Despite considerable interest in the role of spatial intelligence in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) achievement, little is known about the ontogenetic origins of individual differences in spatial aptitude or their relation to later accomplishments in STEM disciplines. The current study provides evidence that spatial processes present in infancy predict interindividual variation in both spatial and mathematical competence later in development. Using a longitudinal design, we found that children’s performance on a brief visuospatial change-detection task administered between 6 and 13 months of age was related to their spatial aptitude (i.e., mental-transformation skill) and mastery of symbolic-math concepts at 4 years of age, even when we controlled for general cognitive abilities and spatial memory. These results suggest that nascent spatial processes present in the first year of life not only act as precursors to later spatial intelligence but also predict math achievement during childhood.
BonnyJ. W.LourencoS. F. (2013). The approximate number system and its relation to early math achievement: Evidence from the preschool years. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 114, 375–388. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2012.09.015
2.
BullR.EspyK. A.WiebeS. A. (2008). Short-term memory, working memory, and executive functioning in preschoolers: Longitudinal predictors of mathematical achievement at age 7 years. Developmental Neuropsychology, 33, 205–228. doi:10.1080/87565640801982312
3.
ChengY. L.MixK. S. (2014). Spatial training improves children’s mathematics ability. Journal of Cognition and Development, 15, 2–11. doi:10.1080/15248372.2012.725186
4.
DehaeneS. (2011). The number sense: How the mind creates mathematics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
5.
EdmonstonN. K.Litchfield ThaneN. (1988). TRC: Test of Relational Concepts. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
6.
FrickA.MöhringW. (2013). Mental object rotation and motor development in 8- and 10-month-old infants. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 115, 708–720. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2013.04.001
7.
FrickA.MöhringW.NewcombeN. S. (2014). Development of mental transformation abilities. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18, 536–542. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2014.05.011
8.
GlenbergA. M.RobertsonD. A. (2000). Symbol grounding and meaning: A comparison of high-dimensional and embodied theories of meaning. Journal of Memory and Language, 43, 379–401. doi:10.1006/jmla.2000.2714
9.
GundersonE. A.RamirezG.BeilockS. L.LevineS. C. (2012). The relation between spatial skill and early number knowledge: The role of the linear number line. Developmental Psychology, 48, 1229–1241. doi:10.1037/a0027433
10.
HawesZ.MossJ.CaswellB.PoliszczukD. (2015). Effects of mental rotation training on children’s spatial and mathematics performance: A randomized controlled study. Trends in Neuroscience & Education, 4, 60–68. doi:10.1016/j.tine.2015.05.001
11.
HegartyM.WallerD. (2005). Individual differences in spatial abilities. In ShahP.MiyakeA. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of visuospatial thinking (pp. 121–169). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
HuttenlocherJ. (1968). Constructing spatial images: A strategy in reasoning. Psychological Review, 75, 550–560. doi:10.1037/h0026748
14.
KaufmanA. S.KaufmanN. L. (1983). Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children: Administration and scoring manual. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
15.
KaufmanS. B. (2007). Sex differences in mental rotation and spatial visualization ability: Can they be accounted for by differences in working memory capacity?Intelligence, 35, 211–223. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2006.07.009
16.
KellH. J.LubinskiD.BenbowC. P.SteigerJ. H. (2013). Creativity and technical innovation: Spatial ability’s unique role. Psychological Science, 24, 1831–1836. doi:10.1177/0956797613478615
17.
KnopsA.ThirionB.HubbardE. M.MichelV.DehaeneS. (2009). Recruitment of an area involved in eye movements during mental arithmetic. Science, 324, 1583–1585. doi:10.1126/science.1171599
18.
KorkmanM.KirkU.KempS. (2007). NEPSY-II. San Antonio, TX: Pearson.
19.
KourtziZ.KanwisherN. (2000). Cortical regions involved in perceiving object shape. The Journal of Neuroscience, 20, 3310–3318.
20.
