Religion shapes the nature of intergroup conflict, but conflict may also shape religion. Here, we report four multimethod studies that reveal the impact of conflict on religious belief: The threat of warfare and intergroup tensions increase the psychological need for order and obedience to rules, which leads people to view God as more punitive. Studies 1 (N = 372) and 2 (N = 911) showed that people’s concern about conflict correlates with belief in a punitive God. Study 3 (N = 1,065) found that experimentally increasing the salience of conflict increases people’s perceptions of the importance of a punitive God, and this effect is mediated by people’s support for a tightly regulated society. Study 4 showed that the severity of warfare predicted and preceded worldwide fluctuations in punitive-God belief between 1800 CE and 2000 CE. Our findings illustrate how conflict can change the nature of religious belief and add to a growing literature showing how cultural ecologies shape psychology.
BellowsJ.MiguelE. (2006). War and institutions: New evidence from Sierra Leone. American Economic Review, 96, 394–399.
2.
BendaB. B.ToombsN. J. (2000). Religiosity and violence: Are they related after considering the strongest predictors?Journal of Criminal Justice, 28, 483–496.
3.
BluemkeM.JongJ.GrevensteinD.MikloušićI.HalberstadtJ. (2016). Measuring cross-cultural supernatural beliefs with self- and peer-reports. PLOS ONE, 11(10), Article e0164291. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0164291
4.
BoteroC. A.GardnerB.KirbyK. R.BulbuliaJ.GavinM. C.GrayR. D. (2014). The ecology of religious beliefs. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 111, 16784–16789.
5.
BreckeP. (1999, October). Violent conflicts 1400 A.D. to the present in different regions of the world. Paper presented at the Meeting of the Peace Science Society, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
6.
BreckeP. (2001, June). The long-term patterns of violent conflict in different regions of the world. Paper presented at the Uppsala Conflict Data Program Conference, Uppsala, Sweden.
7.
BushmanB. J.RidgeR. D.DasE.KeyC. W.BusathG. L. (2007). When God sanctions killing: Effect of scriptural violence on aggression. Psychological Science, 18, 204–207.
8.
EpleyN.ConverseB. A.DelboscA.MonteleoneG. A.CacioppoJ. T. (2009). Believers’ estimates of God’s beliefs are more egocentric than estimates of other people’s beliefs. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 106, 21533–21538.
9.
GelfandM. (2018). Rule makers, rule breakers: How tight and loose cultures wire our mind. New York, NY: Scribner.
GelfandM. J.RaverJ. L.NishiiL.LeslieL. M.LunJ.LimB. C.. . . AycanZ. (2011). Differences between tight and loose cultures: A 33-nation study. Science, 332, 1100–1104.
12.
GingesJ.HansenI.NorenzayanA. (2009). Religion and support for suicide attacks. Psychological Science, 20, 224–230.
13.
HarringtonJ. R.GelfandM. J. (2014). Tightness–looseness across the 50 United States. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 111, 7990–7995.
14.
HarrisS. (2005). The end of faith: Religion, terror, and the future of reason. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.
15.
HenrichJ.BauerM.CassarA.ChytilováJ.PurzyckiB. G. (2019). War increases religiosity. Nature Human Behavior, 3, 129–135.
16.
JacksonJ. C.HesterN.GrayK. (2018). The faces of God in America: Revealing religious diversity across people and politics. PLOS ONE, 13(6), Article e0198745. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0198745
17.
JacksonJ. C.von EgmondM.ChoiV.EmberC.Halberstadt.BalanovicJ.. . .GelfandM. (2019). Ecological and cultural factors underlying the global distribution of prejudice. PLOS ONE, 14(9), Article e0221953. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0221953
18.
JohnsonD. (2005). God’s punishment and public goods. Human Nature, 16, 410–446.
19.
JohnsonD. (2016). God is watching you: How the fear of God makes us human. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
20.
JohnsonK. A.LiY. J.CohenA. B. (2015). Fundamental social motives and the varieties of religious experience. Religion, Brain & Behavior, 5, 197–231.
