Concepts Are Restructured During Language Contact: The Birth of Blue and Other Color Concepts in Tsimane’-Spanish Bilinguals

Abstract

Words and the concepts they represent vary across languages. Here we ask if mother-tongue concepts are altered by learning a second language. What happens when speakers of Tsimane’, a language with few consensus color terms, learn Bolivian Spanish, a language with more terms? Three possibilities arise: Concepts in Tsimane’ may remain unaffected, or they may be remapped, either by Tsimane’ terms taking on new meanings or by borrowing Bolivian-Spanish terms. We found that adult bilingual speakers (n = 30) remapped Tsimane’ concepts without importing Bolivian-Spanish terms into Tsimane’. All Tsimane’ terms become more precise; for example, concepts of monolingual shandyes and yụshñus (~green or blue, used synonymously by Tsimane’ monolinguals; n = 71) come to reflect the Bolivian-Spanish distinction of verde (~green) and azul (~blue). These results show that learning a second language can change the concepts in the first language.

Keywords

bilingualism conceptual representation language change open data open materials

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aikhenvald

A. Y.

(2003). Language contact and language change in Amazonia. In Blake

B. J.

Burridge

(Eds.), Historical linguistics 2001: Selected papers from the 15th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Melbourne, 13–17 August 2001 (pp. 1–20). John Benjamins.

Ann

(2001). Bilingualism and language contact. In The sociolinguistics of sign languages (pp. 33–60). http://lanlib.alzahra.ac.ir/multiMediaFile/2231115-4-1.pdf#page=53

Appel

Muysken

(2005). Language contact and bilingualism. Amsterdam University Press.

Athanasopoulos

(2009). Cognitive representation of colour in bilinguals: The case of Greek blues. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 12(1), 83–95. https://doi.org/10.1017/S136672890800388X

Athanasopoulos

Damjanovic

Krajciova

Sasaki

(2011). Representation of colour concepts in bilingual cognition: The case of Japanese blues. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 14(1), 9–17. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728909990046

Athanasopoulos

Dering

Wiggett

Kuipers

J. R.

Thierry

(2010). Perceptual shift in bilingualism: Brain potentials reveal plasticity in pre-attentive colour perception. Cognition, 116(3), 437–443.

Bacon-Shone

Bolton

(1998). Charting multilingualism: Language censuses and language surveys in Hong Kong. In Pennington

M. C.

(Ed.), Language in Hong Kong at century’s end (pp. 43–90). Hong Kong University Press.

Bacon-Shone

Bolton

Luke

(2015). Language use, proficiency and attitudes in Hong Kong. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/38084400.pdf

Berlin

Kay

(1969). Basic color terms: Their universality and evolution. University of California Press.

10.

Boroditsky

(2001). Does language shape thought? Mandarin and English speakers’ conceptions of time. Cognitive Psychology, 43, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.2001.0748

11.

Conway

Ratnasingam

Jara-Ettinger

Futrell

Gibson

(2020). Communication efficiency of color naming across languages provides a new framework for the evolution of color terms. Cognition, 195, Article 104086. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010027719302604

12.

Cook

Bassetti

Kasai

Sasaki

Takahashi

J. A.

(2016). Do bilinguals have different concepts? The case of shape and material in Japanese L2 users of English. International Journal of Bilingualism, 10(2), 137–152. https://doi.org/10.1177/13670069060100020201

13.

Daller

M. H.

Treffers-Daller

Furman

(2011). Transfer of conceptualization patterns in bilinguals: The construal of motion events in Turkish and German. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 14(1), 95–119.

14.

Deterding

(2010). Variation across Englishes: Phonology. In The Routledge handbook of World Englishes. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9780203849323-34/variation-across-englishes-phonology-david-deterding

15.

Francis

W. S.

(2005). Bilingual semantic and conceptual representation. In Kroll

J. F.

de Groot

A. M. B.

(Eds.), Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic approaches (pp. 251–267). Oxford University Press. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2005-08338-012

16.

Gibson

Futrell

Jara-Ettinger

Mahowald

Bergen

Ratnasingam

Gibson

Piantadosi

S. T.

Conway

B. R.

(2017). Color naming across languages reflects color use. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 114(40), 10785–10790. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1619666114

17.

Gibson

Futrell

Piandadosi

S. T.

Dautriche

Mahowald

Bergen

Levy

(2019). How efficiency shapes human language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 23(5), 389–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2019.02.003

18.

Grosjean

(2022). The mysteries of bilingualism: Unresolved issues. Wiley Blackwell.

