It is commonly assumed that inner speech—the experience of thought as occurring in a natural language—is a human universal. Recent evidence, however, suggests that the experience of inner speech in adults varies from near constant to nonexistent. We propose a name for a lack of the experience of inner speech—anendophasia—and report four studies examining some of its behavioral consequences. We found that adults who reported low levels of inner speech (N = 46) had lower performance on a verbal working memory task and more difficulty performing rhyme judgments compared with adults who reported high levels of inner speech (N = 47). Task-switching performance—previously linked to endogenous verbal cueing—and categorical effects on perceptual judgments were unrelated to differences in inner speech.
Alderson-DayB.MitrengaK.WilkinsonS.McCarthy-JonesS.FernyhoughC. (2018). The varieties of inner speech questionnaire–revised (VISQ-r): Replicating and refining links between inner speech and psychopathology. Consciousness and Cognition, 65, 48–58.
3.
BaddeleyA. (1966). Short-term memory for word sequences as a function of acoustic, semantic and formal similarity. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18(4), 362–365.
4.
BaddeleyA.ChincottaD.AdlamA. (2001). Working memory and the control of action: Evidence from task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130(4), 641–657.
5.
BergouniouxG. (2001). Endophasie et linguistique: Décomptes, quotes et squelette [Endophasia and linguistics: Quantification, quotes, and outline]. Langue Francaise, 132, 106–124.
6.
BermúdezJ. L. (2007). Thinking without words. Oxford University Press.
7.
BrinthauptT. M. (2019). Individual differences in self-talk frequency: Social isolation and cognitive disruption. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article 1088. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01088
8.
BrinthauptT. M.HeinM. B.KramerT. E. (2009). The self-talk scale: Development, factor analysis, and validation. Journal of Personality Assessment, 91(1), 82–92.
9.
CarruthersP. (2002). The cognitive functions of language. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 25(6), 657–674.
10.
ChellaA.PipitoneA. (2020). A cognitive architecture for inner speech. Cognitive Systems Research, 59, 287–292.
11.
ClarkA. (1998). Magic words: How language augments human computation. In CarruthersP.BoucherJ. (Eds.), Language and thought: Interdisciplinary themes (pp. 162–183). Cambridge University Press.
12.
CraggL.NationK. (2010). Language and the development of cognitive control. Topics in Cognitive Science, 2(4), 631–642.
13.
DawesA. J.KeoghR.AndrillonT.PearsonJ. (2020). A cognitive profile of multi-sensory imagery, memory and dreaming in aphantasia. Scientific Reports, 10, Article 10022. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-65705-7
14.
De LeeuwJ. R. (2015). jsPsych: A JavaScript library for creating behavioral experiments in a Web browser. Behavior Research Methods, 47, 1–12.
15.
DuñabeitiaJ. A.CrepaldiD.MeyerA. S.NewB.PliatsikasC.SmolkaE.BrysbaertM. (2018). MultiPic: A standardized set of 750 drawings with norms for six European languages. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71(4), 808–816.
16.
EmersonM. J.MiyakeA. (2003). The role of inner speech in task switching: A dual-task investigation. Journal of Memory and Language, 48(1), 148–168.
FernyhoughC. (2004). Alien voices and inner dialogue: Towards a developmental account of auditory verbal hallucinations. New Ideas in Psychology, 22(1), 49–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2004.09.001
19.
FernyhoughC.BorghiA. M. (2023). Inner speech as language process and cognitive tool. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 27, 1180–1193.
20.
ForderL.LupyanG. (2019). Hearing words changes color perception: Facilitation of color discrimination by verbal and visual cues. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 148(7), 1105–1123.
21.
FrankishK. (2018). Inner speech and outer thought. In Langland-HassanP.VicenteA. (Eds.), Inner speech: New voices (pp. 221–243). Oxford University Press.
22.
GaukerC. (2011). Words and images: An essay on the origin of ideas. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
23.
GevaS. (2018). Inner speech and mental imagery: A neuroscientific perspective. In Langland-HassanP.VicenteA. (Eds.), Inner speech: New voices (pp. 105–130). Oxford University Press.
24.
GevaS.BennettS.WarburtonE. A.PattersonK. (2011). Discrepancy between inner and overt speech: Implications for post-stroke aphasia and normal language processing. Aphasiology, 25(3), 323–343.
25.
GevaS.WarburtonE. A. (2019). A test battery for inner speech functions. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 34(1), 97–113.
26.
GrandchampR.RapinL.Perrone-BertolottiM.PichatC.HaldinC.CousinE.LachauxJ. P.DohenM.PerrierP.GarnierM.BaciuM.LœvenbruckH. (2019). The ConDialInt model: Condensation, dialogality, and intentionality dimensions of inner speech within a hierarchical predictive control framework. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article 2019. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02019
27.
GregoryD. (2016). Inner speech, imagined speech, and auditory verbal hallucinations. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 7, 653–673.
28.
HeaveyC. L.HurlburtR. T. (2008). The phenomena of inner experience. Consciousness and Cognition, 17(3), 798–810.
29.
HinwarR. P.LambertA. J. (2021). Anauralia: The silent mind and its association with aphantasia. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 744213. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.744213
HurlburtR. T.AkhterS. A. (2006). The descriptive experience sampling method. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 5(3), 271–301.
32.
HurlburtR. T.AkhterS. A. (2008). Unsymbolized thinking. Consciousness and Cognition, 17(4), 1364–1374.
33.
