Objective: This study investigates the association of dental instrument noise with patients’ experiences of pain, stress, annoyance, and fear during dental procedures. This research seeks to provide a deeper understanding of the role of auditory stimuli in shaping patient experiences. Method: This cross-sectional study involved 235 participants referred to dental clinics. Patients’ noise exposure during treatment was measured using a calibrated dosimeter in accordance with ISO 9612 standard methods. Participants completed questionnaires assessing demographic information, noise sensitivity, and psychological responses, including pain, stress, fear, and annoyance, following treatments. Finally, a hypothesis model was constructed and tested using structural equation modeling. Results: The findings indicated that noise exposure was directly associated with higher annoyance (coefficient = 0.231), fear (coefficient = 0.184), and pain (coefficient = 0.146). Indirect pathways suggesting mediation through pain, fear, and stress were associated with higher annoyance. Sensitivity exhibited a moderate direct effect on fear (coefficient = 0.321), with its indirect influence on annoyance occurring through other independent variables, indirectly. Conclusion: Dental noise was significantly associated with patients’ psychological responses, particularly annoyance, pain, stress, and fear. Individual susceptibility also plays a crucial role in patient reactions. Implementing noise reduction strategies, such as utilizing quieter equipment and providing pre-treatment educational interventions, is essential for enhancing patient experiences in dental settings. Practice Implications: This study highlights the need for dental practices to implement noise reduction strategies, educate patients about auditory stimuli, and personalize care based on individual noise sensitivity. These measures can significantly enhance patient comfort and reduce psychological distress during dental treatments.
BaseerMAAlSAAlMasoudSM, et al.Noise levels encountered in university dental clinics during different specialty treatments. J Fam Med Prim Care2021; 10(8): 2987–2992.
2.
MaKWWongHMMakCM. Dental environmental noise evaluation and health risk model construction to dental professionals. Int J Environ Res Publ Health2017; 14(9): 1084.
3.
Dentistry – handpieces and motors, ISO 14457:2017Geneva, Switzerland : International Organization for Standardization, 2017.
4.
AntoniadouMTziovaraPAntoniadouC. The effect of sound in the dental office: practices and recommendations for quality assurance—A narrative review. Dent J2022; 10(12): 228.
5.
Monazzam EsmaielpourMRZakerianSAAbbasiM, et al.Investigating the effect of noise exposure on mental disorders and the work ability index among industrial workers. Noise Vib Worldw2022; 53(1-2): 3–11.
6.
AbbasiMYazdaniradSDehdariradH, et al.Noise exposure and the risk of cancer: a comprehensive systematic review. Rev Environ Health2023; 38(4): 713–726.
7.
ChenXLiuMZuoL, et al.Environmental noise exposure and health outcomes: an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analysis. Eur J Publ Health2023; 33(4): 725–731.
8.
Al-RawiNHAl NuaimiASSadiqiA, et al.Occupational noise-induced hearing loss among dental professionals. Quintessence Int2019; 50(3): 245–250.
9.
Al ShanqitiAMAbugadHASalamaKF. Assessment of ambient noise exposure among medical staff in dental clinics center of dammam medical complex, Saudi Arabia. J Ecophysiol Occup Health2020; 20: 120–127.
10.
Arsal YıldırımSKurtHSaygıE, et al.Evaluation of the relationship between occupational noise exposure and stress levels in a healthcare facility. Int J Occup Saf Ergon2024; 30(3): 977–984.
11.
ZhouTWuYMengQ, et al.Influence of the acoustic environment in hospital wards on patient physiological and psychological indices. Front Psychol2020; 11: 1600.
12.
TziovaraPAntoniadouCAntoniadouM. Patients’ perceptions of sound and noise dimensions in the dental clinic soundscape. Applied Sciences2024; 14(6): 2587.
13.
MakCWongHChuY (eds). Effect of the sound of dental equipment on dental anxiety and noise control techniques. Proceedings of the 12th ICBEN Congress on Noise as a Public Health Problem. Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, 2017.
14.
LuCZhangYYXiangB, et al.Management of fear and anxiety in dental treatments: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Odontology2023; 111(1): 20–32.
15.
DierickxMVerschraegenSWierinckE, et al.Noise disturbance and potential hearing loss due to exposure of dental equipment in Flemish dentists. Int J Environ Res Publ Health2021; 18(11): 5617.
16.
KoširTSajovicJGrošeljM, et al.Real-life dental examination elicits physiological responses different to visual and auditory dental-related stimuli. PLoS One2021; 16(6): e0252128.
17.
ShresthaPShakyaSPoudyalS, et al.Relationship between dental anxiety and pain perception during scaling in periodontally healthy subjects. Journal of Chitwan Medical College2021; 11(3): 88–91.
18.
AlkananSAMAlhaweriHSKhalifaGA, et al.Dental pain perception and emotional changes: on the relationship between dental anxiety and olfaction. BMC Oral Health2023; 23(1): 175.
19.
Murillo‐BenítezMMartín‐GonzálezJJiménez‐SánchezM, et al.Association between dental anxiety and intraoperative pain during root canal treatment: a cross‐sectional study. Int Endod J2020; 53(4): 447–454.
20.
WynsAHendrixJLahousseA, et al.The biology of stress intolerance in patients with chronic Pain—State of the art and future directions. J Clin Med2023; 12(6): 2245.
