Abstract
In this paper, we present the computed flow results for those endwall designs produced using the automated non-axisymmetric endwall design procedure and target objective functions detailed in Part 1 of this paper, and where available, compare these with experimental measurements made using the CSIR low-speed research turbine used as the test case for the designs. Experimental measurements were taken immediately aft (X3) as well as downstream (X4) of the rotor row using a drilled 5-hole elbow probe, and both the computed as well as physical results were processed identically to ensure as high a degree of comparability between the computed and physical datasets. For the two initial cases (the η tt - and C ske -based designs), the results of the experiments confirmed the predictions of the simulations, although unexpected flow separations which were not predicted by the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) resulted in poorer agreement for the two remaining contoured cases. In general, the results of the CFD, as confirmed by the experiment, showed that the best metric for the design of the endwall contours for this rig was that based on the rotor total–total efficiency although importantly, the well-known coefficient of secondary kinetic energy (C ske ), even when formulated using a reasonably simple approach, was able to produce closely competitive results to the efficiency-based metric. These findings are significant firstly because, to date, the use of efficiency is not widespread for the design of non-axisymmetric endwall contours, and secondly, because in cases where the efficiency might be difficult to measure and/or predict, the C ske may form a robust if only slightly less effective alternative.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