19.

Hajk-Georg

(2019). Philentropy: Similarity and distance quantification between probability functions (R package Version 0.3.0) [Computer software]. Retrieved from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=philentropy

20.

Håkansson

Pienemann

Sayehli

(2002). Transfer and typological proximity in the context of second language processing. Second Language Research, 18(3), 250–273. https://doi.org/10.1191/0267658302SR206OA

21.

Haugen

(1950). The analysis of linguistic borrowing. Language, 26(2), 210–231. https://doi.org/10.2307/410058; http://www.jstor.org/stable/410058

22.

Xiao

Jiang

Yang

Zhi

(2019). Language and color perception: Evidence from Mongolian and Chinese speakers. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article 551. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00551

23.

Henrich

Heine

S. J.

Norenzayan

(2010). Most people are not WEIRD. Nature, 466(7302), 29. https://doi.org/10.1038/466029a

24.

January

Kako

(2007). Re-evaluating evidence for linguistic relativity: Reply to Boroditsky (2001). Cognition, 104(2), 417–426. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COGNITION.2006.07.008

25.

Jarvis

Pavlenko

(2012). Crosslinguistic influence in language and cognition. Sociolinguistic Studies, 6, 603–607. https://doi.org/10.1558/sols.v6i3.603

26.

Kay

Maffi

(1999). Color appearance and the emergence and evolution of basic color lexicons. American Anthropologist, 101(4), 743–760. https://doi.org/10.1525/AA.1999.101.4.743

27.

Lindsey

D. T.

Brown

A. M.

Brainard

D. H.

Apicella

C. L.

(2015). Hunter-gatherer color naming provides new insight into the evolution of color terms. Current Biology, 25(18), 2441–2446.

28.

Lucas

(2015). Contact-induced language change. In Bowern

Evans

(Eds.), The Routledge handbook of historical linguistics. https://www.academia.edu/download/37935459/Lucas_Routledge_Contact_final_pre-publication_version.pdf

29.

Lupyan

Zettersten

(2021). Does vocabulary help structure the mind? In Sera

Koenig

(Eds.), Minnesota Symposia on Child Psychology: Human Communication: Origins, Mechanisms, and Functions (Vol. 40, pp. 160–199). John Wiley & Sons.

30.

Mahowald

Dautriche

Braginsky

Gibson

(2020). Efficient communication and the organization of the lexicon. https://psyarxiv.com/4an6v/download?format=pdf

31.

Malik-Moraleda

Roca

Gibson

(2022). Color naming in Tsimane’-Spanish bilinguals indicates that differential experience with content domains affects lexical access. Scientific Reports, 12, Article 17479. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-18461-9

32.

Mangiafico

M. S.

(2017). Package ‘rcompanion.’ Cran Repos.

33.

Neitz

(2001). A new mass screening test for color-vision deficiencies in children. Color Research & Application, 26(S1), S239–S249. https://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6378(2001)26:1

34.

Owens

(1999). Uniformity and discontinuity: Toward a characterization of speech communities. Linguistics, 37(362), 663–698. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.37.4.663

35.

Regier

Kemp

Kay

(2015). Word meanings across languages support efficient communication. In MacWhinney

O’Grady

(Eds.), The handbook of language emergence (pp. 87–237). Wiley & Sons. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/9781118346136#page=247

36.

Ryan

(2013). Language use in the United States: 2011. US Census Bureau.

37.

Silva-Corvalán

(1986). Bilingualism and language change: The extension of estar in Los Angeles Spanish. Language, 62(3), 587–608.

38.

Silva-Corvalán

(1997). Spanish in four continents: Studies in language contact and bilingualism. Georgetown University Press.

39.

Thomason

S. G.

(2001). Language contact. Edinburgh University Press.

40.

Thomason

S. G.

Kaufman

(1992). Language contact, creolization, and genetic linguistics. University of California Press.

41.

Wnuk

Verkerk

Levinson

S. C.

Majid

(2022). Color technology is not necessary for rich and efficient color language. Cognition, 229, Article 105223.

42.

Zaslavsky

Garvin

Kemp

Tishby

Regier

(2022). The evolution of color naming reflects pressure for efficiency: Evidence from the recent past. Journal of Language Evolution. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1093/JOLE/LZAC001

43.

Zaslavsky

Kemp

Regier

Tishby

(2018). Efficient compression in color naming and its evolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 115(31), 7937–7942. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1800521115

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

2.05 MB