Adaptive Repulsion of Long-Term Memory Representations Is Triggered by Event Similarity

Abstract

We tested whether similarity between events triggers adaptive biases in how those events are remembered. We generated pairs of competing objects that were identical except in color and varied the degree of color similarity for the competing objects. Subjects (N = 123 across four experiments) repeatedly studied and were tested on associations between each of these objects and corresponding faces. As expected, high color similarity between competing objects created memory interference for object–face associations. Strikingly, high color similarity also resulted in a systematic bias in how the objects themselves were remembered: Competing objects with highly similar colors were remembered as being further apart (in color space) than they actually were. This repulsion of color memories increased with learning and served a clear adaptive purpose: Greater repulsion was associated with lower associative-memory interference. These findings reveal that similarity between events triggers adaptive-memory distortions that minimize interference.

Keywords

episodic memory long-term memory forgetting open data open materials

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aly

Ranganath

Yonelinas

A. P.

(2013). Detecting changes in scenes: The hippocampus is critical for strength-based perception. Neuron, 78, 1127–1137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2013.04.018

Aly

Turk-Browne

N. B.

(2018). Flexible weighting of diverse inputs makes hippocampal function malleable. Neuroscience Letters, 680, 13–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2017.05.063

Anderson

M. C.

(2003). Rethinking interference theory: Executive control and the mechanisms of forgetting. Journal of Memory and Language, 49, 415–445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2003.08.006

Anderson

M. C.

Bjork

R. A.

Bjork

E. L.

(1994). Remembering can cause forgetting: Retrieval dynamics in long-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 1063–1087. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.20.5.1063

Bae

G.-Y.

Luck

S. J.

(2017). Interactions between visual working memory representations. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 79, 2376–2395. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-017-1404-8

Bakker

Kirwan

C. B.

Miller

Stark

C. E. L.

(2008). Pattern separation in the human hippocampal CA3 and dentate gyrus. Science, 319, 1640–1642. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1152882

Ballard

I. C.

Wagner

A. D.

McClure

S. M.

(2019). Hippocampal pattern separation supports reinforcement learning. Nature Communications, 10, Article 1073. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-08998-1

Barnes

J. M.

Underwood

B. J.

(1959). “Fate” of first-list associations in transfer theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58, 97–105. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0047507

Brady

T. F.

Konkle

Alvarez

G. A.

Oliva

(2013). Real-world objects are not represented as bound units: Independent forgetting of different object details from visual memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142, 791–808. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029649

10.

Chanales

A. J. H.

Oza

Favila

S. E.

Kuhl

B. A.

(2017). Overlap among spatial memories triggers repulsion of hippocampal representations. Current Biology, 27, 2307–2317.e5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2017.06.057

11.

Colgin

L. L.

Moser

E. I.

Moser

M.-B.

(2008). Understanding memory through hippocampal remapping. Trends in Neurosciences, 31, 469–477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2008.06.008

12.

Detre

G. J.

Natarajan

Gershman

S. J.

Norman

K. A.

(2013). Moderate levels of activation lead to forgetting in the think/no-think paradigm. Neuropsychologia, 51, 2371–2388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.02.017

13.

Dimsdale-Zucker

H. R.

Ritchey

Ekstrom

A. D.

Yonelinas

A. P.

Ranganath

(2018). CA1 and CA3 differentially support spontaneous retrieval of episodic contexts within human hippocampal subfields. Nature Communications, 9, Article 294. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-02752-1

14.

Ezzyat

Davachi

(2014). Similarity breeds proximity: Pattern similarity within and across contexts is related to later mnemonic judgments of temporal proximity. Neuron, 81, 1179–1189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2014.01.042

15.

Favila

S. E.

Chanales

A. J. H.

Kuhl

B. A.

(2016). Experience-dependent hippocampal pattern differentiation prevents interference during subsequent learning. Nature Communications, 7, Article 11066. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms11066

16.

Förster

Liberman

Kuschel

(2008). The effect of global versus local processing styles on assimilation versus contrast in social judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 579–599. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.94.4.579

17.

Gluck

M. A.

Myers

C. E.

(1993). Hippocampal mediation of stimulus representation: A computational theory. Hippocampus, 3, 491–516. https://doi.org/10.1002/hipo.450030410

18.

