The low energy yield of solar photovoltaic plants remains a critical challenge, primarily due to elevated operating temperatures and extensive soiling rates. To address these limitations, besides tracking, this paper suggests the integration of solar PVT system for cooling and robotic cleaning system in solar modules. In this work, three performance metrics: energy production, thermal efficiency of PVT system and degradation rate of solar module are optimized simultaneously using MOPSO (Multi-Objective Particle Swarm Optimization) framework coupled with TOPSIS (The Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution) rank based decision algorithm. A comparative analysis is conducted under anisotropic condition for four PV technologies: mono-crystalline, polycrystalline, microcrystalline and thin-film modules. The region chosen is Quaid-e-Azam solar park located in Bahawalpur Pakistan. The MATLAB computational simulation results indicate that mono crystalline modules yield a higher energy production of 16.8 MWH whereas polycrystalline modules demonstrate a superior PVT thermal efficiency of 92.15% (neglecting losses). In contrast, thin-film and polycrystalline modules exhibit only a marginal improvement in life span of approximately 1 year as compared to other modules. This intelligent framework supports global energy enhancement through automated solar PV systems by integrating module type with their life time evaluation.
MoharramNAKonsowaAHShehataAI, et al.Sustainable seascapes: an in-depth analysis of multigeneration plants utilizing supercritical zero liquid discharge desalination and a combined cycle power plant. Alex Eng J2025; 118: 523–542. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AEJ.2025.01.091
2.
ZainalNAYusoffARApenA. Integrated cooling systems and maximum power point tracking of fuzzy logic controller for improving photovoltaic performances. Measurement2019; 131: 100–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MEASUREMENT.2018.08.056
MasoumiAPBagherianVTavakolpour-SalehAR, et al.A new two-axis solar tracker based on the online optimization method: experimental investigation and neural network modeling. Energy AI2023; 14: 100284. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EGYAI.2023.100284
5.
FarooqSSAttiqueJAhmadSA, et al.Performance analysis of dual axis solar tracking system actuated through serial manipulators. In: 2022 International conference on emerging trends in electrical, control, and telecommunication engineering (ETECTE), Lahore, Pakistan, 2–4 December 2022, pp. 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ETECTE55893.2022.10007364
LuNQinJ. Optimization of tilt angle for PV in China with long-term hourly surface solar radiation. Renew Energy2024; 229(June): 120741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2024.120741
8.
ChelATiwariGNChandraA. Simplified method of sizing and life cycle cost assessment of building integrated photovoltaic system. Energy Build2009; 41(11): 1172–1180. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENBUILD.2009.06.004
9.
RidhaHMGomesCHizamH, et al.Optimal design of standalone photovoltaic system based on multi-objective particle swarm optimization: a case study of Malaysia. Process2020; 8(1): 41. https://doi.org/10.3390/PR8010041
10.
RidhaHMGomesCHizamH, et al.Multi-objective optimization and multi-criteria decision-making methods for optimal design of standalone photovoltaic system: a comprehensive review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev2021; 135: 110202. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RSER.2020.110202
11.
RidhaHMGomesCHazimH, et al.Sizing and implementing off-grid stand-alone photovoltaic/battery systems based on multi-objective optimization and techno-economic (MADE) analysis. Energy2020; 207: 118163. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENERGY.2020.118163
12.
BaghelNManjunathKKumarA. Performance evaluation and optimization of albedo and tilt angle for solar photovoltaic system. Comput Electr Eng2023; 110: 108849. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPELECENG.2023.108849
Al-GhussainLTaylanOAbujubbehM, et al.Optimizing the orientation of solar photovoltaic systems considering the effects of irradiation and cell temperature models with dust accumulation. Sol Energy2023; 249: 67–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SOLENER.2022.11.029
15.
HamedAAl-GhussainLHassanMA, et al.Techno-economic analysis for optimal configurations of PV systems with back reflectors. Energy Rep2022; 8: 14979–14996. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EGYR.2022.11.053
16.
PodderBBiswasASahaS. Multi-objective optimization of a small sized solar PV-T water collector using controlled elitist NSGA-II coupled with TOPSIS. Sol Energy2021; 230: 688–702. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SOLENER.2021.10.078
17.
PiotrowskiLJFarretFA. Feasibility of solar tracking and fixed topologies considering the estimated degradation and performance of photovoltaic panels. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells2022; 244: 111834. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SOLMAT.2022.111834
18.
KurtzSWhitfieldKMillerD, et al.Evaluation of high-temperature exposure of rack-mounted photovoltaic modules. In: 2009 34th IEEE photovoltaic specialists conference (PVSC), Philadelphia, PA, 7–12 June 2009, pp. 002399–002404. https://doi.org/10.1109/PVSC.2009.5411307
19.
MatteiMNottonGCristofariC, et al.Calculation of the polycrystalline PV module temperature using a simple method of energy balance. Renew Energy2006; 31(4): 553–567. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RENENE.2005.03.010
20.
