Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2026
Reliability-based design optimization and working capability quantification for a double-suction centrifugal fan subject to ambient temperature uncertainty
The double-suction centrifugal fans are designed under a standard atmospheric condition but are usually operated under off-design conditions where the ambient temperature varies, in which the density and viscosity of the air are different from those of the standard condition, thereby affecting the fan’s performance. This work performed a surrogate-based multi-objective reliability-based design optimization (RBDO) on a double-suction centrifugal fan considering the ambient temperature (T) uncertainty. The RBDO intends to improve the static pressure rise (Ps) and static pressure efficiency (ηs) of the fan by optimizing the design variables of outlet installation angle, camberline radius and number of the blades, and the volute pitch. The global sensitivity analysis using Sobol’ and Borgonovo indices reveal that the volute pitch dominates ηs, while the blade camberline radius and volute pitch dominate Ps. The Borgonovo index highlights the non-negligible effect of blade outlet installation angle on the probability distribution of Ps and ηs. The effectiveness of RBDO was validated through the Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) simulations. The RBDO improves Ps and ηs by 10.44% and 1.87%, respectively, at T = 20°C where the fan is designed, and by 8.62% and 2.00% at T = 0°C, and 9.39% and 2.06% at T = 40°C, revealing a robust effectiveness of RBDO. The working capability of the optimized fan within a range of ambient temperature is quantified to evaluate the trade-off between performance improvement and feasible reliability. The design feasibility domain reduces significantly due to the temperature sensitivity which determines the safety margin as the target static pressure rise exceeds 84 Pa. An analysis on flow physics demonstrates that the optimized fans effectively suppress the separation and recirculating vortices, weaken the entropy generation, and generate a better uniform distribution of flow angle and velocity in multiple blade passages of the impeller, which contributes to the improved performance of the fan.
WenXMaoYYangX, et al.Design method for the volute profile of a squirrel cage fan with space limitation. J Turbomach2016; 138(8): 081001. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4032537
6.
ChoGRKawahashiMHiraharaH, et al.Application of stereoscopic particle image velocimetry to experimental analysis of flow through multi-blade fan. JSME Int J Series B2005; 48(1): 25–33. https://doi.org/10.1299/jsmeb.48.25
7.
KitadumeMKawahashiMHiraharaH, et al.Experimental analysis of 3D flow in scroll casing of multi-blade fan for air-conditioner. J Fluid Sci Technol2007; 2(2): 302–310. https://doi.org/10.1299/jfst.2.302
ChenZHeHYangH, et al.Asymmetric flow in a double-suction centrifugal fan induced by an inclined impeller. Phys Fluids2024; 36(1): 017113. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0178927
10.
LiuRYangHWeiY, et al.Effect of an axially offset impeller on the transient physics of asymmetric flow in a double-suction centrifugal fan. J Appl Fluid Mech2025; 18(7): 1873–1892. https://doi.org/10.47176/jafm.18.7.3184
11.
LiuHJiangBWangJ, et al.Numerical and experimental investigations on non-axisymmetric D-type inlet nozzle for a squirrel-cage fan. Eng Appl Comput Fluid Mech2021; 15(1): 363–376. https://doi.org/10.1080/19942060.2021.1883115
LiZLuoPZhuM, et al.Surrogate model on the extension operation range of an isolated centrifugal fan. J Appl Fluid Mech2024; 17(4): 900–911.
14.
ZhangHYangJLiB, et al.Noise reduction and aerodynamic performance improvement of a multiblade centrifugal fan. Phys Fluids2024; 36(12): 125168. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0245393
15.
LiuZWangZDuS, et al.Orthogonal optimization design of a sirocco fan and numerical analysis on the internal flow characteristics. J Pow Energy2024; 238(1): 90–110. https://doi.org/10.1177/09576509231195120
16.
ZhouSZhouHYangK, et al.Research on blade design method of multi-blade centrifugal fan for building efficient ventilation based on Hicks-Henne function. Sustain Energy Technol Assessments2021; 43: 100971. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2020.100971
17.
