People differ in how quickly they learn information and how long they remember it, yet individual differences in learning abilities within healthy adults have been relatively neglected. In two studies, we examined the relation between learning rate and subsequent retention using a new foreign-language paired-associates task (the learning-efficiency task), which was designed to eliminate ceiling effects that often accompany standardized tests of learning and memory in healthy adults. A key finding was that quicker learners were also more durable learners (i.e., exhibited better retention across a delay), despite studying the material for less time. Additionally, measures of learning and memory from this task were reliable in Study 1 (N = 281) across 30 hr and Study 2 (N = 92; follow-up n = 46) across 3 years. We conclude that people vary in how efficiently they learn, and we describe a reliable and valid method for assessing learning efficiency within healthy adults.
AmesD. R.RoseP.AndersonC. P. (2006). The NPI-16 as a short measure of narcissism. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 440–450. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2005.03.002
2.
BjorkR. A. (1994). Memory and metamemory considerations in the training of human beings. In MetcalfeJ.ShimamuraA. P. (Eds.), Metacognition: Knowing about knowing (pp. 185–205). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
3.
CacioppoJ. T.PettyR. E.KaoC. F. (1984). The efficient assessment of need for cognition. Journal of Personality Assessment, 48, 306–307. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa4803_13
4.
CohenJ. (2009). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Psychology Press. doi:10.4324/9780203771587
5.
CronbachL. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297–334. doi:10.1007/bf02310555
6.
CronbachL. J.MeehlP. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52, 281–302. doi:10.1037/h0040957
7.
DavisH. P.SmallS. A.SternY.MayeuxR.FeldsteinS. N.KellerF. R. (2003). Acquisition, recall, and forgetting of verbal information in long-term memory by young, middle-aged, and elderly individuals. Cortex, 39, 1063–1091. doi:10.1016/s0010-9452(08)70878-5
8.
DelisD. C.KramerJ. H.KaplanE.OberB. A. (2000). The California Verbal Learning Test (2nd ed.). San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corp.
9.
DuchekJ. M.BalotaD. A.TseC. S.HoltzmanD. M.FaganA. M.GoateA. M. (2009). The utility of intraindividual variability in selective attention tasks as an early marker for Alzheimer’s disease. Neuropsychology, 23, 746–758. doi:10.1037/a0016583
10.
GilletteA. L. (1936). Learning and retention: A comparison of three experimental procedures. Archives of Psychology, 198, 5–56.
11.
GoslingS. D.RentfrowP. J.SwannW. B.Jr. (2003). A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 504–528. doi:10.1016/s0092-6566(03)00046-1
12.
GrimaldiP. J.PycM. A.RawsonK. A. (2010). Normative multitrial recall performance, metacognitive judgments, and retrieval latencies for Lithuanian-English paired associates. Behavior Research Methods, 42, 634–642. doi:10.3758/brm.42.3.634
13.
GusnardD. A.RaichleM. E. (2001). Searching for a baseline: Functional imaging and the resting human brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2, 685–694. doi:10.1038/35094500
14.
HutchisonK. A.BalotaD. A.DuchekJ. M. (2010). The utility of Stroop task switching as a marker for early-stage Alzheimer’s disease. Psychology and Aging, 25, 545–559. doi:10.1037/a0018498
15.
JohnsonJ. W. (2000). A heuristic method for estimating the relative weight of predictor variables in multiple regression. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 35, 1–19. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr3501_1
16.
LyonD. O. (1917). Memory and the learning process. Baltimore, MD: Warwick & York.
17.
MarksD. F. (1973). Visual imagery differences in the recall of pictures. British Journal of Psychology, 64, 17–24. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8295.1973.tb01322.x
18.
MeltonA. W. (1967). Individual differences and theoretical process variables: General comments on the conference. In GagnéR. M. (Ed.), Learning and individual differences (pp. 238–252). Columbus, OH: Merrill.
19.
NelsonS. M.SavaliaN. K.FishellA. K.GilmoreA. W.ZouF.BalotaD. A.McDermottK. B. (2016). Default mode network activity predicts early memory decline in healthy young adults aged 18-31. Cerebral Cortex, 26, 3379–3389. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhv165
20.
NelsonT. O.DunloskyJ. (1994). Norms of paired-associate recall during multitrial learning of Swahili-English translation equivalents. Memory, 2, 325–335. doi:10.1080/09658219408258951
21.
NovickM. R.LewisC. (1967). Coefficient alpha and the reliability of composite measurements. Psychometrika, 32, 1–13. doi:10.1007/bf02289400
22.
NunnallyJ. C.BernsteinI. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
23.
PapagnoC.ValentineT.BaddeleyA. (1991). Phonological short-term memory and foreign-language vocabulary learning. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 331–347. doi:10.1016/0749-596x(91)90040-q
24.
RaichleM. R. (2015). The brain’s default mode network. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 38, 433–437. doi:10.1146/annurev-neuro-071013-014030
25.
ReitanR. M. (1958). Validity of the Trail Making Test as an indicator of organic brain damage. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 8, 271–276. doi:10.2466/pms.8.7.271-276
26.
ReyA. (1964). L’examen clinique en psychologie [Clinical tests in psychology]. Paris, France: Presses Universitaires de France.
27.
SalthouseT. A.BabcockR. L. (1991). Decomposing adult age differences in working memory. Developmental Psychology, 27, 763–776. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.27.5.763
28.
ShipsteadZ.HarrisonT. L.EngleR. W. (2016). Working memory capacity and fluid intelligence: Maintenance and disengagement. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11, 771–799. doi:10.1037/e528942014-017
29.
ShipsteadZ.RedickT. S.HicksK. L.EngleR. W. (2012). The scope and control of attention as separate aspects of working memory. Memory, 20, 608–628. doi:10.1080/09658211.2012.691519
30.
StroopJ. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643–662. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.121.1.15
31.
TravisS. G.HuangY.FujiwaraE.RadomskiA.OlsenF.CarterR.. . . MalykhinN. V. (2014). High field structural MRI reveals specific episodic memory correlates in the subfields of the hippocampus. Neuropsychologia, 53, 233–245. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.11.016
32.
TulvingE. (1983). Elements of episodic memory. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
33.
UnsworthN.SpillersG. J. (2010). Working memory capacity: Attention control, secondary memory, or both? A direct test of the dual-component model. Journal of Memory and Language, 62, 392–406. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2010.02.001
34.
UttlB. (2005). Measurement of individual differences: Lessons from memory assessment in research and clinical practice. Psychological Science, 16, 460–467. doi:10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.01557.x
35.
UttlB.GrafP.RichterL. K. (2002). Verbal Paired Associates tests limits on validity and reliability. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 17, 567–581. doi:10.1093/arclin/17.6.567
WechslerD. (2009). Wechsler Memory Scale—Fourth Edition (WMS-IV) technical and interpretive manual. San Antonio, TX: Pearson.
38.
WechslerD. (2011). Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence (2nd ed.). San Antonio, TX: Pearson.
39.
WoodworthR. S. (1914). A contribution to the question of “quick learning, quick forgetting.”Psychological Bulletin, 11, 58–59.
40.
ZimbardoP. G.BoydJ. N. (1999). Putting time in perspective: A valid, reliable individual-differences metric. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1271–1288. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-07368-2_2
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
