The purpose of this paper is to analyze how participants in mediation hearings get ideas for resolution of the dispute on the table for negotiation and bargaining. The data used are 15 small claims mediation hearings which were videotaped, transcribed and analyzed using the conversation analytic method. While the tasks involved in producing suggestions for solution are tied to institutional role (mediators make proposals and solicit position reports from disputants; disputants produce position reports) the mediators and disputants collaboratively produce ideas for resolution, and use several techniques to control production of ideas and their placement. Mediators orient to the institutional requirements of neutrality and disputant empowerment as they engage in these tasks, but have ways of resisting these constraints. Disputants, in turn, can resist mediator's attempts to infringe upon their autonomy.
Atkinson, J.M. (1992) `Displaying Neutrality: Formal Aspects of Informal Court Proceedings', in P. Drew and J. Heritage (eds) Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings, pp. 199-211. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2.
Atkinson, J.M. and Heritage, J. (eds) (1984) Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3.
Bahr, S.J. (1981) `An Evaluation of Court Mediation', Journal of Family Issues2(1): 39-60.
4.
Barsky, A.E. (1996) `Mediation and Empowerment in Child Protection Cases', Mediation Quarterly14(2): 111-134.
5.
Bottomley, A. (1985) `What is Happening to Family Law? A Feminist Critique of Conciliation', in J. Brophy and C. Smart (eds) Women in Law, pp. 162-187. London: Routledge.
6.
Burton, L. (1986) A Training Manual for Mediators. Santa Monica, CA: Los Angeles County Bar Association.
7.
Button, G. and Casey, N. (1984) `Generating Topic: The Use of Topic Initial Elicitors', in J.M. Atkinson and J. Heritage (eds) Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, pp. 167-190. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8.
Cahn, D.D. (1992) Conflict in Intimate Relationships. New York: Guilford Press.
9.
Carnevale, P.J. and Pruitt, D.G. (1992) `Negotiation and Mediation', Annual Review of Psychology43: 531-582.
10.
Carrol, J.S. and Payne, J. (1991) `An Information Processing Approach to Two-Party Negotiations', in M.H. Bazerman, R.J. Lewicki and B.H. Sheppard (eds) Research on Negotiation in Organizations. Vol 3. Greenwich, CT: JAI.
11.
The Center for Dispute Settlement . (1988) Parent/Adolescent Mediation: A Training Manual. Washington, DC.
12.
Clayman, S. (1988) `Displaying Neutrality in Television News Interviews', Social Problems35(4): 474-492.
13.
Clayman, S. (1992) `Footing in the Achievement of Neutrality: The Case of News-Interview Discourse', in P. Drew and J. Heritage (eds) Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings, pp. 163-198. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14.
Cobb, S. and Rifkin, J. (1991) `Neutrality as a Discursive Practice: The Construction and Transformation of Narratives in Community Mediation', Law, Politics, and Society11: 69-91.
15.
Cook, J.S. and Emerson, R.M. (1978) `Power, Equity, Commitment in Exchange Networks', American Sociological Review43: 721-739.
16.
Cook, K.S. , Emerson, R.M., Gillmore, M.R. and Yamagishi, T. (1983) `The Distribution of Power in Exchange Networks: Theory and Experimental Results', in American Journal of Sociology89(2): 275-305.
17.
Dingwall, R. (1986) `Some Observations on Divorce Mediation in Britain and the United States', Mediation Quarterly5: 5-23.
18.
Donohue, W. (1989) `Communicative Competence in Mediators', in K. Kressel, D.G. Pruitt, and Associates (eds) Mediation Research: The Process and Effectiveness of Third-Party Intervention, pp. 322-343. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
19.
Felstiner, W.L.F. , and Williams, L.A. (1978) `Mediation as an Alternative to Criminal Prosecution', Law and Human Behavior2(3): 223-244.
20.
Filley, A.C. (1975) Interpersonal Conflict Resolution. Glenville, IL: Scott, Foresman.
21.
Fisher, R. , and Ury, W. (1991) Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In. New York: Penguin.
22.
