Through a close reading of 1904 individual stories of sexual harassment collected through an online survey, the study investigates how storytelling constitutes a feminist media practice that (re)defines sexual harassment, exposes the power relations at play in the situations described in the stories, and opens up space for discursive politics in everyday life. In focusing on the active production of identities through discourse, we demonstrate how women themselves make sense of their experience. Most of the storytellers struggled to define what sexual harassment meant to them in their first-person narrations of their experiences. Guided by feminist standpoint methodology and narrative analysis, the study recognizes the narratives as powerful sites of knowledge production from a marginalized group of people who rarely speak out about their sexual harassment experiences, and it reconsiders the importance of the personal in digital space, evaluating how varied narratives can be cooperative and participatory to enact agency in contentious politics.
AhmedS (2004) Affective economies. Social Text22(2): 117–139.
2.
AntunovicD (2019) “We wouldn’t say it to their faces”: Online harassment, women sports journalists, and feminism. Feminist Media Studies19(3): 428–442.
3.
BaltarFBrunetI (2012) Social research 2.0: Virtual snowball sampling method using Facebook. Internet Research22(1): 57–74.
4.
BambergMG (1997) Positioning between structure and performance. Journal of Narrative and Life History7(1–4): 335–342.
5.
Banet-WeiserS (2018) Empowered: Popular Feminism and Popular Misogyny. Durham; London: Duke University Press.
6.
BarakA (1997) Cross-cultural perspectives on sexual harassment. In: O’DonohueW (ed.) Sexual Harassment: Theory, Research, and Treatment. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon, pp.263–300.
7.
BennettWLSegerbergA (2013) The Logic of Connective Action: Digital Media and the Personalization of Contentious Politics. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
8.
BensonDJThomsonGE (1982) Sexual harassment on a university campus: The confluence of authority relations, sexual interest and gender stratification. Social Problems29(3): 236–251.
9.
BerdahlJLMagleyVJWaldoCR (1996) The sexual harassment of men? Exploring the concept with theory and data. Psychology of Women Quarterly20: 527–548.
10.
BrowningCLaumannEO (1997) Sexual contact between children and adults: A life course perspective. American Sociological Review62: 540–560.
11.
CampbellKK (2005) Agency: Promiscuous and protean. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies2(1): 1–19.
ChoiSYChoY (2017) Generating counter-public spheres through social media: Two social movements in neoliberalised South Korea. Javnost-The Public24(1): 15–33.
14.
ClairRP (1993) The use of framing devices to sequester organizational narratives: Hegemony and harassment. Communication Monographs60(2): 113–136.
15.
ClairRPChapmanPAKunkelAW (1996) Narrative approaches to raising consciousness about sexual harassment: From research to pedagogy and back again. Journal of Applied Communication Research24(4): 241–259.
16.
CloughPTHalleyJ (eds) (2007) The Affective Turn: Theorizing the Social. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
17.
CodeL (2014) Ignorance, injustice and the politics of knowledge. Australian Feminist Studies29(80): 148–160.
18.
CortazziM (2002) Analysing narratives and documents. In: ColemanMBriggsARJ (eds) Research Methods in Educational Leadership and Management. London: Sage, pp.196–212.
19.
De FinaA (2015) Narrative and identities. In: De FinaAGeorgakopoulouA (eds) The Handbook of Narrative Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.351–368.
20.
De FinaAGeorgakopoulouA (2012) Analyzing Narrative: Discourse and Sociolinguistic Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21.
De RidderSVan BauwelS (2015) The discursive construction of gay teenagers in times of mediatization: Youth’s reflections on intimate storytelling, queer shame and realness in popular social media places. Journal of Youth Studies18(6): 777–793.
22.
FastingKSandTS (2015) Narratives of sexual harassment experiences in sport. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health7(5): 573–588.
23.
FriedanB (2001) The Feminine Mystique. New York, NY: W. W. Norton Company.
HanischC (1970) The personal is political. In: FirestoneSKoedtA (eds) Notes from the Second Year: Women’s Liberation Major Writings of the Radical Feminists. New York, NY: Radical Feminism, pp.76–78.
29.
HanX (2018) Searching for an online space for feminism? The Chinese feminist group gender watch women’s voice and its changing approaches to online misogyny. Feminist Media Studies18(4): 734–749.
30.
HarawayD (1988) Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies14(3): 575–599.
31.
HardingSG (ed.) (2004) The Feminist Standpoint Theory Reader: Intellectual and Political Controversies. New York, NY: Routledge.
32.
HarpDGrimmJLokeJ (2018) Rape, storytelling and social media: How Twitter interrupted the news media’s ability to construct collective memory. Feminist Media Studies18(6): 979–995.
HeaveyE (2015) Narrative bodies, embodied narratives. In: De FinaAGeorgakopoulouA (eds) The Handbook of Narrative Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.429–446.