21.
JohnsonK. A.LiY. J.CohenA. B.OkunM. A. (2013). Friends in high places: The influence of authoritarian and benevolent god-concepts on social attitudes and behaviors. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 5(1), 15–22.
22.
JohnsonK. A.OkunM. A.CohenA. B. (2015). The mind of the Lord: Measuring authoritarian and benevolent God representations. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 7, 227–238.
23.
JohnsonM. K.RowattW. C.LaBouffJ. (2010). Priming Christian religious concepts increases racial prejudice. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 1, 119–126.
24.
JongJ.HalberstadtJ. (2016). Death anxiety and religious belief: An existential psychology of religion. London, England: Bloomsbury Academic.
25.
KayA. C.GaucherD.NapierJ. L.CallanM. J.LaurinK. (2008). God and the government: Testing a compensatory control mechanism for the support of external systems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 18–35.
26.
KirkpatrickL. A. (1998). God as a substitute attachment figure: A longitudinal study of adult attachment style and religious change in college students. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 961–973.
27.
LandauM. J.SolomonS.GreenbergJ.CohenF.PyszczynskiT.ArndtJ.CookA. (2004). Deliver us from evil: The effects of mortality salience and reminders of 9/11 on support for President George W. Bush. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1136–1150.
28.
LaurinK.ShariffA. F.HenrichJ.KayA. C. (2012). Outsourcing punishment to God: Beliefs in divine control reduce earthly punishment. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 279, 3272–3281.
29.
McCannS. J. (1999). Threatening times and fluctuations in American church memberships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 325–336.
30.
MichelJ. B.ShenY. K.AidenA. P.VeresA.GrayM. K.PickettJ. P.. . . PinkerS. (2011). Quantitative analysis of culture using millions of digitized books. Science, 331, 176–182.
31.
NorenzayanA.ShariffA. F.GervaisW. M.WillardA. K.McNamaraR. A.SlingerlandE.HenrichJ. (2016). The cultural evolution of prosocial religions. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 39, Article e1. doi:10.1017/S0140525X14001356
32.
NunnN.WantchekonL. (2011). The slave trade and the origins of mistrust in Africa. American Economic Review, 101, 3221–3252.
33.
PechenickE. A.DanforthC. M.DoddsP. S. (2015). Characterizing the Google Books corpus: Strong limits to inferences of socio-cultural and linguistic evolution. PLOS ONE, 10(10), Article e0137041. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0137041
34.
PeoplesH. C.MarloweF. W. (2012). Subsistence and the evolution of religion. Human Nature, 23, 253–269.
35.
PurzyckiB. G. (2016). The evolution of gods’ minds in the Tyva Republic. Current Anthropology, 57(S13), S88–S104.
36.
PurzyckiB. G.ApicellaC.AtkinsonQ. D.CohenE.McNamaraR. A.WillardA. K.. . . HenrichJ. (2016). Moralistic gods, supernatural punishment and the expansion of human sociality. Nature, 530, 327–330.
37.
RoesF. L.RaymondM. (2003). Belief in moralizing gods. Evolution and Human Behavior, 24, 126–135.
38.
ShariffA. F.NorenzayanA. (2011). Mean gods make good people: Different views of God predict cheating behavior. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 21, 85–96.
39.
SkoggardI.EmberC.PitekE.JacksonJ. C.CarolusC. (in press). Resource stress predicts changes in religious belief and increases in sharing behavior. Human Nature.
40.
SosisR.AlcortaC. (2003). Signaling, solidarity, and the sacred: The evolution of religious behavior. Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews, 12, 264–274.
41.
WattsJ.SheehanO.AtkinsonQ. D.BulbuliaJ.GrayR. D. (2016). Ritual human sacrifice promoted and sustained the evolution of stratified societies. Nature, 532, 228–231.
42.
WhiteA. E.KenrickD. T.LiY. J.MortensenC. R.NeubergS. L.CohenA. B. (2012). When nasty breeds nice: Threats of violence amplify agreeableness at national, individual, and situational levels. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 622–634.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