Hulbert

J. C.

Norman

K. A.

(2015). Neural differentiation tracks improved recall of competing memories following interleaved study and retrieval practice. Cerebral Cortex, 25, 3994–4008. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhu284

19.

Kim

Norman

K. A.

Turk-Browne

N. B.

(2017). Neural differentiation of incorrectly predicted memories. The Journal of Neuroscience, 37, 2022–2031. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3272-16.2017

20.

Krueger

Rothbart

(1990). Contrast and accentuation effects in category learning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 651–663. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.59.4.651

21.

Levy

Anderson

M. C.

(2002). Inhibitory processes and the control of memory retrieval. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 299–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(02)01923-X

22.

Lewis-Peacock

J. A.

Norman

K. A.

(2014). Competition between items in working memory leads to forgetting. Nature Communications, 5, Article 5768. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms6768

23.

Mensink

G.-J.

Raaijmakers

J. G.

(1988). A model for interference and forgetting. Psychological Review, 95, 434–455. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.95.4.434

24.

Newman

E. L.

Norman

K. A.

(2010). Moderate excitation leads to weakening of perceptual representations. Cerebral Cortex, 20, 2760–2770. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhq021

25.

Norman

K. A.

Newman

E. L.

Detre

(2007). A neural network model of retrieval-induced forgetting. Psychological Review, 114, 887–953. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.114.4.887

26.

Norman

K. A.

Newman

E. L.

Detre

Polyn

(2006). How inhibitory oscillations can train neural networks and punish competitors. Neural Computation, 18, 1577–1610. https://doi.org/10.1162/neco.2006.18.7.1577

27.

O’Reilly

R. C.

(2004). The division of labor between the neocortex and hippocampus. In Houghton

(Ed.), Connectionist models in cognitive psychology (pp. 143–174). Psychology Press.

28.

Osgood

C. E.

(1949). The similarity paradox in human learning: A resolution. Psychological Review, 56(3), 132–143. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0057488

29.

Rademaker

R. L.

Bloem

I. M.

De Weerd

Sack

A. T.

(2015). The impact of interference on short-term memory for visual orientation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 41, 1650–1665. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000110

30.

Richards

B. A.

Xia

Santoro

Husse

Woodin

M. A.

Josselyn

S. A.

Frankland

P. W.

(2014). Patterns across multiple memories are identified over time. Nature Neuroscience, 17, 981–986. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3736

31.

Richter

F. R.

Chanales

A. J. H.

Kuhl

B. A.

(2016). Predicting the integration of overlapping memories by decoding mnemonic processing states during learning. NeuroImage, 124, 323–335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.08.051

32.

Ritvo

V. J. H.

Turk-Browne

N. B.

Norman

K. A.

(2019). Nonmonotonic plasticity: How memory retrieval drives learning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 23, 726–742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2019.06.007

33.

Schacter

D. L.

(1999). The seven sins of memory: Insights from psychology and cognitive neuroscience. American Psychologist, 54, 182–203. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.54.3.182

34.

Schapiro

A. C.

Kustner

L. V.

Turk-Browne

N. B.

(2012). Shaping of object representations in the human medial temporal lobe based on temporal regularities. Current Biology, 22, 1622–1627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2012.06.056

35.

Schlichting

M. L.

Mumford

J. A.

Preston

A. R.

(2015). Learning-related representational changes reveal dissociable integration and separation signatures in the hippocampus and prefrontal cortex. Nature Communications, 6, Article 8151. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms9151

36.

Shohamy

Wagner

A. D.

(2008). Integrating memories in the human brain: Hippocampal-midbrain encoding of overlapping events. Neuron, 60, 378–389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2008.09.023

37.

Storm

B. C.

Bjork

E. L.

Bjork

R. A.

(2008). Accelerated relearning after retrieval-induced forgetting: The benefit of being forgotten. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 230–236. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.34.1.230

38.

Teng

Kravitz

D. J.

(2019). Visual working memory directly alters perception. Nature Human Behaviour, 3, 827–836. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0640-4

39.

Yassa

M. A.

Stark

C. E. L.

(2011). Pattern separation in the hippocampus. Trends in Neurosciences, 34, 515–525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2011.06.006

40.

Zeithamova

Dominick

A. L.

Preston

A. R.

(2012). Hippocampal and ventral medial prefrontal activation during retrieval-mediated learning supports novel inference. Neuron, 75, 168–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2012.05.010

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

1.13 MB