Resisting immediate temptations in favor of larger later rewards predicts academic success, socioemotional competence, and health. These links with delaying gratification appear from early childhood and have been explained by cognitive and social factors that help override tendencies toward immediate gratification. However, some tendencies may actually promote delaying gratification. We assessed children’s delaying gratification for different rewards across two cultures that differ in customs around waiting. Consistent with our preregistered prediction, results showed that children in Japan (n = 80) delayed gratification longer for food than for gifts, whereas children in the United States (n = 58) delayed longer for gifts than for food. This interaction may reflect cultural differences: Waiting to eat is emphasized more in Japan than in the United States, whereas waiting to open gifts is emphasized more in the United States than in Japan. These findings suggest that culturally specific habits support delaying gratification, providing a new way to understand why individuals delay gratification and why this behavior predicts life success.
AkasawaN.AraoC. (2004). Study on the dietary education for dietary habit of preschool children. The Annual Report of the Faculty of Education, University of Iwate, 63, 135–148. https://doi.org/10.15113/00011400
2.
AydukO.Mendoza-DentonR.MischelW.DowneyG.PeakeP. K.RodriguezM. (2000). Regulating the interpersonal self: Strategic self-regulation for coping with rejection sensitivity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 776–792. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.79.5.776
3.
BaldwinA. S.RothmanA. J.HertelA. W.LindeJ. A.JefferyR. W.FinchE. A.LandoH. A. (2006). Specifying the determinants of the initiation and maintenance of behavior change: An examination of self-efficacy, satisfaction, and smoking cessation. Health Psychology, 25(5), 626–634. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.25.5.626
4.
BarbieriM. S.GriguoloM. (1993). Context and quantitative dimension of social conventional transgressions: Is it more serious at home or at school?European Journal of Psychology of Education, 8(2), 105–117. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03173156
5.
BeattyS. E.KahleL. R.UtseyM.KeownC. F. (1993). Gift-giving behaviors in the United States and Japan: A personal values perspective. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 6(1), 49–66. https://doi.org/10.1300/J046v06n01_04
6.
CaseyB. J.SomervilleL. H.GotlibI. H.AydukO.FranklinN. T.AskrenM. K.JonidesJ.BermanM. G.WilsonN. L.TeslovichT.GloverG.ZayasV.MischelW.ShodaY. (2011). Behavioral and neural correlates of delay of gratification 40 years later. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 108(36), 14998–15003. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1108561108
7.
CooperR. P.RuhN.MareschalD. (2014). The goal circuit model: A hierarchical multi-route model of the acquisition and control of routine sequential action in humans. Cognitive Science, 38(2), 244–274. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12067
8.
CoxD. R. (1972). Regression models and life-tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B, 34, 187–220.
9.
DoebelS. (2020). Rethinking executive function and its development. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(4), 942–956. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620904771
10.
DoebelS.MunakataY. (2018). Group influences on engaging self-control: Children delay gratification and value it more when their in-group delays and their out-group doesn’t. Psychological Science, 29(5), 738–748. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617747367
11.
DuckworthA. L.TsukayamaE.KirbyT. A. (2013). Is it really self-control? Examining the predictive power of the delay of gratification task. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39(7), 843–855. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167213482589
12.
GallaB. M.DuckworthA. L. (2015). More than resisting temptation: Beneficial habits mediate the relationship between self-control and positive life outcomes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109(3), 508–525. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000026
13.
GreenR. T.AldenD. L. (1988). Functional equivalence in cross-cultural consumer behavior: Gift giving in Japan and the United States. Psychology & Marketing, 5(2), 155–168. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.4220050205
14.
HagedornJ.HailpernJ.KarahaliosK. G. (2008). VCode and VData: Illustrating a new framework for supporting the video annotation workflow. In S. Levialdi (General Chair), Proceedings of the Workshop on Advanced Visual Interfaces (pp. 317–321). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/1385569.1385622
15.
HannaN.SrivastavaT. (2015). Cultural aspects of gift giving: A comparative analysis of the significance of gift giving in the U.S. and Japan. In SidinS.ManraiA. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 1997 World Marketing Congress. Developments in Marketing Science: Proceedings of the Academy of Marketing Science (pp. 283–287). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17320-7_78
16.
HofmannW.BaumeisterR. F.FörsterG.VohsK. D. (2012). Everyday temptations: An experience sampling study of desire, conflict, and self-control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 1318–1335. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026545
17.
KiddC.PalmeriH.AslinR. N. (2013). Rational snacking: Young children’s decision-making on the marshmallow task is moderated by beliefs about environmental reliability. Cognition, 126(1), 109–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2012.08.004
18.
KochanskaG.MurrayK.JacquesT. Y.KoenigA. L.VandegeestK. A. (1996). Inhibitory control in young children and its role in emerging internalization. Child Development, 67(2), 490–507. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1996.tb01747.x
19.
KoomenR.GrueneisenS.HerrmannE. (2020). Children delay gratification for cooperative ends. Psychological Science, 31(2), 139–148. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797619894205
20.
