In this experimental study, permanent magnets with three different sizes (M-1: 32 mm inner diameter, 70 mm outer diameter and 15 mm thick, M-2: 25 mm inner diameter, 60 mm outer diameter and 10 mm thick, M-3: 22 mm inner diameter, 45 mm outer diameter and 9 mm thick) are fully submerged in the single-slope glass solar still. The performance of magnetic solar stills (MSS) with three different sizes at 2 cm depth water to ensure that magnets are fully submerged is compared with conventional solar still (CSS) at the location 17.3850°N, 78.4867°E. Tiwari model is adapted to calculate the heat transfer coefficients (HTC), internal and exergy efficiencies. MSS with M-1, M-2 and M-3 significantly enhanced the convective, radiative, and evaporative heat transfer rate for the 2 cm depth of water. This is due to the desired magnetic treatment of water, which reduces the surface tension and increases the hydrogen bonds. The MSS's total internal HTC, instantaneous efficiencies led CSS by 25.52%, 28.8%, respectively, with M-1. Having various magnetic fields due to different magnets sizes increases MSS's exergetic efficiency by 33.61% with M-1, 33.76% with M-2, and 42.25% with M-3. Cumulative yield output for MSS with M-1, M-2, and M-3 is 21.66%, 17.64%, 15.78% higher than CSS. The use of permanent magnets of different sizes in the MSS is a viable, economical and straight forward technique to enhance productivity.
RamSKumarAArunkumarT, et al. Progress on suspended nanostructured engineering materials powered solar distillation – a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev2021; 143: 110848.
2.
KotowiczJSkorek-OsikowskaABartelaŁ.Economic and environmental evaluation of selected advanced power generation technologies. Proc IMechE, Part A: J Power and Energy2011; 225: 221–232.
3.
DentCJ.Special issue on renewable energy technologies. Proc IMechE, Part A: J Power and Energy2015; 229: 691–692.
4.
AzouryPH.Power and desalination in the Arabian Gulf region: an overview. Proc IMechE, Part A: J Power and Energy2001; 215: 405–419.
5.
ElsheikhAHSharshirSWMostafaME, et al. Applications of nanofluids in solar energy: a review of recent advances. Renew Sustain Energy Rev2018; 82: 3483–3502.
6.
Vishwanath KumarPKumarAPrakashO, et al. Solar stills system design: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev2015; 51: 153–181.
7.
Kumar A, Siva A and Kumari AA. A brief review on high-performance nano materials in solar desalination. Mater Today Proc 2021; 44: 282–288.
8.
DeshmukhHSThombreSB.Solar distillation with single basin solar still using sensible heat storage materials. Desalination2017; 410: 91–98.
9.
RashidiSBovandMEsfahaniJA.Optimization of partitioning inside a single slope solar still for performance improvement. Desalination2016; 395: 79–91.
10.
Kumar A, Siva A, Kumari AA, et al. Development of hierarchical structures for enhanced solar desalination. Mater Today Proc 2021; 44: 315–320.
11.
PounrajPWinstonDPKabeelAE, et al. Experimental investigation on Peltier based hybrid PV/T active solar still for enhancing the overall performance. Energy Convers Manag2018; 168: 371–381.
12.
KumarRAEsakkimuthuGMurugavelKK.Performance enhancement of a single basin single slope solar still using agitation effect and external condenser. Des2016; 399: 198–202.
13.
SinghDB.Exergo-economic, enviro-economic and productivity analyses of N identical evacuated tubular collectors integrated double slope solar still. Appl Therm Eng2019; 148: 96–104.
14.
AhsanAImteazMThomasUA, et al. Parameters affecting the performance of a low cost solar still. Appl Energy2014; 114: 924–930.
15.
SathyamurthyRNagarajanPKEl-AgouzSA, et al. Experimental investigation on a semi-circular trough-absorber solar still with baffles for fresh water production. Energy Convers Manag2015; 97: 235–242.
16.
SathishDVeeramanikandanMTamilselvanR.Design and fabrication of single slope solar still using metal matrix structure as energy storage. Mater Today Proc2020; 27: 1–5.
17.
KabeelAEAbdelgaiedMEisaA.Enhancing the performance of single basin solar still using high thermal conductivity sensible storage materials. J Clean Prod2018; 183: 20–25.
18.
KabeelAEAbdelgaiedMEisaA.Effect of graphite mass concentrations in a mixture of graphite nanoparticles and paraffin wax as hybrid storage materials on performances of solar still. Renew Energy2019; 132: 119–128.
19.
HaddadZChakerARahmaniA.Improving the basin type solar still performances using a vertical rotating wick. Desalination2017; 418: 71–78.
20.
