In the present article, we introduce the concept of metaphorical conflict—a conflict between the concrete and abstract aspects of a metaphor. We used the association between the concrete (spatial) and abstract (ideological) components of the political left-right metaphor to demonstrate that metaphorical conflict has marked implications for cognitive processing and social perception. Specifically, we showed that creating conflict between a spatial location and a metaphorically linked concept reduces perceived differences between the attitudes of partisans who are generally viewed as possessing fundamentally different worldviews (Democrats and Republicans). We further demonstrated that metaphorical conflict reduces perceived attitude differences by creating a mind-set in which categories are represented as possessing broader boundaries than when concepts are metaphorically compatible. These results suggest that metaphorical conflict shapes social perception by making members of distinct groups appear more similar than they are generally thought to be. These findings have important implications for research on conflict, embodied cognition, and social perception.
AckermanJ. M.NoceraC. C.BarghJ. A. (2010). Incidental haptic sensations influence social judgments and decisions. Science, 328, 1712–1715.
2.
AlterA. L.OppenheimerD. M.EpleyN.EyreR. N. (2007). Overcoming intuition: Metacognitive difficulty activates analytic reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, 569–576.
3.
BarsalouL. W. (2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 617–645.
4.
CarterT. J.FergusonM. J.HassinR. R. (2011). A single exposure to the American flag shifts support toward Republicanism up to 8 months later. Psychological Science, 22, 1011–1018.
5.
CrispR. J.TurnerR. N. (2011). Cognitive adaptation to the experience of social and cultural diversity. Psychological Bulletin, 137, 242–266.
6.
DarleyJ. M.GrossP. H. (1983). A hypothesis-confirming bias in labeling effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 20–33.
7.
EmmonsR. A.KingL. A. (1988). Conflict among personal strivings: Immediate and long-term implications for psychological and physical well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1040–1048.
8.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.LangA. G.BuchnerA. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191.
9.
ForbesC. E.SchmaderT. (2010). Retraining attitudes and stereotypes to affect motivation and cognitive capacity under stereotype threat. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 740–754.
10.
GollwitzerP. M. (1990). Action phases and mind-sets. In HigginsE. T.SorrentinoR. M. (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior (Vol. 2, pp. 53–92). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
11.
GrahamJ.NosekB. A.HaidtJ. (2012). The moral stereotypes of liberals and conservatives: Exaggeration of differences across the political spectrum. PLoS ONE, 7(12), Article e50092. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0050092
12.
HayesA. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
13.
HernandezI.PrestonJ. L. (2013). Disfluency disrupts the confirmation bias. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 178–182.
14.
HigginsE. T. (1998). The aboutness principle: A pervasive influence on human inference. Social Cognition, 16, 173–198.
15.
HuangL.GalinskyA. D. (2011). Mind–body dissonance: Conflict between the senses expands the mind’s horizons. Social Psychological & Personality Science, 2, 351–359.
16.
IsenA. M.DaubmanK. A. (1984). The influence of affect on categorization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 1206–1217.
17.
KawakamiK.PhillsC. E.SteeleJ. R.DovidioJ. F. (2007). (Close)distance makes the heart grow fonder: Improving implicit racial attitudes and interracial interactions through approach behaviors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 957–971.
18.
KleimanT.HassinR. R. (2011). Non-conscious goal conflicts. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 521–532.
19.
KleimanT.HassinR. R. (2013). When conflicts are good: Nonconscious goal conflicts reduce confirmatory thinking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105, 374–387.
20.
KundaZ.OlesonK. C. (1995). Maintaining stereotypes in the face of disconfirmation: Constructing grounds for subtyping deviants. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 565–579.
21.
LakoffG.JohnsonM. (1980). The metaphorical structure of the human conceptual system. Cognitive Science, 4, 195–208.
22.
MargucJ.FörsterJ.Van KleefG. A. (2011). Stepping back to see the big picture: When obstacles elicit global processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 883–901.
23.
MoriceauS.SullivanR. M. (2006). Maternal presence serves as a switch between learning fear and attraction in infancy. Nature Neuroscience, 9, 1004–1006.
24.
MorrisM. W.SheldonO. J.AmesD. R.YoungM. J. (2007). Metaphors and the market: Consequences and preconditions of agent and object metaphors in stock market commentary. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 102, 174–192.
25.
MussweilerT. (2014). Same or different: How similarity versus dissimilarity focus shapes social information processing. In ShermanJ. W.GawronskiB.TropeY. (Eds.), Dual-process theories of the social mind (pp. 328–339). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
26.
OppenheimerD. M.TrailT. E. (2010). Why leaning to the left makes you lean to the left: Effect of spatial orientation on political attitudes. Social Cognition, 28, 651–661.
27.
PettyR. E.TormalaZ. L.BriñolP.JarvisW. B. G. (2006). Implicit ambivalence from attitude change: An exploration of the PAST model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 21–41.
28.
ReesL.RothmanN. B.LehavyR.Sanchez-BurksJ. (2013). The ambivalent mind can be a wise mind: Emotional ambivalence increases judgment accuracy. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 360–367.
29.
RikettaM.SacramentoC. A. (2008). ‘They cooperate with us, so they are like me’: Perceived intergroup relationship moderates projection from self to outgroups. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 11, 115–131.
30.
RoschE. (1975). Cognitive representations of semantic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104, 192–233.
31.
SaguyT.TauschN.DovidioJ. F.PrattoF. (2009). The irony of harmony: Intergroup contact can produce false expectations for equality. Psychological Science, 20, 114–121.
32.
SavaryJ.KleimanT.HassinR. R.DharR. (2015). Positive consequences of conflict on decision making: When a conflict mindset facilitates choice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144, 1–6.
33.
SlepianM. L.WeisbuchM.RuleN. O.AmbadyN. (2011). Tough and tender: Embodied categorization of gender. Psychological Science, 22, 26–28.
34.
SmithP. K.TropeY. (2006). You focus on the forest when you’re in charge of the trees: Power priming and abstract information processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 578–596.
35.
SternC.KleimanT. (2015). Know thy outgroup: Promoting accurate judgments of political attitude differences through a conflict mindset. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 6, 950–958.
36.
TajfelH.TurnerJ. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In AustinW. G.WorchelS. (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 94–109). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
37.
TurnerJ. C. (1982). Towards a cognitive redefinition of the social group. In TajfelH. (Ed.), Social identity and intergroup relations (pp. 15–40). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
38.
WegenerD. T.ClarkJ. K.PettyR. E. (2006). Not all stereotyping is created equal: Differential consequences of thoughtful versus nonthoughtful stereotyping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 42–59.
39.
WestfallJ.Van BovenL.ChambersJ. R.JuddC. M. (2015). Perceiving political polarization in the United States: Party identity strength and attitude extremity exacerbate the perceived partisan divide. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10, 145–158.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
