Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Agency is an important concept in social science, but definitions vary. This paper discusses the treatment of agency in critical linguistics, and argues it could be expanded in terms of scope and linguistic manifestations. It presents a framework for analysing agency in representations of action. This consists of four independent aspects of agency, with each aspect comprised of categories encompassing different levels of agency. The framework is exemplified by examining three official reports into the causes of the Fukushima nuclear disaster. Analysis shows how representations of responsibility in the report forewords are linked to the context and institutional aims of each report.

Keywords

Agency critical discourse analysis fukushima disaster linguistics nuclear power responsibility

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ahearn

(2001) Language and agency. Annual Review of Anthropology 30(1): 109–137.

Archer

(1982) Morphogenesis versus structuration: On combining structure and Action. British Journal of Sociology 33(4): 455–483.

Atomic Energy Society of Japan (2015) The Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Accident. Tokyo: Springer.

Baker

Ellece

(2001) Key Terms in Discourse Analysis. London: Bloomsbury.

Barker

(2002) Making Sense of Cultural Studies. London: SAGE.

BBC News (2011) Struggle to stabilise Japan’s Fukushima nuclear plant. Available at: http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-12726628 (accessed 10 March 2016).

Chouliaraki

Fairclough

(1999) Discourse in Later Modernity: Rethinking Critical Discourse Analysis. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Don

May

(2013) The discursive representation of Iran’s supreme leader in online media. Discourse & Society 24(6): 743–762.

Dreyfus

(2017) ‘Mum, the pot broke’: Taking responsibility (or not) in language. Discourse & Society 28(4): 374–391.

10.

Fairclough

(1989) Language and Power. London: Routledge.

11.

Farrelly

(2014) Discourse and Democracy: Critical Analysis of the Language of Government. New York: Routledge.

12.

Fowler

Hodge

Kress

, et al. (1979) Language and Control. London: Routledge.

13.

Fuchs

(2001) Beyond Agency. Sociological Theory 19(1): 24–40.

14.

Galasiński

Marley

(1998) Agency in foreign news: A linguistic complement of a content analytical study. Journal of Pragmatics 30(5): 565–587.

15.

Halliday

Matthiessen

(2004) An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 3rd edn. London: Hodder Arnold.

16.

Hart

(2014) Discourse, Grammar and Ideology. London: Bloomsbury.

17.

Hastings

(2011) Yes, nuclear power plants are dangerous. But for Britain, the alternative is to start hoarding candles. The Mail, 16 March. Available at: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1366274/Japan-tsunami-earthquake-Nuclear-power-plants-dangerous.html (accessed 21 December 2016)

18.

Hays

(1994) Structure and agency and the Sticky Problem of Culture. Sociological Theory 12(1): 57–72.

19.

Hiltzik

(2014) Three years later, the lessons of Fukushima are uglier than ever. Los Angeles Times, 10 March. Available at: http://www.latimes.com/business/hiltzik/la-fi-mh-fukushima-20140310-story.html (accessed 6 March 2017).

20.

International Atomic Energy Agency (2015) The Fukushima Dai-Ichi Accident. Available at: http://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/Publications/PDF/Pub1710-ReportByTheDG-Web.pdf (accessed 25 April 2016).

21.

International Atomic Energy Agency (n.d.) About Us. Available at: https://www.iaea.org/about (accessed 28 June 2017).

22.

Janks

(1997) Critical Discourse Analysis as a research tool. Discourse Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 18(3): 329–342.

23.

Kaira

(2011) Lesson from Japan disaster: Go easy on nuclear energy. The Times of India, 23 March. Available at: http://blogs.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/randomaccess/lesson-from-japan-disaster-shun-nuclear-energy/ (accessed 22 February 2017).

24.

(2010) Transitivity and lexical cohesion: Press representations of a political disaster and its actors. Journal of Pragmatics 42(12): 3444–3458.

25.

Machin

Mayr

(2012) How to Do Critical Discourse Analysis: A Multimodal Introduction. London: SAGE.

26.

Machin

Mayr

(2013) Personalising crime and crime-fighting in factual television: An analysis of social actors and transitivity in language and images. Critical Discourse Studies 10(4): 356–372.

27.

Merkl-Davies

Koller

(2012) ‘Metaphoring’ people out of this world: A critical discourse analysis of a chairman’s statement of a UK defence firm. Accounting Forum 36(3): 178–193.

28.

Moore

(2011) Don’t rush to abandon nuclear energy. The Mercury News, 7 June. Available at: http://www.mercurynews.com/2011/06/07/opinion-dont-rush-to-abandon-nuclear-energy/ (accessed 6 March 2017).

29.

Mulderrig

(2011) The grammar of governance. Critical Discourse Studies 8(1): 45–68.

30.

