.
HeJRichardP.Environmental Kuznets curve for CO2 in Canada. Ecol Econ2010;
69: 1083–1093.
29.
AngJB.CO2 emissions, energy consumption, and output in France. Energy Policy2007;
35: 4772–4778. 2007;
30.
IwataHOkadaKSamrethS.Empirical study on the environmental Kuznets curve for CO2 in France: the role of nuclear energy. Energy Policy2010;
38: 4057–4063.
31.
CopelandBRTaylorMS.Trade, growth, and the environment. J Econ Lit2004;
42: 7–71.
32.
GrossmanGMKruegerAB.Environmental impacts of a North American free trade agreement (No. w3914).
Wily & Sons, USA:
National Bureau of Economic Research, 1991.
33.
FodhaMZaghdoudO.Economic growth and pollutant emissions in Tunisia: an empirical analysis of the environmental Kuznets curve. Energy Policy2010;
38: 1150–1156.
34.
LeanHHSmythR.CO2 emissions, electricity consumption and output in ASEAN. Appl Energy2010;
87: 1858–1864.
35.
SadorskyP.Renewable energy consumption, CO2 emissions and oil prices in the G7 countries. Energy Econ2009;
31: 456–462.
36.
MenyahKWolde-RufaelY.Energy consumption, pollutant emissions and economic growth in South Africa. Energy Econ2010;
32: 1374–1382.
37.
ApergisNPayneJE.Renewable energy, output, CO2 emissions, and fossil fuel prices in Central America: evidence from a nonlinear panel smooth transition vector error correction model. Energy Econ2014;
42: 226–232.
38.
ApergisNPayneJE.Renewable energy, output, carbon dioxide emissions, and oil prices: evidence from South America. Energy Source Part B2015;
10: 281–287.
39.
ShabbirMSBashirMAbbasiHM, et al.
Effect of domestic and foreign private investment on economic growth of Pakistan. Transnation Corporat Rev2020;
5: 1–13.
40.
YuSSialMSShabbirMS, et al.
Does higher population matter for labour market? Evidence from rapid migration in Canada. Econ Res2020;
2: 1–18.
41.
LiQCherianJShabbirMS, et al.
Exploring the relationship between renewable energy sources and economic growth. The case of SAARC countries. Energies2021;
14: 520.
42.
MuhammadIShabbirMSSaleemS, et al.
Nexus between willingness to pay for renewable energy sources: evidence from Turkey. Environ Sci Pollut Res2021;
28: 2972–2915.
43.
DoganESekerF.The influence of real output, renewable and non-renewable energy, trade and financial development on carbon emissions in the top renewable energy countries. Renew Sust Energ Rev2016;
60: 1074–1085.
44.
ShafikNBandyopadhyayS.Economic growth and environmental quality: time-series and cross-country evidence. Vol.
904. United State of America:
World Bank Publications, 1992.
45.
ItoK.CO2 emissions, renewable and non-renewable energy consumption, and economic growth: evidence from panel data for developing countries. Int Econ2017;
151: 1–6.
UNESCAP. Economic and Social Survey of Asia and the Pacific economies: nurturing productivity for inclusive growth and sustainable development. Wily & Sons: USA, 2016, p. 96.
48.
MacLeanJCSiegelJM. Financing Mechanisms and Public/Private Risk Sharing Instruments for Financing Small Scale Renewable Energy Equipment and Projects. A Report Commissioned by the United Nations Environment Program (UNEP) and Division of Technology, Industry & Economics (DTIE), Energy Branch Renewable Energy and Finance Unit and funded by the Global Environment Facility (GEF), http://www.uneptie.org/energy/. activities/frm/pdf/SSRE.pdf (2007, accessed 5 May 2021).
49.
UNDP Policy Report. Gender and climate change from Asia and the Pacific countries, 2016.
50.
KanagawaMNakataT.Analysis of the energy access improvement and its socio-economic impacts in rural areas of developing countries. Ecol Econ2007;
62: 319–329.
51.
GhaniEKerrWO’ConnellS.Local industrial structures and female entrepreneurship in India.
Cambridge, MA:
National Bureau of Economic Research, 2012.
