Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Recognition memory refers to the process of distinguishing between previously experienced and novel events. Apart from the objective quality of stored memories, recognition depends on the retrieval context produced by all items (foils) presented together with actually memorized targets and causing confusion. Memory models often conceptualize target-foil confusability via distances in psychological spaces where greater confusability originates from shorter interitem distances. We tested whether recognition spaces change when other foils are added to the retrieval context or when target memory strength is changed (N = 1,311 adults). Using signal-detection modeling, we found that separately measured distances, d ′s, from each foil to the target provide a good linear prediction of those distances for all foils being presented together against that target. Those predictions stay accurate even when the absolute distances are scaled up or down because of a change in memory strength. This suggests strong metric invariance of spaces used for recognition decisions under variable retrieval contexts.

Keywords

recognition memory visual memory signal-detection theory representational spaces decision making

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bainbridge

W. A.

(2020). The resiliency of image memorability: A predictor of memory separate from attention and priming. Neuropsychologia, 141, Article 107408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2020.107408

Bainbridge

W. A.

Isola

Oliva

(2013). The intrinsic memorability of face photographs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142(4), 1323–1334. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033872

Balaban

Assaf

Meir

M. A.

Luria

(2020). Different features of real-world objects are represented in a dependent manner in long-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 149(7), 1275–1293. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000716

Brady

T. F.

Konkle

Alvarez

G. A.

Oliva

(2013). Real-world objects are not represented as bound units: Independent forgetting of different object details from visual memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142(3), 791–808. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029649

Brady

T. F.

Störmer

V. S.

(2024). Comparing memory capacity across stimuli requires maximally dissimilar foils: Using deep convolutional neural networks to understand visual working memory capacity for real-world objects. Memory & Cognition, 52(3), 595–609. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-023-01485-5

Busemeyer

J. R.

Gluth

Rieskamp

Turner

B. M.

(2019). Cognitive and neural bases of multi-attribute, multi-alternative, value-based decisions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 23(3), 251–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2018.12.003

Colloff

M. F.

Wilson

B. M.

Seale-Carlisle

T. M.

Wixted

J. T.

(2021). Optimizing the selection of fillers in police lineups. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 118(8), e2017292118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2017292118

Daggett

E. W.

Hout

M. C.

(2025). A tutorial review on methods for collecting similarity judgments from human observers. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 87, 737–751 https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-025-03044-3

DeCarlo

L. T.

(2012). On a signal detection approach to m-alternative forced choice with bias, with maximum likelihood and Bayesian approaches to estimation. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 56(3), 196–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2012.02.004

10.

Dumbalska

Tsetsos

Summerfield

(2020). A map of decoy influence in human multialternative choice. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(40), 25169–25178. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2005058117

11.

Gillund

Shiffrin

R. M.

(1984). A retrieval model for both recognition and recall. Psychological Review, 91(1), 1–67. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0033-295X.91.1.1

12.

Goldstone

(1994). An efficient method for obtaining similarity data. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 26, 381–386. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03204653

13.

Hautus

M. J.

Macmillan

N. A.

Creelman

C. D.

(2021). Detection theory: A user’s guide (3rd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003203636

14.

Hebart

M. N.

Contier

Teichmann

Rockter

A. H.

Zheng

C. Y.

Kidder

Corriveau

Vaziri-Pashkam

Baker

C. I.

(2023). THINGS-data, a multimodal collection of large-scale datasets for investigating object representations in human brain and behavior. eLife, 12, Article e82580. https://doi.org/10.7554/elife.82580

15.

Hintzman

D. L.

(1988). Judgments of frequency and recognition memory in a multiple-trace memory model. Psychological Review, 95(4), 528–551. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0033-295X.95.4.528

16.

Hout

M. C.

Papesh

M. H.

Goldinger

S. D.

(2013). Multidimensional scaling. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 4(1), 93–103. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1203

17.

Hunt

R. R.

(1995). The subtlety of distinctiveness: What von Restorff really did. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 105–112. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF0321441

18.

Isola

Parikh

Torralba

Oliva

(2011). Understanding the intrinsic memorability of images. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 24, 2429–2437. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada554133

19.

Isola

Xiao

Torralba

Oliva

(2011). What makes an image memorable? Journal of Vision, 11(11), Article 1282. https://doi.org/10.1167/11.11.1282

20.

