In this article, power relationships in Turkish families living in the Netherlands were studied by analyzing competition in conversational turn-taking. The notion of competition refers to those instances of turn-taking in which two or more persons are talking simultaneously, and one of them completes his or her turn at the cost of the other(s). A power hierarchy can be constructed on the basis of symmetries and asymmetries in winning and losing verbal competitions. The power structures of two immigrant Turkish families of different orientation and origin have been analyzed with the intention, from a methodological point of view, of contributing to the valid and reliable measurement of conversational power. In addition, the analyses reported in this article differ from mainstream research on Turkish family power, in that the focus is on power processes rather than on power outcomes. Finally, the data are based on observation rather than self-report. The results do not support the stereotype that Turkish families are rigid hierarchies of patriarchal authority. Power patterns in Turkish families - especially migrant families - appear to be changing rapidly.
Abadan-Unat, N. , Keleş, R., Penninx, R., Van Renselaar, H., Van Velzen, L. and Yenisey, L. (1975) Migration and Development: a Study of the Effects of International Labor Migration on Boğazliyan District. Ankara: Ajans Türk Press.
2.
Abadan-Unat, N. (1981) `Social Change and Turkish Women', in N. Abadan-Unat (ed.) Women in Turkish Society, pp. 5-36. Leiden: Brill.
3.
Abadan-Unat, N. (1982) `The Effect of International Labor Migration on Women's Roles: the Turkish Case', in Ç. Kağitçibaşi (ed.) Sex Roles, Family and Community in Turkey, pp. 207-236. Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Turkish Studies.
4.
Abadan-Unat, N. (1986) Women in the Developing World: Evidence from Turkey. Denver, CO: University of Denver.
5.
Atkinson, J.M. and Heritage, J. (eds) (1984) Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6.
Bakeman, R. and Gottman, J.M. (1986) Observing Interaction; An Introduction to Sequential Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7.
Bales, R.F. (1951) Interaction Process Analysis: A Method for the Study of Small Groups. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.
8.
Beattie, G.W. (1981) `Interruption in Conversational Interaction, and its Relation to the Sex and Status of the Interactants', Linguistics19: 15-35.
9.
Bilmes, J. (1997) `Being Interrupted', Language in Society26: 507-531.
10.
Blalock, H.M. and Wilken, P. (1979) Intergroup Processes: A Micro-Macro Perspective. New York: Free Press.
11.
Brouwer, L. (1997) Meiden met Lef; Marokkaanse en Turkse Wegloopsters (`Girls with Guts: Moroccan and Turkish Runaway girls'). Amsterdam: VU Uitgeverij.
12.
Brown, R. and Gilman, A. (1960) `The Pronouns of Power and Solidarity', in T.A. Sebeok (ed.) Style in Language, pp. 253-276. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
13.
Cameron, D. (1998) ` “Is There Any Ketchup, Vera?”: Gender, Power and Pragmatics', Discourse & Society4: 437-455.
14.
Cohen, J. (1960) `A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales', Educational and Psychological Measurement20: 37-46.
15.
Cromwell, R.E. and Olson, D.H. (eds) (1975) Power in Families. New York: Wiley.
16.
Dahl, R.A. (1957) `The concept of power', Behavioral Science2: 201-215.
17.
Davis, K. (1988) Power under the Microscope. Toward a Grounded Theory of Gender Relations. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.
18.
Eakins, B. and Eakins, G. (1976) `Verbal Turn-taking and Exchanges in Faculty Dialogue', in B.L. Dubois and I. Crouch (eds) Papers in Southwest English IV. Proceedings of the Conference on the Sociology of the Languages of American Women, pp. 53-62. San Antonio, TX: Trinity University.
19.
Eppink, A. (1981) Kind-zijn in Twee Culturen; Jonge Marokkaanse en Turkse Kinderen in Nederland (Being a Child in Two Cultures; Young Moroccan and Turkish Children in the Netherlands). Deventer: Van Loghum Slaterus.
20.
Esch, W. van (1982) Etnische Groepen en het Onderwijs: een Verkennende Studie (Ethnic Groups and Education: An Exploratory Study). `s-Gravenhage: SVO.
21.