KozhevnikovM.HegartyM. (2001). A dissociation between object manipulation spatial ability and spatial orientation ability. Memory & Cognition, 29, 745–756. doi:10.3758/BF03200477
21.
LakoffG.NúñezR. E. (2000). Where mathematics comes from: How the embodied mind brings mathematics into being. New York, NY: Basic Books.
22.
LauerJ. E.UdelsonH. B.JeonS. O.LourencoS. F. (2015). An early sex difference in the relation between mental rotation and object preference. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, Article 558. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00558
23.
LeeS. A.SovranoV. A.SpelkeE. S. (2012). Navigation as a source of geometric knowledge: Young children’s use of length, angle, distance, and direction in a reorientation task. Cognition, 123, 144–161. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2011.12.015
24.
LevineS. C.HuttenlocherJ.TaylorA.LangrockA. (1999). Early sex differences in spatial skill. Developmental Psychology, 35, 940–949. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.35.4.940
25.
LinnM. C.PetersenA. C. (1985). Emergence and characterization of sex differences in spatial ability: A meta-analysis. Child Development, 56, 1479–1498. doi:10.2307/1130467
26.
MixK. S.ChengY. L. (2012). The relation between space and math: Developmental and educational implications. In BensonJ. (Ed.), Advances in child development and behavior (pp. 179–243). New York, NY: Elsevier.
27.
MooreD. S.JohnsonS. P. (2008). Mental rotation in human infants: A sex difference. Psychological Science, 19, 1063–1066. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02200.x
28.
QuinnP. C.LibenL. S. (2008). A sex difference in mental rotation in young infants. Psychological Science, 19, 1067–1070. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02201.x
29.
RochatP.HesposS. J. (1996). Tracking and anticipation of invisible spatial transformations by 4- to 8-month-old infants. Cognitive Development, 11, 3–17. doi:10.1016/S0885-2014(96)90025-8
30.
Ross-SheehyS.OakesL. M.LuckS. J. (2003). The development of visual short-term memory capacity in infants. Child Development, 74, 1807–1822. doi:10.1046/j.1467-8624.2003.00639.x
31.
SheaD. L.LubinskiD.BenbowC. P. (2001). Importance of assessing spatial ability in intellectually talented young adolescents: A 20-year longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 604–614. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.93.3.604
StarrA.LibertusM. E.BrannonE. M. (2013). Number sense in infancy predicts mathematical abilities in childhood. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 110, 18116–18120. doi:10.1073/pnas.1302751110
34.
TsaoF. M.LiuH. M.KuhlP. K. (2004). Speech perception in infancy predicts language development in the second year of life: A longitudinal study. Child Development, 75, 1067–1084. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00726.x
35.
UttalD. H.MeadowN. G.TiptonE.HandL. L.AldenA. R.WarrenC.NewcombeN. S. (2013). The malleability of spatial skills: A meta-analysis of training studies. Psychological Bulletin, 139, 352–402. doi:10.1037/a0028446
36.
VoyerD.VoyerS.BrydenM. P. (1995). Magnitude of sex differences in spatial abilities: A meta-analysis and consideration of critical variables. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 250–270. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.117.2.250
37.
WaiJ.LubinskiD.BenbowC. P. (2009). Spatial ability for STEM domains: Aligning over 50 years of cumulative psychological knowledge solidifies its importance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 817–835. doi:10.1037/a0016127
38.
WellmanH. M.Lopez-DuranS.LaBountyJ.HamiltonB. (2008). Infant attention to intentional action predicts preschool theory of mind. Developmental Psychology, 44, 618–623. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.44.2.618
39.
WetzelsR.WagenmakersE.-J. (2012). A default Bayesian hypothesis test for correlations and partial correlations. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19, 1057–1064. doi:10.3758/s13423-012-0295-x
40.
WoodcockR. W.McGrewK. S.MatherN. (2001). Woodcock-Johnson III. Itasca, IL: Riverside.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
