Argumentation is examined in its intersection with narrative in natural, situated, oral discourse in two-party interactions. This study examines the arguments of members of a minority group who are targets of prejudice by other minority groups. In the everyday practice of arguing in and through storytelling, speakers contextualize and rationalize conflicts, including conflicts in intergroup relations. The focus is on operations that establish relations between propositions: consequence, explanation, and analogy. The formal elaborations that take place in face-to-face storytelling include the intense exploitation of negation, parallelism and reported discourse, and reinforce the argumentative position being defended. The interviewees' motivation to make their discourse reasonable and persuasive was to transform negative socially shared opinions that eventually justify unfair treatment of their group.
Antaki, Charles (1994) Explaining and Arguing. The Social Organization of Accounts. London: Sage.
2.
Antaki, Charles and Leudar, Ivan (1990) `Claim-Backing and Other Explanatory Genres in Talk', Journal of Language and Social Psychology9(4): 279-292.
3.
Arnold and Porter and Washington Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law (WLCCRUL) (1992) Immigration Law: A Civil Rights Issue. The Human Impact of Immigration and Refugee Law on the District of Columbia's Latino Population. Report prepared for presentation to the United States Commission on Civil Rights.
4.
Bauman, Richard (1986) Story, Performance, and Event. Contextual Studies of Oral Narrative. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5.
Bauman, Richard (1977) Verbal Art in Performance. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
6.
Bauman, Richard and Briggs, Charles (1990) `Poetics and Performance as Critical Perspectives on Language and Social Life', Annual Review of Anthropology19: 59-88.
7.
Billig, Michael (1988) `The Notion of “Prejudice”: Some Rhetorical and Ideological Aspects', Text8: 91-110.
8.
Billig, Michael (1991) Ideology and Opinions. London: Sage.
9.
Briggs, Charles (1993) ` “I'm not Just Talking to the Victims of Oppression Tonight - I'm Talking to Everybody”: Rhetorical Authority in an African American Poetics of Political Engagement', Journal of Narrative and Life History3(1): 33-78.
10.
Carranza, Isolda E. (1989) `Señales de la Organización Conversacional y Deixis: The Case of “Mirá” ' in Proceedings of the IV National Conference of the Argentine Linguistic Society. Bahía Blanca: Argentine Linguistic Society.
11.
Carranza, Isolda E. (1996) `Argumentation and Ideological Outlook in Storytelling', unpublished PhD thesis. Georgetown University.
12.
Carranza, Isolda E. (1998a) `Low-Narrativity Narratives and Argumentation', Narrative Inquiry8(2): 1-31.
13.
Carranza, Isolda E. (1998b) Conversación y deixis de discurso. Córdoba: Universidad Nacional de Córdoba.
14.
Culler, Johnathan (1981) The Pursuit of Signs: Semiotics, Literature, Deconstruction. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Fairclough, Norman (1989) Language and Power. London: Longman.
17.
Fairclough, Norman (1995) Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Longman.
18.
Fairclough, Norman (1992a) Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.
19.
Fairclough, Norman (1992b) `Discourse and Text: Linguistic and Intertextual Analysis within Discourse Analysis', Discourse & Society3(2): 193-217.
20.
Fisher, Walter (1987) `Technical Logic, Rhetorical Logic, and Narrative Rationality', Argumentation1(1): 3-21.
21.
Grize, Jean-Blaise (1970) `Réflexions pour une recherche sur l'argumentation', Studia philosophica29, 72.
22.
Gumperz, John (1982) Discourse Strategies. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.
23.
Hill, Jane (1995) `The Voices of Don Gabriel', in B. Mannheim and D. Tedlock (eds) The Dialogic Emergence of Culture. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
24.
Hill, Jane and Zepeda, Ofelia (1993) `Mrs. Patricio's Trouble: The Distribution of Responsibility in an Account of Personal Experience', in J. Hill and J.T. Irvine (eds) Responsibility and Evidence in Oral Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25.
Jackson, Sally and Jacobs, Scott (1982) `Conversational Argument: A Discourse Analytic Approach', in R.J. Cox and C.A. Willard (eds) Advances in Argumentation Theory and Research, pp. 205-237. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
26.
Jacobs, Scott (1987) `The Management of Disagreement in Conversation', in F. Van Eemeren, R. Grootendorst, J.A Blair and C.A. Willard (eds) Argumentation Across the Lines of Discipline, pp. 229-239, Dordrecht: Foris Publications.
27.
Kleiner, Brian (1998) `The Modern Racist Ideology and its Reproduction in “Pseudo-Argument” ', Discourse & Society9(2): 187-215.
28.
Labov, William (1972) `The Transformation of Experience in Narrative Syntax', in W. Labov Language in the Inner City. Studies in the Black English Vernacular. Pennsylvania, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
29.
Longacre, Robert (1994) `The Dynamics of Reported Dialogue in Narrative', Word45(2): 125-143.
30.
Lucy, John (1993) `Metapragmatic Presentational: Reporting Speech with Quotatives in Yucatec Maya', in J. Lucy (ed.) Reflexive Language: Reported Speech and Metapragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31.
Mathis, Terrie and Yule, George (1994) `Zero Quotatives', Discourse Processes18: 63-76.
32.
Montes Mozo, Segundo and García Vasquez, Juan José (1988) Salvadoran Migration to the United States: An Exploratory Study. Hemispheric Migration Project. Center for Immigration Policy and Refugee Assistance. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
33.
Perelman, Chaim (1982) The Realm of Rhetoric. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
34.
Perelman, Chaim and Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. (1969 [1958]) The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
35.
Shi-xu (1992) `Argumentation, Explanation, and Social Cognition', Text12(2): 263-291.
36.
Shi-xu (1997) Cultural Representations. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
37.
Schiffrin, Deborah (1985) `Everyday Argument: The Organization of Diversity in Talk', in T. van Dijk (ed.) Handbook of Discourse Analysis, Vol. 3, pp. 35-46. London: Academic Press.
38.
Tannen, Deborah (1989) Talking Voices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
39.
Van Dijk, Teun A. (1984) Prejudice in Discourse. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
40.
Van Dijk, Teun A. (1987) Communicating Racism: Ethnic Prejudice in Thought and Talk. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
41.
Van Dijk, Teun A. (1993) Elite Discourse and Racism. London: Sage.
42.
Van Dijk, Teun A. (1994) `Discourse and Social Cognition', in D. Crowley and D. Mitchell (eds) Communication Theory Today, pp. 107-126. Oxford: Polity Press.
43.
Van Dijk, Teun A. (1998) Ideology: A multidisciplinary approach. London: Sage.
44.
Van Eemeren, Frans (1990) `The Study of Argumentation as Normative Pragmatics', Text10(1-2): 37-44.
45.
Van Eemeren, Frans and Grootendorst, Rob (1984) Speech Acts in Argumentative Discussion: A Theoretical Model for the Analysis of Discussions Directed towards Solving Conflicts of Opinion. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.
46.
Van Eemeren, Frans , Grootendorst, Rob, Jackson, Sally and Jacobs, Scott (1993) Reconstructing Argumentative Discourse. Tuscaloosa: The University of Alabama Press.
47.
Vignaux, Georges (1986 [1976]) La Argumentación: Ensayo de lógica discursiva. Hachette: Buenos Aires. [originally L'Argumentation: Essai d'une logique discursive. Geneva: Libraire Droz.]
