Domestic Discord,Rocky Relationships: Semantic Prosodies in Representations of Marital Violence in the O.J. Simpson Trial

Abstract

This article addresses one of the central concerns of the forensic linguist: the analysis of courtroom discourse and the identification of potentially discriminatory linguistic practices within the criminal justice system. This critical linguistic analysis examines the semantic prosodies of some of the words and phrases used to describe domestic violence at trial, a key issue in the O.J. Simpson double homicide case. The article considers data from the 100,000-word opening arguments of the criminal trial and contrasts the respective lexical representations of domestic violence in the prosecution and defence arguments. Drawing on data from COBUILD Bank of English, the article studies the prosodies of the constructs presented by both sides in their conflicting representations of domestic violence against women in the courtroom context.

Keywords

corpus linguistics courtroom discourse domestic violence forensic linguistics O.J. Simpson semantic prosody

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Caldas-Coulthard, C.R. and Moon, R. (1999) `Curvy, Hunky, Kinky: Using Corpora as Tools in Critical Analysis', paper presented at the Critical Discourse Analysis Conference, University of Birmingham, April 1999.

Clark, M. (1997) Without a Doubt. New York: Viking Books.

Cochran, J. (1996) Journey to Justice. New York: Ballantine Books.

Cooley, A. , Bess, C. and Rubin-Jackson, M. (1995) Madam Foreman: A Rush to Judgement? Los Angeles, CA: Dove Books.

Cotterill, J. (1998) `If it Doesn't Fit, You Must Acquit: Metaphor and the O.J. Simpson Criminal Trial', Forensic Linguistics 5(2): 141-158.

Danet, B. (1980) ` “Baby” or “Fetus”? Language and the Construction of Reality in a Manslaughter Trial', Semiotica 32: 187-219.

Drew, P. (1992) `Contested Evidence in Courtroom Cross-examination: The Case of a Trial for Rape', in P. Drew and J. Heritage (eds) Talk at Work, pp. 470-520. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Firth, J. (1957) `A Synopsis of Linguistic Theory, 1930-1955', Studies in Linguistic Analysis (Special Volume, Philogical Society): 1-32.

Gaines, P. (1999) ` “Miss Nicole Brown Simpson”: The Remaking of a Domestic Violence Victim', unpublished manuscript.

10.

Greene, E. , Schooler, J.W. and Loftus, E. (1985) `Expert Psychological Testimony', in S.M. Kassin and L.S. Wrightsman (eds) The Psychology of Evidence and Trial Procedure, pp. 201-228. London: Sage.

11.

Hunston, S. (1999) `Corpus Evidence for Disadvantage: Issues in Critical Interpretation', paper presented at the BAAL/CUP Applied Linguistics Seminar, Investigating Discourse Practices through Corpus Research: Methods, Findings and Applications, University of Reading, May 1999.

12.

Krishnamurthy, R. (1996) `Ethnic, Racial and Tribal: The Language of Racism?', in C.R. Caldas-Coulthard and M. Coulthard (eds) Texts and Practices: Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis, pp. 129-149. London: Routledge.

13.

Louw, B. (1993) `Irony in the Text or Insincerity in the Writer?: The Diagnostic Potential of Semantic Prosodies', in M. Baker , G. Francis and E. Tognini-Bonelli (eds) Text and Technology: In Honour of John Sinclair, pp. 157-176. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

14.

Sinclair, J.M. (1987) Looking Up: An Account of the COBUILD Project in Lexical Computing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

15.

Sinclair, J.M. (1991) Corpus, Concordance, Collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

16.

Stubbs, M. (1995a) `Collocations and Semantic Profiles: On the Cause of the Trouble with Quantitative Methods', Functions of Language 2(1): 1-33.

17.

Stubbs, M. (1995b) `Corpus Evidence for Norms of Lexical Collocation', in G. Cook and B. Seidlhofer (eds) Principle and Practice in Applied Linguistics, pp. 245-256. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

18.

Stubbs, M. (1996) Text and Corpus Analysis. Oxford: Blackwell.

19.

Walker, L.E. (1979) The Battered Woman. New York: Harper and Row.