Oteíza

Pinto

(2008) Agency, responsibility and silence in the construction of contemporary history in Chile and Spain. Discourse & Society 19(3): 333–358.

31.

O’Connor

(2012) Breaking up the nuclear family. Al Jazeera, 13 June. Available at: http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/2012/06/2012612103055289384.html (accessed 20 December 2016).

32.

Pizziconi

(2012) Japanese discourses on nuclear power in the aftermath of the Fukushima disaster. In: Calvetti

Mariott

(eds) Contemporary Japan: Challenges for a World Economic Power in Transition. Venezia: Edizioni Ca’ Foscari - Digital Publishing, pp.161–189. Available at: http://virgo.unive.it/ecf-workflow/upload_pdf/JapStud_3_DIGITALE.pdf.

33.

Rajandran

(2013) Us and them: The portrayal of Malaysians and British in Malaysian history textbooks. Journal of Asian and African Studies 48(3): 313–331.

34.

Reyes

(2011) Strategies of legitimization in political discourse: From words to actions. Discourse & Society 22(6): 781–807.

35.

Seo

(2013) Hallidayean transitivity analysis: The Battle for Tripoli in the contrasting headlines of two national newspapers. Discourse & Society 24(6): 774–791.

36.

Sewell

(1992) A theory of structure: Duality, agency, and transformation. American Journal of Sociology 98(1): 1–29.

37.

Stamou

(2001) The representation of non-protesters in a student and teacher protest: A Critical Discourse Analysis of news reporting in a Greek newspaper. Discourse & Society 12(5): 653–680.

38.

Stubbs

(1996) Text and Corpus Analysis. Oxford: Blackwell.

39.

The Asahi Shimbun (2011a) Explosion hits Fukushima nuclear plant, fuel begins to melt. Asahi Shimbun, 12 March.

40.

The Asahi Shimbun (2011b) Explosion hits another reactor; cooling functions fail. Asahi Shimbun, 14 March.

41.

The Asahi Shimbun (2011c) Nuclear crisis worsens; dangerous radiation levels detected. Asahi Shimbun, 15 March.

42.

The Financial Times (2011) Nuclear Support: Fukushima Accident Should Not Prompt a Hasty Retreat. The Financial Times, 19 March. Available at: https://www.ft.com/content/a47805a8-5198-11e0-888e-00144feab49a (accessed 6 March 2017).

43.

The Independent (2011) Fukushima has revealed the dangers of the nuclear road. The Independent, Friday 18 March. Available at: http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/editorials/leading-article-fukushima-has-revealed-the-dangers-of-the-nuclear-road-2245011.html (accessed 11 December 2016).

44.

The Independent Investigation Commission on the Fukushima Nuclear Accident (2014) The Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Disaster: Investigating the Myth and Reality. New York: Routledge.

45.

The National Diet of Japan Fukushima Nuclear Accident Independent Investigation Commission (2012) The Official report of The Fukushima Nuclear Accident Independent Investigation Commission. Available at: https://www.nirs.org/wp-content/uploads/fukushima/naiic_report.pdf (accessed 6 January 2016).

46.

The Washington Post (2013) Don’t give up on nuclear energy yet. The Washington Post [Online] 4 September. Available at: https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/dont-give-up-on-nuclear-energy-yet/2013/09/04/9b2a202c-14ea-11e3-a100-66fa8fd9a50c_story.html

47.

Thompson

(2004) Introducing Functional Grammar. London: Arnold.

48.

Tokyo Electric Power Company (2012) Fukushima Nuclear Accident Analysis Report. Available at: www.tepco.co.jp/en/press/corp-com/release/betu12_e/images/120620e0104.pdf (accessed 20 February 2016).

49.

Turner

(2006) Handbook of Sociological Theory. New York: Springer.

50.

van Leeuwen

(1995) Representing social action. Discourse & Society 6(1): 81–106.

51.

Van Leeuwen

(2008) Discourse and Practice: New Tools for Critical Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

52.

Weninger

(2010) The lexico-grammar of partnerships: Corpus patterns of facilitated agency. Text and Talk 30(5): 591–613.

53.

Wetherell

(2005) Unconscious conflict or everyday accountability? British Journal of Social Psychology 44(2): 169–173.

54.

Windridge

(2011) Fear of nuclear power is out of all proportion to the actual risks. The Guardian [online] 4 April. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/science/blog/2011/apr/04/fear-nuclear-power-fukushima-risks (accessed 20 July 2016).

55.

Yamada

(2016) Japan Political Pulse: What will become of the nuclear burden? Mainichi Shimbun, March 14. Available at: http://mainichi.jp/english/articles/20160314/p2a/00m/0na/023000c (accessed 22 February 2017).

Analysing agency in linguistic representations of action

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References