Drawing upon a corpus approach to metaphor analysis, stance analysis, and Critical Discourse Analysis, the study analyzes different stances taken by the Chinese news outlet Global Times (GT) and the American The New York Times (NYT) in 2020 Coronavirus narratives to Chinese and English readers. The database includes all Coronavirus-related GT and NYT bilingual opinion articles in 2020, that is, 97 pairs from GT and 73 pairs from NYT which are comparable in Chinese and English tokens. Results show that the differences between GT and NYT in narrating the pandemic and the involved parties, that is, China and the US, are statistically significant with a moderate to strong effect size. The Lambda test of association demonstrates that the knowledge of metaphor transfer methods can significantly increase the correctness of attitudinal intensity prediction, which bears out metaphor transfer as a representation of stance mediation.
AhrensKJiangM (2020) Source domain verification using corpus-based tools. Metaphor and Symbol35(1): 43–55.
2.
BakerP (2006) Using Corpora in Discourse Analysis. London and New York: Continuum.
3.
BazziS (2014) Foreign metaphors and Arabic translation: An empirical study in journalistic translation practice. Journal of Language and Politics13(1): 120–151.
4.
BednarekM (2006) Evaluation in Media Discourse: Analysis of a Newspaper Corpus. London and New York: Continuum.
5.
BoulangerP-P (2016) When the media translate the crisis: The metaphor used by the mainstream press during the subprimes crisis. Meta61: 144–162.
6.
BradyA-M (2015) Authoritarianism goes global (II): China’s foreign propaganda machine. Journal of Democracy26(4): 51–59.
7.
CameronLMaslenRToddZ, et al. (2009) The discourse dynamics approach to metaphor and metaphor-led discourse analysis. Metaphor and Symbol24(2): 63–89.
8.
ChiluwaIIfukorP (2015) ‘War against our Children’: Stance and evaluation in# BringBackOurGirls campaign discourse on Twitter and Facebook. Discourse & Society26(3): 267–296.
9.
ConradSBiberD (2000) Adverbial marking of stance in speech and writing. In. HunstonSThompsonG (eds) Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and Construction of Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.56–73.
10.
CrosthwaitePCheungLJiangFK (2017) Writing with attitude: Stance expression in learner and professional dentistry research reports. English for Specific Purposes46: 107–123.
11.
DeignanA (2005a) Review of the book Corpus Approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis. Metaphor and Symbol20(4): 295–301.
12.
DeignanA (2005b) Metaphor and Corpus Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.
13.
Du BoisJWKärkkäinenE (2012) Taking a stance on emotion: Affect, sequence, and intersubjectivity in dialogic interaction. Text & Talk32(4): 433–451.
14.
EhineniTO (2014) A critical discourse analysis of modals in Nigerian political manifestos. International Journal of Linguistics6(3): 109.
15.
EnglebretsonR (2007) Stancetaking in discourse: An introduction. In. EnglebretsonR (ed.) Stancetaking in Discourse: Subjectivity, Evaluation, Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing, pp.1–26.
16.
FaircloughN (1992) Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.
17.
FaircloughN (1995) Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. Harlow: Longman.
18.
Frankfort-NachmiasCLeon-GuerreroA (2018) Social Statistics for a Diverse Society, 8th edn.Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
19.
FrassinelliPP (2019) Borders, Media Crossings and the Politics of Translation: The Gaze from Southern Africa. London and New York: Routledge.
20.
FuoliM (2018) A stepwise method for annotating appraisal. Functions of Language25(2): 229–258.
21.
HoSYECrosthwaiteP (2018) Exploring stance in the manifestos of 3 candidates for the Hong Kong Chief Executive election 2017: Combining CDA and corpus-like insights. Discourse & Society29(6): 629–654.
22.
HunstonSSinclairJ (2000) A local grammar of evaluation. In. HunstonSThompsonG (eds) Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and Construction of Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.74–101.
23.
HunstonSThompsonG (2000) Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
24.
JaberMBaumannG (2011) The BBC World Service in the Middle East: Claims to impartiality, or a politics of translation?Journalism12(2): 171–182.
25.
KhwailehTKhuwailehA (2012) The semantic confusing connotation of terrorism: Terminologies generated in Arabic and used in English. Babel58(1): 19–30.
26.
KövecsesZ (2020) Extended Conceptual Metaphor Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27.
LakoffGJohnsonM (2003) Metaphors We Live By. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
28.
LovettD (2019) The politics of translation in the press: Siegfried Kracauer and cultural mediation in the periodicals of the Weimar Republic. Translation and Interpreting Studies14(2): 265–282.
29.
McEntee-AtalianisLJ (2013) Stance and metaphor: Mapping changing representations of (organizational) identity. Discourse & Communication7(3): 319–340.
30.
MarchiATaylorC (2018) Introduction: Partiality and reflexivity. In. TaylorCMarchiA (eds) Corpus Approaches to Discourse: A Critical Review. London and New York: Routledge, pp.1–16.
31.
MartinJRWhitePR (2005) The Language of Evaluation. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
32.
MolterVDiRestaR (2020) Pandemics & propaganda: How Chinese state media creates and propagates CCP coronavirus narratives. Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review1(3): 1–24.
PanLLiaoS (2020) News translation of reported conflicts: A corpus-based account of positioning. Perspectives. Epub ahead of print 17July2020. DOI: 10.1080/0907676X.2020.1792519.
35.
Pragglejaz Group (2007) MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol22(1): 1–39.
36.
PuglisiR (2011) Being the New York Times: The political behaviour of a newspaper. The BE Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy11(1): 1–43.
37.
QinBZhangM (2020) Taking mediated stance via news headline transediting: A case study of the China-US trade conflict in 2018. Meta65(1): 100–122.
ShieJ (2011) Metaphors and metonymies in New York Times and Times Supplement news headlines. Journal of Pragmatics43(5): 1318–1334.
40.
ShuttleworthM (2017) Studying Scientific Metaphor in Translation. Oxford: Taylor & Francis.
41.
SteenGDorstAGHerrmannJB, et al. (2010) A Method for Linguistic Metaphor Identification: From MIP to MIPVU. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.
42.
StefanowitschAGriesST (2007) Corpus-Based Approaches to Metaphor and Metonymy. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
43.
TaylorCMarchiA (2018) Corpus Approaches to Discourse: A Critical Review. London and New York: Routledge.
44.
The Information Department (2020) China takes countermeasures against the US’s suppression of Chinese media agencies in the United States. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People’s Republic of China. Available at: www.new.fmprc.gov.cn/web/fyrbt_673021/t1757128.shtml (accessed 10 April 2021).
45.
ThompsonG (1996) Voices in the text: Discourse perspectives on language reports. Applied Linguistics17(4): 501–530.
46.
ThompsonGHunstonS (2000) Evaluation: An introduction. In. HunstonSThompsonG (eds) Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and Construction of Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.1–27.
47.
TouryG (2012) Descriptive Translation Studies and Beyond, revised edn.Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
48.
ValdeónRACalafatC (2020) Introduction: The politics of translation and the translation of politics. Translation & Interpreting12(2): 1–6.
49.
Van DijkTA (2008) Discourse Reader. London: SAGE.
50.
WuGZhangH (2015) Translating political ideology: A case study of the Chinese translations of the English news headlines concerning South China Sea disputes on the website ofwww.ftchinese.com. Babel61(3): 394–410.
