This article reports a critical discourse analysis of a series of newspaper advertisements advocating `ex-gay' ministries and `reparative therapy' for homosexuality — interventions designed to `treat' homosexuality through prayer or psychoanalysis. These ads, part of an effort to make `ex-gay' discourse more central to the public communication strategies of conservative, anti-gay political groups, feature both narrative and statistical arguments that gay men and lesbians can be converted to heterosexuality. This study draws on quantitative social psychological research on antigay attitudes and Slater's extension of the elaboration likelihood model of persuasion to establish the cognitive context for this discourse and to link the argumentative features of the advertisements to potential persuasive effects on different audiences. The analysis shows how different rhetorical strategies employed in these ads might differentially influence readers who are either `value protective' or `value affirmative' in their processing goals.
Augoustinos, M., Walker, I. and Donaghue, M. (2006) Social Cognition: An Integrated Introduction. London: SAGE.
2.
Biernat, M., Vescio, T.K. and Theno, S.A. (1996) `Violating American Values: A “Value Congruence” Approach to Understanding Outgroup Attitudes', Journal of Experimental Social Psychology32: 387—410.
3.
Bennett, J.A. (2003) `Love Me Gender: Normative Homosexuality and “Ex-Gay” Performativity in Reparative Therapy Narratives', Text and Performance Quarterly23: 331—52.
4.
Benoit, W.L. and Smythe, M.J. (2003) `Rhetorical Theory as Message Reception: A Cognitive Response Approach to Rhetorical Theory and Criticism', Communication Studies54: 96—114.
5.
Besen, W. (2003) Anything but Straight: Unmasking the Scandals and Lies Behind the Ex-Gay Myth. New York: Harrington Park Press.
6.
Billig, M. (1996) Arguing and Thinking: A Rhetorical Approach to Social Psychology, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7.
Brookey, R.A. (2002) Reinventing the Male Homosexual: The Rhetoric and Power of the Gay Gene. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
8.
Condit, C.M. (1999) The Meanings of the Gene: Public Debates about Human Heredity. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
9.
Cottrell, C.A. and Neuberg, S.L. (2005) `Different Emotional Reactions to Different Groups: A Sociofunctional Threat Based Approach to “Prejudice”', Journal of Personality and Social Psychology88: 770—89.
10.
Crandall, C.S. (1994) `Prejudice against Fat People: Ideology and Self-Interest ', Journal of Personality and Social Psychology66: 882—94.
11.
Crandall, C.S., D'Anello, S., Sakalli, N., Lazarus, E., Nejtardt, G.W. and Feather, N.T. (2001) `An Attribution-Value Model of Prejudice: Anti-Fat Attitudes in Six Nations', Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin27: 30—7.
12.
Crandall, C.S. and Martinez, R. (1996) `Culture, Ideology, and Antifat Attitudes', Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin22: 1165—76.
13.
Edwards, D. and Potter, J. (1992) Discursive Psychology. London : SAGE.
14.
Fetner, T. (2005) `Ex-Gay Rhetoric and the Politics of Sexuality: The Christian Antigay/ Pro-Family Movement's “Truth in Love” Ad Campaign', Journal of Homosexuality50: 71—95.
15.
Fisher, W.R. (1984) `Narration as a Human Communication Paradigm: The Case of Public Moral Argument', Communication Monographs51: 1—22.
16.
Gallup Poll (2007) `Tolerance for Gay Rights at High-Water Mark' Available at: http://www.galluppoll.com/content/default.aspx?ci=27694&pg=1 (accessed 14 June 2007).
17.
Haddock, G., Zanna, M.P. and Esses, V.M. (1993) `Assessing the Structure of Prejudicial Attitudes: The Case of Attitudes Toward Homosexuals', Journal of Personality and Social Psychology65: 1105—18.
18.
Hamer, D. and Copeland, P. (1994) The Science of Desire: The Search for the Gay Gene and the Biology of Human Behavior. New York: Simon & Schuster.
19.
Haslam, N. and Levy, S.R. (2006) `Essentialist Beliefs about Homosexuality: Structure and Implications for Prejudice', Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin32: 471—85.
20.
Hegarty, P. (2002) `“It's Not a Choice, It's the Way We're Built”: Symbolic Beliefs about Sexual Orientation in the U.S. and Britain', Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology12: 153—66.
21.
Hegarty, P. and Pratto, F. (2001) `Sexual Orientation Beliefs: Their Relationship to AntiGay Attitudes and Biological Determinist Arguments', Journal of Homosexuality41: 121—35.