Ferguson, N. (1977) `Simultaneous Speech, Interruptions and Dominance', British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology16: 295-302.
22.
Fişek, G.O. (1982) `Psychopathology and the Turkish Family: a Family Systems Theory Analysis', in Ç. Kağitçibaşi (ed.) Sex Roles, Family and Community in Turkey, pp. 295-321. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University (Turkish Studies 3).
23.
Fleiss, J.L. (1981) Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions. New York: Wiley.
24.
Fox, G.L. (1973) `Another Look at the Comparative Resource Model: Assessing the Balance of Power in Turkish Marriages', Journal of Marriage and the Family35: 718-730.
25.
Fruytier, B. (1994) Organisatieverandering en het Probleem van de Baron van Münchhausen; een Systeemtheoretische Analyse van de Overgang van het Tayloristische Produktie Concept naar het Nieuwe Produktie Concept (Organizational Change and the `Münchhausen Problem'; A Systems Theory Analysis of the Transition from the Taylorist Production Concept to the New Production Concept). Delft: Eburon.
26.
Ginsburg, H. (1972) The Myth of the Deprived Child; Poor Children's Intellect and Education. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
27.
Goldberg, J.A. (1990) `Interrupting the Discourse on Interruptions: An Analysis in Terms of Relationnally Neutral, Power- and Rapport-oriented Acts', Journal of Pragmatics14: 883-903.
28.
Gramsci, A. (1971) Selections from the Prison Notebooks. Quintin Hoare and Geoffrey Nowell-Smith, ed. and trans. London: Lawrence and Wishart.
29.
Gumperz, J.J. (1978) `The Conversational Analysis of Interethnic Communication', in E.L. Ross (ed.) Inter-ethnic Communication: Proceedings of the Southern Anthropological Society, pp. 13-31. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.
30.
Hadley, T.R. and Jacob, T. (1973) `Relationship among Measures of Family Power', Journal of Personality and Social Psychology27: 6-12.
31.
Hellinger, M. (1990) Kontrastive Feministische Linguistik: Mechanismen Sprachlicher Diskriminierung im Englischen und Deutschen. Ismaning: Hueber.
32.
Hellinger, M. (1995) `Language and Gender', in P. Stevenson (ed.) The German Language and the Real World: Sociolinguistics, Cultural, and Pragmatic Perspectives on Contemporary German, pp. 279-314. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
33.
Henley, N.M. (1977) Body Politics. Power, Sex, and Nonverbal Communication. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
34.
Holtbrügge, H. (1975) Türkische Familien in der Bundesrepublik. Erziehungsvorstellungen und familialen Rollen- und Autoritätsstruktur. Duisburg: Verlag der Sozialwissenschaftlichen Kooperative.
35.
Huls, E. (1982) Taalgebruik in het Gezin en Sociale Ongelijkheid; Een Interactioneel Sociolinguïstisch Onderzoek (Language Use in the Family and Social Unequality; A Study in Interactional Sociolinguistics). PhD dissertation, Nijmegen: University of Nijmegen.
36.
Huls, E. (1984) `Man en Vrouw: Gelijkwaardige Gesprekspartners?' (Man and Woman: Equal Interlocutors?), Nederlands Tijdschrift voor de Psychologie39: 385-395.
37.
Hutchby, I. (1996) `Power in Discourse: the Case of Arguments on a British Talk Radio Show', Discourse & Society7: 481-497.
38.
James, D. and Clarke, S. (1993) `Women, Men, and Interruptions: a Critical Review', in D. Tannen (ed.) Gender and Conversational Interaction, pp. 231-280. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
39.
Kağitçibaşi, Ç . (1982) `Sex Roles, Value of Children and Fertility in Turkey', in Ç. Kağitçibaşi (ed.) Sex Roles, Family and Community in Turkey, pp. 151-180. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University (Turkish Studies 3).
40.
Kağitçibaşi, Ç . (1996) Family and Human Development across Cultures; A View from the Other Side. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
41.
Kağitçibaşi, Ç. and Kansu, A. (1977) `Socialization of Sex Roles and Family Dynamics: A Cross-generational Comparison', Boğaziçi University Journal Social Science Series5: 35-48.
42.
