Language,Gender and Floor Apportionment in Political Debates

Abstract

Political debates are speech events which foreground issues of power and the `floor', and allow the opportunity of assessing the ways in which the gender of participants affects their construction as more or less powerful participants in debates. Debates in the British House of Commons are adversarial in style, making it appropriate to view the floor as `the site of a contest where there is a winner and a loser'. Previous research into political debates has found that male participants violate the formal rules in debates more than their female counterparts, in order to gain the floor. Although the canonical form and rules of debates exist to `permit the equalization of turns', rule violations are common, and inequalities between participants exist. In this article legal and illegal interventions are evaluated in five debates in order to establish the extent to which the gender of participants is related to the control that an individual has over the debate floor.

Keywords

conversation analysis ethnography floor apportionment gender and language political debates power turn-taking

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adams, K.L. (1992) `Accruing Power on Debate Floors', in K. Hall , M. Bucholtz and B. Moonwomon (eds) Locating Power: proceedings of the second Berkeley women and language conference, pp. 1-10. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Women and Language Group.

Atkinson, M. (1984) Our Master's Voices. London: Routledge.

Coates, J. and Cameron, D. (eds) (1989) Women in their Speech Communities. London: Longman.

Coates, J. (1989) `Gossip Revisited: Language in All-female Groups', in J. Coates and D. Cameron (eds) Women in their Speech Communities, pp. 75-94. London: Longman.

Eckert, P. and McConnell Ginet, S. (1992) `Communities of Practice: Where Language, Gender and Power All Live', in K. Hall , M. Bucholtz and B. Moonwomon (eds) Locating Power: proceedings of the second Berkeley women and language conference. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Women and Language Group.

Edelsky, C. (1981) `Who's Got the Floor?', Language in Society 10: 383-421.

Edelsky, C. and Adams, K.L. (1990) `Creating Equality: Breaking the Rules in Debates', Journal of Language and Social Psychology 9(3): 171-190.

Fairclough, N. (1995) Critical Discourse Analysis. New York: Longman.

Freed, A. (1992) `We Understand Perfectly: A Critique of Tannen's Vew of Cross-sex Communication', in K. Hall , M. Bucholtz and B. Moonwomon (eds) Locating Power: proceedings of the second Berkeley women and language conference. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Women and Language Group.

10.

Gal, S. (1991) `Between Speech and Silence: The Problematics of Research on Language and Gender', in M. Di Leonardo (ed.) Gender at the Crossroads of Knowledge: Feminist Anthropology in the Postmodern Era. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

11.

Hall, K. , Bucholtz, M. and Moonwomon, B. (eds) (1992) Locating Power: proceedings of the second Berkeley women and language conference. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Women and Language Group.

12.

Henley, N.M. (1977) Body Politics: Power, Sex and Non-verbal Communication. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

13.

Heritage, J. (1984) Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Oxford: Blackwell.

14.

Holmes, J. (1995) Women, Men and Politeness. London/New York: Longman.

15.

Hutchby, I. and Woofit, R. (1998) Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Polity Press.

16.

Hymes, D. (1972) `Models for the Interaction of Language and Social Life', in J. Gumperz and D. Hymes (eds) Directions in Sociolinguistics. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

17.

James, D. and Clarke, S. (1992) `Interruptions, Gender and Power: A Critical Review of the Literature', in K. Hall , M. Bucholtz and B. Moonwomon (eds) Locating Power: proceedings of the second Berkeley women and language conference. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Women and Language Group.

18.

Kendall, S. and Tannen, D. (1997) `Gender and Language in the Workplace', in R. Wodak (ed.) Gender and Discourse. London: Sage.

19.

Lakoff, R. (1990) `Why can't a Woman be More like a Man?', in Talking Power: The Politics of Language. San Francisco, CA: Basic Books

20.

Sacks, H. , Schegloff, E.A. and Jefferson, G. (1974) `A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-taking in Conversation', Language 50: 696-735.

21.

Swann, J. (1989) `Talk Control: An Illustration from the Classroom of Problems in Analysing Male Dominance of Conversation', in J. Coates and D. Cameron (eds) Women in their Speech Communities. New York: Longman.

22.

Wodak, R. (ed.) (1997) Gender and Discourse. London: Sage.

23.

Woods, N. (1989) `Talking Shop: Sex and Status as Determinants of Floor Apportionment in a Work Setting', in J. Coates and D. Cameron (eds) Women in Their Speech Communities. London: Longman.

24.

Zimmerman, D. and West, C. (1975) `Sex Roles, Interruptions and Silences in Conversation', in B. Thorne and N. Henley (eds) Language and Sex: Difference and Dominance. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.