A combined cycle integrating a gas turbine (GT) with supercritical carbon dioxide (sCO2) and organic Rankine cycles (ORC) can recover waste heat from the GT’s flue gas. To evaluate the exergoeconomic performance of this GT/sCO2/ORC system, both conventional and advanced exergoeconomic analyses were performed. The results indicate that 27.12% of the combined cycle’s exergy destruction costs(EDC) are avoidable, with endogenous avoidable and exogenous avoidable costs accounting for 13.96% and 13.16%, respectively. Within the individual cycles, the combustion chamber(CC), high-temperature turbine(HT), and ORC turbine exhibit the highest endogenous exergy destruction(ED) costs for the GT, sCO2, and ORC cycles, respectively. A comparative assessment of the two exergoeconomic approaches revealed that the conventional method overestimates the limited optimization potential of the combustion chamber. Prioritizing components based on the advanced exergoeconomic factor suggests the following optimization order for the combined cycle: air compressor(AC), low-temperature turbine(LT), high-temperature turbine, ORC turbine, and then pumps. Therefore, it is recommended that these rotating components be optimized to improve the system.
WangDWangZZhangJ, et al.Analysis of waste heat utilization and dynamic characteristics of gas turbine/supercritical carbon dioxide combined cycle. Therm Power Gener2023; 52(11): 67–75. https://doi.org/10.19666/j.rlfd.202302021
2.
WangDHuYZhangJ, et al.Economic analysis of gas Turbine/supercritical carbon dioxide combined cycle under different cycle configurations. Case Stud Therm Eng2023; 51: 103654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csite.2023.103654
WangDRenXZhangJ, et al.Comparative investigation on techno-economics of Cascade supercritical CO2 combined cycles for waste heat recovery of typical gas turbines. Therm Sci Eng Prog2023; 42: 101941. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsep.2023.101941
5.
HosseinpourJHowardJChenJ, et al.Challenges for developing and marketing a brayton-cycle-based power genset gas turbine using supercritical CO2 and a compressor design for simple recuperated cycle. Journal of Energy Resources Technology, Transactions of the ASME2022; 144(3): 032101. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4051305
6.
HouSZhouYYuL, et al.Optimization of a novel cogeneration system including a gas turbine, a supercritical CO2 recompression cycle, a steam power cycle and an organic Rankine cycle. Energy Convers Manag2018; 172: 457–471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2018.07.042
7.
CarapellucciRDi BattistaD. Combined supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle and organic rankine cycle for exhaust heat recovery. Journal of Energy Resources Technology, Transactions of the ASME2024; 146(6): 062101. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4065080
8.
YousefMSSantanaD. Thermodynamic and exergoeconomic optimization of a new combined cooling and power system based on supercritical CO2 recompression Brayton cycle. Energy Convers Manag2023; 295: 117592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2023.117592
9.
DuYYuZSunW, et al.Chemical looping combustion-driven cooling and power cogeneration system with LNG cold energy utilization: exergoeconomic analysis and three-objective optimization. Energy2024; 295: 130877. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2024.130877
10.
DongXFangZTangX, et al.Thermodynamic and exergoeconomic analysis of a dual expansion and triple recuperation supercritical CO2 power cycle driven by DME-Oxygen combustor. Energy Convers Manag2024; 303: 118173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2024.118173
11.
HanBCChenYDongY, et al.Study on characteristics and exergo-economic analysis of completely recuperative supercritical carbon dioxide Brayton combined cycle. Therm Power Gener2023; 52(11): 76–84. https://doi.org/10.19666/j.rlfd.202301015
12.
MohamedENassibAMMohamedHA. Advancing sustainable thermal power generation: insights from recent energy and exergy studies. Process Saf Environ Prot2024; 183: 617-644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2024.01.039
13.
ElwardanyMNassibAMMohamedHACase study: exergy analysis of a gas turbine cycle power plant in hot weather conditions. In: 2023 5th Novel Intelligent and Leading Emerging Sciences Conference (NILES), Giza, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1109/NILES59815.2023.10296731
14.
ElwardanyMNassibAMMohamedHA, et al.Energy and exergy assessment of 750 MW combined cycle power plant: a case study. Energy Nexus2023; 12: 100251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nexus.2023.100251
15.
TsatsaronisGParkM-H. On avoidable and unavoidable exergy destructions and investment costs in thermal systems. [Online]. Available: https://www.elsevier.com/locate/enconman
16.
PetrakopoulouFTsatsaronisGMorosukT. Evaluation of a power plant with chemical looping combustion using an advanced exergoeconomic analysis. Sustain Energy Technol Assessments2013; 3: 9–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2013.05.001
17.
YangQQianYKraslawskiA, et al.Framework for advanced exergoeconomic performance analysis and optimization of an oil shale retorting process. Energy2016; 109: 62–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.04.076
18.
MubashirWAdnanMZamanM, et al.Thermo-economic evaluation of supercritical CO2 Brayton Cycle integrated with absorption refrigeration system and organic rankine cycle for waste heat recovery. Therm Sci Eng Prog2023; 44: 102073. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsep.2023.102073
LiuZLiuZCaoX, et al.Advanced exergoeconomic evaluation on supercritical carbon dioxide recompression Brayton cycle. J Clean Prod2020; 256: 120537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120537
21.
