Words and the concepts they represent vary across languages. Here we ask if mother-tongue concepts are altered by learning a second language. What happens when speakers of Tsimane’, a language with few consensus color terms, learn Bolivian Spanish, a language with more terms? Three possibilities arise: Concepts in Tsimane’ may remain unaffected, or they may be remapped, either by Tsimane’ terms taking on new meanings or by borrowing Bolivian-Spanish terms. We found that adult bilingual speakers (n = 30) remapped Tsimane’ concepts without importing Bolivian-Spanish terms into Tsimane’. All Tsimane’ terms become more precise; for example, concepts of monolingual shandyes and yụshñus (~green or blue, used synonymously by Tsimane’ monolinguals; n = 71) come to reflect the Bolivian-Spanish distinction of verde (~green) and azul (~blue). These results show that learning a second language can change the concepts in the first language.
AikhenvaldA. Y. (2003). Language contact and language change in Amazonia. In BlakeB. J.BurridgeK. (Eds.), Historical linguistics 2001: Selected papers from the 15th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Melbourne, 13–17 August 2001 (pp. 1–20). John Benjamins.
AppelR.MuyskenP. (2005). Language contact and bilingualism. Amsterdam University Press.
4.
AthanasopoulosP. (2009). Cognitive representation of colour in bilinguals: The case of Greek blues. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 12(1), 83–95. https://doi.org/10.1017/S136672890800388X
5.
AthanasopoulosP.DamjanovicL.KrajciovaA.SasakiM. (2011). Representation of colour concepts in bilingual cognition: The case of Japanese blues. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 14(1), 9–17. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728909990046
6.
AthanasopoulosP.DeringB.WiggettA.KuipersJ. R.ThierryG. (2010). Perceptual shift in bilingualism: Brain potentials reveal plasticity in pre-attentive colour perception. Cognition, 116(3), 437–443.
7.
Bacon-ShoneJ.BoltonK. (1998). Charting multilingualism: Language censuses and language surveys in Hong Kong. In PenningtonM. C. (Ed.), Language in Hong Kong at century’s end (pp. 43–90). Hong Kong University Press.
BerlinB.KayP. (1969). Basic color terms: Their universality and evolution. University of California Press.
10.
BoroditskyL. (2001). Does language shape thought? Mandarin and English speakers’ conceptions of time. Cognitive Psychology, 43, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.2001.0748
11.
ConwayB.RatnasingamS.Jara-EttingerJ.FutrellR.GibsonE. (2020). Communication efficiency of color naming across languages provides a new framework for the evolution of color terms. Cognition, 195, Article 104086. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010027719302604
12.
CookV.BassettiB.KasaiC.SasakiM.TakahashiJ. A. (2016). Do bilinguals have different concepts? The case of shape and material in Japanese L2 users of English. International Journal of Bilingualism, 10(2), 137–152. https://doi.org/10.1177/13670069060100020201
13.
DallerM. H.Treffers-DallerJ.FurmanR. (2011). Transfer of conceptualization patterns in bilinguals: The construal of motion events in Turkish and German. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 14(1), 95–119.
FrancisW. S. (2005). Bilingual semantic and conceptual representation. In KrollJ. F.de GrootA. M. B. (Eds.), Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic approaches (pp. 251–267). Oxford University Press. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2005-08338-012
16.
GibsonE.FutrellR.Jara-EttingerJ.MahowaldK.BergenL.RatnasingamS.GibsonM.PiantadosiS. T.ConwayB. R. (2017). Color naming across languages reflects color use. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 114(40), 10785–10790. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1619666114
17.
GibsonE.FutrellR.PiandadosiS. T.DautricheI.MahowaldK.BergenL.LevyR. (2019). How efficiency shapes human language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 23(5), 389–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2019.02.003
18.
GrosjeanF. (2022). The mysteries of bilingualism: Unresolved issues. Wiley Blackwell.
19.
Hajk-GeorgD. (2019). Philentropy: Similarity and distance quantification between probability functions (R package Version 0.3.0) [Computer software]. Retrieved from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=philentropy
20.
HåkanssonG.PienemannM.SayehliS. (2002). Transfer and typological proximity in the context of second language processing. Second Language Research, 18(3), 250–273. https://doi.org/10.1191/0267658302SR206OA
HeH.LiJ.XiaoQ.JiangS.YangY.ZhiS. (2019). Language and color perception: Evidence from Mongolian and Chinese speakers. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article 551. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00551
JarvisS.PavlenkoA. (2012). Crosslinguistic influence in language and cognition. Sociolinguistic Studies, 6, 603–607. https://doi.org/10.1558/sols.v6i3.603
26.
KayP.MaffiL. (1999). Color appearance and the emergence and evolution of basic color lexicons. American Anthropologist, 101(4), 743–760. https://doi.org/10.1525/AA.1999.101.4.743
27.
LindseyD. T.BrownA. M.BrainardD. H.ApicellaC. L. (2015). Hunter-gatherer color naming provides new insight into the evolution of color terms. Current Biology, 25(18), 2441–2446.
LupyanG.ZetterstenM. (2021). Does vocabulary help structure the mind? In SeraM.KoenigM. (Eds.), Minnesota Symposia on Child Psychology: Human Communication: Origins, Mechanisms, and Functions (Vol. 40, pp. 160–199). John Wiley & Sons.
Malik-MoraledaS.RocaM.GibsonE. (2022). Color naming in Tsimane’-Spanish bilinguals indicates that differential experience with content domains affects lexical access. Scientific Reports, 12, Article 17479. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-18461-9
32.
MangiaficoS.MangiaficoM. S. (2017). Package ‘rcompanion.’Cran Repos.
33.
NeitzM.NeitzJ. (2001). A new mass screening test for color-vision deficiencies in children. Color Research & Application, 26(S1), S239–S249. https://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6378(2001)26:1
34.
OwensJ. (1999). Uniformity and discontinuity: Toward a characterization of speech communities. Linguistics, 37(362), 663–698. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.37.4.663
RyanC. (2013). Language use in the United States: 2011. US Census Bureau.
37.
Silva-CorvalánC. (1986). Bilingualism and language change: The extension of estar in Los Angeles Spanish. Language, 62(3), 587–608.
38.
Silva-CorvalánC. (1997). Spanish in four continents: Studies in language contact and bilingualism. Georgetown University Press.
39.
ThomasonS. G. (2001). Language contact. Edinburgh University Press.
40.
ThomasonS. G.KaufmanT. (1992). Language contact, creolization, and genetic linguistics. University of California Press.
41.
WnukE.VerkerkA.LevinsonS. C.MajidA. (2022). Color technology is not necessary for rich and efficient color language. Cognition, 229, Article 105223.
42.
ZaslavskyN.GarvinK.KempC.TishbyN.RegierT. (2022). The evolution of color naming reflects pressure for efficiency: Evidence from the recent past. Journal of Language Evolution. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1093/JOLE/LZAC001
43.
ZaslavskyN.KempC.RegierT.TishbyN. (2018). Efficient compression in color naming and its evolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 115(31), 7937–7942. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1800521115
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