35.
HuberJCaineVHuberM, et al. (2013) Narrative inquiry as pedagogy in education: The extraordinary potential of living, telling, retelling, and reliving stories of experience. Review of Research in Education37(1): 212–242.
36.
JeongELeeJ (2018) We take the red pill, we confront the DickTrix: Online feminist activism and the augmentation of gendered realities in South Korea. Feminist Media Studies18(4): 705–717.
37.
KimYCBall-RokeachSJ (2006) Community storytelling network, neighborhood context, and civic engagement: A multilevel approach. Human Communication Research32(4): 411–439.
LeungLC (2017) Understanding the help-seeking decisions of sexual assault survivors: Implications for social work practice in Hong Kong. International Social Work60(4): 927–940.
40.
LiJLiX (2017) Media as a core political resource: The young feminist movements in China. Chinese Journal of Communication10(1): 54–71.
41.
LinZ (2019) Corporeal media of visibility: Visualizing feminist activisms in China. Feminist Media Studies19(2): 300–301.
LokotT (2018) #IAmNotAfraidToSayIt: Stories of sexual violence as everyday political speech on Facebook. Information, Communication & Society21(6): 802–817.
44.
MacKinnonCSiegelRB (eds) (2004) Directions in Sexual Harassment Law. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
MillerPJ (1994) Narrative practices: Their role in socialization and self-construction. In: NeisserUFivushR (eds) The Remembering Self: Construction and Accuracy in the Self-Narrative. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.158–179.
47.
MurrayM (2003) Narrative psychology and narrative analysis. In: CamicPMRhodesJEYardleyL (eds) Qualitative Research in Psychology: Expanding Perspectives in Methodology and Design. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, pp.95–112.
48.
NeumayerCRossiL (2018) Images of protest in social media: Struggle over visibility and visual narratives. New Media & Society20(11): 4293–4310.
49.
PhippsA (2016) Whose personal is more political? Experience in contemporary feminist politics. Feminist Theory17(3): 303–321.
50.
PhippsA (2020) Reckoning up: Sexual harassment and violence in the neoliberal university. Gender and Education32(2): 227–243.
51.
PowellGN (1983) Definition of sexual harassment and sexual attention experienced. The Journal of Psychology113(1): 113–117.
52.
RappLButtonDMFleury-SteinerB, et al. (2010) The Internet as a tool for Black feminist activism: Lessons from an online antirape protest. Feminist Criminology5(3): 244–262.
RiessmanCK (1993) Narrative Analysis, vol. 30. Newburry Park, CA: Sage.
56.
RomanoffBD (2001) Research as therapy: The power of narrative to effect change. In: Reclaiming voice: First annual conference on ethnographic inquiry & qualitative research for a postmodern age, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, 20–22 June 1997. Portions of this chapter were presented at the aforementioned conference. American Psychological Association.
57.
ShawF (2012) ‘HOTTEST 100 WOMEN’: Cross-platform discursive activism in feminist blogging networks. Australian Feminist Studies27(74): 373–387.
58.
SomersMR (1994) The narrative constitution of identity: A relational and network approach. Theory and Society23(5): 605–649.
59.
StewartK (2007) Ordinary Affects. Durham; London: Duke University Press.
60.
StrineMS (1992) Understanding “how things work:” Sexual harassment and academic culture. Journal of Applied Communication Research20(4): 391–400.
61.
TanJ (2017) Digital masquerading: Feminist media activism in China. Crime, Media, Culture13(2): 171–186.
62.
TaylorBConradC (1992) Narratives of sexual harassment: Organizational dimensions. Journal of Applied Communication Research20(4): 401–418.
63.
ThumimN (2012) Self-Representation and Digital Culture. New York, NY: Springer.
64.
WangBDriscollC (2019) Chinese feminists on social media: Articulating different voices, building strategic alliances. Continuum33(1): 1–15.
65.
WangZ (2015) Detention of the feminist five in China. Feminist Studies41(2): 476.
66.
WilliamsS (2015) Digital defense: Black feminists resist violence with hashtag activism. Feminist Media Studies15(2): 341–344.
67.
WoodJT (1992a) Telling our stories: Narratives as a basis for theorizing sexual harassment. Journal of Applied Communication Research20(4): 349–362.
68.
WoodJT (1992b) Gender and moral voice: Moving from woman’s nature to standpoint epistemology. Women’s Studies in Communication15(1): 1–24.
69.
WoodLARennieH (1994) Formulating rape: The discursive construction of victims and villains. Discourse & Society5(1): 125–148.
70.
YangF (2016) Rethinking China’s Internet censorship: The practice of recoding and the politics of visibility. New Media & Society18(7): 1364–1381.
71.
ZhangWKramaraeC (2014) “SlutWalk” on connected screens: Multiple framings of a social media discussion. Journal of Pragmatics73: 66–81.