El-SamadonyYAFEl-MaghlanyWMKabeelAE.Influence of glass cover inclination angle on radiation heat transfer rate within stepped solar still. Desalination2016; 384: 68–77.
21.
KabeelAEAbdelgaiedM.Enhancement of pyramid-shaped solar stills performance using a high thermal conductivity absorber plate and cooling the glass cover. Renew Energy2020; 146: 769–775.
22.
WaqasAJiJAliM, et al. Effectiveness of the phase change material-based thermal energy storage integrated with the conventional cooling systems of the buildings – a review. Proc IMechE, Part A: J Power and Energy2018; 232: 735–766.
23.
KavitiAKYadavAShuklaA.Experimental investigation of solar still with opaque North triangular face. Int J Green Energy2019; 10: 1–8.
24.
Kumar A, Ganesh JS and Siva A. An overview on hydrogel materials for solar desalination. Mater Today Proc 2021; 44: 2526–2532.
25.
MuLXuXWilliamsT, et al. Enhancing the performance of a single-basin single-slope solar still by using Fresnel lens: experimental study. J Clean Prod2019; 239: 118094.
26.
ModiKVModiJG.Performance of single-slope double-basin solar stills with small pile of wick materials. Appl Therm Eng2019; 149: 723–730.
27.
PalPYadavPDevR, et al. Performance analysis of modified basin type double slope multi-wick solar still. Desalination2017; 422: 68–82.
28.
MoradMMEl-MaghawryHAMWasfyKI.Improving the double slope solar still performance by using flat-plate solar collector and cooling glass cover. Desalination2015; 373: 1–9.
29.
ManokarAMWinstonDPDebJ, et al. Comparative study of an inclined solar panel basin solar still in passive and active mode. Sol Energy2018; 169: 206–216.
30.
ManokarAMWinstonDPKabeelAE, et al. Sustainable fresh water and power production by integrating PV panel in inclined solar still. J Clean Prod2018; 172: 2711–2719.
31.
Kumar A, Rajaranadher V, Siva A, et al. Energy and exergy analysis of double slope solar still with aluminium truncated conic fins. Mater Today Proc 2021; 45: 5387–5394.
32.
Kumar A, Mary B, Siva A, et al. Influence of aluminium parabolic fins as energy absorption material in the solar distillation system. Mater Today Proc 2021; 44: 2521–2525.
33.
EssaFAElsheikhAHAlgazzarAA, et al. Eco-friendly coffee-based colloid for performance augmentation of solar stills. Process Saf Environ Prot2020; 136: 259–267.
34.
ElsheikhAHKatekarVPMuskensOL, et al. Utilization of LSTM neural network for water production forecasting of a stepped solar still with a corrugated absorber plate. Process Saf Environ Prot2021; 148: 273–282.
35.
ElsheikhAHSharshirSWAbd ElazizM, et al. Modeling of solar energy systems using artificial neural network: a comprehensive review. Sol Energy2019; 180: 622–639.
36.
Hedayati-MehdiabadiESarhaddiFSobhnamayanF.Exergy performance evaluation of a basin-type double-slope solar still equipped with phase-change material and PV/T collector. Renew Energy2020; 145: 2409–2425.
37.
KabeelAEEl-MaghlanyWMAbdelgaiedM, et al. Performance enhancement of pyramid-shaped solar stills using hollow circular fins and phase change materials. J Energy Storage2020; 31: 1–10.
38.
DumkaPMishraDR.Energy and exergy analysis of conventional and modified solar still integrated with sand bed earth: study of heat and mass transfer. Desalination2018; 437: 15–25.
39.
DumkaPKushwahYSharmaA, et al. Comparative analysis and experimental evaluation of single slope solar still augmented with permanent magnets and conventional solar still. Desalination2019; 459: 34–45.
40.
SharshirSWPengGElsheikhAH, et al. Energy and exergy analysis of solar stills with micro/nano particles: a comparative study. Energy Convers Manag2018; 177: 363–375.
41.
SharshirSWKabeelAEElsheikhAH, et al. Thermal performance and exergy analysis of solar stills – a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev2017; 73: 521–544.
42.
KumarSTiwariGN.Estimation of convective mass transfer in solar distillation systems. Sol Energy1996; 57: 459–464.
43.
RaiSNTiwariGN.Single basin solar still coupled with flat plate collector. Energy Convers Manag1983; 23: 145–149.
44.
PetelaR.Exergy of undiluted thermal radiation. Sol Energy2003; 74: 469–488.
45.
VaithilingamSEsakkimuthuGS.Energy and exergy analysis of single slope passive solar still: an experimental investigation. Desalin Water Treat2015; 55: 1433–1444.
