Most work on working memory development has children remember a set of items as well as they can. However, this approach sidesteps the extended mind, the integration of external information with memory. Indeed, adults prefer to use external resources (e.g., lists, models) but will remember more as the cost to access them increases. Here, in our shopping game, we investigated this trade-off in 5- to 8-year-olds. Using a touchscreen, children shopped in a virtual store. Their shopping list and the store were not visible simultaneously but could be toggled. We manipulated access cost by varying a delay (0–4 s) before the list’s reappearance. Across three preregistered experiments at two sites (the United States and China, N = 141), a pattern emerged: When it was costlier to do so, children revisited the list less often, studied it longer, and selected more correct items. Also, children recognized the costs, identifying the no-delay condition as easier. Young children showed a cost-dependent trade-off of external-resource use versus working memory.
AgrawalM.MattarM. G.CohenJ. D.DawN. D. (2022). The temporal dynamics of opportunity costs: A normative account of cognitive fatigue and boredom. Psychological Review, 129(3), 564–585. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000309
2.
AhmedS. F.EllisA.WardK. P.ChakuN.Davis-KeanP. E. (2022). Working memory development from early childhood to adolescence using two nationally representative samples. Developmental Psychology, 58(10), 1962–1973. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0001396
3.
ArmitageK. L.BulleyA.RedshawJ. (2020). Developmental origins of cognitive offloading. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences/The Royal Society, 287(1928), Article 20192927. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2019.2927
4.
ArmitageK. L.RedshawJ. (2022). Children boost their cognitive performance with a novel offloading technique. Child Development, 93(1), 25–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13664
BadreD.NeeD. E. (2018). Frontal cortex and the hierarchical control of behavior. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 22(2), 170–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2017.11.005
7.
BallardD. H.HayhoeM. M.PelzJ. B. (1995). Memory representations in natural tasks. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 7(1), 66–80. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.1995.7.1.66
BatesD.MächlerM.BolkerB.WalkerS. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67, 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
10.
Ben-ShacharM.LüdeckeD.MakowskiD. (2020). Effectsize: Estimation of effect size indices and standardized parameters. Journal of Open Source Software, 5(56), Article 2815. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.02815
11.
BotvinickM.BraverT. S.BarchD. M.CarterC. S.CohenJ. D. (2001). Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review, 108(3), 624–652. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.108.3.624
12.
BulleyA.McCarthyT.GilbertS. J.SuddendorfT.RedshawJ. (2020). Children devise and selectively use tools to offload cognition. Current Biology, 30(17), 3457–3464.e3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2020.06.035
DraschkowD.KallmayerM.NobreA. C. (2021). When natural behavior engages working memory. Current Biology, 31(4), 869–874.e5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2020.11.013
FaulF.ErdfelderE.BuchnerA.LangA.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
FreireM. R.PammerK. (2020). Influence of culture on visual working memory: Evidence of a cultural response bias for remote Australian Indigenous children. Journal of Cultural Cognitive Science, 4(3), 323–341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41809-020-00063-4
22.
GallagherS. (2018). The extended mind: State of the question. The Southern Journal of Philosophy, 56(4), 421–447. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjp.12308
23.
GilbertS. J.BirdA.CarpenterJ. M.FlemingS. M.SachdevaC.TsaiP.-C. (2020). Optimal use of reminders: Metacognition, effort, and cognitive offloading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 149(3), 501–517. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000652
24.
GrinschglS.PapenmeierF.MeyerhoffH. S. (2021). Consequences of cognitive offloading: Boosting performance but diminishing memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 74(9), 1477–1496. https://doi.org/10.1177/17470218211008060
HaselenG. C. L.-V.Van Der SteenJ.FrensM. A. (2000). Copying strategies for patterns by children and adults. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 91(2), 603–615. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.2000.91.2.603
HoffmanJ. E.LandauB.PaganiB. (2003). Spatial breakdown in spatial construction: Evidence from eye fixations in children with Williams syndrome. Cognitive Psychology, 46(3), 260–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0010-0285(02)00518-2
30.