22.
Herman, D. (1997) The Antigay Agenda: Orthodox Vision and the Christian Right. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
23.
Johnson, B.T. and Eagly, A.H. (1989) `Effects of Involvement on Persuasion: A Meta-Analysis ', Psychological Bulletin106: 290—314.
24.
Johnstone, B. (2001) `Discourse Analysis and Narrative', in D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen and H.E. Hamilton (eds) The Handbook of Discourse Analysis, pp. 635—49. Oxford: Blackwell.
25.
Labov, W. and Waletsky, J. (1997) `Narrative Analysis: Oral Versions of Personal Experience', Journal of Narrative and Life History7: 3—38.
26.
LeVay, S. (1996) Queer Science: The Use and Abuse of Research into Homosexuality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
27.
Nicolosi, J. (1991) Reparative Therapy of Male Homosexuality: A New Clinical Approach. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.
Peebles, A.E. (2004) `It's Not Coming Out, So Then What is It? Sexual Identity and the Ex-Gay Narrative', in W.F. Chiang, E. Chun, L. Mahalingappa and S. Mehus (eds) SALSA 11 Proceedings/Texas Linguistic Forum , Vol. 47, pp. 155—64. Austin : University of Texas.
30.
Perelman, C. and Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. (1969 [1958]) The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation (J. Wilkinson and P. Weaver, trans.) . Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
31.
Petty, R.E. and Cacioppo, J.T. (1986) Communication and Persuasion: Central and Peripheral Routes to Attitude Change. New York: Springer.
32.
Petty, R.E., Cacioppo, J.T. and Heesacker, M. (1981) `Effects of Rhetorical Questions on Persuasion: A Cognitive Response Analysis', Journal of Personality and Social Psychology40: 432—40.
33.
Ponticelli, C. (1999) `Crafting Stories of Sexual Identity Reconstruction ', Social Psychology Quarterly62: 157—72.
34.
Sakalli, N. (2002) `Application of the Attribution-Value Model of Prejudice to Homosexuality', Journal of Social Psychology142: 264—71.
35.
Slater, M.D. (2002) `Involvement as Goal-Directed Strategic Processing: Extending the Elaboration Likelihood Model', in M. Pfau and J.P. Dillard (eds) The Persuasion Handbook: Developments in Theory and Practice , pp. 175—94. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
36.
Smith, R.R. and Windes, R.R. (2000) Progay/Antigay: The Rhetorical War over Sexuality . Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
37.
Stein, E. (1999) The Mismeasure of Desire: The Science, Theory, and Ethics of Sexual Orientation. New York: Oxford University Press.
38.
Stewart, C.O. (2003, November) `Gay/Ex-gay: The Dissociation of Concepts in Ex-Gay Testimonies', Paper presented at the National Communication Association convention, Miami Beach .
39.
Tygart, C.E. (2000) `Genetic Causation Attribution and Public Support of Gay Rights', International Journal of Public Opinion Research12: 259—75.
40.
Van Dijk, T.A. (1993) `Principles of Critical Discourse Analysis', Discourse & Society4: 249—83.
41.
Van Dijk, T.A. (2006) `Discourse, Context and Cognition', Discourse Studies8: 159—77.
42.
Verkuyten, M. (2005) `Immigration Discourses and Their Impact on Multiculturalism: A Discursive and Experimental Study', British Journal of Social Psychology44: 223—40.
43.
Wilcox, S. (2003) `Cultural Context and the Conventions of Science Journalism: Drama and Contradiction in Media Coverage of Biological Ideas about Sexuality', Critical Studies in MediaCommunication20: 225—47.
44.
Wodak, R. (2006) `Mediation between Discourse and Society: Assessing Cognitive Approaches in CDA', Discourse Studies8: 179—90.
45.
Wolkomir, M. (2001a) `Emotion Work, Commitment, and the Authentication of the Self: The Case of Gay and Ex-Gay Christian Support Groups', Journal of Contemporary Ethnography30: 305—34.
46.
Wolkomir, M. (2001b) `Wrestling with the Angels of Meaning: The Revisionist Ideological Work of Gay and Ex-Gay Christian Men', Symbolic Interaction24: 407—24.
47.
Wood, P.B. and Bartkowski, J.P. (2004) `Attribution Style and Public Policy Attitudes Toward Gay Rights', Social Science Quarterly85: 58—74.
