The focus of this paper is on power and empowerment as experienced by women mediators. The approach to the topic is seated in phenomenology and feminist scholarship. The authors argue for the appropriateness of these perspectives in examining the ways in which women mediators come to understand their experiences and exercise their roles. The three phases of phenomenological research (i.e. description, reduction, interpretation) are employed in analyzing individual interviews and a focus group interview. The results are discussed in terms of their implications for women and for the dispute resolution context of mediation.
Bernard, S.E. , Folger, J.P., Weingarten, H.R. and Zumeta, Z.R. (1984) `The Neutral Mediator: Value Dilemmas in Divorce Mediation', Mediation Quarterly4: 49-60.
2.
Bloom, M. (1990) `Sex Differences in Ethical Systems: A Useful Framework for Interpreting Communication Research', Communication Quarterly38: 244-254.
3.
Blumstein, P. and Schwartz, P. (1983) American Couples: Money, Work, and Sex. New York: William Morrow.
4.
Corcoran, K.O. and Melamed, J.C. (1989) `From Coercion to Empowerment: Spousal Abuse and Mediation', Mediation Quarterly7: 303-316.
5.
Davis, A.M. and Salem, R.A. (1984) `Dealing with Power Imbalances in the Mediation of Interpersonal Disputes', Mediation Quarterly6: 17-26.
6.
Deetz, S. (1990) `Reclaiming the Subject Matter as a Guide to Mutual Understanding: Effectiveness and Ethics in Interpersonal Interaction', Communication Quarterly38: 226-243.
7.
DeStephen, D. (1987) `Mediating Power Imbalances: The Mediator's Responsibility to Protect Disputants from Unfair Solutions', paper presented at the annual convention of the Speech Communication Association (November), Boston, MA.
8.
Fine, M. , Johnson, F. and Foss, K. (1986) `Student Perceptions of Gender in Managerial Communication', paper presented at the annual convention of the Western Speech Communication Association (February), Tucson, AZ.
9.
Fisher, R. (1985) `Beyond Yes', Negotiation Journal2: 67-70.
10.
Gallagher, M. (1989) `A Feminist Paradigm for Communication Research', in B. Dervin, L. Grossberg, B.J. O'Keefe, and E. Wartella (eds) Rethinking Communication: Vol. 2. Paradigm Exemplars, pp. 75-87, Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
11.
Hale, C.L. (1987) `Mediator Use of Arguments: A Question of Ethics or Tactics?', paper presented at the annual convention of the Speech Communication Association (November), Boston, MA.
12.
Hale, C.L. , Bast, C. and Gordon, B. (1991) `Communication within a Dispute Mediation: Interactants' Perceptions of the Process', The International Journal of Conflict Management2: 139-158.
13.
Helm, B. (1989) `Mediators' Duties, Informed Consent and the Hatfields Versus the McCoys', Mediation Quarterly21: 65-76.
14.
Helm, B. and Scott, S. (1986) `Advocacy in Mediation', Mediation Quarterly13: 69-76.
15.
Ippolito, C.A. and Pruitt, D.G. (1990) `Power Balancing in Mediation: Outcomes and Implications of Mediator Intervention', The International Journal of Conflict Management1: 341-356.
16.
Langellier, K. and Hall, D. (1989) `Interviewing Women: A Phenomenological Approach to Feminist Communication', in K. Carter and C. Spitzack (eds) Doing Research on Feminist Communication, pp. 193-220. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
17.
Langellier, K. and Peterson, E. (1984) `Spinstorying: A Communication Analysis of Women Storytelling', paper presented at the annual convention of the Speech Communication Association (November), Chicago, IL.
18.
Lanigan, R. (1984) `Semiotic Phenomenology of Rhetoric: Eidetic Practice in Henry Grattan's Discourse on Tolerance', Washington, DC: Center for Advanced Research in Phenomenology and University Press of America.
19.
Lannamann, J.W. (1991) `Interpersonal Communication Research as Ideological Practice', Communication Theory1: 179-203.
20.
Leitch, M.L. (1987) `The Politics of Compromise: A Feminist Perspective on Mediation', Mediation Quarterly15: 163-176.
21.
Levine, M.I. (1986) `Power Imbalances in Dispute Resolution', in E. Palenski and H.M. Launer (eds) Mediation: Contexts and Challenges, pp. 63-76, Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
22.
Mayer, B. (1987) `The Dynamics of Power in Mediation and Negotiation', Mediation Quarterly16: 75-86.
23.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962) Phenomenology of Perception (trans. C. Smith, trans. rev. F. Williams). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
24.
Mies, M. (1983) `Toward a Methodology for Feminist Research', in G. Bowles and R. Duelli Klein (eds) Theories of Women's Studies, pp. 117-139. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
25.
Nelson, J. (1989a) `Phenomenology as Feminist Methodology: Explicating Interviews', in K. Carter and C. Spitzack (eds) Doing Research on Feminist Communication, pp. 221-241. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
26.
Nelson, J. (1989b) `Eyes Out of Head: On Televisual Experience', Critical Studies in Mass Communication6: 387-403.
27.
Oakley, A. (1981) `Interviewing Women: A Contradiction in Terms', in J. Roberts (ed.) Doing Feminist Research, pp. 30-61. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
28.
Patton, M. (1980) Qualitative Evaluation Methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
29.
Peterson, E. (1987) `Media Consumption and Girls Who Want to Have Fun', Critical Studies in Mass Communication4: 37-50.
30.
Polkinghorne, D. (1983) Methodology for the Human Sciences: Systems of Inquiry. Albany: State University of New York Press.
31.
Ricci, I. (1985) `Mediator's Notebook: Reflections on Promoting Equal Empowerment and Entitlements for Women', Journal of Divorce8: 49-61.
32.
Robinson, J. (1981) `Personal Narratives Reconsidered', Journal of American Folklore94: 59-85.
33.
Tannen, D. (1990) You Just Don't Understand: Women and Men in Conversation. New York: William Morrow.
34.
Weingarten, H.R. and Douvan, E. (1985) `Male and Female Visions of Mediation', Negotiation Journal1: 349-358.
35.
Wood, J. (1986) `Different Voices in Relationship Crises: An Extension of Gilligan's Theory', American Behavioral Scientist39: 273-301.