LiuRZhangWYangH, et al.Optimization design and experiment of a double-suction centrifugal fan with flow physics analysis. Phys Fluids2025; 37(2): 027183. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0254454
ChanduSVLGrandhiRV. General purpose procedure for reliability based structural optimization under parametric uncertainties. Adv Eng Software1995; 23(1): 7–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/0965-9978(95)00049-w
23.
TuJChoiKKParkYH. A new study on reliability-based design optimization. J Mech Des1999; 121(4): 557–564. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2829499
24.
AouesYChateauneufA. Benchmark study of numerical methods for reliability-based design optimization. Struct Multidiscip Optim2010; 41: 277–294. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-009-0412-2
25.
LianYKimNH. Reliability-based design optimization of a transonic compressor. AIAA J2006; 44(2): 368–375. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.16262
26.
HongSLeeSJunS, et al.Reliability-based design optimization of axial compressor using uncertainty model for stall margin. J Mech Sci Technol2011; 25(3): 731–740. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-011-0103-y
27.
TaiVCTanYCRahmanNFA, et al.Reliability based multi-objective thermodynamic cycle optimisation of turbofan engines using Luus-Jaakola algorithm. Energy Eng J Assoc Energy Eng2021; 118(4): 1057–1068. https://doi.org/10.32604/ee.2021.014866
28.
WangTZhongWQianY, et al.Physical properties of air. In: Wind Turbine Aerodynamic Performance Calculation. Springer, 2023, pp. 3–10.
JiangBLiuHLiB, et al.Effects of cut volute profile on squirrel cage fan performance and flow field. Adv Mech Eng2018; 10(3): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/1687814018766915
31.
SutherlandW. The viscosity of gases and molecular force. Philosophical Magazine Series 5 1893; 36(223): 507–531.
32.
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. National aeronautics and space administration and U.S. air force. U.S. standard atmosphere, 1976. Report no. NASA-TM-X-74335. U.S. Government Printing Office, 1976.
33.
HaldarAMahadevanS. Probability, reliability, and statistical methods in engineering design. John Wiley & Sons, 2000.
34.
RaoSS. Engineering optimization: theory and practice. John Wiley & Sons, 2019.
35.
FellerW. An introduction to probability theory and its applications. John Wiley & Sons, 1968, Vol. 1.
36.
BijlHLucorDMishraS, et al.Uncertainty quantification in computational fluid dynamics. Springer, 2013.
37.
ShenJHuangMLiuX. Reliability-based design optimization of a centrifugal compressor considering manufacturing uncertainties. In: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Reliability Systems Engineering (ICRSE), Beijing, China, 10-12 July 2017.
38.
McKayMDBeckmanRJConoverWJ. A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code. Technometrics1979; 21(2): 239–245. https://doi.org/10.1080/00401706.1979.10489755
MarelliSSudretB. UQLab: a framework for uncertainty quantification in Matlab. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Vulnerability, Risk Analysis and Management (ICVRAM). Liverpool, UK, 13-16 July 2014, pp. 2554–2563.
44.
BlatmanGSudretB. An adaptive algorithm to build up sparse polynomial chaos expansions for stochastic finite element analysis. Probab Eng Mech2010; 25(2): 183–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.probengmech.2009.10.003
45.
BlatmanG. Adaptive sparse polynomial chaos expansion for uncertainty propagation and sensitivity analysis. Ph.D. thesis. Blaise Pascal University - Clermont II, 2009.
46.
Sobol’IM. Sensitivity estimates for nonlinear mathematical models. Math Model Civ Eng1993; 1(4): 407–414.
DuXChenW. Sequential optimization and reliability assessment method for efficient probabilistic design. J Mech Des2004; 126(2): 225–233. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1649968
49.
DebKPratapAAgarwalS, et al.A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Trans Evol Comput2002; 6(2): 182–197. https://doi.org/10.1109/4235.996017
LuJQianLLiuX, et al.Characterization of energy loss in jet mechanism of a pelton turbine. Int J Fluid Eng2024; 1: 033502. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0209402
