Episodic memory involves remembering not only what happened but also where and when the event happened. This multicomponent nature introduces different sources of interference that stem from previous experience. However, it is unclear how the contributions of these sources change across development and what might cause the changes. To address these questions, we tested 4- to 5-year-olds (n = 103), 7- to 8-year-olds (n = 82), and adults (n = 70) using item- and source-recognition memory tasks with various manipulations (i.e., list length, list strength, word frequency), and we decomposed sources of interference using a computational model. We found that interference stemming from other items on the study list rapidly decreased with development, whereas interference from preexperimental contexts gradually decreased but remained the major source of interference. The model further quantified these changes, indicating that the ability to discriminate items undergoes rapid development, whereas the ability to discriminate contexts undergoes protracted development. These results elucidate fundamental aspects of memory development.
AckermanB. P. (1984). Item-specific and relational encoding effects in children’s recall and recognition memory for words. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 37(3), 426–450.
2.
AndersonJ. R.BowerG. H. (1972). Recognition and retrieval processes in free recall. Psychological Review, 79(2), 97–123.
3.
BauerP. J. (2007). Remembering the times of our lives: Memory in infancy and beyond. Erlbaum.
4.
CarpenterB.GelmanA.HoffmanM. D.LeeD.GoodrichB.BetancourtM.BrubakerM.GuoJ.LiP.RiddellA. (2017). Stan: A probabilistic programming language. Journal of Statistical Software, 76(1). https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v076.i01
5.
ClarkS. E.GronlundS. D. (1996). Global matching models of recognition memory: How the models match the data. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3(1), 37–60.
6.
CrissA. H.ShiffrinR. M. (2004). Context noise and item noise jointly determine recognition memory: A comment on Dennis and Humphreys (2001). Psychological Review, 111(3), 800–807.
7.
CycowiczY. M.FriedmanD.SnodgrassJ. G.DuffM. (2001). Recognition and source memory for pictures in children and adults. Neuropsychologia, 39(3), 255–267.
8.
De MasterD.PathmanT.LeeJ. K.GhettiS. (2014). Structural development of the hippocampus and episodic memory: Developmental differences along the anterior/posterior axis. Cerebral Cortex, 24(11), 3036–3045.
9.
DennisS. J.HumphreysM. S. (2001). A context noise model of episodic word recognition. Psychological Review, 108(2), 452–478.
10.
DennisS. J.LeeM. D.KinnellA. (2008). Bayesian analysis of recognition memory: The case of the list-length effect. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(3), 361–376.
11.
DrummeyA. B.NewcombeN. S. (2002). Developmental changes in source memory. Developmental Science, 5(4), 502–513.
12.
FoxJ.DennisS.OsthA. F. (2020). Accounting for the build-up of proactive interference across lists in a list length paradigm reveals a dominance of item-noise in recognition memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 110, Article 104065. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2019.104065
13.
FrankM. C.BraginskyM.YurovskyD.MarchmanV. A. (2017). Wordbank: An open repository for developmental vocabulary data. Journal of Child Language, 44(3), 677–694.
14.
GeurtenM.WillemsS.LloydM. (2021). Too much familiarity! The developmental path of the fluency heuristic in children. Child Development, 92(3), 919–936.
15.
GhettiS.AngeliniL. (2008). The development of recollection and familiarity in childhood and adolescence: Evidence from the dual-process signal detection model. Child Development, 79(2), 339–358.
GillundG.ShiffrinR. M. (1984). A retrieval model for both recognition and recall. Psychological Review, 91(1), 1–67.
18.
GlanzerM.AdamsJ. K.IversonG. J.KimK. (1993). The regularities of recognition memory. Psychological Review, 100(3), 546–567.
19.
GlanzerM.BowlesN. (1976). Analysis of the word-frequency effect in recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory, 2(1), 21–31.
20.
GlanzerM.HilfordA.MaloneyL. T. (2009). Likelihood ratio decisions in memory: Three implied regularities. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16(3), 431–455.
21.
GobboC.ChiM. T. H. (1986). How knowledge is structured and used by expert and novice children. Cognitive Development, 1, 221–237.
22.
GronlundS. D.ElamL. E. (1994). List-length effect: Recognition accuracy and variance of underlying distributions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20(6), 1355–1369.
23.
GrossJ.GardinerB.HayneH. (2016). Developmental reversals in recognition memory in children and adults. Developmental Psychobiology, 58(1), 52–59. https://doi.org/10.1002/dev.21344
24.
HalberdaJ.FeigensonL. (2008). Developmental change in the acuity of the “number sense”: The approximate number system in 3-, 4-, 5-, and 6-year-olds and adults. Developmental Psychology, 44(5), 1457–1465.
25.
HartB.RisleyT. R. (1995). Meaningful differences in the everyday experience of young American children. Paul H. Brookes.
26.
HayesB. K.DunnJ. C.JoubertA.TaylorR. (2017). Comparing single- and dual-process models of memory development. Developmental Science, 20(6), Article e12469. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12469
27.
HoffE. (2014). Language development (5th ed.). Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
28.
JeffreysH. (1961). Theory of probability (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.
29.
KeilF. C. (1979). Semantic and conceptual development: An ontological perspective. Harvard University Press.