KusanagiE. (1993). A psychometric examination of the Children’s Behavior Questionnaire. Research and Clinical Center for Child Development Annual Report, 15, 25–33. http://hdl.handle.net/2115/25287
21.
LammB.KellerH.TeiserJ.GudiH.YovsiR. D.FreitagC.PoloczekS.FassbenderI.SuhrkeJ.TeubertM.VöhringerI.KnopfM.SchwarzerG.LohausA. (2018). Waiting for the second treat: Developing culture-specific modes of self-regulation. Child Development, 89(3), 261–277. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12847
22.
LegareC. H.WenN. J.HerrmannP. A.WhitehouseH. (2015). Imitative flexibility and the development of cultural learning. Cognition, 142, 351–361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2015.05.020
23.
LevyG. D.TaylorM. G.GelmanS. A. (1995). Traditional and evaluative aspects of flexibility in gender roles, social conventions, moral rules, and physical laws. Child Development, 66(2), 515–531. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1995.tb00887.x
24.
LuerssenA.GyurakA.AydukO.WendelkenC.BungeS. A. (2015). Delay of gratification in childhood linked to cortical interactions with the nucleus accumbens. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 10(12), 1769–1776. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsv068
25.
MaF.ZengD.XuF.ComptonB. J.HeymanG. D. (2020). Delay of gratification as reputation management. Psychological Science, 31(9), 1174–1182. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620939940
26.
MichaelsonL. E.MunakataY. (2016). Trust matters: Seeing how an adult treats another person influences preschoolers’ willingness to delay gratification. Developmental Science, 19(6), 1011–1019. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12388
27.
MichaelsonL. E.MunakataY. (2020). Same data set, different conclusions: Preschool delay of gratification predicts later behavioral outcomes in a preregistered study. Psychological Science, 31(2), 193–201. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797619896270
28.
MischelW.EbbesenE. B. (1970). Attention in delay of gratification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 16(2), 329–337. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0029815
29.
MischelW.EbbesenE. B.Raskoff ZeissA. (1972). Cognitive and attentional mechanisms in delay of gratification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 21(2), 204–218. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0032198
30.
MischelW.ShodaY.PeakeP. K. (1988). The nature of adolescent competencies predicted by preschool delay of gratification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 687–696. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.54.4.687
MoffittT. E.ArseneaultL.BelskyD.DicksonN.HancoxR. J.HarringtonH.HoutsR.PoultonR.RobertsB. W.RossS.SearsM. R.ThomsonW. M.CaspiA. (2011). A gradient of childhood self-control predicts health, wealth, and public safety. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 108, 2693–2698. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1010076108
33.
MunakataY.YanaokaK.DoebelS.GuildM. R.MichaelsonE. L.SaitoS. (2020). Group influences on children’s delay of gratification: Testing the roles of culture and personal connections. Collabra: Psychology, 6(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.265
34.
NealD. T.WoodW.LabrecqueJ. S.LallyP. (2012). How do habits guide behavior? Perceived and actual triggers of habits in daily life. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 492–498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.10.011
35.
OkudaK.KuraganoT. (1998). Children’s behavior on between-meals eating and parent’s views. Journal for the Integrated Study of Dietary Habits, 9, 56–62. https://doi.org/10.2740/jisdh.9.3_56
36.
OmoriK.KurokawaK. (2012). How do American parents teach table manners to their children during the child-rearing stage?Journal of Home Economics of Japan, 63, 247–255. https://doi.org/10.11428/jhej.63.247
37.
R Core Team. (2013). R: A language and environment for statistical computing (Version 3.5.2) [Computer software]. http://www.R-project.org
38.
RothbartM. K.AhadiS. A.HersheyK. L.FisherP. (2001). Investigations of temperament at three to seven years: The Children’s Behavior Questionnaire. Child Development, 72(5), 1394–1408. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00355
39.
SchlamT. R.WilsonN. L.ShodaY.MischelW.AydukO. (2013). Preschoolers’ delay of gratification predicts their body mass 30 years later. The Journal of Pediatrics, 162(1), 90–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2012.06.049
40.
ShodaY.MischelW.PeakeP. K. (1990). Predicting adolescent cognitive and self-regulatory competencies from preschool delay of gratification: Identifying diagnostic conditions. Developmental Psychology, 26(6), 978–986. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.26.6.978
41.
SmetanaJ. G. (1981). Preschool children’s conceptions of moral and social rules. Child Development, 52(4), 1333–1336. https://doi.org/10.2307/1129527
WattsT. W.DuncanG. J.QuanH. (2018). Revisiting the marshmallow test: A conceptual replication investigating links between early delay of gratification and later outcomes. Psychological Science, 29(7), 1159–1177. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797618761661
44.
WitkowskiT. H.YamamotoY. (1991). Omiyage gift purchasing by Japanese travelers in the U.S. Advances in Consumer Research, 18, 123–128.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