Folberg, J. (1983) `A Mediation Overview: History and Dimensions of Practice', Mediation Quarterly1: 3-13.
23.
Folberg, J. and Taylor, A. (1984) Mediation: A Comprehensive Guide to Resolving Conflicts without Litigation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
24.
Garcia, A. (1991) `Dispute Resolution Without Disputing: How the Interactional Organization of Mediation Hearings Minimizes Argument', American Sociological Review56: 818-835.
25.
Garcia, A. (1997) `Interactional Constraints on Proposal Generation in Mediation Hearings: A Preliminary Investigation', Discourse & Society8(2): 219-249.
26.
Garcia, A. (n.d.) Creating Agreement in Mediation Hearings: The Interactional Basis of Third Party Conflict Resolution. Unpublished book manuscript.
27.
Girdner, L.K. (1985) `Adjudication and Mediation: A Comparison of Custody Decision-making Processes involving Third Parties', Journal of Divorce8: 33-47.
28.
Goffman, E. (1981) Forms of Talk. Oxford: Blackwell.
29.
Goodwin, C. and Duranti, A. (1992) `Rethinking Context: An Introduction', in A. Duranti and C. Goodwin (eds) Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon, pp. 1-42.
30.
Greatbatch, D. and Dingwall, R. (1989) `Selective Facilitation: Some Preliminary Observations on a Strategy Used by Divorce Mediators', Law & Society Review23(4): 613-641.
31.
Greatbatch, D. and Dingwall, R. (1997) `Argumentative Talk in Divorce Mediation Sessions', American Sociological Review62: 151-170.
32.
Grebe, S.C. (1992) `Ethics and the Professional Family Mediator', Mediation Quarterly10(2): 155-165.
33.
Harrington, C.B. (1985) Shadow Justice: The Ideology and Institutionalization of Alternatives to Court. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
34.
Heritage, J. (1984) Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
35.
Heritage, J. (1987) `Ethnomethodology', in A. Giddens and J. Turner (eds) Social Theory Today, pp. 224-272. Cambridge: Polity Press.
36.
Heritage, J. and Atkinson, J.M. (1984) in J.M. Atkinson and J. Heritage (eds) Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, pp. 1-16. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
37.
Hutchby, I. (1996) `Power in Discourse: The Case of Arguments in Talk Radio', Discourse & Society7: 481-497.
38.
Irving, H.H. and Benjamin, M. (1987) Family Mediation: Theory and Practice of Dispute Resolution. Toronto: Carswell.
39.
Kelly, J.B. and Gigy, L. (1989) `Divorce Mediation: Characteristics of Clients and Outcomes', in K. Kressell and D.G. Pruitt (eds) Mediation Research, pp. 263-283. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
40.
Kolb, D. (1981) `Roles Mediators Play: State and Federal Practice', Industrial Relations20(1): 1-17.
41.
Kolb, D. (1983) The Mediators. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
42.
Lerner, G. (1993) `Collectivities in Action: Establishing the Relevance of Conjoined Participation in Conversation', Text13(2): 213-245.
43.
Maggiolo, W.A. (1985) Techniques of Mediation. New York: Oceana.
44.
Matz, D.E. (1994) `Mediator Pressure and Party Autonomy: Are They Consistent with Each Other?', Negotiation Journal10(4): 359-365.
45.
Maynard, D. (1984) Inside Plea Bargaining: The Language of Negotiation. New York: Plenum.
46.
Merry, S. , and Silbey, S. (1986) `Mediator Settlement Strategies', Law and Policy8: 7-32.
47.
Merry, S. (1989) `Myth and Practice in the Mediation Process', in M. Wright and B. Galaway (eds) Mediation and Criminal Justice: Victims, Offenders, and Community. London: Sage.
48.
Molm, L. (1987) `Linking Power Structure and Power Use', pp. 101-129 in K. Cook (ed.) Social Exchange Theory. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
49.
Moore, C.W. (1986) The Mediation Process: Practical Strategies for Resolving Conflict. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
50.
Neumann, D. (1992) `How Mediation can Effectively Address the Male-Female Power Imbalance in Divorce', Mediation Quarterly8(3): 227-239.