30.
KeresztesA.NgoC. T.LindenbergerU.Werkle-BergnerM.NewcombeN. S. (2018). Hippocampal maturation drives memory from generalization to specificity. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 22(8), 676–686.
31.
KinnellA.DennisS. (2011). The list length effect in recognition memory: An analysis of potential confounds. Memory & Cognition, 39(2), 348–363.
32.
KinnellA.DennisS. J. (2012). The role of stimulus type in list length effects in recognition memory. Memory & Cognition, 40(3), 311–325.
33.
KleinerM.BrainardD. H.PelliD. G. (2007). What’s new in Psychtoolbox-3?Perception, 36(ECVP Abstract Suppl.).
34.
KruschkeJ. K. (2014). Doing Bayesian data analysis: A tutorial with R, JAGS, and Stan. Academic Press.
35.
KupermanV.Stadthagen-GonzalezH.BrysbaertM. (2012). Age-of-acquisition ratings for 30,000 English words. Behavior Research Methods, 44, 978–990.
36.
LandauerT. K.DumaisS. T. (1997). A solution to Plato’s problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104(2), 211–240.
37.
LeeJ. K.FandakovaY.JohnsonE. G.CohenN. J.BungeS. A.GhettiS. (2020). Changes in anterior and posterior hippocampus differentially predict item-space, item-time, and item-item memory improvement. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 41, Article 100741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2019.100741
38.
LeeM. D.WagenmakersE.-J. (2014). Bayesian cognitive modeling: A practical course. Cambridge University Press
.
39.
LloydM. E.DoydumA. O.NewcombeN. S. (2009). Memory binding in early childhood: Evidence for a retrieval deficit. Child Development, 80(5), 1321–1328.
40.
MacWhinneyB. (2000). The CHILDES Project: Tools for analyzing talk (3rd ed.). Erlbaum.
41.
MandlerJ. M.BauerP. J.McDonoughL. (1991). Separating the sheep from the goats: Differentiating global categories. Cognitive Psychology, 23(2), 263–298.
42.
MandlerJ. M.RobinsonC. A. (1978). Developmental changes in picture recognition. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 26(1), 122–136.
43.
MurdockB. B.KahanaM. J. (1993a). Analysis of the list-strength effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19(3), 689–697.
44.
MurdockB. B.KahanaM. J. (1993b). List-strength and list-length effects: Reply to Shiffrin, Ratcliff, Murnane, and Nobel (1993). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19(6), 1450–1453. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.19.6.1450
45.
NgoC. T.LinY.NewcombeN. S.OlsonI. R. (2019). Building up and wearing down episodic memory: Mnemonic discrimination and relational binding. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 148(9), 1463–1479.
46.
OsthA. F.DennisS. J. (2015). Sources of interference in item and associative recognition memory. Psychological Review, 122(2), 260–311.
OsthA. F.DennisS. J.HeathcoteA. (2017). Likelihood ratio sequential sampling models of recognition memory. Cognitive Psychology, 92, 101–126.
49.
OsthA. F.DennisS. J.KinnellA. (2014). Stimulus type and the list strength paradigm. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67(9), 1826–1841.
50.
OsthA. F.FoxJ.McKagueM.HeathcoteA.DennisS. J. (2018). The list strength effect in source memory: Data and a global matching model. Journal of Memory and Language, 103, 91–113.
51.
OsthA. F.JanssonA.DennisS.HeathcoteA. (2018). Modeling the dynamics of recognition memory testing with a combined model of retrieval and decision making. Cognitive Psychology, 104, 106–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2018.04.002
52.
PicardL.CousinS.Guillery-GirardB.EustacheF.PiolinoP. (2012). How do the different components of episodic memory develop? Role of executive functions and short-term feature-binding abilities. Child Development, 83(3), 1037–1050.
53.
RatcliffR.ClarkS. E.ShiffrinR. M. (1990). List-strength effect: I. Data and discussion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16(2), 163–178.
54.
SaxeA. M.McClellandJ. L.GanguliS. (2019). A mathematical theory of semantic development in deep neural networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 166(23), 11537–11546. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1820226116
55.
ShiffrinR. M.SteyversM. (1997). A model for recognition memory: REM-retrieving effectively from memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4(2), 145–166. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03209391
56.
TulvingE. (1972). Episodic and semantic memory. In TulvingE.DonaldsonW. (Eds.), Organization of memory (pp. 381–403). Academic Press.
57.
TurnerB. M.SederbergP. B.BrownS. D.SteyversM. (2013). A method for efficiently sampling from distributions with correlated dimensions. Psychological Methods, 18(3), 368–384.
58.
YimH.DennisS. J.SloutskyV. M. (2013). The development of episodic memory: Items, contexts, and relations. Psychological Science, 24(11), 2163–2172. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613487385
59.
YimH.O’BrienC. R.StoneB.OsthA.DennisS. J. (2020). Using emails to quantify the impact of prior exposure on word recognition memory. In DenisonS.MackM.XuY.ArmstrongB. C. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 185–190). Cognitive Science Society.
60.
YimH.OsthA. F.SloutskyV. M.DennisS. J. (2018). Evidence for the use of three-way binding structures in associative and source recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 100, 89–97.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
