To overcome the three critical bottlenecks restricting large-scale photovoltaic (PV) deployment—grid-side intermittency, source-side thermal degradation, and environmental soiling losses—this study proposes a novel trigeneration system integrating Photovoltaics, Compressed Air Energy Storage, and Vortex Tube cooling (PV-CAES-VT). Unlike conventional binary coupling approaches, this system establishes a “one-source, three-use” thermodynamic loop where compressed air serves as an energy storage medium, a cooling fluid, and a pneumatic cleaning agent. A unified thermodynamic and economic model was developed to quantify the system’s performance, revealing that the recovery of pressure exergy for active cooling significantly enhances PV conversion efficiency. Under base-case conditions, the system achieves a Coefficient of Performance (COP) of 1.99, with a Levelized Cost of Energy (LCOE) of 0.1308 $/kWh and a Static Payback Period (SPP) of roughly 7 years. Exergy analysis identifies the vortex tube and PV cooling interface as the primary sources of irreversibility, collectively accounting for over 52% of total exergy destruction. Parametric analyses demonstrate that the system exhibits “sun-chasing” characteristics: while robust against ambient temperature variations, its thermodynamic and economic performance improves substantially with higher solar irradiance. This work confirms the feasibility of using steady-state compressed air for multi-domain synergistic optimization, offering a sustainable pathway for high-efficiency renewable energy integration in arid, high-irradiance regions.
WangYGuoCDuC, et al.Carbon peak and carbon neutrality in China: goals, implementation path, and prospects. China Geol2021; 4: 1–27. https://doi.org/10.31035/cg2021083
2.
PerkinsJH. Electrical systems and the mitigation of climate change: essay book review: stokes, leah cardamore. Short Circuiting Policy: Interest Groups and the Battle over Clean Energy and Climate Policy in the American States2020; 11: 281–285.
3.
ChenMDuYWangC, et al.Study on thermo-fluid-chemical coupling simulation and characteristic fields evolution during in-situ pyrolysis of tar-rich coal. Int J Heat Fluid Flow2025; 116: 109903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2025.109903
4.
ChenMDuYWangC, et al.Study on characterization of tri-phase products and microstructure evolution during in-situ pyrolysis of tar-rich coal at different temperatures. Fuel2025; 388: 134562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2025.134562
5.
JuXXuCHuY, et al.A review on the development of photovoltaic/concentrated solar power (PV-CSP) hybrid systems. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cell2017; 161: 305–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2016.12.004
6.
KhalidFSuhailSAAkbulutU. In-depth exergoeconomic analysis and optimization of a solar-wind hybrid trigeneration system for green hydrogen, power, and cooling. Int J Hydrogen Energy2025; 143: 1174–1185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2025.01.131
7.
LorenziB. Hybrid thermoelectric–photovoltaic generators under negative illumination conditions. ACS Appl Energy Mater2022; 5: 5381–5387. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaem.1c02710
DubeySSarvaiyaJNSeshadriB. Temperature dependent photovoltaic (PV) efficiency and its effect on PV production in the world – a review. Energy Proc2013; 33: 311–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2013.05.072
11.
ZhengCLuHZhaoW, et al.Study of ash deposition characteristics of photovoltaic arrays taking into account the effect of photovoltaic module spacing and its effect on output characteristics: indoor experiment. Energy2024; 310: 133138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2024.133138
12.
MakhdoomiSAskarzadehA. Daily performance optimization of a grid-connected hybrid system composed of photovoltaic and pumped hydro storage (PV/PHS). Renew Energy2020; 159: 272–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2020.06.020
13.
GaoYCaiYLiuC. Annual operating characteristics analysis of photovoltaic-energy storage microgrid based on retired lithium iron phosphate batteries. J Energy Storage2022; 45: 103769. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2021.103769
14.
YuHEngelkemierSGençerE. Process improvements and multi-objective optimization of compressed air energy storage (CAES) system. J Clean Prod2022; 335: 130081. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.130081
15.
JiZTengSXiH. Thermodynamic and economic performance analysis of compressed air energy storage system with a cold, heat and power tri-generation function combined with vortex tube. J Energy Storage2025; 131: 115932. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2025.115932
16.
YangYWangJWangW, et al.Comprehensive performance assessment and multi-objective optimization of a new combined cooling, heating and power system with CO2 working fluid. Appl Therm Eng2024; 236: 121673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2023.121673
17.
GeGWangHLiR, et al.A reliable operation strategy on the compressed-air-regulates-pressure underground pumped storage system and its thermo-economic investigation. J Energy Storage2023; 74: 109295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2023.109295
18.
WangZXuCYuB, et al.Multi-objective optimization of capacity configuration in a wind–PV–compressed air energy storage hybrid system. Energy2025; 332: 137097. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2025.137097
19.
BassamAMElminshawyNASOterkusE, et al.Hybrid compressed air energy storage system and control strategy for a partially floating photovoltaic plant. Energy2024; 313: 133706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2024.133706
20.
CaliseFCappielloFLCimminoL, et al.Off-design performance of a hybrid renewable compressed air energy storage system: dynamic simulation and thermo-economic analysis. J Clean Prod2025; 501: 145254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.145254
21.
ZhaoZShiYChenH, et al.Study on the coupling of compressed air energy storage systems and photovoltaic power generation. J Energy Storage2025; 140: 119136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2025.119136
22.
