The Mandela effect is an Internet phenomenon describing shared and consistent false memories for specific icons in popular culture. The visual Mandela effect is a Mandela effect specific to visual icons (e.g., the Monopoly Man is falsely remembered as having a monocle) and has not yet been empirically quantified or tested. In Experiment 1 (N = 100 adults), we demonstrated that certain images from popular iconography elicit consistent, specific false memories. In Experiment 2 (N = 60 adults), using eye-tracking-like methods, we found no attentional or visual differences that drive this phenomenon. There is no clear difference in the natural visual experience of these images (Experiment 3), and these errors also occur spontaneously during recall (Experiment 4; N = 50 adults). These results demonstrate that there are certain images for which people consistently make the same false-memory error, despite the majority of visual experience being the canonical image.
Anwyl-IrvineA. L.ArmstrongT.DalmaijerE. S. (2021). MouseView.js: Reliable and valid attention tracking in web-based experiments using a cursor-directed aperture. Behavior Research Methods. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-021-01703-5
2.
BainbridgeW. A. (2017). The memorability of people: Intrinsic memorability across transformations of a person’s face. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 43(5), 706–716. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000339
3.
BainbridgeW. A. (2019). Memorability: How what we see influences what we remember. In FedermeierK. D.BeckD. M. (Eds.), Psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 70, pp. 1–27). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.plm.2019.02.001
BainbridgeW. A.DilksD. D.OlivaA. (2017). Memorability: A stimulus-driven perceptual neural signature distinctive from memory. NeuroImage, 149, 141–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.01.063
6.
BainbridgeW. A.HallE. H.BakerC. I. (2019). Drawings of real-world scenes during free recall reveal detailed object and spatial information in memory. Nature Communications, 10(1), Article 5. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-07830-6
7.
BainbridgeW. A.IsolaP.OlivaA. (2013). The intrinsic memorability of face photographs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142(4), 1323–1334. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033872
8.
BainbridgeW. A.KwokW. Y.BakerC. I. (2021). Disrupted object-scene semantics boost scene recall but diminish object recall in drawings from memory. Memory & Cognition, 49(8), 1568–1582. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-021-01180-3
BlakeA. B.NazarianM.CastelA. D. (2015). Rapid communication: The apple of the mind’s eye: Everyday attention, metamemory, and reconstructive memory for the Apple logo. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 68(5), 858–865. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2014.1002798
11.
BradyT. F.KonkleT.AlvarezG. A.OlivaA. (2008). Visual long-term memory has a massive storage capacity for object details. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 105(38), 14325–14329. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0803390105
de LeeuwJ. R. (2015). jsPsych: A JavaScript library for creating behavioral experiments in a Web browser. Behavior Research Methods, 47(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-014-0458-y
16.
The GIMP Team. (2020). GNU image manipulation program (GIMP) (Version 2.10.18) [Computer software]. https://www.gimp.org/
HendersonJ. M.HayesT. R. (2017). Meaning-based guidance of attention in scenes as revealed by meaning maps. Nature Human Behaviour, 1(10), 743–747. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-017-0208-0
19.
HollingworthA.HendersonJ. M. (2002). Accurate visual memory for previously attended objects in natural scenes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28(1), 113–136. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.28.1.113
20.
IsolaP.XiaoJ.ParikhD.TorralbaA.OlivaA. (2014). What makes a photograph memorable?IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 36(7), 1469–1482. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2013.200
21.
JonesG. V. (1990). Misremembering a common object: When left is not right. Memory & Cognition, 18(2), 174–182. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197093
22.
KoutstaalW.SchacterD. L. (1997). Gist-based false recognition of pictures in older and younger adults. Journal of Memory and Language, 37(4), 555–583. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1997.2529
MaswoodR.RajaramS. (2019). Social transmission of false memory in small groups and large networks. Topics in Cognitive Science, 11(4), 687–709. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12348
NeedellC. D.BainbridgeW. A. (2022). Embracing new techniques in deep learning for estimating image memorability. Computational Brain & Behavior, 5(2), 168–184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42113-022-00126-5
28.
NickersonR. S. (1965). Short-term memory for complex meaningful visual configurations: A demonstration of capacity. Canadian Journal of Psychology/Revue Canadienne de Psychologie, 19(2), 155–160. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0082899
RoedigerH. L.McDermottK. B. (1995). Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21(4), 803–814. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.21.4.803
31.
RoedigerH. L.WatsonJ. M.McDermottK. B.GalloD. A. (2001). Factors that determine false recall: A multiple regression analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8(3), 385–407. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196177
32.
SeamonJ. G.LuoC. R.SchlegelS. E.GreeneS. E.GoldenbergA. B. (2000). False memory for categorized pictures and words: The category associates procedure for studying memory errors in children and adults. Journal of Memory and Language, 42(1), 120–146. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1999.2676
33.
StadlerM. A.RoedigerH. L.McDermottK. B. (1999). Norms for word lists that create false memories. Memory & Cognition, 27(3), 494–500. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211543
34.
WongK.WadeeF.EllenblumG.McCloskeyM. (2018). The devil’s in the g-tails: Deficient letter-shape knowledge and awareness despite massive visual experience. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 44(9), 1324–1335. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000532
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