SchwingshacklCPetittaMWagnerJ, et al.Wind effect on PV module temperature: analysis of different techniques for an accurate estimation. Energy Proc2013; 40: 77–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EGYPRO.2013.08.010
21.
SkoplakiEBoudouvisAGPalyvosJA. A simple correlation for the operating temperature of photovoltaic modules of arbitrary mounting. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells2008; 92(11): 1393–1402. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SOLMAT.2008.05.016
22.
KhosaAAur RashidTShahN-u-H, et al.Performance analysis based on probabilistic modelling of Quaid-e-Azam solar park (QASP) Pakistan. Energy Strategy Rev2020; 29: 100479. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ESR.2020.100479
23.
Al-GhussainLAbubakerAMDarwish AhmadA. Superposition of renewable-energy supply from multiple sites maximizes demand-matching: towards 100% renewable grids in 2050. Appl Energy2021; 284: 116402. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.APENERGY.2020.116402
DuffieJABeckmanWA. Solar energy thermal process. John Wiley Sons, 1974, pp. 142–145.
26.
JaszczurMTenetaJStyszkoK, et al.The field experiments and model of the natural dust deposition effects on photovoltaic module efficiency. Environ Sci Pollut Res2019; 26(9): 8402–8417. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11356-018-1970-X/TABLES/2
27.
ConceiçãoRSilvaHGFialhoL, et al.PV system design with the effect of soiling on the optimum tilt angle. Renew Energy2019; 133: 787–796. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RENENE.2018.10.080
28.
El Hadi AttiaMKhelifaAKabeelAE, et al.A novel PVT system integrated with semicircular fins: CFD-based analysis of heat dissipation and energy efficiency. Appl Therm Eng2025; 279: 127551. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.APPLTHERMALENG.2025.127551
HottelHCWoertzBB. The performance of flat-plate solar-heat collectors. J Fluid Eng1942; 64(2): 91–103. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4018980
32.
AsimMMilanoJKhanHI, et al.Investigation of mono-crystalline photovoltaic active cooling thermal system for hot climate of Pakistan. Sustain Times2022; 14(16): 10228. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU141610228
33.
JordanDCKurtzSRVanSantK, et al.Compendium of photovoltaic degradation rates. Prog Photovoltaics Res Appl2016; 24(7): 978–989. https://doi.org/10.1002/PIP.2744
34.
JordanDCSilvermanTJWohlgemuthJH, et al.Photovoltaic failure and degradation modes. Prog Photovoltaics Res Appl2017; 25(4): 318–326. https://doi.org/10.1002/PIP.2866
35.
DosantosPSBouchetAMariñas-ColladoI, et al.OPSBC: a method to sort Pareto-optimal sets of solutions in multi-objective problems. Expert Syst Appl2024; 250: 123803. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ESWA.2024.123803
36.
DouJWangXLiuZ, et al.Towards Pareto-optimal energy management in integrated energy systems: a multi-agent and multi-objective deep reinforcement learning approach. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst2024; 159: 110022. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJEPES.2024.110022
37.
HarrisonKREngelbrechtAPOmbuki-BermanBM. Self-adaptive particle swarm optimization: a review and analysis of convergence. Swarm Intell2018; 12(3): 187–226. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11721-017-0150-9/TABLES/4
38.
KennedyJ. Minds and cultures: particle swarm implications for beings in sociocognitive space. Adapt Behav1999; 7(4): 269–287. https://doi.org/10.1177/105971239900700304
39.
RajendraRPratiharDK. Particle swarm optimization algorithm vs genetic algorithm to develop integrated scheme for obtaining optimal mechanical structure and adaptive controller of a robot. Intell Control Autom2011; 2(4): 430–449. https://doi.org/10.4236/ICA.2011.24050
40.
GadAG. Particle swarm optimization algorithm and its applications: a systematic review. Arch Comput Methods Eng2022; 29(5): 2531–2561. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11831-021-09694-4
41.
ClercMKennedyJ. The particle swarm-explosion, stability, and convergence in a multidimensional complex space. IEEE Trans Evol Comput2002; 6(1): 58–73. https://doi.org/10.1109/4235.985692
42.
KennedyJEberhartR. Particle swarm optimization. In: Proceedings of ICNN’95 - international conference on neural networks, Perth, WA, 27 November 1995–1 December 1995, pp. 1942–1948. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICNN.1995.488968
43.
BamisileOAcenCCaiD, et al.The environmental factors affecting solar photovoltaic output. Renew Sustain Energy Rev2025; 208: 115073. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RSER.2024.115073
44.
MoharramNABayoumiSHanafyAA, et al.Hybrid desalination and power generation plant utilizing multi-stage flash and reverse osmosis driven by parabolic trough collectors. Case Stud Therm Eng2021; 23: 100807. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CSITE.2020.100807