HolmS. (1979). A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Theory and Applications, 6(2), 65–70. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4615733
31.
InamdarS.PomplunM. (2003). Comparative search reveals the tradeoff between eye movements and working memory use in visual tasks [Paper presentation]. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 25, Boston, MA. https://escholarship.org/content/qt4k01x26b
32.
InzlichtM.ShenhavA.OlivolaC. Y. (2018). The effort paradox: Effort is both costly and valued. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 22(4), 337–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2018.01.007
KenderlaP.KibbeM. M. (2023). Explore versus store: Children strategically trade off reliance on exploration versus working memory during a complex task. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 225, Article 105535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2022.105535
35.
KirályI.TakácsS.KaldyZ.BlaserE. (2017). Preschoolers have better long-term memory for rhyming text than adults. Developmental Science, 20(3), Article 12398. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12398
36.
KobakhidzeM. N.MaY.TsaloukidisA. (2023). Tiger parenting beyond cultural essentialism: Discourses of class, culture, and competition in Hong Kong. ECNU Review of Education, 7(3), Article 20965311231198252. https://doi.org/10.1177/20965311231198252
KoolW.GershmanS. J.CushmanF. A. (2017). Cost-benefit arbitration between multiple reinforcement-learning systems. Psychological Science, 28(9), 1321–1333. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617708288
39.
KoolW.McGuireJ. T.RosenZ. B.BotvinickM. M. (2010). Decision making and the avoidance of cognitive demand. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 139(4), 665–682. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020198
40.
KuznetsovaA.BrockhoffP. B.ChristensenR. H. B. (2017). lmerTest package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software, 82, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v082.i13
41.
LegerK. R.GutchessA. (2021). Cross-cultural differences in memory specificity: Investigation of candidate mechanisms. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 10(1), 33–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2020.08.016
LiederF.GriffithsT. L. (2019). Resource-rational analysis: Understanding human cognition as the optimal use of limited computational resources. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 43, Article e1. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X1900061X
44.
LongB.WangY.ChristieS.FrankM. C.FanJ. E. (2023). Developmental changes in drawing production under different memory demands in a U.S. and Chinese sample. Developmental Psychology, 59(10), 1784–1793. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0001600
45.
NiebaumJ. C.ChevalierN.GuildR. M.MunakataY. (2019). Adaptive control and the avoidance of cognitive control demands across development. Neuropsychologia, 123, 152–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.04.029
46.
NiebaumJ. C.ChevalierN.GuildR. M.MunakataY. (2021). Developing adaptive control: Age-related differences in task choices and awareness of proactive and reactive control demands. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 21(3), 561–572. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-020-00832-2
47.
NiebaumJ. C.MunakataY. (2020). Deciding what to do: Developments in children’s spontaneous monitoring of cognitive demands. Child Development Perspectives, 14(4), 202–207. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12383
O’LearyA. P.SloutskyV. M. (2017). Carving metacognition at its joints: Protracted development of component processes. Child Development, 88(3), 1015–1032. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12644
50.
O’ReillyR. C.FrankM. J. (2006). Making working memory work: A computational model of learning in the prefrontal cortex and basal ganglia. Neural Computation, 18(2), 283–328. https://doi.org/10.1162/089976606775093909
51.
PeirceJ.GrayJ. R.SimpsonS.MacAskillM.HöchenbergerR.SogoH.KastmanE.LindeløvJ. K. (2019). PsychoPy2: Experiments in behavior made easy. Behavior Research Methods, 51(1), 195–203. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-01193-y
QuY.JorgensenN. A.TelzerE. H. (2021). A call for greater attention to culture in the study of brain and development. Perspectives on Psychological Science: A Journal of the Association for Psychological Science, 16(2), 275–293. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620931461
54.