LiuJZhouTYangS. Advanced exergy and exergoeconomic analysis of a multi-stage rankine cycle system combined with hydrate energy storage recovering LNG cold energy. Energy2024; 288: 129810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2023.129810
22.
LiTLiXGaoX, et al.Geothermal power generation improvement of organic Rankine flash cycle using exergy, advanced exergy and exergoeconomic analyses. Appl Therm Eng2023; 223: 120032. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2023.120032
23.
ElwardanyMNassibAMMohamedHA, Exergy analysis of a gas turbine cycle power plant: a case study of power plant in Egypt. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry2024; 149(14): 7433-7447. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-024-13324-z
24.
ElwardanyMNassibAMMohamedHA. Analyzing global research trends in combined cycle power plants: a bibliometric study. Energy Nexus2024; 13: 100265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nexus.2023.100265
25.
MohamedE. Enhancing steam boiler efficiency through comprehensive energy and exergy analysis: a review. Process Saf Environ Prot2024; 184: 1222-1250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2024.01.102
26.
RafeekMElwardanyMNassibAM, et al.Enhancing energy and exergy efficiency in a petroleum refining unit: a case study. Journal of Thermal Analysis & Calorimetry2025; 150(21): 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-025-14700-z
27.
MohamedENassibAMMohamedHA, et al. “Performance Assessment of Combined Cycle Power Plant,” 2023 5th Novel Intelligent and Leading Emerging Sciences Conference (NILES), Giza, Egypt, 2023, pp. 80-84. https://doi.org/10.1109/NILES59815.2023.10296617
28.
WangDChenHWangT, et al.Study on configuration of gas-supercritical carbon dioxide combined cycle under different gas turbine power. Energy Rep2022; 8: 5965–5973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2022.04.037
29.
ThanganadarDAsfandFPatchigollaK. Thermal performance and economic analysis of supercritical carbon dioxide cycles in combined cycle power plant. Appl Energy2019; 255: 113836. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113836
30.
RonaldHA.Turbine Aerodynamics: Axial-Flow and Radial-Inflow Turbine Design and Analysis. New York, USA: ASME Press, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.802418
31.
BaikYJKimMChangKC, et al.A comparative study of power optimization in low-temperature geothermal heat source driven R125 transcritical cycle and HFC organic rankine cycles. Renew Energy2013; 54: 78–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2012.08.055
32.
ChoSK. Investigation of the bottoming cycle for high efficiency combined cycle gas turbine system with supercritical carbon dioxide power cycle. [Online]. Available: https://www.asme.org/about-asme/terms-of-use. 2015.
MaYNHuPJiaCQ, et al.Thermo-economic analysis and multi-objective optimization of supercritical Brayton cycles with CO2-Based mixtures. Appl Therm Eng2023; 219: 119492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2022.119492
35.
AkbariADMahmoudiSMS. Thermoeconomic performance and optimization of a novel cogeneration system using carbon dioxide as working fluid. Energy Convers Manag2017; 145: 265–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2017.04.103
36.
CaoYZhanJCaoQ, et al.Techno-economic analysis of cascaded supercritical carbon dioxide combined cycles for exhaust heat recovery of typical gas turbines. Energy Convers Manag2022; 258: 115536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2022.115536
37.
QinLXieGMaY, et al.Thermodynamic analysis and multi-objective optimization of a waste heat recovery system with a combined Supercritical/Transcritical CO2 cycle. Energy2023; 265: 126332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.126332
38.
LiBWangS. Thermo-economic analysis and optimization of a Cascade transcritical carbon dioxide cycle driven by the waste heat of gas turbine and cold energy of liquefied natural gas. Appl Therm Eng2022; 214: 118861. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2022.118861
39.
WeilandNTLanceBWPidapartiSR. “sCO2 Power Cycle Component Cost Correlations From DOE Data Spanning Multiple Scales and Applications.” Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo 2019: Turbomachinery Technical Conference and Exposition. Volume 9: Oil and Gas Applications; Supercritical CO2 Power Cycles; Wind Energy.Phoenix, Arizona, USA. June 17-21, 2019. V009T38A008. ASME. https://doi.org/10.1115/GT2019-90493
40.
SunLWangDXieY. Thermodynamic and exergoeconomic analysis of combined supercritical CO2 cycle and organic rankine cycle using CO2-Based binary mixtures for gas turbine waste heat recovery. Energy Convers Manag2021; 243: 114400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2021.114400
41.
AkbariADMahmoudiSMS. Thermoeconomic analysis & optimization of the combined supercritical CO2 (Carbon dioxide) recompression Brayton/Organic rankine cycle. Energy2014; 78: 501–512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2014.10.037
42.
ChenJBChenHYChenSM, et al.Analysis and evaluation method of distributed energy supply system based on exergic economics. Kongzhi Lilun Yu Yingyong/Control Theory and Applications2022; 39(3): 553–560. https://doi.org/10.7641/CTA.2021.10504
43.
KeçebaşAHepbasliA. Conventional and advanced exergoeconomic analyses of geothermal district heating systems. Energy Build2014; 69: 434–441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.11.011
44.
MoharamianASoltaniSRosenMA, et al.Advanced exergy and advanced exergoeconomic analyses of biomass and natural gas fired combined cycles with hydrogen production. Appl Therm Eng2018; 134: 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2018.01.103
