Everyone knows that if you want to learn how to do something, you should get advice from people who do it well. But is everyone right? In a series of studies (N = 8,693), adult participants played a game after receiving performance advice from previous participants. Although advice from the best-performing advisors was no more beneficial than advice from other advisors, participants believed that it had been—and they believed this despite the fact that they were told nothing about their advisors’ performance. Why? The best performers did not give better advice, but they did give more of it, and participants apparently mistook quantity for quality. These studies suggest that performing and advising may often be unrelated skills and that in at least some domains, people may overvalue advice from top performers.
BatesD. M.MächlerM.BolkerB.WalkerS. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1). https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
2.
BeilockS. L.CarrT. H.MacMahonC.StarkesJ. L. (2002). When paying attention becomes counterproductive: Impact of divided versus skill-focused attention on novice and experienced performance of sensorimotor skills. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 8, 6–16.
3.
BlessingS. B.AndersonJ. R. (1996). How people learn to skip steps. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 576–598.
4.
BrooksA. W.GinoF.SchweitzerM. E. (2015). Smart people ask for (my) advice: Seeking advice boosts perceptions of competence. Management Science, 61, 1421–1435.
5.
CarpenterS. K.WilfordM. M.KornellN.MullaneyK. M. (2013). Appearances can be deceiving: Instructor fluency increases perceptions of learning without increasing actual learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20, 1350–1356.
6.
CasciaroT.LoboM. S. (2008). When competence is irrelevant: The role of interpersonal affect in task-related ties. Administrative Science Quarterly, 53, 655–684.
EpleyN.KeysarB.Van BovenL.GilovichT. (2004). Perspective taking as egocentric anchoring and adjustment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 327–339.
12.
FisherM.KeilF. C. (2016). The curse of expertise: When more knowledge leads to miscalibrated explanatory insight. Cognitive Science, 40, 1251–1269.
13.
FlegalK. E.AndersonM. C. (2008). Overthinking skilled motor performance: Or why those who teach can’t do. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 927–932.
HattieJ.MarshH. W. (1996). The relationship between research and teaching: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 66, 507–542.
17.
HindsP. J.PattersonM.PfefferJ. (2001). Bothered by abstraction: The effect of expertise on knowledge transfer and subsequent novice performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 1232–1243.
18.
HofmannD. A.LeiZ.GrantA. M. (2009). Seeking help in the shadow of doubt: The sensemaking processes underlying how nurses decide whom to ask for advice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(5), 1261–1274.
19.
HurJ. D.RuttanR. L.SheaC. T. (2020). The unexpected power of positivity: Predictions versus decisions about advisor selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 149, 1969–1986.
20.
LeongY. C.ZakiJ. (2018). Unrealistic optimism in advice taking: A computational account. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 147, 170–189.
21.
NickersonR. S. (1999). How we know—and sometimes misjudge—what others know: Imputing one’s own knowledge to others. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 737–759.
22.
PetersenS. E.van MierH.FiezJ. A.RaichleM. E. (1998). The effects of practice on the functional anatomy of task performance. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 95, 853–869.
23.
PriceP. C.StoneE. R. (2004). Intuitive evaluation of likelihood judgment producers: Evidence for a confidence heuristic. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 17, 39–57.
24.
R Core Team. (2021). R: A language and environment for statistical computing (Version 4.0.5) [Computer software]. R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
25.
ReedN.McLeodP.DienesZ. (2010). Implicit knowledge and motor skill: What people who know how to catch don’t know. Consciousness and Cognition, 19, 63–76.
26.
SchwartzH. A.RouhizadehM.BishopM.TetlockP.MellersB.UngarL. (2017). Assessing objective recommendation quality through political forecasting. In PalmerM.HwaR.RiedelS. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (pp. 2348–2357). Association for Computational Linguistics.
27.
SpeelmanC. (1998). Implicit expertise: Do we expect too much from our experts? In KirsnerK.SpeelmanC.MayberyM.O’Brien-MaloneA.AndersonM. (Eds.), Implicit and explicit mental processes (pp. 135–148). Psychology Press.
28.
TingleyD.YamamotoT.HiroseK.KeeleL.ImaiK. (2014). Mediation: R package for causal mediation analysis. Journal of Statistical Software, 59(5). https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v059.i05
29.
TsayC. J.BanajiM. R. (2011). Naturals and strivers: Preferences and beliefs about sources of achievement. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 460–465.
30.
YanivI.Choshen-HillelS. (2012). When guessing what another person would say is better than giving your own opinion: Using perspective-taking to improve advice-taking. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 1022–1028.
31.
ZhangT.HarringtonK. B.SherfE. N. (2022). The errors of experts: When expertise hinders effective provision and seeking of advice and feedback. Current Opinion in Psychology, 43, 91–95.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
