Spatial cognition is a fundamental aspect of human intelligence, but our understanding of its developmental trajectory across the life span is limited. Here, we applied game-based assessment on mobile devices to engage a large sample from China (N = 216,713) with a wide age range (from under 10 years old to above 60) in multiple participations of a mental rotation task, a typical measure of spatial cognition. We found that spatial ability developed asynchronously with its malleability. Whereas mental rotation performance peaked at the age of 28, with males performing better than females, the effect of training from repeated participation peaked at 18, probably laying the foundation for the development of spatial ability. In contrast, children showed particularly low malleability, and a follow-up experiment revealed that the underdeveloped ability of mirror-image discrimination likely hindered the malleability of spatial cognition during this period. The intermingled relation of ability and malleability illustrates dynamics in the development of spatial cognition, inviting broad research on the development of other cognitive functions.
AaronP.MalateshaR. (1974). Discrimination of mirror image stimuli in children. Neuropsychologia, 12(4), 549–551.
2.
BavelierD.GreenC. S.PougetA.SchraterP. (2012). Brain plasticity through the life span: Learning to learn and action video games. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 35, 391–416.
3.
BornsteinM. H.GrossC. G.WolfJ. Z. (1978). Perceptual similarity of mirror images in infancy. Cognition, 6(2), 89–116.
4.
CaseyM. B.NuttallR.PezarisE.BenbowC. P. (1995). The influence of spatial ability on gender differences in mathematics college entrance test scores across diverse samples. Developmental Psychology, 31(4), 697–705.
5.
ChristodoulouJ.JohnsonS. P.MooreD. M.MooreD. S. (2016). Seeing double: 5-month-olds’ mental rotation of dynamic, 3D block stimuli presented on dual monitors. Infant Behavior and Development, 45, 64–70.
6.
EaglyA. H.WoodW. (2013). The nature-nurture debates: 25 years of challenges in understanding the psychology of gender. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(3), 340–357.
7.
FengJ.SpenceI.PrattJ. (2007). Playing an action video game reduces gender differences in spatial cognition. Psychological Science, 18(10), 850–855.
8.
FortenbaughF. C.DeGutisJ.GermineL.WilmerJ. B.GrossoM.RussoK.EstermanM. (2015). Sustained attention across the life span in a sample of 10,000 dissociating ability and strategy. Psychological Science, 26(9), 1497–1510.
9.
FrickA.HansenM. A.NewcombeN. S. (2013). Development of mental rotation in 3- to 5-year-old children. Cognitive Development, 28(4), 386–399.
10.
GermineL.NakayamaK.DuchaineB. C.ChabrisC. F.ChatterjeeG.WilmerJ. B. (2012). Is the Web as good as the lab? Comparable performance from Web and lab in cognitive/perceptual experiments. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19(5), 847–857.
11.
GibsonE. P.GibsonJ. J.PickA. D.OsserH. (1962). A developmental study of the discrimination of letter-like forms. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 55(6), 897–906.
12.
GregoryE.McCloskeyM. (2010). Mirror-image confusions: Implications for representation and processing of object orientation. Cognition, 116(1), 110–129.
13.
HalpernD. F.BenbowC. P.GearyD. C.GurR. C.HydeJ. S.GernsbacherM. A. (2007). The science of sex differences in science and mathematics. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 8(1), 1–51.
14.
HammJ. P.JohnsonB. W.CorballisM. C. (2004). One good turn deserves another: An event-related brain potential study of rotated mirror–normal letter discriminations. Neuropsychologia, 42(6), 810–820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2003.11.009
15.
HartshorneJ. K.GermineL. T. (2015). When does cognitive functioning peak? The asynchronous rise and fall of different cognitive abilities across the life span. Psychological Science, 26(4), 433–443.
16.
HawesZ.LeFevreJ.-A.XuC.BruceC. D. (2015). Mental rotation with tangible three-dimensional objects: A new measure sensitive to developmental differences in 4- to 8-year-old children. Mind, Brain, and Education, 9(1), 10–18.
17.
HerlitzA.ReuterskiöldL.LovénJ.ThilersP. P.RehnmanJ. (2013). Cognitive sex differences are not magnified as a function of age, sex hormones, or puberty development during early adolescence. Developmental Neuropsychology, 38(3), 167–179.
LevineS. C.VasilyevaM.LourencoS. F.NewcombeN. S.HuttenlocherJ. (2005). Socioeconomic status modifies the sex difference in spatial skill. Psychological Science, 16(11), 841–845.
20.