FarukCÖArslanEKoşanM, et al.Experimental and numerical assessment of PV-TvsPV by using waste aluminum as an industrial symbiosis product. Sol Energy2022; 234: 338–347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2022.02.008
23.
LiHZhaoJLiM, et al.Performance analysis of passive cooling for photovoltaic modules and estimation of energy-saving potential. Sol Energy2019; 181: 70–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2019.01.014
24.
YangL-HLiangJ-DHsuC-Y, et al.Enhanced efficiency of photovoltaic panels by integrating a spray cooling system with shallow geothermal energy heat exchanger. Renew Energy2019; 134: 970–981. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.11.089
25.
MoharramKAAbd-ElhadyMSKandilHA, et al.Enhancing the performance of photovoltaic panels by water cooling. Ain Shams Eng J2013; 4: 869–877. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2013.03.005
26.
ArslanEDoğuş TuncerAKoşanM, et al.Designing of a new type air-water cooled photovoltaic collector. Teh glas (Online)2020; 14: 41–45. https://doi.org/10.31803/tg-20190227095246
27.
DasMArslanEAkpinarE, et al.Evaluating the performance of four types of photovoltaic panels in Antarctica’s extreme environment. Case Stud Therm Eng2025; 69: 106007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csite.2025.106007
28.
AlghamdiASBahajASBlundenLS, et al.Dust removal from solar PV modules by automated cleaning systems. Energies.
29.
ChenDQianJDuM, et al.A comprehensive techno-economic analysis and site suitability assessment of dry-cooled CSP integrated with sCO2 recompression cycles: impacts of ambient temperature and solar irradiance. Appl Therm Eng2026; 285: 129113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2025.129113
30.
IlseKKFiggisBWNaumannV, et al.Fundamentals of soiling processes on photovoltaic modules. Renew Sustain Energy Rev2018; 98: 239–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.09.015
31.
LiDKingMDoonerM, et al.Study on the cleaning and cooling of solar photovoltaic panels using compressed airflow. Sol Energy2021; 221: 433–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2021.04.050
32.
KawamotoHTanabeJKobayashiY. Airflow-assisted electrodynamic cleaning of sand deposited on solar panels. J Electrost2021; 113: 103618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elstat.2021.103618
33.
AwanOAASagerRPetersenNH, et al.Flow phenomena inside the ranque-hilsch vortex tube: a state-of-the-art review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev2025; 211: 115351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2025.115351
34.
ChowdhuryNHKPoveyT. High-accuracy experimental study of performance characteristics of optimised ranque-hilsch vortex tube. Appl Therm Eng2024; 251: 123385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2024.123385
35.
DawahdehAIAl-NimrMA. A novel energy harvesting and battery thermal management in hybrid vehicles using a thermally regenerative electrochemical device. Energy2023; 270: 126865. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2023.126865
36.
LiYTengSXiH. 3E analyses of a cogeneration system based on compressed air energy storage system, solar collector and organic rankine cycle. Case Stud Therm Eng2023; 42: 102753. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csite.2023.102753
37.
LiuZLiuZXinX, et al.Proposal and assessment of a novel carbon dioxide energy storage system with electrical thermal storage and ejector condensing cycle: energy and exergy analysis. Appl Energy2020; 269: 115067. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115067
38.
FanRXiH. Energy, exergy, economic (3E) analysis, optimization and comparison of different carnot battery systems for energy storage. Energy Convers Manag2022; 252: 115037. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2021.115037
39.
ZhangYLiangTTianZ, et al.A comprehensive parametric, energy and exergy analysis of a novel physical energy storage system based on carbon dioxide brayton cycle, low-temperature thermal storage, and cold energy storage. Energy Convers Manag2020; 226: 113563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2020.113563
40.
XiHLiMHuangZ, et al.Energy, exergy and economic analyses and performance assessment of a trigeneration system for power, freshwater and heat based on supercritical water oxidation and organic rankine cycle. Energy Convers Manag2021; 243: 114395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2021.114395
Da Silva RPPStrobelMErguvanM, et al.3E analysis of a solar hybrid CCHP system at a university campus. Sol Energy2025; 291: 113413.
44.
TengSXiH. Experimental evaluation of vortex tube and its application in a novel trigenerative compressed air energy storage system. Energy Convers Manag2022; 268: 115972. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2022.115972
45.
QyyumMANoonAAWeiF, et al.Vortex tube shape optimization for hot control valves through computational fluid dynamics. Int J Refrig2019; 102: 151–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2019.02.014
46.
JainGAroraAGuptaSN. Performance analysis of a transcritical N2 O refrigeration cycle with vortex tube. Int J Ambient Energy2019; 40: 350–356. https://doi.org/10.1080/01430750.2017.1399449
47.
LiMWangMZhuK, et al.Multi-objective optimization and 3E analysis of an integrated PV/T-wind-borehole-ORC driven ground source heat pump system. Process Saf Environ Prot2025; 196: 106930. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2025.106930
ZhangFChenJSuC, et al.Energy consumption and economic analyses of a supercritical water oxidation system with oxygen recovery. Processes2018; 6: 224. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr6110224
50.
LiuJLinZ. A novel dual-temperature ejector-compression heat pump cycle - exergetic and economic analyses. Int J Refrig2021; 126: 155–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2021.01.005
