Interleaving Retrieval Practice Promotes Science Learning

Abstract

Can interleaved retrieval practice enhance learning in classrooms? Across a 4-week period, ninth- through 12th-grade students (N = 155) took a weekly quiz in their science courses that tested half of the concepts taught that week. Questions on each quiz were either blocked by concept or interleaved with different concepts. A month after the final quiz, students were tested on the concepts covered in the 4-week period. Replicating the retrieval-practice effect, results showed that participants performed better on concepts that had been on blocked quizzes (M = 54%, SD = 28%) than on concepts that had not been quizzed (M = 47%, SD = 20%; d = 0.30). Interleaved quizzes led to even greater benefits: Participants performed better on concepts that had been on interleaved quizzes (M = 63%, SD = 26%) than on concepts that had been on blocked quizzes (d = 0.35). These results demonstrate a cost-effective strategy to promote classroom learning.

Keywords

interleaving retrieval practice classroom learning open data open materials

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Brunmair

Richter

(2019). Similarity matters: A meta-analysis of interleaved learning and its moderators. Psychological Bulletin, 145(11), 1029–1052. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000209

Carvalho

P. F.

Goldstone

R. L.

(2017). The sequence of study changes what information is attended to, encoded, and remembered during category learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 42(3), 481–495. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000406

Faul

Erdfelder

Lang

A.-G.

Buchner

(2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191.

Kang

S. H. K.

(2017). The benefits of interleaved practice for learning. In Horvath

J. C.

Lodge

J. M.

Hattie

(Eds.), From the laboratory to the classroom: Translating science of learning for teachers (pp. 79–93). Routledge.

Kang

S. H. K.

Pashler

(2012). Learning painting styles: Spacing is advantageous when it promotes discriminative contrast. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 26(1), 97–103. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1801

Karpicke

J. D.

Blunt

J. R.

(2011). Retrieval practice produces more learning than elaborative studying with concept mapping. Science, 331(6018), 772–775. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1199327

Kraft

M. A.

(2020). Interpreting effect sizes of education interventions. Educational Researcher, 49(4), 241–253. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X20912798

McDaniel

M. A.

Thomas

R. C.

Agarwal

P. K.

McDermott

K. B.

Roediger

H. L.

(2013). Quizzing in middle-school science: Successful transfer performance on classroom exams. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 27(3), 360–372. http://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2914

Ostrow

Heffernan

Peterson

(2015). Blocking vs. interleaving: Examining single-session effects within middle school math homework. In Conati

Heffernan

Mitrovic

Verdejo

(Eds.), Artificial intelligence in education: AIED 2015. Lecture notes in computer science (Vol. 9112, pp. 338–347). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19773-9_34

10.

Roediger

H. L.

III Putnam

A. L.

Smith

M. A.

(2011). Ten benefits of testing and their applications to educational practice. In Mestre

Ross

(Eds.), Psychology of learning and motivation: Cognition in education (pp. 1–36). Elsevier.

11.

Rohrer

Dedrick

R. F.

Burgess

(2014). The benefit of interleaved mathematics practice is not limited to superficially similar kinds of problems. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21(5), 1323–1330. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-014-0588-3

12.

Rohrer

Dedrick

R. F.

Hartwig

M. K.

(2020). The scarcity of interleaved practice in mathematics textbooks. Educational Psychology Review, 32(3), 873–883. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09516-2

13.

Rohrer

Dedrick

R. F.

Hartwig

M. K.

Cheung

C.-N.

(2020). A randomized controlled trial of interleaved mathematics practice. Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(1), 40–52. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000367

14.

Rohrer

Dedrick

R. F.

Stershic

(2015). Interleaved practice improves mathematics learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(3), 900–908. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000001

15.

Statistics Canada. (2017). Census profile, 2016 census. https://www12.statcan.gc.ca/census-recensement/2016/dp-pd/prof/index.cfm?Lang=E

16.

Wulf

Shea

C. H.

(2002). Principles derived from the study of simple skills do not generalize to complex skill learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9(2), 185–211. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196276

17.

Yan

V. X.

Bjork

E. L.

Bjork

R. A.

(2016). On the difficulty of mending metacognitive illusions: A priori theories, fluency effects, and misattributions of the interleaving benefit. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145(7), 918–933. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000177

18.

Yang

Luo

Vadillo

M. A.

Shanks

D. R.

(2021). Testing (quizzing) boosts classroom learning: A systematic and meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 147(4), 399–435. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000309

19.

Ziegler

Stern

(2014). Delayed benefits of learning elementary algebraic transformations through contrasted comparisons. Learning and Instruction, 33(1), 131–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.04.006

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.02 MB