MarmorG. S. (1975). Development of kinetic images: When does the child first represent movement in mental images?Cognitive Psychology, 7(4), 548–559.
21.
McCloskeyM.ValtonenJ.ShermanJ. C. (2006). Representing orientation: A coordinate-system hypothesis and evidence from developmental deficits. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 23(5), 680–713. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643290500538356
22.
McGrawK. O.TewM. D.WilliamsJ. E. (2000). The integrity of Web-delivered experiments: Can you trust the data?Psychological Science, 11(6), 502–506.
23.
MeneghettiC.BorellaE.PazzagliaF. (2016). Mental rotation training: Transfer and maintenance effects on spatial abilities. Psychological Research, 80(1), 113–127.
24.
MillerD. I.HalpernD. F. (2014). The new science of cognitive sex differences. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(1), 37–45.
25.
MoreauD.ClercJ.Mansy-DannayA.GuerrienA. (2012). Enhancing spatial ability through sport practice. Journal of Individual Differences, 33(2), 83–88.
26.
NewcombeN. S.FrickA. (2010). Early education for spatial intelligence: Why, what, and how. Mind, Brain, and Education, 4(3), 102–111.
27.
NosekB. A.SmythF. L.SriramN.LindnerN. M.DevosT.AyalaA.Bar-AnanY.BerghR.CaiH.GonsalkoraleK.KesebirS.MaliszewskiN.NetoF.OlliE.ParkJ.SchnabelK.ShiomuraK.TulbureB. T.WiersR. W.. . . GreenwaldA. G. (2009). National differences in gender–science stereotypes predict national sex differences in science and math achievement. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 106(26), 10593–10597.
28.
PaschkeK.JordanK.WüstenbergT.BaudewigJ.MüllerJ. L. (2012). Mirrored or identical—Is the role of visual perception underestimated in the mental rotation process of 3D-objects? A combined fMRI-eye tracking-study. Neuropsychologia, 50(8), 1844–1851.
29.
SchmaderT. (2010). Stereotype threat deconstructed. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19(1), 14–18.
30.
SnowC. E.Hoefnagel-HöhleM. (1978). The critical period for language acquisition: Evidence from second language learning. Child Development, 49(4), 1114–1128. https://doi.org/10.2307/1128751
31.
SpiersH.ManleyE.SilvaR.DaltonR. C.WienerJ. M.HölscherC.BohbotV.HornbergerM. (2016, November16). Spatial navigation ability assessed in over 1 million people globally [Paper presentation]. Society for Neuroscience 2016 Meeting, San Diego, CA, United States.
32.
StranskyD.WilcoxL. M.DubrowskiA. (2010). Mental rotation: Cross-task training and generalization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 16(4), 349–360.
33.
TerleckiM. S.NewcombeN. S. (2005). How important is the digital divide? The relation of computer and videogame usage to gender differences in mental rotation ability. Sex Roles, 53(5–6), 433–441.
34.
UttalD. H.MeadowN. G.TiptonE.HandL. L.AldenA. R.WarrenC.NewcombeN. S. (2013). The malleability of spatial skills: A meta-analysis of training studies. Psychological Bulletin, 139(2), 352–402.
35.
UttalD. H.MillerD. I.NewcombeN. S. (2013). Exploring and enhancing spatial thinking: Links to achievement in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics?Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22(5), 367–373.
36.
VandenbergS. G.KuseA. R. (1978). Mental rotations, a group test of three-dimensional spatial visualization. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 47(2), 599–604.
37.
Vander HeydenK. M.HuizingaM.KanK.-J.JollesJ. (2016). A developmental perspective on spatial reasoning: Dissociating object transformation from viewer transformation ability. Cognitive Development, 38, 63–74.
38.
VirtanenP.GommersR.OliphantT. E.HaberlandM.ReddyT.CournapeauD.BurovskiE.PetersonP.WeckesserW.BrightJ.van der WaltS. J.BrettM.WilsonJ.Jarrod MillmanK.MayorovN.NelsonA. R. J.JonesE.KernR.LarsonE., . . . SciPy 1.0 Contributors (2020). SciPy 1.0: Fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python. Nature Methods, 17(3), 261–272.
39.
WaiJ.LubinskiD.BenbowC. P. (2009). Spatial ability for STEM domains: Aligning over 50 years of cumulative psychological knowledge solidifies its importance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(4), 817–835.
40.
WilsonJ. R.De FriesJ.Mc ClearnG.VandenbergS.JohnsonR.RashadM. (1975). Cognitive abilities: Use of family data as a control to assess sex and age differences in two ethnic groups. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 6(3), 261–276.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
