A quantitative, corpus-based approach is most illuminating for describing collocational and other recurrent patterns associated with specific lexical items across an entire corpus, while a qualitative, critical discourse analysis approach is best suited for scrutinising specific stretches of text at various levels. By incorporating both approaches, this study examines US news stories published in mainstream media with an attempt to identify specific discursive practices relating to North Korea. The analysis reveals that three US media outlets (CNN, Newsweek and The New York Times) divide the world into certain sets of countries, and that being pro- or anti-USA might have an impact on which country is associated with North Korea.
AFP (2012) US Navy deploys ships before North Korean launch. AFP, 7December. Available at: http://goo.gl/6hwPi (accessed 10 December 2012).
2.
Al-HejinB (2007) Representations of the Muslim veil in the BBC news website: A critical discourse analysis. MRes dissertation, Lancaster University, UK.
3.
BakerP (2010) Sociolinguistics and Corpus Linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
4.
BakerPGabrielatosCKhosravinikM. (2008) A useful methodological synergy? Combining critical discourse analysis and corpus linguistics to examine discourses of refugees and asylum seekers in the UK press. Discourse & Society19(3): 273–306.
5.
BangM (2003) A corpus based study of representation of foreign countries in the South Korean press. MPhil dissertation, University of Birmingham, UK.
6.
BangM (2008) Representation of foreign countries in the US press: A corpus study. PhD thesis, University of Birmingham, UK.
ByrneM (2000) National security archive electronic briefing book 28: The secret CIA history of the Iran coup, 1953. Available at: http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB28/ (accessed 20 November 2011).
11.
CarruthersSL (2000) The Media at War. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
CookTE (1994) Washington newsbeats and network news after the Iraq invasion of Kuwait. In: BennettWLPaletzDL (eds) Taken by Storm: The Media, Public Opinion and US Foreign Policy in the Gulf War. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 105–130.
De CilliaRReisiglMWodakR (1999) The discursive construction of national identities. Discourse & Society10(2): 149–173.
16.
DunmireP (1997) Naturalising the future in factual discourse: A critical linguistic analysis of a projected event. Written Communication14(2): 221–264.
17.
FaircloughN (1989) Language and Power. London and New York: Longman.
18.
FowlerR (1991) Languages in the News: Discourse and Ideology in the Press. London and New York: Routledge.
19.
HallSClarkeJNCritcherC. (1978) Policing the Crisis: Mugging, the State and Law and Order. London: Macmillan.
20.
Hardt-MautnerG (1995) Only connect: Critical discourse analysis and corpus linguistics. UCREL Technical paper 6. Available at: http://stig.lancs.ac.uk/papers/techpaper/vol6.pdf (accessed 27 December 2013).
21.
HermanESChomskyN (1988) Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media. London: Vintage Books.
22.
HernándezÁA (2008) Discursive strategies in the construction of national identity: A critical discourse analysis of the Gibraltar issue in the printed media. National Identities10(2): 225–235.
IzadiFSaghaye-BiriaH (2007) A discourse analysis of elite American newspaper editorials: The case of Iran’s nuclear program. Journal of Communication Inquiry31(2): 140–165.
25.
JacksonR (2005) Writing the War on Terrorism: Language, Politics and Counter-terrorism. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
26.
JiangX (2006) Cross-cultural pragmatic differences in US and Chinese press conferences: The case of the North Korea nuclear crisis. Discourse & Society17(2): 237–257.
27.
KeenS (1986) Faces of the Enemy: Reflections of the Hostile Imagination. San Francisco, CA: Harper & Row.
28.
LeeK (2012) The USA carried out a first-hand investigation on Kim Hyeon-Hee, after the bombing of a Korean Air flight [美, ‘KAL기 폭파사건’ 직후 김현희 직접 조사]. KBS, 19July. Available at: http://news.kbs.co.kr/world/2012/07/19/2505606.html (accessed 27 October 2012).
29.
LiY (2007) The hidden power of the language in web-news headlines. US–China Foreign Language5(3): 1–7.
MartinD (1995) The choices of identity. Social Identities1(1): 5–20.
32.
OddoJ (2011) War legitimation discourse: Representing ‘Us’ and ‘Them’ in four US presidential addresses. Discourse & Society22(3): 287–314.
33.
ParkH (2006) 중국의 對한반도 정책과 중국-북한 관계에 관한 연구 [Study on China’s policies toward South Korea and Sino–North Korea relationship]. MA dissertation, Kyonggi University, South Korea.
SolomonJ (2010) North Korea nuclear find raises fear on Tehran: Pyongyang’s apparent use of next-generation centrifuges spurs lawmakers’ concerns that technology could be shared. The Wall Street Journal, 22November. Available at: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703559504575631111672617070.html (accessed 20 November 2011).
37.
StubbsM (1994) Grammar, text and ideology: Computer-assisted methods in the linguistics of representation. Applied Linguistics15(2): 201–223.
38.
StubbsM (1996) Text and Corpus Analysis: Computer-assisted Studies of Language and Culture. Oxford: Blackwell.
39.
StubbsM (1997) Whorf’s children: Critical comments on Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA). In: RyanAWrayA (eds) Evolving Models of Language. Clevedon, OH: Multilingual Matters, pp. 100–106.
40.
StubbsMGerbigA (1993) Human and inhuman geography: On the computer-assisted analysis of long texts. In: HoeyM (ed.) Data, Description, Discourse. London: HarperCollins, pp. 64–85.
41.
TisdallS (2012) North Korea’s rocket launch could be a massive own goal. The Guardian, 3December. Available at: http://goo.gl/b8wcS (accessed 10 December 2012).
42.
TolsonA (1996) Mediations: Text and Discourse in Media Studies. London: Arnold.
43.
United States Congress Senate Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations with Respect to Intelligence Activities (1975) Alleged assassination plots involving foreign leaders: An interim report of the Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations with Respect to Intelligence Activities, United States Senate: Together with additional, supplemental and separate views, November. Available at: http://archive.org/stream/allegedassassina00unit/allegedassassina00unit_djvu.txt (accessed 20 November 2011).
44.
Van DijkTA (1998) Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach. London: SAGE.
