Pretend play is a ubiquitous learning tool in early childhood, enabling children to explore possibilities outside of their current reality. Here, we demonstrate how pretend play can be leveraged to empower girls in scientific domains. American children ages 4 to 7 years (N = 240) played a challenging science activity in one of three conditions. Children in the exposure condition heard about a successful gender-matched scientist, children in the roleplay condition pretended to be that scientist, and children in the baseline condition did not receive information about the scientist. Girls in the roleplay condition, but not in the exposure condition, persisted longer in the science activity than girls in the baseline condition. Pretending to be the scientist equated girls’ persistence to that of boys. These findings suggest that pretend play of role models motivates young girls in science and may help reduce gender gaps from their roots.
BanduraA. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28(2), 117–148. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2802_3
2.
BetzD. E.SekaquaptewaD. (2012). My fair physicist? Feminine math and science role models demotivate young girls. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3(6), 738–746. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550612440735
3.
BianL.LeslieS. J.CimpianA. (2017). Gender stereotypes about intellectual ability emerge early and influence children’s interests. Science, 355(6323), 389–391. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aah6524
4.
BianL.LeslieS. J.MurphyM. C.CimpianA. (2018). Messages about brilliance undermine women’s interest in educational and professional opportunities. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 76, 404–420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2017.11.006
5.
BuckG. A.ClarkV. L. P.Leslie-PeleckyD.LuY.Cerda-LizarragaP. (2008). Examining the cognitive processes used by adolescent girls and women scientists in identifying science role models: A feminist approach. Science Education, 92(4), 688–707. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20257
6.
CarlsonS. M.WhiteR. E. (2013). Executive function, pretend play, and imagination. In TaylorM. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of the development of imagination (pp. 161–174). Oxford University Press.
7.
ChambersD. W. (1983). Stereotypic images of the scientist: The draw-a-scientist test. Science Education, 67(2), 255–265. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730670213
8.
CheryanS.DruryB. J.VichayapaiM. (2013). Enduring influence of stereotypical computer science role models on women’s academic aspirations. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 37(1), 72–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684312459328
9.
CheryanS.MasterA.MeltzoffA. N. (2015). Cultural stereotypes as gatekeepers: Increasing girls’ interest in computer science and engineering by diversifying stereotypes. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, Article 49. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00049
10.
CheryanS.SiyJ. O.VichayapaiM.DruryB. J.KimS. (2011). Do female and male role models who embody STEM stereotypes hinder women’s anticipated success in STEM?Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2(6), 656–664. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550611405218
11.
ChowS.-C.ShaoJ.WangH. (2008). Sample size calculations in clinical research (2nd ed.). Taylor & Francis.
12.
CoxD. R.OakesD. (1984). Analysis of survival data. Chapman and Hall.
DasguptaN. (2011). Ingroup experts and peers as social vaccines who inoculate the self concept: The stereotype inoculation model. Psychological Inquiry, 22(4), 231–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2011.607313
15.
DoyleA. C. (1913). The adventure of the dying detective. Collier’s.
16.
DweckC. S. (2006). Mindsets. The psychology of success. Ballantine Books.
17.
GoodC.RattanA.DweckC. S. (2012). Why do women opt out? Sense of belonging and women’s representation in mathematics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(4), 700–717. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0026659
18.
GreenwaldA. G.McGheeD. E.SchwartzJ. L. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(6), 1464–1480. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1464
HarterS. (2015). The construction of the self: Developmental and sociocultural foundations (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.
21.
KarniolR.GaliliL.ShtilermanD.NaimR.SternK.ManjochH.SilvermanR. (2011). Why superman can wait: Cognitive self-transformation in the delay of gratification paradigm. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 40(2), 307–317. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2011.546040
22.
LazarusA. A.AbramovitzA. (1962). The use of “emotive imagery” in the treatment of children’s phobias. Journal of Mental Science, 108(453), 191–195. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.108.453.191
23.
