An integrated exploration of thermal and water management dynamics on the performance of a stand-alone 5-kW Ballard fuel-cell system for its scale-up design
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online November, 2014
An integrated exploration of thermal and water management dynamics on the performance of a stand-alone 5-kW Ballard fuel-cell system for its scale-up design
A semi-empirical dynamic model with a generalized modeling framework is presented in this paper for the optimal design of a proton-exchange membrane fuel-cell system in order to bring out the importance of thermal and water management dynamics. Numerous electrochemical models exist in the literature presently predict the static and dynamic behavior at a specified operated conditions. However, those models have not considered the influence of both thermal and water management dynamics on the cell polarization and performance behavior. Hence an integrated exploration is done to illustrate the combined effect of operating temperature and membrane hydration over the steady state and dynamic behavior of the fuel-cell stack system. Benchmark data obtained from a stand-alone 5-kW Ballard fuel-cell power system using Nafion 117 membrane are taken to validate the predicted results over a wide range of operating conditions. The influence of stack-operating temperature over the membrane dynamics is investigated, and a similar trend is followed to analyze the temperature dynamics for the effect of dehydrated membrane. Thereby, the optimal operating condition of the stack is determined in terms of thermal and water management dynamics that facilitate the scale-up design of a fuel-cell stack system.
NolanJKolodziejJ. Modeling of an automotive fuel cell thermal system. J Power Sources2010; 195: 4743–4752.
2.
JanssenGJMOverveldeMLJ. Water transport in the proton-exchange-membrane fuel cell: measurements of the effective drag coefficient. J Power Sources2001; 101: 117–125.
SpringerTEWilsonMSGottesfeldS. Modeling and experimental diagnostics in polymer electrolyte fuel cells. J Electrochem Soc1993; 140: 3513–3526.
7.
NguyenTVWhiteRE. A water and heat management model for proton exchange membrane fuel cells. J Electrochem Soc1993; 140: 2178–2186.
8.
MannRFAmphlettJCHooperMAI. Development and application of a generalised steady-state electrochemical model for a PEM fuel cell. J Power Sources2000; 86: 173–180.
9.
FullerTNewmanJ. Water and thermal management in solid-polymer-electrolyte fuel cells. J Electrochem Soc1993; 140: 1218–1225.
10.
AmphlettJCBaumertRMMannRF. Performance modeling of the Ballard-Mark-IV solid polymer electrolyte fuel-cell. 1. Mechanistic model development. J Electrochem Soc1995; 142: 1–8.
11.
AmphlettJCBaumertRMMannRF. Performance modeling of the Ballard-Mark-IV solid polymer electrolyte fuel-cell 1. Empirical-model development. J Electrochem Soc1995; 142: 9–15.
12.
Genevey D, Von Spakovsky MR, Ellis MW, et al. Transient model of the heat, mass and charge transfer as well as electrochemistry in the catalyst layer of a PEMFC. In: Proceedings of ASME international mechanical engineering congress and exposition, Louisiana, 1–12 November 2002.
13.
DuttaSShimpaleeSVan ZeeJW. Numerical prediction of mass-exchange between cathode and anode channels in a PEM fuel cell. Int J Heat Mass Transfer2001; 44: 2029–2042.
14.
ParthasarathyASrinivasanSApplebyAJ. Temperature dependence of the electrode kinetics of oxygen reduction at the platinum/nafion® interface—a microelectrode investigation. J Electrochem Soc1992; 139: 2530–2537.
15.
WangLHusarAZhouT. A parametric study of PEM fuel cell performances. J Hydrogen Energy2003; 28: 1263–1272.
16.
KarthikMVijayachitraS. Investigation of water management dynamics on the performance of a Ballard-Mark-V proton exchange membrane fuel cell stack system. J Electrochem Sci2013; 8: 7885–7904.
17.
PukrushpanJTStefanopoulouAGPengH. Control of fuel cell breathing. IEEE Control Syst Mag2004; 24: 30–46.
18.
GrujicicMChittajalluKMLawEH. Model-based control strategies in the dynamic interaction of air supply and fuel cell. Proc IMechE, Part A: J Power and Energy2004; 218: 487–499.
19.
ZiogouCVoutetakisSPapadopoulouS. Modeling, simulation and experimental validation of a PEM fuel cell system. J Comput Chem Eng2011; 35: 1886–1900.
20.
WangCNehrirMHShawSR. Dynamic models and model validation for PEM fuel cells using electrical circuits. IEEE Trans Energy Convers2005; 20: 442–451.
21.
PanosCKouramasKIGeorgiadisMC. Modelling and explicit model predictive control for PEM fuel cell systems. J Chem Eng Sci2012; 67: 15–25.
22.
JiMWeiZ. A review of water management in polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells. J Energies2009; 2: 1057–1106.
WangCNehrirMH. A physically based dynamic model for solid oxide fuel cells. IEEE Trans Energy Convers2007; 22: 887–897.
25.
LarminieJDicksA. Fuel Cell Systems Explained, New York: John Wiley and Sons, 2001.
26.
AmphlettJCMannRFPeppleyBA. A model predicting transient responses of proton exchange membrane fuel cells. J Power Sources1996; 61: 183–188.
27.
LeeCYangJ. Modeling of the Ballard-Mark-V proton exchange membrane fuel cell with power converters for applications in autonomous underwater vehicles. J Power Sources2011; 196: 3810–3823.
28.
Pukrushpan JT, Peng H and Stefanopoulou AG. Simulation and analysis of transient fuel cell system performance based on a dynamic reactant flow model. In: Proceedings of ASME international mechanical engineering congress and exposition, Louisiana, 1–12 November 2002.
29.
LaurencelleFChahineRHamelinJ. Characterization of a Ballard MK5-E proton exchange membrane fuel cell stack. J Fuel Cells2001; 1: 66–71.
30.
PathapatiPRXueXTangJ. A new dynamic model for predicting transient phenomena in a PEM fuel cell system. Int J Renewable Energy2005; 30: 1–22.
31.
CorreaJMFarretFACanhaLN. An electrochemical-based fuel-cell model suitable for electrical engineering automation approach. IEEE Trans Ind Elect2004; 51: 1103–1112.
32.
NaWKGouB. Feedback-linearization-based nonlinear control for PEM fuel cells. IEEE Trans Energy Convers2008; 23: 179–190.
33.
Correa JM, Farret FA and Canha LN. An analysis of the dynamic performance of proton exchange membrane fuel cells using an electrochemical model. In: Proceedings of the 27th annual conference of the IEEE industrial electronics society, Denver, 29 November–2 December 2001.
34.
BelvedereBBianchiMBorghettiA. Experimental analysis of a PEM fuel cell performance at variable load with anodic exhaust management optimization. J Hydrogen Energy2013; 38: 385–393.
35.
LiHTangYWangZ. A review of water flooding issues in the proton exchange membrane fuel cell. J Power Sources2008; 178: 103–117.
36.
JiaJLiQWangY. Modeling and dynamic characteristic simulation of a proton exchange membrane fuel cell. IEEE Trans Energy Convers2009; 24: 283–291.
37.
LiuWRuthKRuschG. Membrane durability in PEM fuel cells. J New Mater Electrochem Syst2001; 4: 227–231.