51.
Pinkley, R. (1990) `Dimensions of Conflict Frame', Journal of Applied Psychology75: 117-126.
52.
Pomerantz, A. (1988) `Offering a Candidate Answer: An Information Seeking Strategy', Communication Monographs54: 360-373.
53.
Pruitt, D.G. (1991) `Strategy in Negotiation', in V. Kremenyuk (ed.) International Negotiation: Analysis, Approaches, Issues. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
54.
Pruitt, D.G. , Carnevale, P.J., Ben-Yoav, O., Nochajski, T.H. and Van Slyck, M. (1983) `Incentives for Cooperation in Integrative Bargaining', in R. Tietz (ed.) Aspiration Levels in Bargaining and Economic Decision Making, pp. 22-34. Berlin: Springer.
55.
Regehr, C. (1994) `The Use of Empowerment in Child Custody Mediation: A Feminist Critique', Mediation Quarterly11(4): 361-371.
56.
Ricci, I. (1985) `Mediator's Notebook: Reflections on Promoting Equal Empowerment and Entitlements for Women', Journal of Divorce2(2): 21-31.
57.
Rifkin, J. , Millen, J. and Cobb, S. (1991) `Toward a New Discourse for Mediation: A Critique of Neutrality', Mediation Quarterly9(2): 151-164.
58.
Roberts, M. (1988) Mediation in Family Disputes. Aldershot: Wildwood House.
59.
Roehl, J.A. and Cook, R.F. (1989) `Mediation in Interpersonal Disputes: Effectiveness and Limitations', in K. Kressell, D.G. Pruittet al. (eds) Mediation Research: The Process and Effectiveness of Third-party Intervention. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
60.
Rubin, J.Z. , Kim, S.H. and Peretz, N.M. (1990) `Expectancy Effects and Negotiation', Journal of Social Issues46: 125-139.
61.
Sacks, H. (1984) `Notes on Methodology', in J.M. Atkinson and J. Heritage (eds) Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, pp. 21-27. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
62.
Sacks, H. (1984) `On Doing “Being Ordinary” ', in J.M. Atkinson and J. Heritage (eds) Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, pp. 413-429. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
63.
Sacks, H. (1992) Lectures on Conversation, ed. G. Jefferson. Oxford: Blackwell.
64.
Sacks, H. , Schegloff, E.A. and Jefferson, G. (1974) `A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-taking for Conversation', in Language50: 696-735.
Schegloff, E.A. and Sacks, H. (1973`Opening up Closings', Semiotica8(4): 289-327.
67.
Shailor, J.G. (1994) Empowerment in Dispute Mediation: A Critical Analysis of Communication. Westport, CT: Praeger.
68.
Skvoretz, J. and Willer, D. (1991) `Power in Exchange Networks: Setting and Structural Variations', Social Psychology Quarterly54(3): 224-238.
69.
Thoennes, N.A. and Pearson, J. (1985) `Predicting Outcomes in Divorce Mediation: The Influence of People and Process', Journal of Social Issues41(2): 115-126.
70.
Tjosvold, D. and van de Vliert, E. (1994) `Applying Cooperative and Competitive Conflict Theory to Mediation', Mediation Quarterly11(4): 303-311.
71.
Tyler, T.R. (1987) `The Psychology of Disputant Concerns in Mediation', Negotiation Journal3: 367-374.
72.
Worley, S.M. and Schwebel, A.L. (1985) `The Effect of Cooperation on Egocentrism in Divorce Mediation: A Simulation Study', in Divorce Mediation: Perspectives on the Field, pp. 151-165. Binghamton, NY: Haworth Press.
73.
Zetzel, G.W.K. and Wixted, S. (1984) A Trainer's Manual for Parent Child Mediation. Cambridge, MA: The Children's Hearings Project.
74.
Zubek, J.M. , Pruitt, D.G., Pierce, R.S. and Iocolano, A. (1989) `Mediator and Disputant Characteristics and Behavior as they Affect the Outcome of Community Mediation'. Presented at the 2nd Annual Meeting of the International Association of Conflict Management, Athens, GA.
