This article aims to determine the optimum parameters of a half-car model passive suspension vehicle passing on a random road. The optimum parameters are obtained based on the response of linear quadratic regulator control with a look-ahead preview for attaining the passive suspension performance nearly equivalent to the active suspension performance. The optimum parameters are estimated by equalizing mean square suspension controlling forces of passive and active vehicle models and subsequently minimizing the performance error between the two systems. The response of passive suspension with optimized parameters matches approximately with the active suspension response, with respect to ride comfort and road holding.
HacA. Suspension optimization of a two dof vehicle model using stochastic optimal control technique. Journal of Sound and Vibration1985; 100: 343–357.
2.
DangorMDahunsiOAPedroJO, et al.Evolutionary algorithm-based PID controller tuning for nonlinear quarter-car electro hydraulic vehicle suspensions. Nonlinear Dynamics2014; 78(4): 2795–2810.
3.
LiWXieZWongPK, et al.Robust non fragile H∞ optimum control for active suspension systems with time-varying actuator delay. Journal of Vibration and Control2019; 25(18): 2435–2452.
4.
LiPLamJCheungKC. H∞ control of periodic piecewise vibration systems with actuator saturation. Journal of Vibration and Control2017; 23(20): 3377–3391.
5.
JingHWangRLiC, et al.Robust finite-frequency H∞ control of full-car active suspension. Journal of Sound and Vibration2019; 441: 221–239.
6.
LiPLamJCheungKC. Multi-objective control for active vehicle suspension with wheelbase preview. Journal of Sound and Vibration2014; 333(21): 5269–5282.
7.
GobiMMastinuG. Analytical description and optimization of the dynamic behavior of passively suspended road vehicles. Journal of Sound and Vibration2000; 245(3): 457–481.
8.
ThoressonMJUysPEElsPS, et al.Efficient optimization of a vehicle suspension system using a gradient-based approximation method, Part-1: mathematical modeling. Mathematical and Computer Modelling2009; 50: 1421–1436.
9.
ThoressonMJUysPEElsPS, et al.Efficient optimization of a vehicle suspension system using a gradient-based approximation method,Part-2: optimization results. Mathematical and Computer Modelling2009; 50: 1437–1447.
10.
MitraACPatilMVBanerjeeN. Optimization of vehicle suspension parameters for ride comfort based on RSM. J.Inst.Eng.India Ser2015; 96(2): 165–173.
11.
GadhviBSavsaniV. Passive suspension optimization using teaching learning based optimization and genetic algorithm considering variable speed over a bump. ASME 2014 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition2014; 23: V04AT04A018.
12.
HuismanRGMVeldpausFEVoetsHJM, et al.An optimal continuous time control strategy for active suspension with preview. Vehicle System Dynamics1993; 23: 43–55.
13.
YoshimuraTEdokoroKAnanthanarayanaN. An active suspension model for rail/vehicle systems with preview and stochastic optimal control. Journal of Sound and Vibration1993; 166(3): 507–519.
14.
ThompsonAGDavisBR. RMS values of force, stroke and tyre deflection in a half-car model with preview controlled active suspension. Vehicle System Dynamics2001; 39(3): 245–253.
15.
ThompsonAGPearceCEM. RMS values for force, stroke and deflection in a quarter-car model active suspension with preview. Vehicle System Dynamics2003; 39(1): 57–75.
16.
KimHJYangHS, and ParkYP. Improving the vehicle performance with active suspension using road-sensing algorithm. Computers and Structures2002; 80: 1569–1577.
17.
MarzbanradJAhmadiGZohoorH, etc. Stochastic optimal preview control of a vehicle suspension. Journal of Sound and Vibration2004; 275(3–5): 973–990.
18.
Gopala RaoLVVNarayananS. Optimal response of half car vehicle model with sky-hook damper based on LQR control. International Journal of Dynamics and Control2019; 8: 488–496.
19.
AlfadhliADarlingJHillisAJ. The control of an active seat with vehicle suspension preview information. Journal of Vibration and Control2018; 24(8): 1412–1426.
20.
LiaoFJiaCMalikU, et al.The preview control of a class of linear systems and its application in the fault-tolerant control theory. International Journal of Systems Science2019; 50(5): 1017--1027.
21.
HamadaY. New LMI-based conditions for preview feed forward synthesis. Control Engineering Practice2019; 90: 19–26.
22.
HarrisonRFHammondJK. A systems approach to the characterization of rough ground. Journal of Sound and Vibration1985; 99(3): 437–447.
23.
SenthilSNarayananS. Stationary response of a four dof vehicle model with look ahead preview. Proc. of International Conference on Mechanical Engineering, IISc Bangalore1995;2: 995–1005.