Jang

Wixted

J. T.

Huber

D. E.

(2009). Testing signal-detection models of yes/no and two-alternative forced-choice recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138(2), 291–306.

21.

Konkle

Brady

T. F.

Alvarez

G. A.

Oliva

(2010). Conceptual distinctiveness supports detailed visual long-term memory for real-world objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 139(3), 558–578. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019165

22.

Kramer

M. A.

Hebart

M. N.

Baker

C. I.

Bainbridge

W. A.

(2023). The features underlying the memorability of objects. Science Advances, 9(17), eadd2981. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.add2981

23.

Meagher

B. J.

Nosofsky

R. M.

(2023). Testing formal cognitive models of classification and old-new recognition in a real-world high-dimensional category domain. Cognitive Psychology, 145, Article 101596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2023.101596

24.

Migo

Montaldi

Norman

K. A.

Quamme

Mayes

(2009). The contribution of familiarity to recognition memory is a function of test format when using similar foils. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(6), 1198–1215. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210802391599

25.

Migo

E. M.

Montaldi

Mayes

A. R.

(2013). A visual object stimulus database with standardized similarity information. Behavior Research Methods, 45, 344–354. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-012-0255-4

26.

Mullen

K. M.

Ardia

Gil

D. L.

Windover

Cline

(2011). DEoptim: An R package for global optimization by differential evolution. Journal of Statistical Software, 40(6), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v040.i06

27.

Nosofsky

R. M.

(1991). Tests of an exemplar model for relating perceptual classification and recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 17(1), 3–27. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.17.1.3

28.

Nosofsky

R. M.

Little

D. R.

Donkin

Fific

(2011). Short-term memory scanning viewed as exemplar-based categorization. Psychological Review, 118(2), 280–315. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022494

29.

Oberauer

Lin

H. Y.

(2017). An interference model of visual working memory. Psychological Review, 124(1), 21–59. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000044

30.

Roe

R. M.

Busemeyer

J. R.

Townsend

J. T.

(2001). Multialternative decision field theory: A dynamic connectionist model of decision making. Psychological Review, 108(2), 370–392. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0033-295X.108.2.370

31.

Roediger

H. L.

III McDermott

K. B.

(1995). Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21(4), 803–814. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0278-7393.21.4.803

32.

Sanders

Nosofsky

R. M.

(2020). Training deep networks to construct a psychological feature space for a natural-object category domain. Computational Brain & Behavior, 3(3), 229–251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42113-020-00073-z

33.

Schurgin

Wixted

J. T.

Brady

T. F.

(2020). Psychophysical scaling reveals a unified theory of visual memory strength. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(11), 1156–1172. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-00938-0

34.

Shen

K. J.

Colloff

M. F.

Vul

Wilson

B. M.

Wixted

J. T.

(2023). Modeling face similarity in police lineups. Psychological Review, 130(2), 432–461. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000408

35.

Son

Walther

Mack

M. L.

(2021). Scene wheels: Measuring perception and memory of real-world scenes with a continuous stimulus space. Behavior Research Methods, 54(1), 444–456. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-021-01630-5

36.

Spektor

M. S.

Bhatia

Gluth

(2021). The elusiveness of context effects in decision making. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 25(10), 843–854. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2021.07.011

37.

Trueblood

J. S.

(2012). Multialternative context effects obtained using an inference task. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19, 962–968. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-012-0288-9

38.

Tulving

(1981). Similarity relations in recognition. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20(5), 479–496. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5371(81)90129-8

39.

Usher

McClelland

J. L.

(2004). Loss aversion and inhibition in dynamical models of multialternative choice. Psychological Review, 111(3), 757–769. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0033-295X.111.3.757

40.

Utochkin

I. S.

Brady

T. F.

(2020). Independent storage of different features of real-world objects in long-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 149(3), 530–549. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000664

41.

Wixted

J. T.

Mickes

(2010). A continuous dual-process model of remember/know judgments. Psychological Review, 117, 1025–1054. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020874

42.

Wixted

J. T.

Mickes

(2014). A signal-detection-based diagnostic-feature-detection model of eyewitness identification. Psychological Review, 121(2), 262–276. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035940

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.60 MB

Invariant Recognition Memory Spaces for Real-World Objects Revealed With Signal-Detection Analysis

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material