How does the mind grow? Despite centuries of philosophical and psychological inquiry, little is known about how ordinary people intuitively conceptualize mental development. Across six countries (Australia, Japan, Mexico, South Africa, the United Kingdom, and the United States), adult participants reported their intuitions about mental development by indicating when they think various mental capacities first emerge. Across tasks and cultures, intuitions about mental development were consistently organized along two dimensions: an earlier-developing perceptual and experiential dimension (e.g., seeing, fear, hunger, pain) and a later-developing reflective and evaluative dimension (e.g., reasoning, beliefs, self-restraint, pride). Competing models were ruled out, showing that this structure is unique to lay beliefs about mental development. These dimensions also aligned with participants’ intuitions about the origins of mental capacities within a nature–nurture framework. Together, the findings reveal a consistent cross-cultural pattern for reasoning about mental development and illuminate the intuitive architecture of mind perception.
BianL.LeslieS. J.CimpianA. (2017). Gender stereotypes about intellectual ability emerge early and influence children’s interests. Science, 355(6323), 389–391. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aah6524
2.
BronfenbrennerU. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Harvard University Press.
3.
BurnettC. J.LiC.WebberE.TsaousidouE.XueS. Y.BrüningJ. C.KrashesM. J. (2016). Hunger-driven motivational state competition. Neuron, 92(1), 187–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2016.08.032
4.
ComreyA. L.LeeH. B. (1992). A first course in factor analysis (2nd ed.). Erlbaum.
5.
Confucius. (1980). The analects of Confucius. Zhonghua Book Company.
6.
CooperJ. M.HutchinsonD. S. (1997). Plato: Complete works. Hackett Publishing.
7.
De CruzH.De SmedtJ. (2007). The role of intuitive ontologies in scientific understanding – the case of human evolution. Biology & Philosophy, 22, 351–368. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-006-9036-8
8.
DorisJ. M. (2015). Talking to our selves: Reflection, ignorance, and agency. Oxford University Press.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.LangA.-G.BuchnerA. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
11.
FingaretteH. (1972). Confucius: The secular as sacred. Harper & Row.
12.
FoxN. A.CalkinsS. D. (2003). The development of self-control of emotion: Intrinsic and extrinsic influences. Motivation and Emotion, 27, 7–26. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023622324898
13.
GauvainM.BeebeH.ZhaoS. (2011). Applying the cultural approach to cognitive development. Journal of Cognition and Development, 12(2), 121–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/15248372.2011.563481
14.
GelmanS. A. (2003). The essential child: Origins of essentialism in everyday thought. Oxford University Press.
GopnikA.WellmanH. M. (1994). The theory theory. In HirschfeldL. A.GelmanS. A. (Eds.), Mapping the mind: Domain specificity in cognition and culture (pp. 257–293). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511752902.011
HarknessS.SuperC. M.TijenN. V. (2000). Individualism and the “Western mind” reconsidered: American and Dutch parents’ ethnotheories of the child. New directions for child and adolescent development, 2000(87), 23–39.
19.
HeelasP.LockA. (1981). Indigenous psychologies: The anthropology of the self. Academic Press.
KahnemanD. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Macmillan.
22.
KellerH. (2007). Cultures of infancy. Psychology Press.
23.
KellyD. J.QuinnP. C.SlaterA. M.LeeK.GeL.PascalisO. (2007). The other-race effect develops during infancy: Evidence of perceptual narrowing. Psychological Science, 18(12), 1084–1089. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.02029.x
24.
LockeJ. (1847). An essay concerning human understanding. Kay & Troutman.
25.
Lorenzo-SevaU.Ten BergeJ. M. F. (2006). Tucker’s congruence coefficient as a meaningful index of factor similarity. Methodology, 2(2), 57–64. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-2241.2.2.57
26.
MalleB. F. (2019). How many dimensions of mind perception really are there?Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 41, 2268–2274. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3j55p1rz
27.
MartinotP.ColnetB.BredaT.SultanJ.TouitouL.HuguetP.SpelkeE.Dehaene-LambertzG.BressouxP.DehaeneS. (2025). Rapid emergence of a maths gender gap in first grade. Nature, 643, 1020–1029. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-09126-4
McMurtrieB. L. (2023). Investigating the dimensions of mind perception. Journal of European Psychology Students, 14(1), 54–68. http://doi.org/10.59477/jeps.594
30.
MengX.WangJ. J.YoshikawaY.IshiguroH.ItakuraS. (2022). A cross-cultural investigation of people’s intuitive beliefs about the origins of cognition. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.974434
31.
MundfromD. J.ShawD. G.KeT. L. (2005). Minimum sample size recommendations for conducting factor analyses. International Journal of Testing, 5(2), 159–168. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327574ijt0502_4
32.
NisbettR. E.PengK.ChoiI.NorenzayanA. (2001). Culture and systems of thought: Holistic versus analytic cognition. Psychological Review, 108(2), 291–310. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.108.2.291
33.
PeplakJ.BobbaB.HasegawaM.CaravitaS. C. S.MaltiT. (2023). The warm glow of kindness: Developmental insight into children’s moral pride across cultures and its associations with prosocial behavior. Developmental Psychology, 59(12), 2320–2332. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0001613
34.
PiagetJ.CookM. (1952). The origins of intelligence in children (Vol. 8, Issue 5). International Universities Press.
RobbinsJ.RumseyA. (2008). Introduction: Cultural and linguistic anthropology and the opacity of other minds. Anthropological Quarterly, 81(2), 407–420. https://doi.org/10.1353/anq.0.0005
38.
RogoffB. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. Oxford University Press.
39.
SchieffelinB. B. (1990). The give and take of everyday life: Language, socialization of Kaluli children (No. 9). CUP Archive.
40.
SigelI. E.McGillicuddy-DeLisiA. V.GoodnowJ. J. (2014). Parental belief systems: The psychological consequences for children. Psychology Press.
WangJ.FeigensonL. (2019). Is empiricism innate? Preference for nurture over nature in people’s beliefs about the origins of human knowledge. Open Mind, 3, 89–100. https://doi.org/10.1162/opmi_a_00028
45.
WangL. L.WattsA. S.AndersonR. A.LittleT. D. (2013). Common fallacies in quantitative research methodology. In LittleT. D. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of quantitative methods: Statistical analysis (pp. 718–758). Oxford University Press.
46.
WeismanK.DweckC. S.MarkmanE. M. (2017). Rethinking people’s conceptions of mental life. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 114(43), 11374–11379. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1704347114
47.
WeismanK.LegareC. H.SmithR. E.DzokotoV. A.AulinoF.NgE.DulinJ. C.Ross-ZehnderN.BrahinskyJ. D.LuhrmannT. M. (2021). Similarities and differences in concepts of mental life among adults and children in five cultures. Nature Human Behaviour, 5(10), 1358–1368. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01184-8
48.
WellmanH. M. (2014). Making minds: How theory of mind develops. Oxford University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
