Six-month-old infants can store representations of multiple objects in working memory but do not always remember the objects’ features (e.g., shape). Here, we asked whether infants’ object representations (a) may contain conceptual content and (b) may contain this content even if perceptual features are forgotten. We hid two conceptually distinct objects (a humanlike doll and a nonhuman ball) one at a time in two separate locations and then tested infants’ memory for the first-hidden object by revealing either the original hidden object or an unexpected other object. Using looking time, we found that infants remembered the categorical identity of the hidden object but failed to remember its perceptual identity. Our results suggest that young infants may encode conceptual category in a representation of an occluded object, even when perceptual features are lost.
BaillargeonR.LiJ.NgW.YuanS. (2009). An account of infants’ physical reasoning. In WoodwardA.NeedhamA. (Eds.), Learning and the infant mind (pp. 66–116). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
2.
BaillargeonR.StavansM.WuD.GertnerY.SetohP.KittredgeA. K.BernardA. (2012). Object individuation and physical reasoning in infancy: An integrative account. Language Learning and Development, 8, 4–46.
3.
BonattiL. L.FrotE.MehlerJ. (2005). What face inversion does to infants’ counting abilities. Psychological Science, 16, 506–510.
4.
BonattiL.FrotE.ZanglR.MehlerJ. (2002). The human first hypothesis: Identification of conspecifics and individuation of objects in the young infant. Cognitive Psychology, 44, 388–426.
5.
CareyS. (2009). The origin of concepts. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
FarroniT.JohnsonM. H.MenonE.ZulianL.FaragunaD.CsibraG. (2005). Newborns’ preference for face-relevant stimuli: Effects of contrast polarity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 102, 17245–17250.
8.
FeigensonL.HalberdaJ. (2008). Conceptual knowledge increases infants’ memory capacity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 105, 9926–9930.
9.
FutóJ.TéglásE.CsibraG.GergelyG. (2010). Communicative function demonstration induces kind-based artifact representation in preverbal infants. Cognition, 117, 1–8.
10.
GallistelC. R. (2009). The importance of proving the null. Psychological Review, 116, 439–453.
11.
GorenC. C.SartyM.WuP. Y. (1975). Visual following and pattern discrimination of face-like stimuli by newborn infants. Pediatrics, 56, 544–549.
12.
HarrisonS. A.TongF. (2009). Decoding reveals the contents of visual working memory in early visual areas. Nature, 458, 632–635.
13.
HaysW. L. (1994). Statistics (5th ed.). New York, NY: Harcourt Brace.
14.
KáldyZ.LeslieA. M. (2005). A memory span of one? Object identification in 6.5-month-old infants. Cognition, 97, 153–177.
15.
KanwisherN. (2000). Domain specificity in face perception. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 759–763.
16.
KibbeM. M. (2015). Varieties of visual working memory representation in infancy and beyond. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24, 433–439.
17.
KibbeM. M.FeigensonL. (2016). Infants use temporal regularities to chunk objects in memory. Cognition, 146, 251–263.
18.
KibbeM. M.LeslieA. M. (2011). What do infants remember when they forget? Location and identity in 6-month-olds’ memory for objects. Psychological Science, 22, 1500–1505.
19.
KibbeM. M.LeslieA. M. (2013). What’s the object of object working memory in infancy? Unraveling ‘what’ and ‘how many.’Cognitive Psychology, 66, 380–404.
20.
KibbeM. M.LeslieA. M. (2016). The ring that does not bind: Topological class in infants’ working memory for objects. Cognitive Development, 38, 1–9.
21.
LeslieA. M. (1994). ToMM, ToBy, and Agency: Core architecture and domain specificity. In HirschfeldL. A.GelmanS. A. (Eds.), Mapping the mind: Domain specificity in cognition and culture (pp. 119–148). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
22.
LeslieA. M.XuF.TremouletP. D.SchollB. J. (1998). Indexing and the object concept: Developing ‘what’ and ‘where’ systems. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2, 10–18.
LiuJ.HarrisA.KanwisherN. (2010). Perception of face parts and face configurations: An fMRI study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22, 203–211.
25.
NeedhamA.DuekerG.LockheadG. (2005). Infants’ formation and use of categories to segregate objects. Cognition, 94, 215–240.
26.
PeelenM. V.CaramazzaA. (2012). Conceptual object representations in human anterior temporal cortex. The Journal of Neuroscience, 32, 15728–15736.
27.
PylyshynZ. (1989). The role of location indexes in spatial perception: A sketch of the FINST spatial-index model. Cognition, 32, 65–97.
28.
PylyshynZ. (2004). Some puzzling findings in multiple object tracking: I. Tracking without keeping track of object identities. Visual Cognition, 11, 801–822.
29.
RouderJ. N.SpeckmanP. L.SunD.MoreyR. D.IversonG. (2009). Bayesian t tests for accepting and rejecting the null hypothesis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 225–237.
30.
SchollB. J.LeslieA. M. (1999). Explaining the infant’s object concept: Beyond the perception/cognition dichotomy. In LeporeE.PylyshynZ. (Eds.), What is cognitive science? (pp. 26–73). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
31.
SerencesJ. T.EsterE. F.VogelE. K.AwhE. (2009). Stimulus-specific delay activity in human primary visual cortex. Psychological Science, 20, 207–214.
32.
SouthgateV.CsibraG.KaufmanJ.JohnsonM. H. (2008). Distinct processing of objects and faces in the infant brain. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20, 741–749.
33.
SpelkeE. S.BreinlingerK.MacomberJ.JacobsonK. (1992). Origins of knowledge. Psychological Review, 99, 605–632.
34.
StavansM.BaillargeonR. (2018). Four-month-old infants individuate and track simple tools following functional demonstrations. Developmental Science, 21(1), Article e12500. doi:10.1111/desc.12500
35.
SteinT.SterzerP.PeelenM. V. (2012). Privileged detection of conspecifics: Evidence from inversion effects during continuous flash suppression. Cognition, 125, 64–79.
36.
SurianL.CaldiS. (2010). Infants’ individuation of agents and inert objects. Developmental Science, 13, 143–150.
37.
XuF.CareyS. (1996). Infants’ metaphysics: The case of numerical identity. Cognitive Psychology, 30, 111–153.
38.
XuF.CareyS.QuintN. (2004). The emergence of kind-based object individuation in infancy. Cognitive Psychology, 49, 155–190.
39.
XuF.CareyS.WelchJ. (1999). Infants’ ability to use object kind information for object individuation. Cognition, 70, 137–166.
40.
YoonJ. M.JohnsonM. H.CsibraG. (2008). Communication-induced memory biases in preverbal infants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 105, 13690–13695.
41.
ZoshJ. M.FeigensonL. (2012). Memory load affects object individuation in 18-month-old infants. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 113, 322–336.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
