This article draws on a conceptualization of the link between science and politics based on discourse analysis. The public objects of science are theorized as discursive creatures. This political concept encapsulates the predetermination of politics by scientific discourse. This framework has been used to study the legitimation of in vitro fertilization in the UK. Through different linguistic and textual mechanisms the discourse of reproductive biology constructed IVF as a technology acceptable to actors of various persuasions. The article focuses on one such mechanism, namely, narration. The first successful fertilization of human eggs in vitro was immediately reported in a popular scientific article. This article is analysed by means of sequential theory and narrative semiotics. The story is then put in relation with parliamentary discourse on IVF.
Adam, J.M. (1984a) `Pour une pragmatique textuelle: l'exemple d'un discours politique giscardien', in C. Kerbrat-Orecchioni and M. Mouillaud (eds) Le discours politique, pp. 187-211. Lyon: Presses Universitaires de Lyon.
2.
Adam, J.M. (1984b) Le récit. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
3.
Adam, J.M. (1992) Les textes: types et prototypes. Paris: Nathan.
4.
Bastide, F. (1992) `A Night with Saturn', Science, Technology & Human Values17(3): 259-281.
5.
Bastide, F. and Latour, B. (1983) `Essai de science-fabrication', Etudes françaises19(2): 111-133.
6.
Corten, A. (1999) Pentecostalism in Brazil: Emotion of the Poor and Theological Romanticism. Basingstoke/New York: Macmillan/St Martin's.
7.
Curtis, R. (1994) `Narrative Form and Normative Force: Baconian Story-Telling in Popular Science', Social Studies of Science24(3): 419-461.
8.
Edwards, R. (1974) `Fertilization of Human Eggs in Vitro: Morals, Ethics and the Law', Quarterly Review of Biology49(1): 3-26.
9.
Edwards, R. and Fowler, R. (1970) `Human Embryos in the Laboratory', Scientific American223(6): 45-54.
10.
Everaert-Desmedt, N. (1988) Sémiotique du récit. Bruxelles: De Boeck.
11.
Faye, J.P. (1972a) Théorie du récit: introduction aux `langages totalitaires'. Paris: Hermann.
12.
Faye, J.P. (1972b) Langages totalitaires: critique de la raison/l'économie narrative. Paris: Hermann.
13.
Finsberg, G. (1982) Intervention in the first IVF parliamentary debate, Hansard (Commons), 30 March: col. 282.
14.
Franklin, S. (1990) `Deconstructing “Desperateness”: The Social Construction of Infertility in Popular Representations of New Reproductive Technologies', in M. McNeil, I. Varcoe and S. Yearley (eds) The New Reproductive Technologies, pp. 200-229. Basingstoke/London: Macmillan.
15.
Greimas, J. (1966) Sémantique structurale. Paris: Larousse.
16.
Greimas, J. (1983) Du sens II. Paris: Seuil.
17.
Gross, A. (1990) The Rhetoric of Science. Harvard: Harvard University Press.
18.
Gunning, J. and English, V. (1993) Human In Vitro Fertilization: A Case Study in the Regulation of Medical Innovation. Aldershot: Dartmouth.
19.
Hénault, A. (1983) Narratologie, sémiotique générale. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
20.
Heslot, J. (1983) `Récit et commentaire dans un article scientifique', DRLAV29: 133-154.
21.
Holmes, F. (1991) `Argument and Narrative in Scientific Writing', in P. Dear (ed.) The Literary Structure of Scientific Argument, pp. 164-181. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
22.
Jacobi, D. (1986) Diffusion et vulgarisation: Itinéraires du texte scientifique. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.
23.
Jenny, J. (1996) `Analyses de contenu et de discours dans la recherche sociologique française: pratiques micro-informatiques actuelles et potentielles', Current Sociology44(3): 279-290.
24.
Labov, W. (1977) Language in the Inner City: Studies in the Black English Vernacular. Oxford: Blackwell.
25.
Latour, B. (1983) `Give Me a Laboratory and I will Raise the World', in K. Knorr-Cetina and M. Mulkay (eds) Science Observed, pp. 141-170. London: Sage.
26.
Latour, B. (1988) The Pasteurization of France. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
27.
Latour, B. (1991) `The Impact of Science Studies on Political Philosophy', Science, Technology & Human Values16(1): 3-19.
28.
Latour, B. (1993) We Have Never Been Modern. New York: Harvester.
29.
Latour, B. (1999) Politiques de la nature: comment faire entrer les sciences en démocratie. Paris: La Découverte.
30.
Licoppe, C. (1994) `The Crystallization of a New Narrative Form in Experimental Reports (1660-1690)', Science in Context7(2): 205-244.
31.
Limon, J. (1986) `The Double Helix as Literature', Raritan5: 26-47.
32.
Merrill-Squier, S. (1994) Babies in Bottles: Twentieth Century Visions of Reproductive Technology. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
33.
Montgomery, S. (1991) `Codes and Combat in Biomedical Discourse', Science as Culture2/3(12): 341-390.
34.
Mulkay, M. (1997) The Embryo Research Debate: Science and the Politics of Reproduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
35.
Myers, G. (1990) Writing Biology: Texts in the Social Construction of Scientific Knowledge. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
36.
Revas, F. (1987) `Du descriptif au narratif et à l'injonctif', Pratiques56: 18-38.
37.
Schleifer, R. (1987) A.J. Greimas and the Nature of Meaning. London: Croom Helm.
38.
Seguin, E. (1994) `Unité et pluralité de l'analyse de discours', Language & Société69: 37-57.
39.
Seguin, E. (1996) `L'analyse politique de la science: technocratie vs discours scientifique', Politix36: 181-193.
40.
Seguin, E. (2000a) `Bloor, Latour, and the Field', Studies in History and Philosophy of Science31A(3): 503-508.
41.
Seguin, E. (2000b) `The UK BSE Crisis: Strengths and Weaknesses of Existing Conceptual Approaches', Science and Public Policy27(4): 293-301.
42.
Seguin, E. (2001, in preparation) `Science in Politics: The Production of Discursive Creatures'.
43.
Van Dijk, T. (1999) `On Context', Discourse & Society10(3): 291-292.
44.
Van Dyck, J. (1995) Manufacturing Babies and Public Consent: Debating the New Reproductive Technologies. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
45.
Yoxen, E. (1985) `Speaking out about Competition - An Essay on The Double Helix as Popularisation', in T. Shinn and R. Whitley (eds) Expository Science: Forms and Functions of Popularisation, pp. 163-181. Reidel: Dordrecht.
46.
Yoxen, E. (1990) `Conflicting Concerns: The Political Context of Recent Embryo Research Policy in Britain', in M. McNeil, I. Varcoe and S. Yearley (eds) The New Reproductive Technologies, pp. 173-199. Basingstoke/London: Macmillan.