HurlburtR. T.HeaveyC. L.KelseyJ. M. (2013). Toward a phenomenology of inner speaking. Consciousness and Cognition, 22(4), 1477–1494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2013.10.003
KayL.KeoghR.AndrillonT.PearsonJ. (2022). The pupillary light response as a physiological index of aphantasia, sensory and phenomenological imagery strength. eLife, 11, Article e72484. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.72484
36.
KeoghR.WickenM.PearsonJ. (2021). Visual working memory in aphantasia: Retained accuracy and capacity with a different strategy. Cortex, 143, 237–253.
37.
Langland-HassanP. (2018). From introspection to essence: The auditory nature of inner speech. In Langland-HassanP.VicenteA. (Eds.), Inner speech: New voices (pp. 78–104). Oxford University Press.
38.
Langland-HassanP.FariesF. R.RichardsonM. J.DietzA. (2015). Inner speech deficits in people with aphasia. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, Article 528. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00528
39.
LaurentL.MillotJ.-L.AndrieuP.CamosV.FlocciaC.MathyF. (2016). Inner speech sustains predictable task switching: Direct evidence in adults. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 28(5), 585–592.
40.
LidstoneJ. S. M.MeinsE.FernyhoughC. (2010). The roles of private speech and inner speech in planning during middle childhood: Evidence from a dual task paradigm. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 107(4), 438–451. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2010.06.002
41.
LœvenbruckH.GrandchampR.RapinL.NalborczykL.DohenM.PerrierP.BaciuM.Perrone-BertolottiM. (2018). A cognitive neuroscience view of inner language: To predict and to hear, see, feel. In Langland-HassanP.VicenteA. (Eds.), Inner speech: New voices (pp. 131–167). Oxford University Press.
McCarthy-JonesS.FernyhoughC. (2011). The varieties of inner speech: Links between quality of inner speech and psychopathological variables in a sample of young adults. Consciousness and Cognition, 20(4), 1586–1593.
45.
MiyakeA.EmersonM. J.PadillaF.AhnJ. (2004). Inner speech as a retrieval aid for task goals: The effects of cue type and articulatory suppression in the random task cuing paradigm. Acta Psychologica, 115(2–3), 123–142.
46.
MonzelM.MitchellD.MacphersonF.PearsonJ.ZemanA. (2022). Aphantasia, dysikonesia, anauralia: Call for a single term for the lack of mental imagery–Commentary on Dance et al. (2021) and Hinwar and Lambert (2021). Cortex, 150, 149–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2022.02.002
47.
MorinA. (2018). The self-reflective functions of inner speech: Thirteen years later. In Langland-HassanP.VicenteA. (Eds.), Inner speech: New voices (pp. 276–298). Oxford University Press.
48.
MorinA.DuhnychC.RacyF. (2018). Self-reported inner speech use in university students. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 32(3), 376–382.
49.
MurrayD. (1968). Articulation and acoustic confusability in short-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 78(4, Pt.1), 679–684.
50.
NalborczykL.LongcampM.BonnardM.ServeauV.SpieserL.AlarioF.-X. (2023). Distinct neural mechanisms support inner speaking and inner hearing. Cortex, 169, 161–173.
51.
NedergaardJ. S. K.ChristensenM. S.WallentinM. (2023). Mind over body: Interfering with the inner voice is detrimental to endurance performance. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 68, Article 102472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2023.102472
52.
NedergaardJ. S. K.WallentinM.LupyanG. (2023). Verbal interference paradigms: A systematic review investigating the role of language in cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 30(2), 464–488.
53.
OppenheimG. M.DellG. S. (2010). Motor movement matters: The flexible abstractness of inner speech. Memory & Cognition, 38(8), 1147–1160.
54.
Perrone-BertolottiM.RapinL.LachauxJ.-P.BaciuM.LœvenbruckH. (2014). What is that little voice inside my head? Inner speech phenomenology, its role in cognitive performance, and its relation to self-monitoring. Behavioural Brain Research, 261, 220–239.
55.
PerryL. K.LupyanG. (2014). The role of language in multi-dimensional categorization: Evidence from transcranial direct current stimulation and exposure to verbal labels. Brain and Language, 135, 66–72.
56.
RacyF.MorinA.DuhnychC. (2020). Using a thought listing procedure to construct the general inner speech questionnaire: An ecological approach. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 33(4), 385–405.
57.
R Core Team. (2022). R: A language and environment for statistical computing (Version 4.1.3) [Computer software]. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org
58.
RoebuckH.LupyanG. (2020). The Internal Representations Questionnaire: Measuring modes of thinking. Behavior Research Methods, 52(5), 2053–2070.
59.
RossionB.PourtoisG. (2004). Revisiting Snodgrass and Vanderwart’s object pictorial set: The role of surface detail in basic-level object recognition. Perception, 33(2), 217–236.
TianX.ZarateJ. M.PoeppelD. (2016). Mental imagery of speech implicates two mechanisms of perceptual reactivation. Cortex, 77, 1–12.
62.
VicenteA.Martinez-ManriqueF. (2016). The nature of unsymbolized thinking. Philosophical Explorations, 19(2), 173–187.
63.
WallaceG. L.PengC. S.WilliamsD. (2017). Interfering with inner speech selectively disrupts problem solving and is linked with real-world executive functioning. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 60(12), 3456–3460.
64.
WinawerJ.WitthoftN.FrankM. C.WuL.WadeA. R.BoroditskyL. (2007). Russian blues reveal effects of language on color discrimination. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 104(19), 7780–7785.
65.
ZemanA. Z.Della SalaS.TorrensL. A.GountounaV. E.McGonigleD. J.LogieR. H. (2010). Loss of imagery phenomenology with intact visuo-spatial task performance: A case of ‘blind imagination.’Neuropsychologia, 48, 145–155.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
