The Visual Mandela Effect as Evidence for Shared and Specific False Memories Across People

Abstract

The Mandela effect is an Internet phenomenon describing shared and consistent false memories for specific icons in popular culture. The visual Mandela effect is a Mandela effect specific to visual icons (e.g., the Monopoly Man is falsely remembered as having a monocle) and has not yet been empirically quantified or tested. In Experiment 1 (N = 100 adults), we demonstrated that certain images from popular iconography elicit consistent, specific false memories. In Experiment 2 (N = 60 adults), using eye-tracking-like methods, we found no attentional or visual differences that drive this phenomenon. There is no clear difference in the natural visual experience of these images (Experiment 3), and these errors also occur spontaneously during recall (Experiment 4; N = 50 adults). These results demonstrate that there are certain images for which people consistently make the same false-memory error, despite the majority of visual experience being the canonical image.

Keywords

visual memory recognition visual recall memory errors drawing paradigm open data open materials

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anwyl-Irvine

A. L.

Armstrong

Dalmaijer

E. S.

(2021). MouseView.js: Reliable and valid attention tracking in web-based experiments using a cursor-directed aperture. Behavior Research Methods. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-021-01703-5

Bainbridge

W. A.

(2017). The memorability of people: Intrinsic memorability across transformations of a person’s face. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 43(5), 706–716. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000339

Bainbridge

W. A.

(2019). Memorability: How what we see influences what we remember. In Federmeier

K. D.

Beck

D. M.

(Eds.), Psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 70, pp. 1–27). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.plm.2019.02.001

Bainbridge

W. A.

(2020). The resiliency of image memorability: A predictor of memory separate from attention and priming. Neuropsychologia, 141, Article 107408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2020.107408

Bainbridge

W. A.

Dilks

D. D.

Oliva

(2017). Memorability: A stimulus-driven perceptual neural signature distinctive from memory. NeuroImage, 149, 141–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.01.063

Bainbridge

W. A.

Hall

E. H.

Baker

C. I.

(2019). Drawings of real-world scenes during free recall reveal detailed object and spatial information in memory. Nature Communications, 10(1), Article 5. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-07830-6

Bainbridge

W. A.

Isola

Oliva

(2013). The intrinsic memorability of face photographs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142(4), 1323–1334. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033872

Bainbridge

W. A.

Kwok

W. Y.

Baker

C. I.

(2021). Disrupted object-scene semantics boost scene recall but diminish object recall in drawings from memory. Memory & Cognition, 49(8), 1568–1582. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-021-01180-3

Bakkila

(2019, August 6). What is the Mandela effect? Good Housekeeping. https://www.goodhousekeeping.com/life/entertainment/g28438966/mandela-effect-examples/

10.

Blake

A. B.

Nazarian

Castel

A. D.

(2015). Rapid communication: The apple of the mind’s eye: Everyday attention, metamemory, and reconstructive memory for the Apple logo. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 68(5), 858–865. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2014.1002798

11.

Brady

T. F.

Konkle

Alvarez

G. A.

Oliva

(2008). Visual long-term memory has a massive storage capacity for object details. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 105(38), 14325–14329. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0803390105

12.

Broome

(2010, September 9). Nelson Mandela died in prison? Mandela Effect. https://mandelaeffect.com/nelson-mandela-died-in-prison/

13.

Clinton

(2021). Google Images download [Python script]. GitHub. https://github.com/Joeclinton1/google-images-download

14.

Dagnall

Drinkwater

(2018, February 14). The Mandela effect: Explaining the science behind false memories. The Independent. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/mandela-effect-false-memories-explain-science-time-travel-parallel-universe-matrix-a8206746.html

15.

de Leeuw

J. R

. (2015). jsPsych: A JavaScript library for creating behavioral experiments in a Web browser. Behavior Research Methods, 47(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-014-0458-y

16.

The GIMP Team. (2020). GNU image manipulation program (GIMP) (Version 2.10.18) [Computer software]. https://www.gimp.org/

17.

Henderson

J. M.

(2007). Regarding scenes. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16(4), 219–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00507.x

18.

Henderson

J. M.

Hayes

T. R.

(2017). Meaning-based guidance of attention in scenes as revealed by meaning maps. Nature Human Behaviour, 1(10), 743–747. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-017-0208-0

19.

Hollingworth

Henderson

J. M.

(2002). Accurate visual memory for previously attended objects in natural scenes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28(1), 113–136. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.28.1.113

20.

Isola

Xiao

Parikh

Torralba

Oliva

(2014). What makes a photograph memorable? IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 36(7), 1469–1482. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2013.200

21.

Jones

G. V.

(1990). Misremembering a common object: When left is not right. Memory & Cognition, 18(2), 174–182. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197093

22.

Koutstaal

Schacter

D. L.

(1997). Gist-based false recognition of pictures in older and younger adults. Journal of Memory and Language, 37(4), 555–583. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1997.2529

23.

Kramer

M. A.

Hebart

M. N.

Baker

C. I.

Bainbridge

W. A.

(2022). The features underlying the memorability of Objects. bioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.04.29.490104

24.

Lin

Yousif

S. R.

Chun

M. M.

Scholl

B. J.

(2021). Visual memorability in the absence of semantic content. Cognition, 212, Article 104714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104714

25.

Maswood

Rajaram

(2019). Social transmission of false memory in small groups and large networks. Topics in Cognitive Science, 11(4), 687–709. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12348

26.

Miller

M. B.

Gazzaniga

M. S.

(1998). Creating false memories for visual scenes. Neuropsychologia, 36(6), 513–520. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0028-3932(97)00148-6

27.

Needell

C. D.

Bainbridge

W. A.

(2022). Embracing new techniques in deep learning for estimating image memorability. Computational Brain & Behavior, 5(2), 168–184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42113-022-00126-5

28.

Nickerson

R. S.

(1965). Short-term memory for complex meaningful visual configurations: A demonstration of capacity. Canadian Journal of Psychology/Revue Canadienne de Psychologie, 19(2), 155–160. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0082899

29.

Nickerson

R. S.

Adams

M. J.

(1979). Long-term memory for a common object. Cognitive Psychology, 11(3), 287–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(79)90013-6

30.

Roediger

H. L.

McDermott

K. B.

(1995). Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21(4), 803–814. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.21.4.803

31.

Roediger

H. L.

Watson

J. M.

McDermott

K. B.

Gallo

D. A.

(2001). Factors that determine false recall: A multiple regression analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8(3), 385–407. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196177

32.

Seamon

J. G.

Luo

C. R.

Schlegel

S. E.

Greene

S. E.

Goldenberg

A. B.

(2000). False memory for categorized pictures and words: The category associates procedure for studying memory errors in children and adults. Journal of Memory and Language, 42(1), 120–146. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1999.2676

33.

Stadler

M. A.

Roediger

H. L.

McDermott

K. B.

(1999). Norms for word lists that create false memories. Memory & Cognition, 27(3), 494–500. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211543

34.

Wong

Wadee

Ellenblum

McCloskey

(2018). The devil’s in the g-tails: Deficient letter-shape knowledge and awareness despite massive visual experience. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 44(9), 1324–1335. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000532

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

4.36 MB