21.
EnrightAEnrightS. Dental anxiety and phobia–Causes, impacts, and treatment. Dent Oral Maxillofac Res2021; 7: 1–6.
22.
LiuYChenX. A study on the influence of dominant sound sources on users’ emotional perception in a pediatric dentistry clinic. Front Psychol2024; 15: 1379450.
23.
StandardizationI9612. Edition 2. Acoustics Determination of Occupational Noise Exposure-Engineering Method. Int Organization Stand, 2009, vol 43.
24.
FreesA. Dental professionals occupational noise exposure and its auditory and non-auditory effects. 2019.
25.
AlimohammadiINassiriPAzkhoshM, et al.Reliability and validity of the Persian translation of the weinstein noise sensitivity scale. Psychol Res2006.
26.
EkehammarBDornicS. Weinstein's noise sensitivity scale: reliability and construct validity. Percept Mot Skills1990; 70(1): 129–130.
27.
GoudmanLPilitsisJBilletB, et al.The level of agreement between the numerical rating scale and visual analogue scale for assessing pain intensity in adults with chronic pain. Anaesthesia2024; 79(2): 128–138.
28.
Escalona-MarfilCCodaARuiz-MorenoJ, et al.Validation of an electronic visual analog scale mHealth tool for acute pain assessment: prospective cross-sectional study. J Med Internet Res2020; 22(2): e13468.
29.
BegumMRHossainMA. Validity and reliability of visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain measurement. Journal of Medical Case Reports and Reviews. 2019; 2(11): 394–402.
30.
ZhangJChenKLiH, et al.The effects of rating scales and individual characteristics on perceived annoyance in laboratory listening tests. Appl Acoust2023; 202: 109137.
31.
SchefferACSchuurmansMJVanDijkN, et al. Reliability and validity of the visual analogue scale for fear of falling in older persons letters to the editor. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010; 58(11): 394–402.
32.
Askary-AshtianiAEbrahimi-TakamejaniITorkamanG, et al.Reliability and validity of the Persian versions of the fear avoidance beliefs questionnaire and Tampa scale of kinesiophobia in patients with neck pain. Spine2014; 39(18): E1095–E1102.
33.
CouarrazeSDelamarreLMarharF, et al.The major worldwide stress of healthcare professionals during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic–the international COVISTRESS survey. PLoS One2021; 16(10): e0257840.
34.
GadupudiSSiddannaSChandrashekarBR, et al.Association of fear and annoyance with acoustic levels of dental equipment among adolescents attending rural dental health center: a cross-sectional study. Open Dent J2021; 15: 595–600.
35.
LangerJTaylourJSmithAP. Noise exposure, satisfaction with the working environment, and the wellbeing process. ICBEN, 2020.
36.
ClarkCCrumplerCNotleyH. Evidence for environmental noise effects on health for the United Kingdom policy context: a systematic review of the effects of environmental noise on mental health, wellbeing, quality of life, cancer, dementia, birth, reproductive outcomes, and cognition. Int J Environ Res Publ Health2020; 17(2): 393.
37.
AbbasiMYazdaniradSZokaeiM, et al.A Bayesian network model to predict the role of hospital noise, annoyance, and sensitivity in quality of patient care. BMC Nurs2022; 21(1): 243.
38.
StansfeldSClarkCSmukM, et al.Road traffic noise, noise sensitivity, noise annoyance, psychological and physical health and mortality. Environmental Health2021; 20: 1–15.
39.
WongCSMChanWCLoKWY, et al.Environmental stress and emotional reactivity: an exploratory experience sampling method study. Front Psychiatr2024; 15: 1375735.
40.
PenlingtonCUrbanekMBarkerS. Psychological theories of pain. Optimal pain management for the dental team. Springer, 2022, pp. 49–59.
41.
EliI. Oral psychophysiology: stress, pain, and behavior in dental care. CRC Press, 2020.
42.
LinC-SWuS-YYiC-A. Association between anxiety and pain in dental treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of dental research2017; 96(2): 153–162.
43.
Stein DukerLIGragerMGiffinW, et al.The relationship between dental fear and anxiety, general anxiety/fear, sensory over-responsivity, and oral health behaviors and outcomes: a conceptual model. Int J Environ Res Publ Health2022; 19(4): 2380.
44.
ShiRSharpeLAbbottM. A meta-analysis of the relationship between anxiety and attentional control. Clin Psychol Rev2019; 72: 101754.
45.
BasanovicJ. Attentional biases to signals of negative information: reliable measurement across three anxiety domains. Behav Res Methods2024; 56(4): 4173–4187.
46.
LiuCElhaiJDMontagC, et al.Social anxiety and attentional bias to negative emotional information: the relationship and intervention. BMC Psychiatry2024; 24(1): 508.
47.
HahadOKunticMAl-KindiS, et al.Noise and mental health: evidence, mechanisms, and consequences. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol2025; 35(1): 16–23.
48.
MilenkovićSPaunovićK. Noise sensitivity, handedness, and the occurrence of high perceived anxiety and depression in young adults. Pers Indiv Differ2015; 83: 158–163.
49.
AbbasiMTokhiMOEyvazzadehN, et al.Prioritization of noise abatement methods for controlling hospital noise pollution. J Low Freq Noise Vib Act Control2024: 14613484241245002.