RanceG.DowellR. C.TomlinD. (2023). The effect of classroom environment on literacy development. NPJ Science of Learning, 8(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-023-00157-y
55.
R Core Team. (2023). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
RiskoE. F.MedimorecS.ChisholmJ.KingstoneA. (2014). Rotating with rotated text: A natural behavior approach to investigating cognitive offloading. Cognitive Science, 38(3), 537–564. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12087
58.
RStudio Team. (2015). RStudio: Integrated development environment for R. RStudio. http://www.rstudio.com/
59.
SahakianA.GayetS.PaffenC. L. E.Van der StigchelS. (2023). Mountains of memory in a sea of uncertainty: Sampling the external world despite useful information in visual working memory. Cognition, 234, Article 105381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2023.105381
ShenhavA.BotvinickM. M.CohenJ. D. (2013). The expected value of control: An integrative theory of anterior cingulate cortex function. Neuron, 79(2), 217–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2013.07.007
62.
ShenhavA.FaheyM. P.GrahekI. (2021). Decomposing the motivation to exert mental effort. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 30(4), 307–314. https://doi.org/10.1177/09637214211009510
63.
ShenhavA.MusslickS.LiederF.KoolW.GriffithsT. L.CohenJ. D.BotvinickM. M. (2017). Toward a rational and mechanistic account of mental effort. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 40, 99–124. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-neuro-072116-031526
64.
SheteS.BeasleyT. M.EtzelC. J.FernándezJ. R.ChenJ.AllisonD. B.AmosC. I. (2004). Effect of winsorization on power and type 1 error of variance components and related methods of QTL detection. Behavior Genetics, 34(2), 153–159. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BEGE.0000013729.26354.da
65.
SinghL.CristiaA.KarasikL. B.RajendraS. J.OakesL. M. (2023). Diversity and representation in infant research: Barriers and bridges toward a globalized science of infant development. Infancy: The Official Journal of the International Society on Infant Studies, 28(4), 708–737. https://doi.org/10.1111/infa.12545
66.
SomaiR. S.SchutM. J.Van der StigchelS. (2020). Evidence for the world as an external memory: A trade-off between internal and external visual memory storage. Cortex, 122, 108–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2018.12.017
67.
TaylorS. E. (1981). The interface of cognitive and social psychology. In HarveyJ. H. (Ed.), Cognition, social behavior, and the environment (pp. 189–211). Lawrence Erlbaum.
68.
UrbanK.UrbanM. (2021). Effects of performance feedback and repeated experience on self-evaluation accuracy in high- and low-performing preschool children. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 36(1), 109–124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-019-00460-6
VerschoorenS.SchindlerS.De RaedtR.PourtoisG. (2019). Switching attention from internal to external information processing: A review of the literature and empirical support of the resource sharing account. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 26(2), 468–490. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-019-01568-y
71.
WangJ.BonawitzE. (2022). Children’s sensitivity to difficulty and reward probability when deciding to take on a task. Journal of Cognition and Development, 4(3), 341–353. https://doi.org/10.1080/15248372.2022.2152032
72.
WardA. F. (2021). People mistake the internet’s knowledge for their own. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(43), Article e2105061118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2105061118
73.
WestbrookA.BraverT. S. (2015). Cognitive effort: A neuroeconomic approach. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 15(2), 395–415. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-015-0334-y
74.
WestbrookA.KesterD.BraverT. S. (2013). What is the subjective cost of cognitive effort? Load, trait, and aging effects revealed by economic preference. PLOS ONE, 8(7), Article e68210. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0068210
75.
WickhamH.AverickM.BryanJ.ChangW.McGowanL.FrançoisR.GrolemundG.HayesA.HenryL.HesterJ.KuhnM.PedersenT.MillerE.BacheS.MüllerK.OomsJ.RobinsonD.SeidelD.SpinuV.. . . YutaniH. (2019). Welcome to the tidyverse. Journal of Open Source Software, 4(43), Article 1686. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.01686
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
