We propose that self-control failures, and variation across individuals in self-control abilities, are partly due to differences in the speed with which the decision-making circuitry processes basic attributes, such as tastiness, versus more abstract attributes, such as healthfulness. We tested these hypotheses by combining a dietary-choice task with a novel form of mouse tracking that allowed us to pinpoint when different attributes were being integrated into the choice process with temporal resolution at the millisecond level. We found that, on average, tastiness was processed about 195 ms earlier than healthfulness during the choice process. We also found that 13% to 39% of observed individual differences in self-control ability could be explained by differences in the relative speed with which tastiness and healthfulness were processed.
AshbyF. G. (1983). A biased random walk model for two choice reaction times. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 27, 277–297.
2.
BaumeisterR. F.VohsK. D. (Eds.). (2004). Handbook of self-regulation: Research, theory, and applications. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
3.
BeaverJ. D.LawrenceA. D.van DitzhuijzenJ.DavisM. H.WoodsA.CalderA. J. (2006). Individual differences in reward drive predict neural responses to images of food. The Journal of Neuroscience, 26, 5160–5166.
4.
BogaczR. (2007). Optimal decision-making theories: Linking neurobiology with behaviour. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 118–125.
5.
BrainardD. H. (1997). The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433–436.
6.
BusemeyerJ. R.TownsendJ. T. (1993). Decision field theory: A dynamic-cognitive approach to decision making in an uncertain environment. Psychological Review, 100, 432–459.
7.
DaleR.KehoeC.SpiveyM. J. (2007). Graded motor responses in the time course of categorizing atypical exemplars. Memory & Cognition, 35, 15–28.
8.
de WitH.FloryJ. D.AchesonA.McCloskeyM.ManuckS. B. (2007). IQ and nonplanning impulsivity are independently associated with delay discounting in middle-aged adults. Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 111–121.
9.
DshemuchadseM.ScherbaumS.GoschkeT. (2013). How decisions emerge: Action dynamics in intertemporal decision making. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142, 93–100.
10.
FreemanJ. B.AmbadyN. (2009). Motions of the hand expose the partial and parallel activation of stereotypes. Psychological Science, 20, 1183–1188.
11.
FreemanJ. B.AmbadyN.RuleN. O.JohnsonK. L. (2008). Will a category cue attract you? Motor output reveals dynamic competition across person construal. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137, 673–690.
12.
HareT. A.CamererC. F.RangelA. (2009). Self-control in decision-making involves modulation of the vmPFC valuation system. Science, 324, 646–648.
13.
HareT. A.MalmaudJ.RangelA. (2011). Focusing attention on the health aspects of foods changes value signals in vmPFC and improves dietary choice. The Journal of Neuroscience, 31, 11077–11087.
14.
HarrisA.HareT.RangelA. (2013). Temporally dissociable mechanisms of self-control: Early attentional filtering versus late value modulation. The Journal of Neuroscience, 33, 18917–18931.
15.
HutchersonC. A.PlassmannH.GrossJ. J.RangelA. (2012). Cognitive regulation during decision making shifts behavioral control between ventromedial and dorsolateral prefrontal value systems. The Journal of Neuroscience, 32, 13543–13554.
16.
IkedaS.KangM.-I.OhtakeF. (2010). Hyperbolic discounting, the sign effect, and the body mass index. Journal of Health Economics, 29, 268–284.
17.
LaibsonD. (1997). Golden eggs and hyperbolic discounting. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112, 443–478.
18.
LibermanN.TropeY. (2008). The psychology of transcending the here and now. Science, 322, 1201–1205.
19.
LoewensteinG. (1996). Out of control: Visceral influences on behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 65, 272–292.
20.
LuceR. D. (1986). Response times: Their role in inferring elementary mental organization. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
21.
McKinstryC.DaleR.SpiveyM. J. (2008). Action dynamics reveal parallel competition in decision making. Psychological Science, 19, 22–24.
22.
MilosavljevicM.MalmaudJ.HuthA.KochC.RangelA. (2010). The drift diffusion model can account for the accuracy and reaction time of value-based choices under high and low time pressure. Judgment and Decision Making, 5, 437–449.
23.
MitchellS. H. (1999). Measures of impulsivity in cigarette smokers and non-smokers. Psychopharmacology, 146, 455–464.
24.
MuravenM.BaumeisterR. F. (2000). Self-regulation and depletion of limited resources: Does self-control resemble a muscle?Psychological Bulletin, 126, 247–259.
25.
O’DonoghueT.RabinM. (1999). Doing it now or later. The American Economic Review, 89, 103–124.
26.
RangelA. (2013). Regulation of dietary choice by the decision-making circuitry. Nature Neuroscience, 16, 1717–1724.
27.
RangelA.ClitheroJ. A. (2013). The computation of stimulus values in simple choice. In GlimcherP. W.FehrE. (Eds.), Neuroeconomics: Decision making and the brain (2nd ed.; pp. 125–148). London, England: Academic Press.
28.
RatcliffR.McKoonG. (2008). The diffusion decision model: Theory and data for two-choice decision tasks. Neural Computation, 20, 873–922.
29.
RatcliffR.RouderJ. N. (1998). Modeling response times for two-choice decisions. Psychological Science, 9, 347–356.
30.
ReutskajaE.NagelR.CamererC. F.RangelA. (2011). Search dynamics in consumer choice under time pressure: An eye-tracking study. The American Economic Review, 101, 900–926.
31.
RollsE. T.GrabenhorstF.DecoG. (2010). Choice, difficulty, and confidence in the brain. NeuroImage, 53, 694–706.
32.
ScherbaumS.DshemuchadseM.FischerR.GoschkeT. (2010). How decisions evolve: The temporal dynamics of action selection. Cognition, 115, 407–416.
33.
ScherbaumS.DshemuchadseM.GoschkeT. (2012). Building a bridge into the future: Dynamic connectionist modeling as an integrative tool for research on intertemporal choice. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, Article 514. Retrieved from http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00514/full
ShamoshN. A.GrayJ. R. (2008). Delay discounting and intelligence: A meta-analysis. Intelligence, 36, 289–305.
36.
SongJ.-H.NakayamaK. (2008). Target selection in visual search as revealed by movement trajectories. Vision Research, 48, 853–861.
37.
SpiveyM. J.GrosjeanM.KnoblichG. (2005). Continuous attraction toward phonological competitors. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 102, 10393–10398.
38.
SteinbergL.GrahamS.O’BrienL.WoolardJ.CauffmanE.BanichM. (2009). Age differences in future orientation and delay discounting. Child Development, 80, 28–44.
39.
SuterR. S.HertwigR. (2011). Time and moral judgment. Cognition, 119, 454–458.
40.
UsherM.McClellandJ. L. (2001). The time course of perceptual choice: The leaky, competing accumulator model. Psychological Review, 108, 550–592.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