Kiray, M. (1976a) `The Family of the Immigrant Worker', in N. Abadan-Unat (ed.) Turkish Workers in Europe 1960-1975: A Socio-economic Reappraisal, pp. 210-234. Leiden: E.J. Brill.
43.
Kiray, M. (1976b) `The New Role of Mothers: Changing Intra-familial Relationships in a Small Town in Turkey', in J.G. Peristiany (ed.) Mediterranean Family Structures, pp. 261-271. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
44.
Kollock, P. , Blumstein, P. and Schwartz, P. (1985) `Sex and Power in Interaction: Conversational Privileges and Duties', American Sociological Review50: 34-46.
45.
Komter, A. (1985) De Macht van de Vanzelfsprekendheid in Relaties tussen Vrouwen en Mannen (The Hidden Dynamics of Power in Male-Female Relationships). Leiden: VUGA.
46.
Komter, A. (1992) `Controversen and Ontwikkelingen in het Denken over Macht' (`Controversies and Developments in the Thinking about Power'). Psychologie en Maatschappij58: 15-27.
47.
Kudat, A. (1975) `Structural Change in the Migrant Turkish Family', in R.E. Krane (ed.) Manpower Mobility across Cultural Boundaries; Social, Economic and Legal Aspects. The Case of Turkey and West Germany, pp. 77-94. Leiden: E.J. Brill.
48.
Labov, W. (1972) Language in the Inner City. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
49.
Lammers, C.J. (1983) Organisaties Vergelijkenderwijs. Ontwikkeling en Relevantie van het Sociologisch Denken over Organisaties (Organizations' Comparative Development and Relevance of Sociological Thinking about Organizations). Utrecht/Antwerpen: Het Spectrum.
50.
Landis, J.R. and Koch, G.G. (1977) `An Application of Hierarchical Kappa-type Statistics in the Assessment of Majority Agreement among Multiple Observers', Biometrics33: 363-374.
51.
Leary, T. (1957) Interpersonal Diagnosis of Personality: A Functional Theory and Methodology for Personality Evaluation. New York: Ronald.
52.
Levine, N. (1982) `Social Change and Family Crisis: the Nature of Turkish Divorce', in Ç. Kağitçibaşi (ed.) Sex Roles, Family and Community in Turkey, pp. 323-347. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University (Turkish Studies 3).
53.
Lier, L. van . (1988) The Classroom and the Language Learner: Ethnography and Second-Language Classroom Research. London: Longman.
54.
Luhmann, N. (1984) Soziale Systeme. Grundriss einer Algemeinen Theorie. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
55.
Lukes, S. (1974) Power: A Radical View. London: Macmillan.
56.
McDonald, G.W. (1980) `Family Power: the Assessment of a Decade of Theory and Research, 1970-1979', Journal of Marriage and the Family42: 841-854.
57.
Meeuwesen, L. (1989) `Sekseverschillen in Verbaal Gedrag in de Cliënt-helper Interactie' (Sex Differences in Verbal Behaviour in Interaction between Clients and Helpers, in A.P. Buunk and A.J. Vrugt (eds) Sociale Psychologie en Psychische Problemen; Op het Raakvlak van Sociale en Klinische Psychologie, pp. 188-202. Assen: Dekker and Van de Vegt.
58.
Meeuwesen, L. , Schaap, C. and Staak, C. van der (1991) `Verbal Analysis of Doctor-patient Communication', Social Science & Medicine32: 1143-1150.
59.
Neumann, U. (1980) Erziehung Ausländischer Kinder. Dusseldorf: Pädagogischer Verlag Schwann.
60.
Ng, S.H. and Bradac, J.J. (1993) Power in Language: Verbal Communication and Social Influence. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
61.
Nofsinger, R.E. (1991) Everyday Conversation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
62.
Olson, D.H. and Cromwell, R.E. (1975a) `Power in Families', in R.E. Cromwell and D.H. Olson (eds.) Power in Families, pp. 3-11. New York: Wiley.
63.
Olson, D.H. and Cromwell, R.E. (1975b) `Methodological Issues in Family Power', in R.E. Cromwell and D.H. Olson (eds) Power in Families, pp. 131-150. New York: Wiley.