LeiR. F.GreenE. R.LeslieS. J.RhodesM. (2019). Children lose confidence in their potential to “be scientists,” but not in their capacity to “do science.” Developmental Science, 22(6), Article e12837. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12837
24.
LeonardJ.MartinezD. N.DashineauS.ParkA.MackeyA. (2021). Children persist less when adults take over. Child Development. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13492
McGuireJ. T.KableJ. W. (2012). Decision makers calibrate behavioral persistence on the basis of time-interval experience. Cognition, 124(2), 216–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2012.03.008
28.
McPhersonE.ParkB.ItoT. A. (2018). The role of prototype matching in science pursuits: Perceptions of scientists that are inaccurate and diverge from self-perceptions predict reduced interest in a science career. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 44(6), 881–898. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167217754069
29.
MillerD. I.NollaK. M.EaglyA. H.UttalD. H. (2018). The development of children’s gender-science stereotypes: A meta-analysis of 5 decades of US draw-a-scientist studies. Child Development, 89(6), 1943–1955. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13039
30.
MontoriV. M.GuyattG. H. (2001). Intention-to-treat principle. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 165(10), 1339–1341.
31.
R Core Team. (2021). R: A language and environment for statistical computing (Version 4.04) [Computer software]. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.R-project.org
32.
RhodesM.LeslieS. J.YeeK. M.SaundersK. (2019). Subtle linguistic cues increase girls’ engagement in science. Psychological Science, 30(3), 455–466. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797618823670
33.
RubinL.LivesayH. (2006). Look, up in the sky! Using superheroes in play therapy. International Journal of Play Therapy, 15(1), 117–133. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0088911
34.
SmithJ. L.LewisK. L.HawthorneL.HodgesS. D. (2013). When trying hard isn’t natural: Women’s belonging with and motivation for male-dominated STEM fields as a function of effort expenditure concerns. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39(2), 131–143. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167212468332
35.
StoutJ. G.DasguptaN.HunsingerM.McManusM. A. (2011). STEMing the tide: Using ingroup experts to inoculate women’s self-concept in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(2), 255–270. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021385
36.
SutherlandS. L.FriedmanO. (2013). Just pretending can be really learning: Children use pretend play as a source for acquiring generic knowledge. Developmental Psychology, 49(9), 1660–1668. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030788
37.
TaylorM.SachetA. B.MaringB. L.ManneringA. M. (2013). The assessment of elaborated role-play in young children: Invisible friends, personified objects, and pretend identities. Social Development, 22(1), 75–93. https://doi.org/10.1111/sode.12011
38.
VoyerD.VoyerS. D. (2014). Gender differences in scholastic achievement: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 140, 1174–1204. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036620
39.
WhiteR. E.CarlsonS. M. (2016). What would Batman do? Self-distancing improves executive function in young children. Developmental Science, 19(3), 419–426. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12314
40.
WhiteR. E.CarlsonS. M. (2021). Pretending with realistic and fantastical stories facilitates executive function in 3-year-old children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 207, Article 105090. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2021.105090
41.
WhiteR. E.PragerE. O.SchaeferC.KrossE.DuckworthA. L.CarlsonS. M. (2017). The “Batman effect”: Improving perseverance in young children. Child Development, 88(5), 1563–1571. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12695
42.
WhitebreadD.O’SullivanL. (2012). Preschool children’s social pretend play: Supporting the development of metacommunication, metacognition and self-regulation. International Journal of Play, 1(2), 197–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/21594937.2012.693384
43.
YeagerD. S.CarrollJ. M.BuontempoJ.CimpianA.WoodyS.CrosnoeR.MullerC.MurrayJ.MhatreP.KerstingN.HullemanC.KudymM.MurphyM.DuckworthA. L.WaltonG. M.DweckC. S. (2022). Teacher Mindsets Help Explain Where a Growth-Mindset Intervention Does and Doesn’t Work. Psychological Science, 33(1), 18–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/09567976211028984
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