64.
Pels, T. (1992) Allochtone Kinderen en de Overgang van Gezin naar Basisschool; Uitgangspunten voor Voorschoolse Educatieve Projecten (Children Born Abroad and the Transition from Home to School; Guidelines for Pre-school Educational Projects). Leiden: PEWA.
65.
Pels, T. (1994) `Opvoeding in Nieuw Perspectief' (Education in a New Perspective), in T. Pels (ed.) Opvoeding in Chinese, Marokkaanse en Surinaams-Creoolse Gezinnen, pp. 169-181. Rotterdam: Instituut voor Sociologisch-Economisch Onderzoek.
66.
Richter, H.E. (1970) Patient Familie (The Patient Family). Reinbek: Rowohlt.
67.
Rişvanoğlu-Bilgin, S. , Brouwer, L. and Priester, M. (1986) Verschillend als de Vingers van een Hand (Research into the process of integration of Turkish families in the Netherlands). Leiden: COMT.
68.
Roger, D. (1989) `Experimental Studies of Dyadic Turn-taking Behaviour', in D. Roger and P. Bull (eds) Conversation: An Interdisciplinary Perspective, pp. 75-95. Clevedon, Philadelphia, PA: Multilingual Matters.
69.
Roger, D. , Bull, P. and Smith, S. (1988) `The Development of a Comprehensive System for Classifying Interruptions', Journal of Language and Social Psychology7(1): 27-34.
70.
Rogers, W.T. and Jones, S.E. (1975) `Effects of Dominance Tendencies on Floor Holding and Interruption Behavior in Dyadic Interaction', Human Communication Research1: 113-122.
71.
Rollins, B.C. and Thomas, D.L. (1979) `Parental Support, Power, and Control Techniques in the Socialization of Children', in W.R. Burr, R. Hill, F. Ivan Nye and I.L. Reiss (eds) Contemporary Theories about the Family, pp. 317-364. New York: Free Press.
72.
Sacks, H. , Schegloff, E.A. and Jefferson, G. (1974) `A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-taking for Conversation', Language50: 696-735.
73.
Safilios-Rothschild, C. (1970) `The Study of Family Power Structure: a Review 1960-1969', Journal of Marriage and the Family32: 539-552.
74.
Scanzoni, J. (1979) `Social Processes and Power in Families', in W.R. Burr, R. Hill, F.I. Nye and I.L. Reiss (eds) Contemporary Theories about the Family, Vol 1: Research-based Theories, pp. 295-316. New York: The Free Press.
75.
Schrader, A. , Nikles, B.W. and Griese, H.M. (1979) Die Zweite Generation; Sozialisation und Akkulturation Ausländischer Kinder in der Bundesrepublik. Königstein Ts: Athenäum.
76.
Sitter, L.U. de (1974) `Een Systeemtheoretisch Paradigma van een Sociaal Interactienetwerk' (`A Systems Theory Paradigm of a Social Interaction Network'), Mens en Maatschappij3, 260-296.
77.
Stiles, W.B. (1992) Describing Talk. A Taxonomy of Verbal Response Modes. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
78.
Tannen, D. (1984) Conversational Style. Analyzing Talk among Friends. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
79.
Thorne, B. and Henley, N. (eds). (1975) Language and Sex: Difference and Dominance. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
80.
Timur, S. (1972) Family Structure in Turkey. Ankara: Sevinç Matbaasi.
81.
Timur, S. (1978) `Determinants of Family Structure in Turkey', in J. Allman (ed.) Women's Status and Fertility in the Muslim World, pp. 227-242. New York/London: Praeger.
82.
Weick, K.E. (1968) `Systematic Observational Methods', in G. Lindzey and E. Aronson (eds) The Handbook of Social Psychology vol. II., pp. 357-451. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
83.
West, C. and Zimmerman, D.H. (1977) `Women's Place in Everyday Talk: Reflections on Parent-child Interaction', Social Problems24(5): 521-529.
84.
Zimmerman, D.H. and West, C. (1975) `Sex Roles, Interruptions and Silences in Conversation', in B. Thorne and N. Henley (eds.) Language and Sex: Difference and Dominance, pp. 105-129. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
